Featured Stories
USITC Makes Determinations in Five-Year Reviews Concerning Silicon Metal From Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia
WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 (TNSrep) -- The U.S. International Trade Commission issued the following news release on Aug. 21, 2026:
* * *
USITC Makes Determinations in Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews Concerning Silicon Metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia
The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) today determined that revocation of the countervailing duty order on imports of silicon metal from Kazakhstan and the antidumping duty orders on silicon metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, and Malaysia would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 (TNSrep) -- The U.S. International Trade Commission issued the following news release on Aug. 21, 2026:
* * *
USITC Makes Determinations in Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews Concerning Silicon Metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia
The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) today determined that revocation of the countervailing duty order on imports of silicon metal from Kazakhstan and the antidumping duty orders on silicon metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, and Malaysia would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injurywithin a reasonably foreseeable time.
As a result of the USITC's affirmative determinations, the existing orders on imports of this product from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia will remain in place.
Chairman Brett W. Doyle and Commissioners Jason E. Kearns, Peter-Anthony Pappas, Bart Thanhauser, and David Foley Jr. voted in the affirmative.
Today's action comes under the five-year (sunset) review process required by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. See the attached page for background on these five-year (sunset) reviews.
The USITC's public report, Silicon Metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia (Inv. Nos. 701-TA- 652 and 731-TA-1524-1526 (Review), USITC Publication 5785, August 2026), will contain the views of the USITC and information developed during the reviews.
The report will be available on the USITC website (https://www.usitc.gov/commission_publications_library) by September 28, 2026.
BACKGROUND
The Uruguay Round Agreements Act requires the Department of Commerce to revoke an antidumping or countervailing duty order, or terminate a suspension agreement, after five years unless the Department of Commerce and the USITC determine that revoking the order or terminating the suspension agreement would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or subsidies (Commerce) and of material injury (USITC) within a reasonably foreseeable time.
The USITC's institution notice in five-year reviews requests that interested parties file responses with the USITC concerning the likely effects of revoking the order under review as well as other information. Generally, within 95 days from institution, the USITC will determine whether the responses it has received reflect an adequate or inadequate level of interest in a full review. If responses to the USITC's notice of institution are adequate, or if other circumstances warrant a full review, the USITC conducts a full review, which includes a public hearing and issuance of questionnaires.
The USITC generally does not hold a hearing or conduct further investigative activities in expedited reviews. Commissioners base their injury determination in expedited reviews on the facts available, including the USITC's prior injury and review determinations, responses received to its notice of institution, data collected by staff in connection with the reviews, and information provided by the Department of Commerce.
The five-year (sunset) reviews concerning Silicon Metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia were instituted on March 2, 2026.
On June 5, 2026, the USITC determined to conduct expedited five-year reviews. Commissioners David S. Johanson, Jason E. Kearns, and Amy A. Karpel concluded that the domestic interested party group responses were adequate and the respondent interested party group responses were inadequate, and voted for expedited reviews. Chairman Brett W. Doyle and Commissioners Peter-Anthony Pappas, Bart Thanhauser, and David Foley Jr. did not participate in the adequacy votes.
A record of the USITC's vote to conduct expedited reviews is available on the investigations page for Silicon Metal from Bosnia-Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia; Inv. No. 701-TA-652 and 731-TA-1524-1526 (Review).
* * *
Original text here: https://www.usitc.gov/press_room/news_release/2026/er0821_69113.htm
SEC Settles Litigation With Individual Charged in Alleged Microcap Fraud Scheme
WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 -- The Securities and Exchange Commission issued the following litigation release:
* * *
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jonathan Farber et al., No. 24-cv-00273 (S.D.N.Y. filed Jan. 12, 2024)
On August 20, 2026, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a final consent judgment as to defendant Brian Keasberry in a previously-filed action alleging a fraudulent microcap scheme.
The Commission's complaint, filed on January 12, 2024, alleged that Keasberry and two co-defendants carried out a fraudulent scheme to profit from their
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 -- The Securities and Exchange Commission issued the following litigation release:
* * *
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jonathan Farber et al., No. 24-cv-00273 (S.D.N.Y. filed Jan. 12, 2024)
On August 20, 2026, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a final consent judgment as to defendant Brian Keasberry in a previously-filed action alleging a fraudulent microcap scheme.
