Featured Stories
FCC Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau Issues Public Notice: Conditional Approval, Exemption of Certain Uncrewed Aircraft Systems, Routers From FCC Covered List
WASHINGTON, June 23 -- The Federal Communications Commission Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau issued the following public notice (WC Docket No. 18-89; ET Docket No. 21-232; EA Docket No. 21-233):
* * *
The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC or Commission) Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau (PSHSB or Bureau) maintains a list of equipment and services (Covered List) that have been determined to "pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States or the security and safety of United States persons."/1 Pursuant to section 2 of the Secure and Trusted Communications
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 23 -- The Federal Communications Commission Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau issued the following public notice (WC Docket No. 18-89; ET Docket No. 21-232; EA Docket No. 21-233):
* * *
The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC or Commission) Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau (PSHSB or Bureau) maintains a list of equipment and services (Covered List) that have been determined to "pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States or the security and safety of United States persons."/1 Pursuant to section 2 of the Secure and Trusted CommunicationsNetworks Act of 2019 (Secure Networks Act)/2 and sections 1.50002(a) and 1.50003 of the Commission's rules,/3 PSHSB announces that the Department of War (DoW) has granted Conditional Approvals for certain uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS) and routers. Therefore, such devices are exempt from the Covered List.
Additions of UAS and UAS Critical Components, and Routers to the Covered List:
UAS and UAS Critical Components. On December 22, 2025, PSHSB issued a Public Notice adding all UAS and UAS critical components produced in a foreign country to the Covered List./4 This action was based on a National Security Determination from an Executive Branch interagency body, including several appropriate national security agencies, determining (among other things) that UAS and UAS critical components produced in a foreign country pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States and to the safety and security of U.S. persons. In that Public Notice, we stated, "[i]f we receive a further specific determination from the Department of War or the Department of Homeland Security that a given UAS, class of UAS, or UAS critical component does not pose unacceptable risks, we will further update the Covered List."/5
In January 2026, we updated the Covered List to reflect DoW's determinations that, until January 1, 2027, UAS and UAS critical components included on DoW's Blue UAS Cleared List and UAS and UAS critical components that qualify as "domestic end products" under the Buy American Standard do not pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States and to the safety and security of U.S. persons./6 In March 2026, we updated the Covered List to reflect the first Conditional Approvals that the FCC received from the DoW, exempting specific UAS and UAS critical components "which have been granted a Conditional Approval by DoW or DHS" from the Covered List./7
Routers. On March 23, 2026, the Commission added to the Covered List "routers produced in a foreign country, except routers which have been granted a Conditional Approval by DoW or DHS."/8 This addition was based on a National Security Determination from an Executive Branch interagency body, including several appropriate national security agencies, determining (among other things) that routers produced in a foreign country pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States and to the safety and security of U.S. persons./9
Conditional Approvals:
The Executive Branch interagency body established a process by which entities producing UAS and UAS critical components and routers in foreign countries can request DoW or the Department of Homeland Security to evaluate whether such devices do not pose unacceptable risks to national security and receive Conditional Approvals that would exempt such devices from the Covered List. The Commission has updated the Covered List to reflect the Conditional Approvals that we have received from the DoW exempting certain UAS and UAS critical components and routers from the Covered List./10
DoW has reviewed submissions and granted Conditional Approvals for the following devices:
* Real-Time Robotics, Inc.'s HERA Tactical Uncrewed Aircraft Systems Platform (terminating December 31, 2026)
* Ceres Air LLC's Uncrewed Aircraft Systems Platforms: C40, C31, C26, C20, and C6 (terminating December 31, 2026)
* Hitron Technologies Americas, Inc.'s DOCSIS 4.0 Wi-Fi Gateway, DOCSIS 3.1 Wi-Fi Gateway, XGSPON Wi-Fi Gateway, Standalone Wi-Fi routers, 5G FWA Wi-Fi Gateway, and 5G FWA Wi-Fi Hotspot (terminating December 18, 2027)
The Covered List:
We find that each of the Conditional Approvals constitutes "a specific determination" by DoW that such devices do not pose risks to U.S. national security./11 Therefore, we conclude that PSHSB is required to update the Covered List to exclude the equipment identified in these Conditional Approvals.
