Featured Stories
SEC Files Proposed Settlement With Respect to Fraud and Market Manipulation Claims Against Gotbit Consulting, Dismisses Claims Against Fedor Kedrov
WASHINGTON, Aug. 4 -- The Securities and Exchange Commission issued the following litigation release:
* * *
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gotbit Consulting LLC a/k/a Gotbit Hedge Fund and Fedor Kedrov, No. 1:24-cv-12589-AK (D. Mass. filed Oct. 9, 2024)
On July 28, 2026, the SEC filed a proposed final judgment in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts as to the Commission's claims against Gotbit Consulting LLC a/k/a Gotbit Hedge Fund. If approved by the court, the proposed final judgment would settle the Commission's previously-filed fraud and market manipulation claims
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 4 -- The Securities and Exchange Commission issued the following litigation release:
* * *
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gotbit Consulting LLC a/k/a Gotbit Hedge Fund and Fedor Kedrov, No. 1:24-cv-12589-AK (D. Mass. filed Oct. 9, 2024)
On July 28, 2026, the SEC filed a proposed final judgment in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts as to the Commission's claims against Gotbit Consulting LLC a/k/a Gotbit Hedge Fund. If approved by the court, the proposed final judgment would settle the Commission's previously-filed fraud and market manipulation claimsagainst Gotbit. The Commission previously filed a notice of voluntary dismissal as to the pending claims against Fedor Kedrov.
The SEC's complaint, filed in October 2024, alleged that Gotbit engaged in a scheme to manipulate the market for a crypto asset that was offered and sold subject to an investment contract, including by generating artificial trading volume for the crypto asset. The SEC alleged that Gotbit manipulated the market for the crypto asset by self-trading (commonly referred to as "wash trading") or by engaging in other trading practices that likewise served no economic purpose. As described in the complaint, wash trading generally refers to trades that do not lead to a change in beneficial ownership, but create the false impression of market interest in the underlying asset.
Gotbit consented to the entry of a final judgment, subject to court approval, that would permanently enjoin Gotbit from violating Section 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 9(a)(2) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder, and from participating, directly or indirectly, in any issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any securities.
In a parallel criminal proceeding, U.S. v. Gotbit Consulting LLC et al., No. 24-cr-10190 (D. Mass.), Gotbit pleaded guilty to wire fraud and conspiracy to commit market manipulation and wire fraud, and, in June 2025, Gotbit was sentenced to five years' probation.
The SEC's investigation was conducted by Amy Harman Burkart, Ivan Panchenko, Jeffrey Cook, and John McCann in the SEC's Boston Regional Office, as well as Joy Guo of the Division of Enforcement's Cyber and Emerging Technologies Unit (CETU). They were supervised by Amy Gwiazda and Laura D'Allaird of CETU, Michael Brennan, and Celia Moore and John T. Dugan of the Boston Regional Office. The SEC's litigation was led by Amy Harman Burkart.
