Attorney General
Here's a look at documents from state attorneys general
Featured Stories
Attorney General Alan Wilson announces State Grand Jury indictments for nearly $1.4 million in auto loan fraud scams
COLUMBIA, South Carolina, April 13 -- South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson issued the following news:
* * *
Attorney General Alan Wilson announces State Grand Jury indictments for nearly $1.4 million in auto loan fraud scams
*
(COLUMBIA, S.C.) - South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson announced today in the "VINsanity" investigation that the South Carolina State Grand Jury returned 125 counts in seven separate indictments alleging Keiron Murray committed nearly $1.4 million in auto loan scams. Generally, the indictments allege that Murray used various small dealerships to obtain
... Show Full Article
COLUMBIA, South Carolina, April 13 -- South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson issued the following news:
* * *
Attorney General Alan Wilson announces State Grand Jury indictments for nearly $1.4 million in auto loan fraud scams
*
(COLUMBIA, S.C.) - South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson announced today in the "VINsanity" investigation that the South Carolina State Grand Jury returned 125 counts in seven separate indictments alleging Keiron Murray committed nearly $1.4 million in auto loan scams. Generally, the indictments allege that Murray used various small dealerships to obtainfraudulent loans from banks for vehicles that were never in the dealerships' or the supposed purchaser's possession. Murray would then allegedly steal the loan proceeds.
"Millions of dollars of fraudulent auto loans are a cost that is ultimately borne by consumers throughout South Carolina," Attorney General Alan Wilson said. "While accountability for these crimes fundamentally rests on the fraudsters committing them, banking institutions can do a better job of detecting fraud through the loan application process, particularly online. Moreover, more can be done to identify and shut down the various small auto sales dealerships that are used all too often as a mechanism for facilitating millions of dollars of auto loan fraud," he added.
"If someone breaks into your house, that's entirely on them, but people, of course, need to make sure their front door is locked," said State Grand Jury chief attorney Creighton Waters. "Institutions should be more aware that scammers will use small dealerships and VIN information on cars that were never in their possession -much less in South Carolina -to get fraudulent loans," he added.
The State Grand Jury issued indictments against Keiron Murray for the following offenses:
2026-GS-47-02 (Superseding) -Richland County
Obtaining Signature or Property by False Pretenses, Value $10,000 or More
* 16-13-240: 0-10 years (15 Counts)
Crime Against a Federally Chartered or Insured Financial Institution
* 34-3-110: 0-5 years and/or fine up to $10,000 (14 Counts)
Computer Crime Valued More than $10,000
* 16-16-20; 16-1-57: 0-5 years and/or a fine up to $50,000 (15 Counts)
Criminal Conspiracy
* 16-17-410: 0-5 years and/or a fine up to $5,000
Money Laundering, Value $100,000 or More
* 35-11-740: Up to 20 years and/or fine up to $250,000, or twice the value of the financial transaction, whichever is greater.
2026-GS-47-20 - Richland County
Obtaining Signature or Property by False Pretenses, Value $10,000 or More
* 16-13-240: 0-10 years (3 Counts)
Crime Against a Federally Chartered or Insured Financial Institution
* 34-3-110: 0-5 years and/or fine up to $10,000 (2 Counts)
Computer Crime Valued More than $10,000
* 16-16-20; 16-1-57: 0-5 years and/or a fine up to $50,000 (3 Counts)
Criminal Conspiracy
* 16-17-410: 0-5 years and/or a fine up to $5,000
Money Laundering, Value $100,000 or More
* 35-11-740: Up to 20 years and/or fine up to $250,000, or twice the value of the financial transaction, whichever is greater.
2026-GS-47-21 - Richland County
Obtaining Signature or Property by False Pretenses, Value $10,000 or More
* 16-13-240: 0-10 years (1 Counts)
Crime Against a Federally Chartered or Insured Financial Institution
* 34-3-110: 0-5 years and/or fine up to $10,000 (1 Counts)
Computer Crime Valued More than $10,000
* 16-16-20; 16-1-57: 0-5 years and/or a fine up to $50,000 (15 Counts)
Money Laundering, Value $20,00 - $100,000
* 35-11-740: Up to 10 years and/or fine of up to $250,000 or twice the value of the transactions, whichever is greater.