PSHSB takes this action under its authority and obligation to publish and maintain the Covered List. Sections 1.50002(a) and 1.50003 of the Commission's rules require PSHSB to publish the Covered List on the Commission's website, to maintain and update the Covered List, and to monitor the status of determinations./12
The Covered List and the list of devices that have received Conditional Approvals are attached as Appendices A and B to this Public Notice and can also be found on the Bureau's website at https://www.fcc.gov/supplychain/coveredlist./13
We note the continued availability of FCC staff guidance pursuant to sections 0.191 and 0.31(i) of the Commission's rules. Commission staff will provide guidance to TCBs, test labs, and equipment authorization applicants on the impact of these updates.
* * *
Footnotes:
1/ Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019, Pub. L. No. 116-124, 133 Stat. 158 (2020) (codified as amended at 47 U.S.C. Sec.Sec. 1601-1609) (Secure Networks Act); 47 CFR Sec.Sec. 1.50002, 1.50003. For the current version of the Covered List, see Federal Communications Commission, List of Equipment and Services Covered By Section 2 of The Secure Networks Act, https://www.fcc.gov/supplychain/coveredlist (last updated Apr. 14, 2026).
2/ 47 U.S.C. Sec. 1601.
3/ 47 CFR Sec.Sec. 1.50002(a), 1.50003; see also Protecting Against National Security Threats to the Communications Supply Chain Through FCC Programs, WC Docket No. 18-89, Second Report and Order, 35 FCC Rcd 14284 (2020) (Supply Chain Second Report and Order).
4/ Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Announces Addition of Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (UAS) and UAS Critical Components Produced Abroad, and Equipment and Services Listed in Section 1709 of the FY2025 NDAA, to FCC Covered List, WC Docket 18-89, Public Notice, DA 25-1086 (Dec 22, 2025) (UAS Public Notice).
5/ UAS Public Notice at 3.
6/ Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Announces Exemption of Certain Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (UAS) and UAS Critical Components from FCC Covered List, WC Docket No. 18-89, Public Notice, DA 26-22 (Jan. 7, 2026) (Second UAS Public Notice).
7/ Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Announces Conditional Approval of Certain Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (UAS) and UAS Critical Components and Exemption from FCC Covered List, WC Docket No. 18-89, Public Notice, DA 26-253 (Mar. 18, 2026).
8/ FCC's Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Announces Addition of Routers Produced in Foreign Countries to FCC Covered List, WC Docket No. 18-89, Public Notice, DA 26-278 (Mar. 23, 2026) (Routers Public Notice).
9/ Routers Public Notice at 2.
10/ See, e.g., FCC's Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Announces Conditional Approval of Certain Routers and Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (UAS) and Exemption from FCC Covered List, WC Docket No. 18-89, Public Notice, DA-26-351 (April 14, 2026). The list of devices that have received Conditional Approvals can be found on the Bureau's website at https://www.fcc.gov/supplychain/coveredlist.
11/ See Routers Public Notice, Appx. C; Second UAS Public Notice, Appx. B.
12/ 47 CFR Sec.Sec. 1.50002(a), 1.50003. See Supply Chain Second Report and Order, 35 FCC Rcd at 14319, 14325, paras. 72, 77, 92.
13/ The FCC website also contains a list of certain affiliates and subsidiaries of entities identified on the Covered List. The list of affiliates and subsidiaries does not constitute a comprehensive list of all entities that the Commission may find, upon further examination, to qualify as relevant subsidiaries or affiliates of entities on the Covered List. Those entities, whether or not they currently provide covered communications equipment or services, are subject to the Commission's prohibitions, such as the prohibition against obtaining authorizations for covered equipment. See Reminder: Communications Equipment And Services On The Covered List Pose An Unacceptable Risk To National Security, National Security Advisory No. 2025-01, DA 25-927, n.3 (PSHSB Oct. 14, 2025).