* * *
Resources
* SEC Complaint (https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2026/comp26598.pdf)
* Final Judgment - Gotbit Consulting LLC (https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/litreleases/2026/judg26598-gotbit-consulting.pdf)
* Consent - Gotbit Consulting LLC (https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/litreleases/2026/consent-26598gotbit-consulting.pdf)
* Dismissal - Fedor Kedrov (https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/litreleases/2026/dismissal26598-fedor-kedrov.pdf)
* * *
Original text here: https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26598
FCC Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau Issues Public Notice: Comment and Reply Comment Dates for Alerting Modernization Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
WASHINGTON, Aug. 4 -- The Federal Communications Commission Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau issued the following public notice (PS Dockets No. 25-224, 15-94, 15-91):
* * *
On June 25, 2026, the Federal Communications Commission adopted a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Further Notice) to continue its examination of the nation's alert and warning systems and to modernize the Emergency Alert System (EAS) and Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA), improving their effectiveness, efficiency, and service to the public./1
The Further Notice set deadlines for filing comments and reply comments
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 4 -- The Federal Communications Commission Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau issued the following public notice (PS Dockets No. 25-224, 15-94, 15-91):
* * *
On June 25, 2026, the Federal Communications Commission adopted a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Further Notice) to continue its examination of the nation's alert and warning systems and to modernize the Emergency Alert System (EAS) and Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA), improving their effectiveness, efficiency, and service to the public./1
The Further Notice set deadlines for filing comments and reply commentsat 30 and 60 days, respectively, after publication of a summary of the Further Notice in the Federal Register./2
On July 31, 2026, the Office of the Federal Register published a summary of the Further Notice, including the associated comment and reply comment dates./3
Accordingly, comments must be filed on or before August 31, 2026 and reply comments must be filed on or before September 29, 2026. The Further Notice contains the instructions on how to file comments and reply comments./4
* * *
Footnotes:
1/ Modernization of the Nation's Alerting Systems; Protecting the Nation's Communications Systems from Cybersecurity Threats; Wireless Emergency Alerts; Amendment of Part 11 of the Commission's Rules Regarding the Emergency Alert System, Report and Order in PS Dockets 25-224 and 22-329, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in PS Dockets 25-224, 14-94, and 15-91, FCC 26-38, (June 25, 2026), https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-26-38A1.pdf (Further Notice).
2/ Further Notice at *1.
3/ See Federal Communications Commission, Wireless Emergency Alerts; The Emergency Alert System; Modernization of the Nation's Alerting Systems, 91 Fed. Reg. 48320 (July 31, 2026).
4/ Further Notice at *71-72, para. 143.
* * *
Original text here: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-812A1.pdf
FCC Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Issues Public Notice: Native Nations Communications Task Force Notice Regarding the Ex Parte Status of Presentations
WASHINGTON, Aug. 4 -- The Federal Communications Commission Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau issued the following public notice (Docket No. DA 26-813):
* * *
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) recently announced additional appointments to the Native Nations Communications Task Force (Task Force) and date of first meeting./1
The Task Force, composed exclusively of Tribal officials and senior FCC staff, is not subject to the procedures set forth in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)/2 because of an exemption provided under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 4 -- The Federal Communications Commission Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau issued the following public notice (Docket No. DA 26-813):
* * *
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) recently announced additional appointments to the Native Nations Communications Task Force (Task Force) and date of first meeting./1
The Task Force, composed exclusively of Tribal officials and senior FCC staff, is not subject to the procedures set forth in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)/2 because of an exemption provided under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act(UMRA)./3 The UMRA exemption is intended to promote the free exchange of ideas between officials of the federal government and state, local and tribal governments (or their designated employees) on matters of common interest while meeting in closed sessions./4 Accordingly, meetings of the Task Force are not open to the public.
Because the UMRA exemption provides for conversations among the Task Force members and Commission staff or Commissioners, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR Sec.1.1200(a), presentations to the Task Force, including to any subcommittees and working groups and at any roundtable discussions sponsored by the Task Force, and presentations between Task Force members and FCC staff or Commissioners, will be treated as exempt presentations for ex parte purposes. This treatment is appropriate since such presentations, like comments on a Notice of Inquiry, will not directly result in the promulgation of new rules./5
We recognize, however, that in the course of its work the Task Force may address issues that are subject to pending rulemaking proceedings. The Commission will not rely in these proceedings on any information submitted to the Task Force, or to any of its subcommittees, working groups, or sponsored roundtables, or information conveyed by Task Force members to FCC staff or Commissioners, unless that information is first placed in the record of the relevant proceeding.
ACCESSIBLE FORMATS
To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530.
FURTHER INFORMATION
For further information, please contact the Office of Native Affairs and Policy at Native@fcc.gov.
* * *
Footnotes:
1/ FCC Chairman Brendan Carr announced additional appointments to the FCC's Native Nations Communications Task Force and date of first meeting, Public Notice, DA 26-737 (July 16, 2026).