2026-GS-47-22 - Richland County
Obtaining Signature or Property by False Pretenses, Value $10,000 or More
* 16-13-240: 0-10 years (5 Counts)
Crime Against a Federally Chartered or Insured Financial Institution
* 34-3-110: 0-5 years and/or fine up to $10,000 (3 Counts)
Computer Crime Valued More than $10,000
* 16-16-20; 16-1-57: 0-5 years and/or a fine up to $50,000 (5 Counts)
Criminal Conspiracy
* 16-17-410: 0-5 years and/or a fine up to $5,000
Money Laundering, Value $100,000 or More
* 35-11-740: Up to 20 years and/or fine up to $250,000, or twice the value of the financial transaction, whichever is greater.
2026-GS-47-23 - Sumter County
Obtaining Signature or Property by False Pretenses, Value $10,000 or More
* 16-13-240: 0-10 years (2 Counts)
Crime Against a Federally Chartered or Insured Financial Institution
* 34-3-110: 0-5 years and/or fine up to $10,000
Computer Crime Valued More than $10,000
* 16-16-20; 16-1-57: 0-5 years and/or a fine up to $50,000 (2 Counts)
Money Laundering, Value $20,000 - $100,000
* 35-11-740: Up to 10 years and/or fine of up to $250,000 or twice the value of the transactions, whichever is greater.
2026-GS-47-24 - Sumter County
Obtaining Signature or Property by False Pretenses, Value $10,000 or More
* 16-13-240: 0-10 years (15 Counts)
Crime Against a Federally Chartered or Insured Financial Institution
* 34-3-110: 0-5 years and/or fine up to $10,000 (14 Counts)
Computer Crime Valued More than $10,000
* 16-16-20; 16-1-57: 0-5 years and/or a fine up to $50,000 (15 Counts)
Criminal Conspiracy
* 16-17-410: 0-5 years and/or a fine up to $5,000
Money Laundering, Value $100,000 or More
* 35-11-740: Up to 20 years and/or fine up to $250,000, or twice the value of the financial transaction, whichever is greater.
2026-GS-47-19 - Colleton County
Obtaining Signature or Property by False Pretenses, Value $10,000 or More
* 16-13-240: 0-10 years (14 Counts)
Crime Against a Federally Chartered or Insured Financial Institution
* 34-3-110: 0-5 years and/or fine up to $10,000 (14 Counts)
Computer Crime Valued More than $10,000
* 16-16-20; 16-1-57: 0-5 years and/or a fine up to $50,000 (15 Counts)
Criminal Conspiracy
* 16-17-410: 0-5 years and/or a fine up to $5,000
Money Laundering, Value $100,000 or More
* 35-11-740: Up to 20 years and/or fine up to $250,000, or twice the value of the financial transaction, whichever is greater.
The State Grand Jury also charged Tamika Coleman with the following offense:
2026-GS-47-19 - Colleton County
Criminal Conspiracy
* 16-17-410: 0-5 years and/or a fine up to $5,000
Coleman had previously been indicted for 56 counts of similar offenses in a different State Grand Jury investigation that had begun with the investigation, indictment, and conviction of former lawyer Alex Murdaugh and co-conspirators for various financial crimes. (2025-GS-47-12 - 10 Counts, 2024-GS-47-25 - 5 counts, 2024-GS-47-26 - 5 Counts, 2023-GS-47-39 - 6 Counts, 2023-GS-47-40 - 6 Counts, 2023-GS-47-18 - 6 Counts, 2023-GS-47-19 - 6 Counts, 2023-GS-47-20 - 6 Counts, 2023-GS-47-21 - 6 Counts).
The case is being investigated by the South Carolina State Grand Jury, which functions in partnership with the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and the South Carolina Attorney General's State Grand Jury Section. The cases will be prosecuted by the chief attorney of the State Grand Jury Section, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General S. Creighton Waters, Senior Assistant Attorney General Jason Anders, and Assistant Attorney General Walt Whitmire.
Attorney General Wilson stressed that all defendants are presumed innocent unless and until they are proven guilty in a court of law.