The Commission's complaint, filed on January 12, 2024, alleged that Keasberry and two co-defendants carried out a fraudulent scheme to profit from theiraccumulation, manipulation, and sale of the stock of a small publicly traded company to retail investors. The SEC alleged that, from September 2017 to at least October 2021, Keasberry helped his two co-defendants to gain control of the company and a large amount of the company's stock available in public markets. According to the complaint, Keasberry operated companies, which were used to make payments for an online promotional campaign that touted the stock's great potential but concealed the fact that the defendants had paid for this promotional campaign, controlled the company, and were actively selling the majority of the freely tradable stock.
Keasberry consented to the entry of a final judgment enjoining him from violating Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, ordering him to pay disgorgement of $37,500, prejudgment interest of $12,864, a civil penalty of $37,500, and imposing a penny stock bar and an officer-and-director bar against him.
The SEC's ongoing litigation is being handled by Marc Jones and Alfred Day in the SEC's Boston Regional Office.
* * *
Resources
* Final Judgment - Brian Keasberry (https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/litreleases/2026/judg26615.pdf)
* * *
Original text here: https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26615
SEC Files Subpoena Enforcement Action Against Texas Oil Company, Five Affiliated Entities, and Six Related Individuals, in Connection With Investigation Into Possible Fraudulent Securities Offering
WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 -- The Securities and Exchange Commission issued the following litigation release:
* * *
Securities and Exchange Commission v. 1859 Operating, LLC; Centerfire Consulting, LLC; DMMD Marketing, Inc.; DM Sales Consulting, Inc.; The Slade Group, Inc.; Slade Marketing, Inc.; Adam Fieldsted; Dillon Murrow; Alison Slade; Dallin Slade; Duane Slade; and Mason Slade, Misc. Action No. 4:26-MC-00012 (N.D. Tex. filed Aug. 20, 2026)
On August 20, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a subpoena enforcement action in United States District Court for the Northern District of
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 -- The Securities and Exchange Commission issued the following litigation release:
* * *
Securities and Exchange Commission v. 1859 Operating, LLC; Centerfire Consulting, LLC; DMMD Marketing, Inc.; DM Sales Consulting, Inc.; The Slade Group, Inc.; Slade Marketing, Inc.; Adam Fieldsted; Dillon Murrow; Alison Slade; Dallin Slade; Duane Slade; and Mason Slade, Misc. Action No. 4:26-MC-00012 (N.D. Tex. filed Aug. 20, 2026)
On August 20, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a subpoena enforcement action in United States District Court for the Northern District ofTexas, seeking an order to compel 1859 Operating, LLC; Centerfire Consulting, LLC; DMMD Marketing, Inc.; DM Sales Consulting, Inc.; The Slade Group, Inc.; Slade Marketing, Inc.; and individuals Adam Fieldsted, Dillon Murrow, Alison Slade, Dallin Slade, Duane Slade, and Mason Slade (together, "the respondents") to comply with outstanding SEC investigative subpoenas.
According to the SEC's application and supporting papers, the SEC issued the subpoenas beginning in April 2024, requiring the respondents to produce documents and provide sworn testimony in the investigation. According to the SEC's filing, the subpoenas were issued to determine whether any persons or entities may have violated the antifraud or other provisions of the federal securities laws in connection with a potential offering fraud involving 1859's offers and sales of fractional undivided working interests in oil leases, through which respondents have raised approximately $42.7 million.
As described in the SEC's application, despite extended deadlines, repeated communications, and multiple agreements to prioritize production, the respondents almost entirely failed to comply with subpoenas by the compliance deadlines. The application alleges that the respondents have produced approximately 8,344 documents out of a universe of what their counsel has stated includes potentially hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of responsive documents. The application further alleges that several respondents have failed to appear for testimony on dates previously agreed to or scheduled pursuant to SEC subpoenas and that on multiple occasions over the last 10 months, respondents' counsel has unilaterally canceled testimony shortly before the testimony was scheduled to occur.
The SEC's application requests that the Court enter an order compelling the respondents to comply with the subpoenas.
The SEC is continuing its fact finding investigation and, to date, has not concluded that any individual or entity has violated the federal securities laws.
* * *
Resources
* Memorandum of Law in Support of Application of the Securities and Exchange Commission for an Order Compelling Compliance With Administrative Subpoenas (https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/litreleases/2026/lr26616-brief-iso-app-order-compelling-compliance-respondents.pdf)
* Application of the Securities and Exchange Commission for Order Compelling Compliance With Administrative Subpoenas (https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/litreleases/2026/lr26616-mt-compel-compliance-respondents.pdf)
* * *
Original text here: https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26616
SEC Charges Former Investment Bankers With Insider Trading
WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 -- The Securities and Exchange Commission issued the following litigation release:
* * *
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gavin Wolfe et al., No. 1:26-civ-7132 (S.D.N.Y. filed Aug. 21, 2026)
On August 21, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed fraud charges against Gavin Wolfe and Jason Satsky, two former Wall Street investment bankers, for allegedly engaging in insider trading in South Jersey Industries, Inc. in advance of its February 24, 2022 announcement that it had agreed to be acquired by a private investment fund.