2/ See 5 U.S.C. App.2.
3/ See 2 U.S.C. Sec.1534(b).
4/ UMRA permits federal officials or their designated employees to speak with their state, local, and tribal counterparts without implicating the FACA as long as a two-part test set forth in 2 U.S.C. Sec.1534(b) is satisfied: "(1) meetings are held exclusively between federal officials and elected officers of state, local, and tribal governments (or their designated employees with authority to act on their behalf) acting in their official capacities"; and (2) "such meetings are solely for the purpose of exchanging views, information, or advice relating to the management or implementation of federal programs established pursuant to statute, that explicitly or inherently share intergovernmental responsibilities or administration."
5/ See 47 CFR Sec. 1.1204(b)(1) (exempt treatment of presentations regarding a Notice of Inquiry).
* * *
Original text here: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-813A1.pdf
Federal Maritime Commission Orders Ocean Line Logistics to Pay $20,000 for Withholding Cargo Documents Over Unrelated Deposits
WASHINGTON, Aug. 1 -- The Federal Maritime Commission ordered Ocean Line Logistics Inc. to pay CE Global Network LLP $20,000 in reparations plus interest after a small claims officer found the carrier violated federal shipping law by withholding cargo documents to force payment of disputed deposits tied to unrelated shipments.
In an initial decision served July 31, 2026, Small Claims Officer Debra L. Tesh ruled that Ocean Line Logistics engaged in an unjust and unreasonable practice prohibited under Section 41102(c) of the Shipping Act when it refused to release shipping documents for nine fully
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 1 -- The Federal Maritime Commission ordered Ocean Line Logistics Inc. to pay CE Global Network LLP $20,000 in reparations plus interest after a small claims officer found the carrier violated federal shipping law by withholding cargo documents to force payment of disputed deposits tied to unrelated shipments.
In an initial decision served July 31, 2026, Small Claims Officer Debra L. Tesh ruled that Ocean Line Logistics engaged in an unjust and unreasonable practice prohibited under Section 41102(c) of the Shipping Act when it refused to release shipping documents for nine fullypaid containers unless CE Global posted $20,000 in security deposits for four other shipments handled by an affiliate entity.
The dispute centered on nine container shipments moving from the United States to Port Klang, Malaysia between November 2025 and February 2026. CE Global, a Singapore-based freight forwarder, had paid all freight charges for those shipments in full. Despite full payment, Ocean Line Logistics refused to release the shipping documents needed to obtain delivery of the containers unless CE Global paid an additional $20,000 characterized as a "deposit" for four unrelated shipments arranged through Ocean Link Forwarding, Inc., a distinct but affiliated entity operating on a different carrier line. Ocean Line Logistics argued the deposits were justified as financial security against possible non-collection of containers and potential demurrage and detention charges at destination, claiming CE Global had numerous uncollected shipments at Port Klang and was difficult to pursue for outstanding invoices as a foreign entity. However, the carrier produced no tariff item, negotiated rate arrangement, service contract, written agreement, carrier invoice, or other documentation authorizing collection of a container deposit charge as security.
CE Global filed its small claims complaint on March 30, 2026, and after the filing deadline for Ocean Line Logistics' formal response passed, the parties continued exchanging emails disputing the charges. On April 11, 2026, CE Global paid the $20,000 under protest to secure release of the nine shipments, then pursued reimbursement through the FMC proceeding. Ocean Line Logistics released the cargo on April 13, 2026 after receiving payment. Small Claims Officer Tesh was assigned to the case on July 21, 2026 and issued her initial decision on July 31, 2026, which becomes final unless the Commission elects to review it within 30 days.