***
Original text here: https://www.scag.gov/about-the-office/news/attorney-general-alan-wilson-announces-state-grand-jury-indictments-for-nearly-1-4-million-in-auto-loan-fraud-scams/
AG Nessel Reminds Residents of Potential Punishments for Swatting
LANSING, Michigan, April 13 -- Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel issued the following news release:
* * *
AG Nessel Reminds Residents of Potential Punishments for Swatting
*
LANSING - Following yesterday's swatting incident in Marine City, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel is reminding residents of the seriousness of making false calls to 911 or false threats. Swatting is defined as a prank call made to emergency services in an attempt to dispatch law enforcement to a particular location.
"Swatting is not harmless," said Attorney General Nessel. "It is a serious crime that can lead
... Show Full Article
LANSING, Michigan, April 13 -- Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel issued the following news release:
* * *
AG Nessel Reminds Residents of Potential Punishments for Swatting
*
LANSING - Following yesterday's swatting incident in Marine City, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel is reminding residents of the seriousness of making false calls to 911 or false threats. Swatting is defined as a prank call made to emergency services in an attempt to dispatch law enforcement to a particular location.
"Swatting is not harmless," said Attorney General Nessel. "It is a serious crime that can leadto dangerous situations and divert law enforcement away from someone facing an actual emergency. What callers may believe to be a 'joke' actually risks the public safety of our communities and can carry lifelong consequences for those responsible."
Potential charges one could face if they make a threat of violence include:
* Communicating a threat of terrorism, a 20-year felony;
* Calling in a bomb threat, a 4-year felony; and
* Malicious use of a telecommunications device, a 6-month misdemeanor.
Swatting could result in the following charges:
* False report of a crime, a 93-day misdemeanor;
* False report resulting in physical injury, a 5-year felony;
* False report resulting in a serious bodily impairment, a 10-year felony; and/or
* False report resulting in a death, a 15-year felony.
In addition to serving time in jail or prison, those who are found guilty of these crimes can face fines of up to $20,000.00. Residents who receive or know of a threat of violence against their community should contact their local law enforcement.
***
Original text here: https://www.michigan.gov/ag/news/press-releases/2026/04/13/ag-nessel-reminds-residents-of-potential-punishments-for-swatting
AG Murrill's Office arrests Pollack Police Chief for Malfeasance in Office and Principal to Filing or Maintaining False Public Records
BATON ROUGE, Louisiana, April 13 -- Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill issued the following news:
* * *
AG Murrill's Office arrests Pollack Police Chief for Malfeasance in Office and Principal to Filing or Maintaining False Public Records
*
Agents with Attorney General Liz Murrill's Louisiana Bureau of Investigation arrested Pollack Police Chief Christopher Paul for Malfeasance in Office and Principal to Filing or Maintaining False Public Records.
LBI (Louisiana Bureau of Investigation) received a request for assistance from the Grant Parish Sheriff's Office regarding allegations of official
... Show Full Article
BATON ROUGE, Louisiana, April 13 -- Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill issued the following news:
* * *
AG Murrill's Office arrests Pollack Police Chief for Malfeasance in Office and Principal to Filing or Maintaining False Public Records
*
Agents with Attorney General Liz Murrill's Louisiana Bureau of Investigation arrested Pollack Police Chief Christopher Paul for Malfeasance in Office and Principal to Filing or Maintaining False Public Records.
LBI (Louisiana Bureau of Investigation) received a request for assistance from the Grant Parish Sheriff's Office regarding allegations of officialmisconduct involving the Pollock Police Department.
During this investigation, LBI agents learned that in the period between January 1, 2022 - September 11, 2025, 55-year-old Pollock Police Chief Christopher Paul, of Hughart Road in Bentley, directed Pollock police officers to patrol, issue citations, and make arrests on and around the grounds of the Federal Correctional Complex - Pollock.
Agents learned that Chief Paul knew the FCC-Pollock complex and the immediate area (roadway) leading to the facility, was not inside the city limits of Pollock. Chief Paul was also aware that he did not have legal authority to conduct routine law enforcement activities outside of his jurisdiction.
As a result, Pollock police officers - at Chief Paul's direction - made multiple arrests, issued multiple citations, and created investigative reports, which falsely represented that these actions had occurred within the police department's jurisdiction.
On Monday, April 13, 2026, LBI agents arrested Paul pursuant to an arrest warrant issued by the 35th Judicial District Court on charges pertaining to:
* 3 counts of LRS 14:133 - Principal to Filing or Maintaining False Public Records
* 3 counts of LRS 14:134 - Malfeasance in Office
"No one is above the law -especially those sworn to uphold it," said Attorney General Liz Murrill.