* * *
Original text pus attachments here: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-616A1.pdf
NRC Schedules Public Outreach to Discuss Columbia Generating Station Performance
WASHINGTON, June 19 -- The Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued the following news release on June 18, 2026:
* * *
NRC Schedules Public Outreach to Discuss Columbia Generating Station Performance
ARLINGTON, Texas -- Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold an informal public outreach session June 27 in Richland, Washington, to give local residents a clear look at how Columbia Generating Station performed in 2025. The event offers an opportunity for the public to speak one-on-one with NRC inspectors who evaluate the plant throughout the year.
The NRC's annual assessment found that the
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 19 -- The Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued the following news release on June 18, 2026:
* * *
NRC Schedules Public Outreach to Discuss Columbia Generating Station Performance
ARLINGTON, Texas -- Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold an informal public outreach session June 27 in Richland, Washington, to give local residents a clear look at how Columbia Generating Station performed in 2025. The event offers an opportunity for the public to speak one-on-one with NRC inspectors who evaluate the plant throughout the year.
The NRC's annual assessment found that theColumbia plant operated safely in 2025. However, for part of the year, the plant was under increased agency oversight due to two inspection findings of low safety significance related to occupational radiation safety. The NRC conducted a supplemental inspection in February and determined that the issues were properly corrected. As a result, the plant returned to normal oversight by the end of 2025.
The single-unit plant is operated by Energy Northwest and is located in Richland. The informal public outreach will take place from 9 a.m.-3 p.m. Pacific time during the Cool Desert Nights community event at 1317 George Washington Way in Richland. NRC employees responsible for plant inspections, including the resident inspector based full-time at the site, will be available to answer questions at the event.
The agency evaluates plant performance using a color-coded system that tracks inspection findings and performance indicators. The annual assessment letter for the Columbia plant, including upcoming inspection plans, is available on the NRC website.
Current performance information for all U.S. reactors is also available and updated quarterly.
* * *
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission was created as an expert, technical agency to protect public health, safety, and security, and regulate the civilian use of nuclear materials, including enabling the deployment of nuclear power for the benefit of society. Among other responsibilities, the agency issues licenses, conducts inspections, initiates and enforces regulations, and plans for incident response. The NRC is collaborating with interagency partners to implement reforms outlined in new Executive Orders and the ADVANCE Act to streamline agency activities and enhance efficiency.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.nrc.gov/sites/default/files/cdn/doc-collection-news/2026/26-011-iv.pdf
FCC Issues Letter on Cadillac Telecasting
WASHINGTON, June 19 -- The Federal Communications Commission's Media Bureau issued the following letter (Docket No. DA 26-612):
* * *
To: Cadillac Telecasting Co., Bolea Revocable Trust, c/o Elizabeth E. Spainhour, Brooks Pierce LLP, 150 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1700, Raleigh, NC 27601
Mario Peter Iacobelli Revocable Trust, c/o Tim Nelson, Brooks Pierce LLP, 150 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1700, Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Transfer of Control of Cadillac Telecasting Co.
LMS File No. 0000288234
Dear Counsel:
The Video Division, Media Bureau, has before it the above-captioned application seeking
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 19 -- The Federal Communications Commission's Media Bureau issued the following letter (Docket No. DA 26-612):
* * *
To: Cadillac Telecasting Co., Bolea Revocable Trust, c/o Elizabeth E. Spainhour, Brooks Pierce LLP, 150 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1700, Raleigh, NC 27601
Mario Peter Iacobelli Revocable Trust, c/o Tim Nelson, Brooks Pierce LLP, 150 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1700, Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Transfer of Control of Cadillac Telecasting Co.
LMS File No. 0000288234
Dear Counsel:
The Video Division, Media Bureau, has before it the above-captioned application seekingconsent to the transfer of control of Cadillac Telecasting Co. (Cadillac), the licensee of television station WFQXTV, Cadillac, Michigan (WFQX-TV or Station), and its full power satellite WFUP(TV), Vanderbilt, Michigan, from the Bolea Revocable Trust (Bolea Trust) to the Mario Peter Iacobelli Revocable Trust (Iacobelli Trust, and, together with Cadillac and the Bolea Trust, the Applicants)./1 DIRECTV, LLC (DIRECTV), filed a petition to deny the Application./2 For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Petition and grant the Application.