The case turned on Section 41102(c) of the Shipping Act, which prohibits ocean transportation intermediaries from failing to establish, observe, and enforce just and reasonable regulations and practices relating to receiving, handling, storing, or delivering property. Federal regulations at 46 C.F.R. Sec. 545.4 require a complainant to prove five elements: the respondent is a regulated entity; the acts occur on a normal, customary, and continuous basis; the practice relates to handling property; the practice is unjust or unreasonable; and the practice proximately caused the claimed loss. Officer Tesh found all elements satisfied, noting that Ocean Line Logistics is licensed as a non-vessel-operating common carrier with the FMC and appeared as shipper on the bills of lading for the nine shipments. Evidence showed the deposit practice extended beyond these nine shipments, with Ocean Line Logistics continuing to require security deposits on other cargo even after CE Global paid under protest.
The central finding was that Ocean Line Logistics engaged in an unjust and unreasonable practice by conditioning release of fully paid cargo on payment of obligations arising from separate transactions. The $5,000 per container deposits related to four earlier shipments arranged through Ocean Link Forwarding, Inc., a distinct corporate entity. Even if Ocean Line Logistics believed it could lawfully request security for potential future detention and demurrage liability, that belief did not authorize withholding unrelated cargo to compel payment. The decision cited longstanding FMC precedent holding that withholding bills of lading or other shipping documents to compel payment of unrelated debts constitutes an unjust and unreasonable practice, including Bernard & Weldcraft Welding Equipment v. Supertans International (2003), where the Commission held that "disputes over earlier unrelated shipments cannot be used by either a carrier or a shipper as justification for refusing to release the cargo or pay lawful freight money." Rather than pursuing collection through appropriate means or accepting CE Global's proposal for a third-party escrow arrangement, Ocean Line Logistics leveraged its control over cargo otherwise entitled to release.
Under Section 41305 of the Shipping Act, the Commission has authority to award reparations for actual injury caused by violations to restore the injured party to the position it would have been in absent the violation. Officer Tesh found CE Global suffered actual injury of $20,000, proximately caused by Ocean Line Logistics' unlawful practice. The order grants CE Global reparations of $20,000 plus interest calculated from April 11, 2026, the date of injury, through 15 days after service of the order, with interest computed pursuant to 46 C.F.R. Sec. 502.253. All other requested relief not expressly granted is denied. The decision reinforces that carriers cannot use control over cargo as leverage to collect speculative costs or disputed charges from unrelated transactions and serves as notice that deposit policies must be supported by valid tariffs, contracts, or other authorized documentation.
-- Vidhi Gianani, Targeted News Service
* * *
Original text here: https://www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/docs/2056(I)/(09)%202056(I)%20Initial%20Decision.pdf/
FEC Issues Digest for Week of July 27-31, 2026
WASHINGTON, Aug. 1 -- The Federal Election Commission issued the following weekly digest:
* * *
Commission meetings and hearings
No open meetings or executive sessions were scheduled this week.
* * *
Litigation
Bernegger v. FEC (Case No. 26-213) On July 22, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend the June 10, 2026 and July 6, 2026 Minute Orders to Include Certification for Interlocutory Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) and, in the Alternative, for an Extension of Time to Effect Service and a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the June 10, 2026 and
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 1 -- The Federal Election Commission issued the following weekly digest:
* * *
Commission meetings and hearings
No open meetings or executive sessions were scheduled this week.
* * *
Litigation
Bernegger v. FEC (Case No. 26-213) On July 22, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend the June 10, 2026 and July 6, 2026 Minute Orders to Include Certification for Interlocutory Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) and, in the Alternative, for an Extension of Time to Effect Service and a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the June 10, 2026 andJuly 6, 2026 Minute Orders to Include Certification for Interlocutory Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Campaign Legal Center v. FEC (Case No. 26-1559) On July 27, the Republican National Committee filed a Reply in Support of its Motion to Intervene in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
* * *
Reports Due in 2026
The Commission has posted the 2026 Congressional Pre-Election Reporting Dates. Reporting schedules for all filers in 2026 are also available.
* * *
Election Dates
The Commission has posted a list of 2026 Congressional Primary Dates.
* * *
Upcoming educational opportunities
September 16, 2026: The Commission is scheduled to host a webinar on Independent Expenditures and Pre-Election Communications.