Paul was booked without incident at the Grant Parish Sheriff's Office.
He was released on recognizance.
Our investigation continues.
*All persons are presumed innocent until proven guilty.
***
Original text here: https://www.ag.state.la.us/Article/482
Attorney General James Mandates Major Mental Health Reforms at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
ALBANY, New York, April 13 -- New York Attorney General Letitia James issued the following news release:
* * *
Attorney General James Mandates Major Mental Health Reforms at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
*
April 13, 2026
NEW YORK - New York Attorney General Letitia James today announced a landmark settlement with NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital (NYP) following a years-long investigation into the hospital system's treatment of patients experiencing mental health emergencies. The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) found that NYP engaged in a repeated pattern of failures that put vulnerable
... Show Full Article
ALBANY, New York, April 13 -- New York Attorney General Letitia James issued the following news release:
* * *
Attorney General James Mandates Major Mental Health Reforms at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
*
April 13, 2026
NEW YORK - New York Attorney General Letitia James today announced a landmark settlement with NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital (NYP) following a years-long investigation into the hospital system's treatment of patients experiencing mental health emergencies. The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) found that NYP engaged in a repeated pattern of failures that put vulnerablepatients at risk, including failing to properly evaluate and stabilize patients in emergency departments, leaving critical psychiatric beds offline during a worsening mental health crisis, and frequently diverting ambulances from bringing mental health patients to the emergency department without any defined policy in place. As a result of the investigation, NYP must implement extensive reforms to better serve emergency department patients experiencing mental health and substance use challenges and improve its screening, stabilization, and documentation procedures.
"Too many New Yorkers experiencing mental health crises have been met with inadequate care when they need help most," said Attorney General James. "Mental health care is necessary medical care, and hospitals have a legal and moral obligation to treat these crises with urgency and compassion. These sweeping reforms will protect patients, strengthen oversight, and help ensure that no one is left without care in their most vulnerable moments."
The OAG launched an investigation into NYP after mounting concerns regarding access to mental health care and the treatment of patients in crisis, including testimony from providers, advocates, and impacted families about dangerous gaps in emergency and inpatient psychiatric services. The OAG reviewed data regarding thousands of emergency department visits involving behavioral health conditions, as well as patient records, hospital policies, incident reporting systems, and psychiatric bed capacity data to assess compliance with federal and state law.
The investigation uncovered repeated breakdowns in emergency department care, including consistent failures to properly screen and stabilize patients with behavioral health conditions, as well as a lack of effective screening and safety measures to prevent impaired patients from leaving the hospital prior to discharge (known as elopement). The OAG also found that NYP failed to adequately monitor patients placed under observation, including those requiring one-on-one supervision, and did not consistently gather critical information from outside sources, such as family members or community providers. Patients were routinely discharged without the care, stability, or follow-up support they needed, and NYP's records did not always include complete or accurate documentation.
In multiple cases, patients experiencing serious psychiatric symptoms -including suicidal ideation, psychosis, and violent behavior -left the hospital before being properly discharged or transferred due to inadequate supervision and safety protocols, putting both patients and the public at potential risk. For example:
* A patient with a history of suicide attempts and homicidal ideation arrived at the hospital reporting hallucinations. After telling staff he "couldn't control when he wanted to hurt people," he was determined to need inpatient psychiatric admission and remained in the emergency department for more than two days awaiting a bed. Despite being ordered to receive close supervision, he eloped from the hospital before he could be transferred.
* A teenage patient initially cleared for discharge pending a psychiatric evaluation was later found to need inpatient admission after providers reached his mother and determined he was at high risk for suicide or violence. Because staff had failed to implement safety precautions, the patient eloped from the hospital within minutes without receiving further care.
* A young man was brought to the hospital by EMS and police after attacking a bystander. Staff failed to review the EMS report documenting the incident and did not fully assess the risk he posed. The patient ran from the emergency department, chased by staff and security, but the hospital did not notify law enforcement until the following day.
The OAG also determined that NYP failed to bring all of its licensed inpatient psychiatric beds back online after the COVID-19 pandemic, despite clear legal requirements and growing demand for care. As of May 2023, more than 100 psychiatric beds remained out of operation across the NYP system. State regulators had directed hospitals to restore this capacity as the pandemic subsided, but NYP did not fully comply, contributing to a shortage of inpatient care during a period of heightened mental health need.