Background. The Iacobelli Trust ultimately controls Heritage Broadcasting Company of Michigan (Heritage), the licensee of television station WWTV(TV), Cadillac, Michigan, and its full power satellite WWUP-TV, Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan. If it acquires WFQX-TV,/3 the Iacobelli Trust would have an attributable interest in two television stations in the Traverse City-Cadillac, MI Designated Market Area (DMA)./4
The Local Television Ownership Rule, as reflected in the Code of Federal Regulations, provides that an entity may own two television stations licensed in the same DMA if: "(i) the digital noise limited service contours of the stations . . . do not overlap; or (ii) at the time the application to acquire . . . the station(s) is filed, at least one of the stations is not ranked among the top-four stations in the DMA, based on the Sunday to Saturday, 7 a.m. to 1 a.m. day-part audience share ratings averaged over a 12-month period immediately preceding the date of the application, as measured by Nielsen Media Research or by any comparable professional, accepted audience ratings service."/5 However, the court in Zimmer Radio vacated the latter provision--the Top-Four Prohibition--such that ownership of any two stations in a single DMA is now rule compliant (the Two-Station Limit)./6
Pleadings. DIRECTV asserts in its Petition that it has standing to file, alleging direct economic harm due to higher input prices that it asserts it will have to pay as a result of the transaction./7 DIRECTV further claims that it also has standing as a competitor, citing broadcasters' arguments in rulemaking proceedings that multichannel video programming distributors (MVPD) compete with over-the-air broadcasters for viewers as they simultaneously rely on broadcasters as program suppliers./8 DIRECTV maintains that Zimmer Radio does not affect the Applicants' affirmative obligation under section 310(d) of the Communications Acts of 1934, as amended (Act), to show that the proposed license transfer is in the public interest./9 DIRECTV asserts that the Applicants fail to make any public interest showing despite the clear harm arising from creating a new "Big Four" duopoly./10 Specifically, DIRECTV argues that the evidence shows that local television consolidation gives broadcasters more leverage to charge higher retransmission fees, which leads to higher bills for MVPD customers./11 DIRECTV further contends that the transaction will lead to higher prices for DIRECTV and its customers because Heritage, via growth and the resultant diminished competition, would command higher retransmission consent rates than it had previously./12
The Applicants respond that "[e]ach of Heritage and Cadillac is a small, closely-held business owning exactly one full-service television station and one satellite (repeater) in northern Michigan, in the 116th-ranked Traverse City-Cadillac DMA" and that calling DIRECTV's contention that combining the two would make consumer price increases inevitable "a stretch would be a serious understatement."/13 They further contend that "[w]hat has become increasingly obvious in recent weeks is that DIRECTV, inevitably, will reflexively oppose every single proposed, top-four-station in-market combination."/14 The Applicants state that the transaction complies with all Commission rules, including the post-Zimmer Radio Local Television Ownership Rule./15 They also contend that the acquisition will present no harm/16 and that it will, in fact, strengthen WFQX-TV and its service to the Traverse City-Cadillac, MI DMA, because the acquisition would reduce a small market station's competitive disadvantage as it confronts the competitive headwinds created by Big Tech giants and the "[e]ver-escalating programming acquisition costs [that] . . . gobble up an increasingly large percentage of local stations' diminishing revenues."/17 Finally, the Applicants assert that the transaction will produce public interest benefits by strengthening WFQX-TV and WWTV by "being able to combine newsrooms and staff and other resources across a region this large," thus being able to share all overhead and allow for some cost savings "that Heritage intends to invest into local programming and service, allowing for deeper and higher quality local news coverage. . . ."/18
In reply, DIRECTV states that, while the "Applicants are smaller than some of the other broadcasters that have sought to create Big Four duopolies in other markets across the country," the competitive analysis regarding local consolidation . . . does not depend on the size of the broadcaster involved."/19 It further contends that Applicants ignore or minimize the harms established in the Petition with regard to retransmission consent and fail to establish the public interest benefits associated with this transaction./20 DIRECTV also argues that there is no "retransmission consent exception" to the Commission's transaction review; the Commission's public interest analysis must address DIRECTV's contention that the transaction would result in an increase in retransmission consent rates./21