For more information on upcoming training opportunities, see the Commission's Trainings page.
* * *
Upcoming reporting due dates
August 20: August Monthly Reports are due. For more information, see the 2026 Monthly Reporting schedule.
The Commission has posted information regarding reporting deadlines as some states reschedule congressional primary elections to account for redistricting.
The Commission has posted filing information regarding the California 14th District Special Runoff Election, scheduled for August 18, 2026.
The Commission has posted filing information regarding the Georgia 13th District Special Runoff Election, scheduled for August 25, 2026.
* * *
Additional research materials
Contribution Limits: In addition to the current limits, the Commission has posted an archive of contribution limits that were in effect going back to the 1975-1976 election cycles.
Federal election results are available. The data was compiled from the official vote totals published by state election offices.
FEC Notify: Want to be notified by email when campaign finance reports are received by the agency? Sign up here.
The Combined Federal State Disclosure and Election Directory is available. This publication identifies the federal and state agencies responsible for the disclosure of campaign finances, lobbying, personal finances, public financing, candidates on the ballot, election results, spending on state initiatives, and other financial filings.
The Presidential Election Campaign Fund Tax Checkoff Chart provides information on balance of the Fund, monthly deposits into the Fund reported by the Department of the Treasury, payments from the Fund as certified by the FEC, and participation rates of taxpayers as reported by the Internal Revenue Service. For more information on the Presidential Public Funding Program, see the Public Funding of Presidential Elections page.
The FEC Record is available as a continuously updated online news source.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.fec.gov/updates/week-of-july-27-31-2026/
FCC Issues Order to Pay or Show Cause to Eternity Media Group Over Unpaid Regulatory Fees
WASHINGTON, Aug. 1 -- The Federal Communications Commission has initiated a proceeding to revoke the broadcast license held by Eternity Media Group LLC for radio station WHJA(AM) in Laurel, Mississippi. The action stems from failure to pay overdue regulatory fees, along with associated interest, administrative costs, and statutory penalties accumulated over several fiscal years.
In an Order to Pay or Show Cause (DA 26-809), released July 31, 2026, by the Media Bureau and the Office of Managing Director, the agency outlined years of unpaid financial obligations. Under section 9 of the Communications
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 1 -- The Federal Communications Commission has initiated a proceeding to revoke the broadcast license held by Eternity Media Group LLC for radio station WHJA(AM) in Laurel, Mississippi. The action stems from failure to pay overdue regulatory fees, along with associated interest, administrative costs, and statutory penalties accumulated over several fiscal years.
In an Order to Pay or Show Cause (DA 26-809), released July 31, 2026, by the Media Bureau and the Office of Managing Director, the agency outlined years of unpaid financial obligations. Under section 9 of the CommunicationsAct of 1934 and agency rules, broadcast licensees must pay annual regulatory fees to recover operating costs. Late or incomplete payments incur an automatic 25 percent penalty.
Agency records demonstrate that Eternity Media Group owes unpaid regulatory fee debt for WHJA(AM) across six fiscal years, consisting of $2,476.30 for FY 2019, $2,843.75 for FY 2020, $2,831.25 for FY 2021, $3,154.85 for FY 2022, $2,866.90 for FY 2024, and $2,783.40 for FY 2025.
The unpaid balances bring the total primary debt to $16,956.45, with interest and administrative fees continuing to accrue until the balance is settled in full.
Prior attempts to collect the funds included sending demand letters under the Debt Collection Improvement Act and transferring the debt to the United States Department of the Treasury. At the agency's request, the Treasury returned the accounts for further direct collection and enforcement action.
Under statutory authority, the agency holds the power to revoke station authorizations when licensees fail to meet payment deadlines. The directive requires Eternity Media Group to provide proof of full payment within 60 calendar days of the order date or present evidence demonstrating why the fees should be waived, deferred, or deemed inapplicable. Failure to submit sufficient payment proof or valid cause within the 60-day window may result in the direct revocation of the broadcast license for WHJA(AM).