As a result of OAG's investigation, Attorney General James is requiring sweeping reforms across the NYP hospital system, including:
* Major Emergency Department Reforms : NYP must strengthen its screening policies to identify risks such as suicide, violence, and substance use, with required follow-up assessments and ongoing reassessment for higher-risk patients. NYP must also strengthen patient safety and monitoring, including establishing mandatory observation protocols, maintaining monitoring logs, and documenting clinical decisions.
* Elopement Prevention Measures : NYP must strengthen its elopement screening policies and precautions to prevent vulnerable patients from leaving care unsupervised. If a high-need patient goes missing, staff must immediately escalate the situation, notify leadership, and fully document and review each incident.
* Health Record Upgrades : NYP must improve its electronic health record (EHR) system to ensure providers have real-time access to complete patient information and can follow care protocols.
* Care Coordination Improvements : NYP staff must review prior records, consult relevant databases, and make efforts to contact a patient's family members, providers, or other sources when available, documenting all outreach. When appropriate, NYP must coordinate with outpatient providers and care teams before making treatment or discharge decisions.
* Stronger Discharge and Admission Planning : NYP must ensure patients with complex needs leave the hospital with appropriate follow-up care, including scheduled appointments and connections to ongoing services. NYP must also document all efforts to locate available beds for patients awaiting admission.
* Ongoing Oversight and Accountability : NYP will be subject to continued monitoring, reporting, and quality assurance reviews, including tracking and reviewing every incident of patient elopement to ensure compliance with OAG's reforms.
Attorney General James has secured $500,000 from NYP for its misconduct and will impose a $10,000 penalty per violation for any future violations of the settlement terms. NYP must also comply with all laws governing psychiatric bed capacity and ensure appropriate planning and transparency regarding inpatient services going forward.
"Today's settlement announced by New York Attorney General James is an important reminder of the ongoing need for strong oversight and enforcement to ensure compliance and accountability with New York's laws and regulations. This is essential to guarantee that New Yorkers with mental health conditions can access care-especially in emergencies, when proper screening, evaluation, and treatment are crucial," said Glenn Liebman, CEO of Mental Health Association in New York State (MHANYS). "As we continue to address a mental health crisis, it is vital for New York state to require community hospitals to restore all inpatient capacity to pre-COVID levels and to implement policies and procedures that assure not only adequate care and safety in emergency rooms and inpatient units, but also in discharge planning. Let this agreement strengthen the collective commitment and resolve of regulators, providers, and stakeholders to meet the needs of New Yorkers with the most complex mental health conditions and their families."
"We commend Attorney General James and the Office of the Attorney General for this thorough investigation and for taking decisive action to strengthen protections for New Yorkers in crisis," said Nathan McLaughlin, Executive Director of NAMI New York State. "These findings reflect the unfortunate reality individuals and families have experienced for years. New York is in need of expanded access to crisis services this settlement represent an important step toward ensuring people receive safe, appropriate care when they need it most."
This matter was handled by Assistant Attorney General Michael Reisman and Assistant Attorney General and Special Assistant to the First Deputy Gina Bull, under the supervision of Health Care Bureau Chief Darsana Srinivasan. The Health Care Bureau is part of the Division for Social Justice, which is led by Chief Deputy Attorney General Meghan Faux and overseen by First Deputy Attorney General Jennifer Levy.
***
Original text here: https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2026/attorney-general-james-mandates-major-mental-health-reforms-newyork-presbyterian
AG Campbell Urges Supreme Court To Preserve Temporary Protected Status For Haitians And Syrians
BOSTON, Massachusetts, April 13 -- Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell issued the following news release:
* * *
AG Campbell Urges Supreme Court To Preserve Temporary Protected Status For Haitians And Syrians
*
Boston -Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell today co-led a coalition of 19 attorneys general in filing an amicus brief in Trump v. Miot and Mullin v. Doe in the Supreme Court of the United States, in support of a challenge to the Trump Administration's termination of Haiti's and Syria's Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations.