Standing. Under section 309(d) of the Act, only a "party in interest" has standing to file a petition to deny./22 In addition to containing the necessary factual allegations to support a prima facie case that grant of the application would be inconsistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity, a petition to deny must contain specific allegations of fact demonstrating that the petitioner is a party in interest./23 The allegations of fact, except for those of which official notice may be taken, must be supported by an affidavit or declaration under penalty of perjury of someone with personal knowledge of the facts alleged./24 In general, a petitioner in a transfer or assignment proceeding also must allege and prove that: (1) it has suffered or will suffer an injury in fact; (2) there is a causal link between the proposed transfer and the injury in fact; and (3) that not granting the transfer or assignment would remedy or prevent the injury in fact./25 In the broadcast regulatory context, standing is generally shown in one of three ways: (1) as a competitor in the market subject to signal interference; (2) as a competitor in the market subject to economic harm; or (3) as a resident of the station's service area or regular listener of the station./26 In the case of viewer standing, the petitioner must allege that he or she is a resident of the station's service area or a regular viewer of the station./27 An organization can establish standing on behalf of its members if it provides an affidavit or declaration "of one or more individuals entitled to standing indicating that the group represents local residents and that the petition is filed on their behalf."/28
We find that DIRECTV has demonstrated that it meets the requirements for standing with regard to the Application. In its Petition, DIRECTV claims that grant of the transaction will have specific, negative effects on it, specifically related to retransmission consent fee negotiations, and that those harms can be cured by dismissal or denial of the Application./29 Based on these claims, and consistent with precedent, we find that DIRECTV has met the requirements for standing./30
Discussion. Section 310(d) of the Act provides that no station license shall be transferred or assigned except upon application to the Commission and upon a finding by the Commission "that the public interest, convenience, and necessity will be served thereby."/31 In making this determination, we first assess whether the proposed transaction complies with the specific provisions of the Act, other applicable statutes, and the Commission's rules./32 If the proposed transaction does not violate a statute or rule, we then consider whether the transaction could result in public interest harms by substantially frustrating or impairing the objectives or implementation of the Act or related statutes./33 For the reasons explained below, we find that the proposed transaction fully complies with the Commission's rules, including the post-Zimmer Radio Local Television Ownership Rule, and that there are no issues or potential public interest harms identified in the record that would require further consideration. Notably, while the Commission will consider transaction-specific objections to otherwise rule-compliant transactions, we find that DIRECTV has failed to advance any such objections. Accordingly, we conclude that grant of the Application will result in public interest benefits and serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity.
In recent decisions issued subsequent to the close of the pleading cycle in this proceeding, we have considered and rejected substantially similar arguments raised by DIRECTV. On February 3, 2026, the Bureau issued the Sinclair-Cunningham-Roberts Letter Order, which addressed and rejected many of the arguments presented by DIRECTV here./34 In that decision, we traced the history of the Local Television Ownership Rule, from its initial adoption in the 1999 Television Ownership Order/35 through the Eighth Circuit's vacatur of the Top-Four Prohibition, and recognized that "the Two-Station Limit, without restriction, now is the Local Television Ownership Rule."/36 We also rejected the contention that the Commission must engage in a balancing process pursuant to section 310(d) of the Act before granting an application, explaining that "[w]here the Commission has adopted a specific, numerical ownership limit, as it has with the Two-Station Limit, an applicant satisfies its initial burden of showing that the transaction is in compliance with the Act and the Commission's rules and policies related to competition and diversity by correctly certifying compliance with that limit."/37 On February 20, 2026, largely in reliance on the Sinclair-Cunningham-Roberts Letter Order, we issued the Sinclair-HSH-CunninghamDeerfield Letter Order, rejecting claims raised by DIRECTV, again similar to those raised in its Petition here.