As alleged in the SEC's complaint,
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 -- The Securities and Exchange Commission issued the following litigation release:
* * *
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gavin Wolfe et al., No. 1:26-civ-7132 (S.D.N.Y. filed Aug. 21, 2026)
On August 21, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed fraud charges against Gavin Wolfe and Jason Satsky, two former Wall Street investment bankers, for allegedly engaging in insider trading in South Jersey Industries, Inc. in advance of its February 24, 2022 announcement that it had agreed to be acquired by a private investment fund.
As alleged in the SEC's complaint,Satsky was the Co-Head of an energy and utility group at a New York investment bank that advised South Jersey on the potential acquisition and served as the lead banker on the transaction. According to the complaint, Satsky tipped his long-time business colleague and close friend, Wolfe, material nonpublic information regarding the potential acquisition. As alleged, Wolfe bought over 2.2 million shares of South Jersey stock on the basis of the information he received from Satsky and made approximately $18.5 million when the stock price rose by approximately 40% after the acquisition was announced. Wolfe allegedly also tipped others who traded, generating approximately $515,000 in trading profits.
The SEC's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, charges Wolfe and Satsky with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, civil monetary penalties and officer-and-director bars against Wolfe and Satsky, disgorgement and prejudgment interest against Wolfe, and a conduct-based injunction against Satsky. The complaint names the entities through which Wolfe allegedly traded--Evergreen Capital, L.P., Evergreen Financial LLC, Empire Property Management LLC, GAW Holdings, LLC, SA 1055 LLC, SA 1057 LLC, SA 1082 LLC, and SA 1083 LLC--as relief defendants, and seeks disgorgement and prejudgment interest against them.
The investigation of this matter was conducted by Cynthia A. Matthews and George N. Stepaniuk of the SEC's New York Regional Office and was supervised by Sheldon L. Pollock. The litigation will be led by Travis Hill, Hayden Brockett and Christopher Kelly and supervised by Daniel Loss and Christopher Colorado.
* * *
Resources
* SEC Complaint (https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2026/comp26617.pdf)
* * *
Original text here: https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26617
SEC Charges Former Director of Financial Planning With Insider Trading in Advance of Employer's Earnings Releases
WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 -- The Securities and Exchange Commission issued the following litigation release:
* * *
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jesse R. Mitchell, No. 26-civ-07111 (S.D.N.Y. filed Aug. 20, 2026)
On August 20, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Jesse R. Mitchell, formerly the Senior Director of Financial Planning and Analysis at digital advertising company The Trade Desk, Inc. ("TTD"), with insider trading based on material nonpublic information he obtained through advance receipt of TTD's earnings releases.
According to the SEC's complaint, as a member of
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 -- The Securities and Exchange Commission issued the following litigation release:
* * *
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jesse R. Mitchell, No. 26-civ-07111 (S.D.N.Y. filed Aug. 20, 2026)
On August 20, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Jesse R. Mitchell, formerly the Senior Director of Financial Planning and Analysis at digital advertising company The Trade Desk, Inc. ("TTD"), with insider trading based on material nonpublic information he obtained through advance receipt of TTD's earnings releases.
According to the SEC's complaint, as a member ofTTD's financial planning team Mitchell received TTD's quarterly earnings results in advance of their public release. The complaint alleges that, in one instance, Mitchell used that knowledge to purchase 3,850 shares of TTD common stock in advance of the company's positive second quarter 2024 earnings release, then profited nearly $20,000 by selling those shares in the day following the release. As alleged, Mitchell later purchased out-of-the-money put options in advance of TTD's fourth quarter 2024 earnings release, which included the company's first ever revenue guidance miss. According to the complaint, TTD's share price dropped by over 30% the day after it announced the revenue guidance miss, and Mitchell sold his options that day for a profit of over $318,000. As alleged in the complaint, Mitchell's illegal trading activity was done not only while he was in possession of material nonpublic information but was in violation of trading blackout periods imposed by TTD on its employees and, in the second instance, in violation of TTD's explicit and permanent ban on employees trading in TTD options.
The SEC's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, charges Mitchell with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, civil penalties, and an officer-and-director bar.
