House Bill Introductions
Here's a look at news stories involving U.S. House bills introduced in the 119th Congress
Featured Stories
Stopping Abusive Student Loan Collection Practices in Bankruptcy Legislation by Rep. Thanedar Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The Stopping Abusive Student Loan Collection Practices in Bankruptcy Act of 2026, originally introduced by Rep. Shri Thanedar, D-Michigan, on June 2, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The bill aims to amend Title 11 of the United States Code to address and prohibit abusive collection practices related to student loans during bankruptcy proceedings.
This legislative effort responds to widespread concerns about the detrimental impact that current student loan collection practices can have on individuals seeking financial relief through bankruptcy.
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The Stopping Abusive Student Loan Collection Practices in Bankruptcy Act of 2026, originally introduced by Rep. Shri Thanedar, D-Michigan, on June 2, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The bill aims to amend Title 11 of the United States Code to address and prohibit abusive collection practices related to student loans during bankruptcy proceedings.
This legislative effort responds to widespread concerns about the detrimental impact that current student loan collection practices can have on individuals seeking financial relief through bankruptcy.Existing laws have allowed aggressive collection methods that can hinder the ability of debtors to successfully navigate their bankruptcy cases. By rectifying these practices, the proposed bill aims to provide a clearer framework that protects borrowers from undue hardship during one of the most challenging financial periods of their lives.
Transitioning to a more supportive legal environment for individuals struggling with student debt is critical as student loan debt continues to escalate. According to recent studies, millions of Americans are burdened by student loans, with many unable to pay them off even after declaring bankruptcy. This legislation seeks not only to alleviate the immediate pressure from collections but also to reshape the overall narrative surrounding student loans and bankruptcy law.
In its essence, the Stopping Abusive Student Loan Collection Practices in Bankruptcy Act of 2026 signals a shift toward more compassionate and responsible financial policies. By preventing lenders from exploiting vulnerable debtors, it aims to foster a fairer economic landscape. Implementation of this Act would not only empower borrowers but also hold lenders accountable, marking a significant step in the ongoing discourse about student loans and financial reform in the United States.
The bill (H.R. 9111) has no co-sponsors.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9111/text
Stop ANTIFA Act Legislation by Rep. Steube Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The Stop ANTIFA Act, originally introduced by Rep. W. Gregory Steube, R-Florida, on June 2, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation seeks to designate the group Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization, aiming to counter escalating domestic terrorism and organized political violence across the nation.
The proposed bill emphasizes a need for a comprehensive approach to identifying and dismantling networks that propagate political violence. Among its motivations is a reported increase in attacks on law enforcement agencies and politically
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The Stop ANTIFA Act, originally introduced by Rep. W. Gregory Steube, R-Florida, on June 2, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation seeks to designate the group Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization, aiming to counter escalating domestic terrorism and organized political violence across the nation.
The proposed bill emphasizes a need for a comprehensive approach to identifying and dismantling networks that propagate political violence. Among its motivations is a reported increase in attacks on law enforcement agencies and politicallymotivated assaults, which proponents argue underline a coordinated campaign to suppress lawful political discourse. The legislation outlines provisions for federal investigative bodies, including the National Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF), to enact strategies designed to investigate, disrupt, and prosecute individuals or groups engaged in such actions.
Supporters of the Stop ANTIFA Act argue that designating Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization will empower law enforcement to utilize robust investigatory and prosecutorial tools against not only individual operatives but also the organizations that facilitate their violent tactics. This initiative aligns with broader concerns regarding the safety of public discourse, ensuring that radicalized groups cannot obstruct the rule of law and democratic institutions.
The bill also proposes a national strategy that includes tracking financing sources that support violent actions, underscoring the interplay between funding and domestic terrorism. Critics of the bill, while opposing its measures, highlight the potential implications for civil liberties and free speech, raising concerns about the scope and impact of such designations.
As the legislative process unfolds, the broader implications of the Stop ANTIFA Act continue to ignite discussions regarding the balance between security and civil rights in American society.