The ruling notes that requests for fee waivers based on financial hardship require clear documentation demonstrating an inability to pay while maintaining service to the public. A previous waiver request submitted by the licensee for FY 2020 fees was denied due to lack of supporting financial evidence.
Unless the station licensee presents a substantial and material question of fact, no adjudicatory hearing will be designated. Any potential hearing would rely strictly on written evidence, with the burden of proof resting on the station owner. Copies of the directive were dispatched via registered mail to company addresses in Laurel and Hattiesburg, Mississippi.
-- Vidhi Gianani, Targeted News Service
* * *
Original text here: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-809A1.pdf
FCC Considers Table of TV Allotments Rulemaking Proposal for Elko, Nevada Broadcast Station
WASHINGTON, Aug. 1 -- The Federal Communications Commission Media Bureau Video Division has initiated a proceeding regarding the Amendment of Section 73.622(j), Table of TV Allotments, Television Broadcast Stations (Elko, Nevada) (MB Docket No. 26-196).
The action follows a rulemaking petition submitted on April 13, 2026, by Reno (KENV-TV) Licensee, Inc., the licensee of full-service television station KENV-DT in Elko, Nevada. The station currently holds a construction permit to build technical facilities on Ultra High Frequency (UHF) channel 20 in Elko. Through the petition, the licensee requests
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 1 -- The Federal Communications Commission Media Bureau Video Division has initiated a proceeding regarding the Amendment of Section 73.622(j), Table of TV Allotments, Television Broadcast Stations (Elko, Nevada) (MB Docket No. 26-196).
The action follows a rulemaking petition submitted on April 13, 2026, by Reno (KENV-TV) Licensee, Inc., the licensee of full-service television station KENV-DT in Elko, Nevada. The station currently holds a construction permit to build technical facilities on Ultra High Frequency (UHF) channel 20 in Elko. Through the petition, the licensee requeststhat the agency substitute Very High Frequency (VHF) channel 10 for UHF channel 20 in the Table of TV Allotments while retaining its currently licensed technical parameters.
This request marks another shift in the station's operational timeline. Previously, on July 19, 2023, the Video Division granted a prior petition submitted by the licensee to substitute UHF channel 20 for VHF channel 10 in Elko. Following that decision, the licensee received a construction permit for the channel 20 facility on August 14, 2023, which established a three-year construction deadline expiring on August 14, 2026.
However, the licensee stated in its official filing that it is unable to complete the construction of the channel 20 facility before the deadline specified in the permit. To avoid losing capability or interrupting service, the licensee asked the agency to amend the Table of TV Allotments to permit continued operations on VHF channel 10 using its existing, licensed broadcast parameters.
In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking adopted and released on July 31, 2026, the Video Division concluded that the proposal warrants full public consideration. Station KENV-DT is actively operating on VHF channel 10, and granting the request will allow the station to remain operational on the air without interrupting coverage to existing area viewers.
Under the specific parameters outlined in the filing, VHF channel 10 would operate at 1.5 kilowatts of power with an antenna height above average terrain of 562.2 meters at geographic coordinates 40 41' 58.8" N and 115 54' 10.9" W. Agency officials confirmed that this technical configuration complies with all principal community coverage requirements set forth under section 73.618(a) and section 73.622(a) of the agency rules.
The proceeding is governed by restricted ex parte rules, meaning public presentations to agency decision-makers are prohibited while the rulemaking is pending. Public feedback is being solicited to assist in making a final determination. Interested parties may submit initial comments within 30 days after the official notice is published in the Federal Register, and reply comments must be submitted within 45 days of publication.
All filings can be submitted electronically through the Electronic Comment Filing System or delivered by mail to the Secretary of the Federal Communications Commission. The licensee is required to file comments reiterating its commitment to operate the channel if the allotment is granted.
-- Vidhi Gianani, Targeted News Service
* * *
Original text here: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-806A1.pdf