We find that the Application fully complies with the Two-Station Limit, and DIRECTV has failed to provide any transaction-specific arguments that raise a substantial and material question of fact sufficient to show that grant of the Application would be prima facie inconsistent with the public interest./38 The Petition focuses primarily on the retransmission consent harms raised by the proposed combinations./39 However, just as we found in the Sinclair-Cunningham-Roberts Letter Order and again in the Sinclair-HSH-Cunningham-Deerfield Letter Order that similar concerns were speculative, we reach the same determination here./40 And again, as we explained in the Sinclair-Cunningham-Roberts Letter Order, the Commission has found on multiple occasions in the past that issues of broad applicability, such as the effect of common ownership of two top-four stations on the market for retransmission consent, are best handled in a rulemaking of industry-wide effect./41 We emphasize again that we will not consider such issues in an adjudication involving rule-compliant broadcast television duopolies./42
Finally, based on our own review of the proposed transactions, we have not identified any issues or potential public interest harms that would require further consideration. To the contrary, we find that that operational "efficiencies allowed by common ownership" could benefit viewers as Heritage looks to reinvest those efficiencies "into sustaining and, potentially improving, its local news operations."/43
Accordingly, having reviewed the Application and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons specified herein, the Application (LMS File No. 0000288234) IS GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request for continued operation of WFUP(TV), Vanderbilt, Michigan, as a satellite station of WFQX-TV, Cadillac, Michigan, pursuant to the "satellite exception" of Note 5 to section 73.3555 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR Sec. 73.3555, IS GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition to Deny filed by DIRECTV, LLC, IS DENIED. These actions are taken pursuant to sections 0.61 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR Sec.Sec. 0.61, 0.283, and sections 4(i) and (j), and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sec.Sec. 154(i), 154(j), 310(d).
Sincerely,
/s/ David J. Brown, Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau
* * *
Original text plus footnotes here: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-612A1.pdf
CPSC Issues Recall Alert Involving Veseacky Pajama Sets
WASHINGTON, June 19 -- The Consumer Product Safety Commission issued the following recall alert:
* * *
Name of Product: Veseacky Pajama Sets
Hazard: The pajama sets violate the mandatory safety standards for children's sleepwear, posing a risk of serious injury or death to children from burns.
Remedy: Refund
Recall Date: June 18, 2026
Units: About 3,700 units
Consumer Contact: Veseacky by email at Veseackypajamarecall@outlook.com.
Recall Details
Description: This recall involves Veseacky pajama sets. The pajama sets consist of a long-sleeve, button-up top with a front pocket and matching
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 19 -- The Consumer Product Safety Commission issued the following recall alert:
* * *
Name of Product: Veseacky Pajama Sets
Hazard: The pajama sets violate the mandatory safety standards for children's sleepwear, posing a risk of serious injury or death to children from burns.
Remedy: Refund
Recall Date: June 18, 2026
Units: About 3,700 units
Consumer Contact: Veseacky by email at Veseackypajamarecall@outlook.com.
Recall Details
Description: This recall involves Veseacky pajama sets. The pajama sets consist of a long-sleeve, button-up top with a front pocket and matchingpants. They were sold in various colors and prints. The pajama sets have the size and care instructions printed on a sewn-in side seam label. The model number "C0001-NB 130-LCUS" is on a barcode sticker on the packaging.
Remedy: Consumers should stop using the recalled pajama sets immediately and contact Veseacky for a full refund. Consumers will be asked to destroy the pajamas by cutting them in half and send a photo of the destroyed pajama set to Veseackypajamarecall@outlook.com. Consumers should then dispose of the destroyed product.
Incidents/Injuries: None reported
Sold Online At: Amazon.com from October 2020 through January 2026 for about $29.
Importer(s): Shenzhen City ShengRu Fu Shi Company Ltd., doing business as Veseacky, of China
Manufactured In: China
Recall number: 26-564
* * *
Original text here: https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2026/Veseacky-Pajama-Sets-Recalled-Due-to-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-or-Death-from-Burn-Hazard-Violate-Mandatory-Standards-for-Childrens-Sleepwear
CPSC Issues Recall Alert Involving Michley Children's Pajamas
WASHINGTON, June 19 -- The Consumer Product Safety Commission issued the following recall alert:
* * *
Name of Product: Michley Children's Pajamas
Hazard: The recalled children's pajamas violate the mandatory flammability standard for children's sleepwear, posing a risk of serious burn injuries or death.