The bill (H.R. 9109) has no co-sponsors.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9109/text
Robert Lodge Medal of Honor Legislation by Rep. Pfluger Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The Robert Lodge Medal of Honor Act, originally introduced by Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, on June 2, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The bill seeks to authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to Robert Lodge for his exceptional acts of valor as a member of the Air Force during the Vietnam War.
This legislation is a significant recognition of Lodge's bravery, specifically during a mission on May 10, 1972, which highlights the sacrifices made by service members during a contentious period in American history. The Medal of Honor is
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The Robert Lodge Medal of Honor Act, originally introduced by Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, on June 2, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The bill seeks to authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to Robert Lodge for his exceptional acts of valor as a member of the Air Force during the Vietnam War.
This legislation is a significant recognition of Lodge's bravery, specifically during a mission on May 10, 1972, which highlights the sacrifices made by service members during a contentious period in American history. The Medal of Honor isthe nation's highest military honor, and awarding it to Lodge not only serves to acknowledge his individual courage but also reinforces the broader narrative of valor that characterized many servicemen and women during the Vietnam War.
The motivation behind this bill stems from a sustained effort to honor veterans who have demonstrated extraordinary heroism, even when time limitations typically prevent the awarding of such honors. By circumventing these constraints, the legislation not only aims to recognize Lodge's particular contributions but may also inspire further recognition of other unsung heroes whose actions warrant similar acknowledgment.
The enactment of this bill could have a lasting impact, not only validating Lodge's courage but also sparking renewed interest in the sacrifices of Vietnam veterans. It serves as a reminder that the legacies of military service are woven deeply into the fabric of the nation, highlighting the importance of honoring those who have served.
As this bill moves forward through the legislative process, it stands to demonstrate the commitment of Congress to recognize and honor the sacrifices of those who have risked their lives for their country.
The bill (H.R. 9106) has 3 co-sponsors: Reps. Darrell Issa, R-CA; Jake Ellzey, R-TX; Charles J. Chuck Fleischmann, R-TN.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9106/text
Patient Choice and Access Act Legislation by Rep. Rulli Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The Patient Choice and Access Act, originally introduced by Rep. Michael A. Rulli, R-Ohio, on June 2, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This bill aims to amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act by stipulating that qualified health plans are not required to maintain a provider network, potentially reshaping the landscape of health insurance options available to consumers.
This legislative move is motivated by the growing call for greater flexibility in health plan offerings. By eliminating the requirement for a provider network, the
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The Patient Choice and Access Act, originally introduced by Rep. Michael A. Rulli, R-Ohio, on June 2, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This bill aims to amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act by stipulating that qualified health plans are not required to maintain a provider network, potentially reshaping the landscape of health insurance options available to consumers.
This legislative move is motivated by the growing call for greater flexibility in health plan offerings. By eliminating the requirement for a provider network, thebill seeks to broaden access to care, allowing insurers to offer plans that may have more appealing premiums or broader coverage areas for enrollees. Proponents argue that this change could empower consumers with more choices and facilitate improved access to diverse healthcare providers.
Under the proposed changes, starting in 2027, health plans would still need to meet certain criteria under the Affordable Care Act, but maintaining a defined provider network would no longer be a prerequisite. Instead, the Secretary of Health and Human Services would be barred from requiring networks, thereby opening up potential avenues for innovative insurance products that do not confine members to specific doctors or hospitals.
To ensure transparency and support for consumers choosing plans without provider networks, the bill mandates that these plans provide clear information regarding out-of-pocket costs and potential billing practices. Additionally, health plans would be required to offer resources to assist enrollees in locating providers willing to accept the plan's payment options as full payment for services rendered.
As healthcare continues to be a pivotal issue in American society, the Patient Choice and Access Act represents a significant shift toward enhancing consumer choice in their healthcare decisions. The implications of this bill could lead to a reimagined approach to health insurance that prioritizes consumer flexibility while striving to maintain essential protections.