In a parallel action, on August 20, 2026, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York announced an indictment charging Mitchell with securities fraud.
The SEC's investigation was conducted by Samuel M. Kalar, under the supervision of Celeste A. Chase and Thomas P. Smith, Jr., of the New York Regional Office. The litigation will be led by Paul G. Gizzi and Mr. Kalar, under the supervision of Jack Kaufman. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, the FBI, and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
* * *
Resources
* SEC Complaint (https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/litreleases/2026/comp26614.pdf)
* * *
Original text here: https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26614
FEC Issues Digest for Week of Aug. 17-21, 2026
WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 -- The Federal Election Commission issued the following weekly digest:
* * *
Commission meetings and hearings
No open meetings or executive sessions were scheduled this week.
* * *
Litigation
DCCC v. FEC (Case No. 24-2935) On August 14, the Commission filed a Reply in Support of Supplemental Brief, the NRSC filed a Response to DCCC's Supplemental Memorandum, and DCCC filed a Response to Defendant FEC's and Intervenor-Defendant NRSC's Supplemental Memoranda in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
* * *
Employment opportunities
The Commission is accepting
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 -- The Federal Election Commission issued the following weekly digest:
* * *
Commission meetings and hearings
No open meetings or executive sessions were scheduled this week.
* * *
Litigation
DCCC v. FEC (Case No. 24-2935) On August 14, the Commission filed a Reply in Support of Supplemental Brief, the NRSC filed a Response to DCCC's Supplemental Memorandum, and DCCC filed a Response to Defendant FEC's and Intervenor-Defendant NRSC's Supplemental Memoranda in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
* * *
Employment opportunities
The Commission is acceptingapplications for the position of IT Project Manager (ENTARCH) through September 1, 2026.
* * *
Reports Due in 2026
The Commission has posted the 2026 Congressional Pre-Election Reporting Dates. Reporting schedules for all filers in 2026 are also available.
* * *
Election Dates
The Commission has posted a list of 2026 Congressional Primary Dates.
* * *
Upcoming educational opportunities
September 16, 2026: The Commission is scheduled to host a webinar on Independent Expenditures and Pre-Election Communications.
September 30, 2026: The Commission is scheduled to host FECFile and reporting webinars for candidate committees.
October 7, 2026: The Commission is scheduled to host FECFile and reporting webinars for PACs and party committees.
For more information on upcoming training opportunities, see the Commission's Trainings page.
* * *
Upcoming reporting due dates
September 20: September Monthly Reports are due. For more information, see the 2026 Monthly Reporting schedule.
The Commission has posted filing information regarding the Georgia 13th District Special Runoff Election, scheduled for August 25, 2026.
* * *
Additional research materials
Contribution Limits: In addition to the current limits, the Commission has posted an archive of contribution limits that were in effect going back to the 1975-1976 election cycles.
Federal election results are available. The data was compiled from the official vote totals published by state election offices.
FEC Notify: Want to be notified by email when campaign finance reports are received by the agency? Sign up here.
The Combined Federal State Disclosure and Election Directory is available. This publication identifies the federal and state agencies responsible for the disclosure of campaign finances, lobbying, personal finances, public financing, candidates on the ballot, election results, spending on state initiatives, and other financial filings.
The Presidential Election Campaign Fund Tax Checkoff Chart provides information on balance of the Fund, monthly deposits into the Fund reported by the Department of the Treasury, payments from the Fund as certified by the FEC, and participation rates of taxpayers as reported by the Internal Revenue Service. For more information on the Presidential Public Funding Program, see the Public Funding of Presidential Elections page.
The FEC Record is available as a continuously updated online news source.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.fec.gov/updates/week-of-august-17-21-2026/
FCC Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau Issues Public Notice: Conditional Approval, Exemption of Certain Uncrewed Aircraft Systems & Routers From FCC Covered List
WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 -- The Federal Communications Commission Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau issued the following public notice (WC Docket No. 18-89, ET Docket No. 21-232, EA Docket No. 21-233):
* * *
The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC or Commission) Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau (PSHSB or Bureau) maintains a list of equipment and services (Covered List) that have been determined to "pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States or the security and safety of United States persons."/1 Pursuant to section 2 of the Secure and Trusted Communications
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 -- The Federal Communications Commission Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau issued the following public notice (WC Docket No. 18-89, ET Docket No. 21-232, EA Docket No. 21-233):
* * *
The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC or Commission) Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau (PSHSB or Bureau) maintains a list of equipment and services (Covered List) that have been determined to "pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States or the security and safety of United States persons."/1 Pursuant to section 2 of the Secure and Trusted CommunicationsNetworks Act of 2019 (Secure Networks Act)/2 and sections 1.50002(a) and 1.50003 of the Commission's rules,/3 PSHSB announces that the Department of War (DoW) has granted Conditional Approvals for certain uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS) and routers. Therefore, such devices are exempt from the Covered List.