Remedy: Refund
Recall Date: June 18, 2026
Units: About 160
Consumer Contact: SHEIN toll-free at 833-853-8668 from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. PT Monday through Friday, email at uscsteam@shein.com, or online at https://us.shein.com/product-recalls/list or www.us.shein.com and click on "Product Recalls"
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 19 -- The Consumer Product Safety Commission issued the following recall alert:
* * *
Name of Product: Michley Children's Pajamas
Hazard: The recalled children's pajamas violate the mandatory flammability standard for children's sleepwear, posing a risk of serious burn injuries or death.
Remedy: Refund
Recall Date: June 18, 2026
Units: About 160
Consumer Contact: SHEIN toll-free at 833-853-8668 from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. PT Monday through Friday, email at uscsteam@shein.com, or online at https://us.shein.com/product-recalls/list or www.us.shein.com and click on "Product Recalls"at the bottom of the page for more information.
Recall Details
Description: This recall involves Michley-branded children's pajamas. The recalled one-piece pajamas were sold in green with a dinosaur patch, pink with a bunny patch, yellow with a giraffe patch and purple with a rabbit patch; and in sizes 80 through 130. "Michley" and the size are printed on a sewn-in seam label.
Remedy: Consumers should stop using the recalled pajamas immediately and contact SHEIN for a full refund. Consumers will be asked to destroy the pajamas by cutting them in half and send a photo of the destroyed pajamas to uscsteam@shein.com. Consumers should then dispose of the destroyed product.
Incidents/Injuries: None reported
Sold Online At: SHEIN.com from May 2025 through December 2025 for about $25. The third-party seller has not responded to CPSC's Notice of Violation. CPSC issued a Product Safety Warning for products sold by the seller.
Importer(s): SHEIN Distribution Corporation, of Los Angeles, California
Manufactured In: China
Recall number: 26-567
* * *
Original text here: https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2026/SHEIN-Distribution-Corporation-Recalls-Michley-Childrens-Pajamas-Due-to-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-or-Death-from-Burn-Hazard-Violate-Mandatory-Standard-for-Childrens-Sleepwear
CPSC Issues Recall Alert Involving GOPO TOYS Pull String Teething Toys
WASHINGTON, June 19 -- The Consumer Product Safety Commission issued the following recall alert:
* * *
Name of Product: GOPO TOYS Pull String Teething Toys
Hazard: The recalled teething toys violate the mandatory standard for toys because the silicone strings are smaller and longer than permitted. The strings can reach the back of children's throat and become lodged, posing a serious risk of respiratory distress and deadly choking hazard.
Remedy: Refund
Recall Date: June 18, 2026
Units: About 70,410
Consumer Contact: GOPO Toys at 800-445-2344, email at recalls@gopotoys.com, or online at
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 19 -- The Consumer Product Safety Commission issued the following recall alert:
* * *
Name of Product: GOPO TOYS Pull String Teething Toys
Hazard: The recalled teething toys violate the mandatory standard for toys because the silicone strings are smaller and longer than permitted. The strings can reach the back of children's throat and become lodged, posing a serious risk of respiratory distress and deadly choking hazard.
Remedy: Refund
Recall Date: June 18, 2026
Units: About 70,410
Consumer Contact: GOPO Toys at 800-445-2344, email at recalls@gopotoys.com, or online athttps://recall.gopotoys.com for more information.
Recall Details
Description: This recall involves GOPO TOYS pull string teething toys. The teething toys consist of an off-white disc shape with a grey ball in the center and six multi-colored, silicone tentacle-looking pull strings that run through the ball. The disc has seven soft push buttons. The brand name and "Pull String Toy" is printed on the front of the product packaging, and the batch number 250905, 250530, 250120, 240315, 231005 or 230610 on the back of packaging.
Remedy: Consumers should stop using the teething toy immediately, take it away from children and contact GOPO Toys to receive a full refund. Consumers will be asked to destroy the toy by cutting all silicone strings and writing in permanent marker "DESTROYED" on the main body of the toy and send a photo of the destroyed toy to recalls@gopotoys.com. Consumers should then dispose of the destroyed product.