The bill (H.R. 9107) has 3 co-sponsors: Reps. H. Morgan Griffith, R-VA; Troy Balderson, R-OH; Aaron Bean, R-FL.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9107/text
Gig Is Up Act Legislation by Rep. Watson Coleman Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The Gig Is Up Act, originally introduced by Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman, D-New Jersey, on June 2, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This bill aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, specifically targeting large businesses that engage independent contractors, requiring these employers to withhold payroll taxes for contract work.
As the gig economy continues to expand, the legislation seeks to address the growing concerns regarding tax compliance and financial security for independent contractors. Currently, independent contractors often
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The Gig Is Up Act, originally introduced by Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman, D-New Jersey, on June 2, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This bill aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, specifically targeting large businesses that engage independent contractors, requiring these employers to withhold payroll taxes for contract work.
As the gig economy continues to expand, the legislation seeks to address the growing concerns regarding tax compliance and financial security for independent contractors. Currently, independent contractors oftenface obstacles in securing adequate retirement benefits and social security due to irregular payment structures. By mandating payroll tax withholding at large companies-defined as those with at least $100 million in gross annual receipts and employing over 10,000 independent contractors-the bill aims to stabilize earnings and ensure that these workers contribute to essential social programs.
This legislation comes at a time when the shift to independent contracting has raised questions about worker protections and fair compensation. Many in the labor force are transitioning away from traditional employment models, driven by the flexibility that gig work offers. However, this transition often leaves workers vulnerable to financial instability, as they grapple with unanticipated expenses and lack of employer-sponsored benefits. By imposing payroll tax requirements, the proposed law seeks to safeguard the economic futures of independent contractors, bringing additional transparency to their earnings and reinforcing their eligibility for social security benefits.
The implementation of these measures is expected to take effect for payments made after December 31, 2026, marking a significant shift in how independent contractors are treated under U.S. tax law. This initiative underscores a growing recognition of the importance of equitable tax policies that reflect contemporary workforce dynamics.
The bill (H.R. 9114) has 7 co-sponsors: Reps. Summer L. Lee, D-PA; LaMonica McIver, D-NJ; Jahana Hayes, D-CT; Rashida Tlaib, D-MI; Alma S. Adams, D-NC; Ilhan Omar, D-MN; Delia C. Ramirez, D-IL.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9114/text
FISA Amendments Act of 2008 Legislation by Rep. Higgins Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The FISA Amendments Act of 2008, originally introduced by Rep. Clay Higgins, R-Louisiana, on June 3, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation aims to extend the authorities granted under Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978, a law governing the surveillance of foreign powers and terrorists.
The proposed amendments extend the repeal date for certain FISA provisions until June 12, 2029. This extension is critical in maintaining national security surveillance capabilities, allowing intelligence agencies
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The FISA Amendments Act of 2008, originally introduced by Rep. Clay Higgins, R-Louisiana, on June 3, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation aims to extend the authorities granted under Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978, a law governing the surveillance of foreign powers and terrorists.
The proposed amendments extend the repeal date for certain FISA provisions until June 12, 2029. This extension is critical in maintaining national security surveillance capabilities, allowing intelligence agenciesto monitor foreign communications that may pose threats to the United States. The legislation emphasizes safeguards designed to protect the communications of U.S. persons by requiring a warrant for certain acquisitions, effectively balancing intelligence needs with privacy rights.
Motivated by evolving threats and the need for robust surveillance tools, the legislation is positioned as a necessary measure to keep pace with modern technologies and methodologies that adversaries may exploit. In particular, it addresses issues surrounding the unauthorized collection and retention of information relating to U.S. citizens, aiming to prevent potential abuses of power within intelligence agencies.
Additionally, the legislation introduces stricter penalties for unlawful disclosures of classified information and sets out procedures for the review of surveillance practices by federal courts. These measures are intended to enhance accountability and oversight within the intelligence community, assuring the public that legal protections for personal data are paramount even against the backdrop of national security.
If enacted, these changes may significantly influence how intelligence operations are conducted in the U.S., shaping the legal landscape of surveillance and privacy rights in the years to come.