Additions of UAS and UAS Critical Components, and Routers to the Covered List:
UAS and UAS Critical Components. On December 22, 2025, PSHSB issued a Public Notice adding all UAS and UAS critical components produced in a foreign country to the Covered List./4 This action was based on a National Security Determination from an Executive Branch interagency body, including several appropriate national security agencies, determining (among other things) that UAS and UAS critical components produced in a foreign country pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States and to the safety and security of U.S. persons. In that Public Notice, we stated, "[i]f we receive a further specific determination from the Department of War or the Department of Homeland Security that a given UAS, class of UAS, or UAS critical component does not pose unacceptable risks, we will further update the Covered List."/5
In January 2026, we updated the Covered List to reflect DoW's determinations that, until January 1, 2027, UAS and UAS critical components included on DoW's Blue UAS Cleared List and UAS and UAS critical components that qualify as "domestic end products" under the Buy American Standard do not pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States and to the safety and security of U.S. persons./6 In March 2026, we updated the Covered List to reflect the first Conditional Approvals that the FCC received from the DoW, exempting specific UAS and UAS critical components "which have been granted a Conditional Approval by DoW or DHS" from the Covered List./7 Additionally, on June 15, 2026, based on a National Security Determination from DoW, PSHSB updated the Covered List to exempt "Toy Drones" as defined in the National Security Determination and "Toy Drones that contain foreign-produced components."/8
On July 21, 2026, we updated the Covered List to reflect DoW's determination that extended timelines for the exemption of UAS and UAS critical components included on DoW's Blue UAS Cleared List and UAS and UAS critical components that qualify as "domestic end products" under the Buy American Standard to January 1, 2028./9 We also updated the Covered List to reflect DoW's determination that Conditional Approvals for foreign-produced UAS and UAS critical components will not terminate on December 31, 2026, so long as the applicant complies with its approved onshoring plan and updated vetting of the products./10 Additionally, under DoW's determination, a Conditional Approval will terminate--and the device will be restored to the Covered List--if the applicant fails to adhere to the onshoring plan or if the U.S. Government discovers any false statements or misrepresentations in the application./11
Routers. On March 23, 2026, the Commission added to the Covered List "routers produced in a foreign country, except routers which have been granted a Conditional Approval by DoW or DHS."/12 This addition was based on a National Security Determination from an Executive Branch interagency body, including several appropriate national security agencies, determining (among other things) that routers produced in a foreign country pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States and to the safety and security of U.S. persons./13
Conditional Approvals:
The Executive Branch interagency body established a process by which entities producing UAS and UAS critical components and routers in foreign countries can request DoW or the Department of Homeland Security to evaluate whether such devices do not pose unacceptable risks to national security and receive Conditional Approvals that would exempt such devices from the Covered List. The Commission has updated the Covered List to reflect the Conditional Approvals that we have received from the DoW exempting certain UAS and UAS critical components and routers from the Covered List./14
DoW has reviewed submissions and granted Conditional Approvals for the following devices:
* Ascento, Inc.'s Ascento Guard Dori USA v1 Uncrewed Aircraft System/15
* WNC Corporation's LVR5A, LVM9, and LV85C Wi-Fi Routers (terminating February 21, 2028) The Covered List:
We find that each of the Conditional Approvals constitutes "a specific determination" by DoW that such devices do not pose risks to U.S. national security./16 Therefore, we conclude that PSHSB is required to update the Covered List to exclude the equipment identified in these Conditional Approvals.
PSHSB takes this action under its authority and obligation to publish and maintain the Covered List. Sections 1.50002(a) and 1.50003 of the Commission's rules require PSHSB to publish the Covered List on the Commission's website, to maintain and update the Covered List, and to monitor the status of determinations./17
The Covered List and the list of devices that have received Conditional Approvals are attached as Appendices A and B to this Public Notice and can also be found on the Bureau's website at https://www.fcc.gov/supplychain/coveredlist./18
We note the continued availability of FCC staff guidance pursuant to sections 0.191 and 0.31(i) of the Commission's rules. Commission staff will provide guidance to TCBs, test labs, and equipment authorization applicants on the impact of these updates.
* * *
Original text plus footnotes here: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-875A1.pdf