Incidents/Injuries: The firm is aware of three reports of the toy's strings reaching the back of a child's throat, resulting in respiratory distress or choking.
Sold Online At: Amazon.com from August 2023 through March 2026 for between $11 to $15.
Distributor(s): GOPO Toys LLC, of San Bernardino, California
Manufactured In: China
Recall number: 26-562
* * *
Original text here: https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2026/GOPO-Toys-Recalls-Pull-String-Teething-Toys-Due-to-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-or-Death-from-Choking-Violate-Mandatory-Standard-for-Toys
CPSC Issues Recall Alert Involving Arizer Solo III Portable Electronic Vaporizers
WASHINGTON, June 19 -- The Consumer Product Safety Commission issued the following recall alert:
* * *
Name of Product: Arizer Solo III portable electronic vaporizers (Intergalactic/Black color only)
Hazard: The internal lithium-ion battery can explode or ignite, posing fire and burn hazards.
Remedy: Replace
Recall Date: June 18, 2026
Units: About 5,000
Consumer Contact: 7111495 Canada toll-free at 888-291-0521 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET Monday through Friday, by email at recall@arizer.com or online https://www.arizer.com/solo-iii-voluntary-recall-submission-form or www.arizer.com and click
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 19 -- The Consumer Product Safety Commission issued the following recall alert:
* * *
Name of Product: Arizer Solo III portable electronic vaporizers (Intergalactic/Black color only)
Hazard: The internal lithium-ion battery can explode or ignite, posing fire and burn hazards.
Remedy: Replace
Recall Date: June 18, 2026
Units: About 5,000
Consumer Contact: 7111495 Canada toll-free at 888-291-0521 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET Monday through Friday, by email at recall@arizer.com or online https://www.arizer.com/solo-iii-voluntary-recall-submission-form or www.arizer.com and clickon "Recall Information" at the top of the page for more information.
Recall Details
Description:: This recall involves the Arizer Solo III Intergalactic (Black), a portable electronic vaporizer powered by an internal lithium-ion battery. The unit features a rigid anodized aluminum housing. It includes a front-facing digital display for temperature and device settings, with a stainless steel heating chamber and removable glass components. Only devices with serial numbers beginning with the following prefixes are included in this recall:
M3B1G5
M3F4G6
M35C43
M3PN54
M3SR42
M38G53
M3G576
M3C121
The serial number is etched on the bottom of the device and is also printed on the outside of the product packaging. UPC 628078802274 is printed on the product packaging.
Remedy: Consumers should stop using the Arizer Solo III portable electronic vaporizers immediately and contact 7111495 Canada regarding a replacement Solo III V2 unit. Consumers who register for the recall and have serial numbers confirmed to fall within the affected serial number ranges will receive instructions to dispose of the recalled device. Consumers will be asked to submit a photograph showing the word "recalled" written on their device in permanent marker and confirm that they have disposed of the device in accordance with applicable laws and regulations before receiving a replacement Solo III V2 unit.
Note: Do not throw this recalled lithium-ion battery or device in the trash, the general recycling stream (e.g., street-level or curbside recycling bins), or used battery recycling boxes found at various retail and home improvement stores. Recalled lithium-ion batteries must be disposed of differently than other batteries, because they present a greater risk of fire. Your municipal household hazardous waste (HHW) collection center may accept this recalled lithium-ion battery or device for disposal. Before taking your battery or device to a HHW collection center, contact that office ahead of time and ask whether it accepts recalled lithium-ion batteries. If it does not, contact your municipality for further guidance.
Incidents/Injuries: The firm has received four reports of the battery exploding or igniting.
Sold At: Specialty, health and wellness and adult novelty stores nationwide and on Arizer.com from May 2025 through January 2026 for about $300.
Importer(s): 7111495 Canada Inc., dba Arizer Tech, of Waterloo, Ontario
Manufactured In: China
Recall number: 26-565
* * *
Original text here: https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2026/Arizer-Solo-III-Portable-Vaporizers-Recalled-Due-to-Fire-and-Burn-Hazards-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-or-Death-Imported-by-7111495-Canada