The bill (H.R. 9115) has no co-sponsors.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9115/text
BRIDGE Act Legislation by Rep. Fitzgerald Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The BRIDGE Act, originally introduced by Rep. Scott Fitzgerald, R-Wisconsin, on June 2, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation mandates a comprehensive report on the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) use of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to challenge the United States-led international order, while also outlining a strategy for the U.S. to counter these efforts.
At the core of the BRIDGE Act is a response to the growing influence of China's Belt and Road Initiative, which seeks to link global
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The BRIDGE Act, originally introduced by Rep. Scott Fitzgerald, R-Wisconsin, on June 2, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation mandates a comprehensive report on the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) use of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to challenge the United States-led international order, while also outlining a strategy for the U.S. to counter these efforts.
At the core of the BRIDGE Act is a response to the growing influence of China's Belt and Road Initiative, which seeks to link globalregions through extensive infrastructure projects. The bill highlights the risks posed by BRI to national security and economic interests of the U.S. and its allies, noting the CCP's strategy to establish a Sinocentric world order that could undermine global stability. It emphasizes the need for a coordinated U.S. government effort to confront this challenge, as previous measures have been criticized for lacking cohesive direction.
Within 180 days of enactment, the Secretary of State, along with other relevant agencies, will be required to deliver a detailed report addressing the BRI's scope and the means by which it aims to establish alternative geopolitical structures. The report aims to identify existing U.S. policies and propose an integrated approach to enhance America's economic and strategic position globally.
The bill underscores the importance of formulating a clear, actionable strategy to promote cooperative infrastructure development that aligns with U.S. foreign policy objectives. By advocating for a thorough evaluation of U.S. responses to the BRI, the BRIDGE Act seeks to ensure that American initiatives build resilience against global challenges posed by the PRC while reinforcing alliances in key regions, particularly the Indo-Pacific. As the world watches, the BRIDGE Act aims to strengthen the U.S.'s competitive edge on the international stage.
The bill (H.R. 9093) has 1 co-sponsor: Rep. Zachary Nunn, R-IA.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9093/text
Adak Island Land Transfer Legislation by Rep. Begich Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The Adak Island Land Transfer Act, originally introduced by Rep. Nicholas J. Begich III, R-Alaska, on June 4, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The legislation aims to transfer administrative jurisdiction of approximately 5,624 acres of land on Adak Island from the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary of the Navy, primarily for defense-related purposes.
This measure is set against a backdrop of increasing military and strategic needs in the Arctic region. As national security concerns grow, the bill facilitates the Navy's access to critical
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 8 -- The Adak Island Land Transfer Act, originally introduced by Rep. Nicholas J. Begich III, R-Alaska, on June 4, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The legislation aims to transfer administrative jurisdiction of approximately 5,624 acres of land on Adak Island from the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary of the Navy, primarily for defense-related purposes.
This measure is set against a backdrop of increasing military and strategic needs in the Arctic region. As national security concerns grow, the bill facilitates the Navy's access to criticalland for various military applications, including training exercises and development of new tactical technologies. By removing the land from the National Wildlife Refuge System, the bill seeks to ensure that necessary operations can be conducted without the constraints typically placed on wildlife conservation areas.
The proposed transfer of land is expected to bolster military readiness and enhance the capabilities of the Navy while reflecting the broader strategic focus on Arctic operations amid geopolitical tensions. Supporters argue that the transfer not only strengthens national defense but also fosters economic opportunities for local communities through potential job creation linked to military activities.
Moreover, the legislation underscores a pressing need for adaptation in military infrastructure as the global landscape evolves. The proposed adjustments to the boundaries of the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge by the Secretary of the Interior are designed to align with the new military objectives while maintaining conservation efforts in other areas.
This bill highlights the intersection of environmental conservation and national defense, prompting discussions about balancing military needs with ecological considerations in Alaska's unique landscape.
The bill (H.R. 9138) has no co-sponsors.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9138/text