"Massachusetts is proud
... Show Full Article
BOSTON, Massachusetts, April 13 -- Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell issued the following news release:
* * *
AG Campbell Urges Supreme Court To Preserve Temporary Protected Status For Haitians And Syrians
*
Boston -Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell today co-led a coalition of 19 attorneys general in filing an amicus brief in Trump v. Miot and Mullin v. Doe in the Supreme Court of the United States, in support of a challenge to the Trump Administration's termination of Haiti's and Syria's Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations.
"Massachusetts is proudto be home to tens of thousands of TPS holders who are a critical part of our workforce and economy. The Trump Administration's attempt to revoke legal status from this community and send children and families to countries experiencing widespread violence and starvation is unlawful and cruel," said AG Campbell. "I urge the Supreme Court to affirm the rulings that have blocked these terminations and protect states' economies, health care systems, and public safety."
TPS is a humanitarian immigration status created by Congress to protect foreign nationals who cannot safely return to their home country because of war, natural disaster, or other extraordinary conditions. TPS allows recipients to live and work in the United States as long as their home country has a TPS designation.
Haitian immigrants have been eligible for TPS since 2010, when a devastating earthquake hit the country. The protections have repeatedly been extended due to unsafe conditions in Haiti, including widespread violence, homelessness, and starvation. Syrian immigrants have been eligible for TPS since 2012, when a violent civil war broke out. The protections have been extended multiple times due to the ongoing conflict that continues to cause food insecurity, limited access to health care and clean water, and an increased risk of violence against civilians.
The Trump Administration attempted to abruptly terminate TPS for Haitians and Syrians in November of 2025, without any evidence that the dangerous conditions in the countries had improved and despite the fact that the U.S. State Department continues to classify both nations as "Level 4: Do Not Travel" countries-its highest risk designation. In February 2026, courts preserved protections for Haitian and Syrian TPS holders while the litigation over the lawfulness of the termination continues. In March 2026, the Supreme Court agreed to hear both cases. The Court deferred ruling on the Trump Administration's request to allow the terminations to take effect immediately until a decision could be made on the merits of the cases.
In today's brief, AG Campbell and the coalition urge the Supreme Court to preserve the block on the Trump Administration's termination, arguing that termination of TPS for Haitians and Syrians would separate families, damage economies, deplete workforces, increase health care costs, and harm public health and safety.
Across states, thousands of TPS recipients provide important public services as health care providers, teachers, entrepreneurs, construction workers, and more. Hundreds of thousands of TPS-eligible Haitians work in labor-short industries, and Syrian immigrants own businesses at more than triple the rate of U.S. citizens by birth. Together, TPS-eligible Haitians and Syrians contribute more than $3.5 billion annually to the U.S. economy.
Massachusetts is home to one of the nation's largest Haitian populations, including tens of thousands of Haitian TPS holders. Massachusetts's Department of Developmental Services alone employs dozens of Haitian TPS holders, who provide care to some of Massachusetts's most vulnerable populations. Additionally, across the Commonwealth, 40% of the front-line staff in nursing homes are foreign born, many of them from Haiti. Stripping TPS recipients of their legal status and work authorization will cause irreparable harm to families, workforces, and state economies.
In submitting their brief, AG Campbell and the coalition are asking the Supreme Court to affirm the lower court orders temporarily blocking termination of TPS for Haiti and Syria.
Joining AG Campbell in submitting this brief, which she co-led with the attorneys general of California, New York, and Illinois, are the attorneys general of Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawai'i, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island, Virginia, Vermont, and Washington.
* Office of the Attorney General
The Attorney General is the chief lawyer and law enforcement officer of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
***
Original text here: https://www.mass.gov/news/ag-campbell-urges-supreme-court-to-preserve-temporary-protected-status-for-haitians-and-syrians
Attorney General James and Bipartisan Coalition Urge FTC to Address Deceptive Rental Fees
ALBANY, New York, April 13 -- New York Attorney General Letitia James issued the following news release:
* * *
Attorney General James and Bipartisan Coalition Urge FTC to Address Deceptive Rental Fees
*
April 13, 2026
NEW YORK - New York Attorney General Letitia James and a bipartisan coalition of 25 other attorneys general today called on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to enact a rule addressing unfair and deceptive fee practices in the rental housing market. In a comment letter submitted to the FTC, the coalition urged the agency to establish clear, nationwide standards to ensure transparency
... Show Full Article
ALBANY, New York, April 13 -- New York Attorney General Letitia James issued the following news release:
* * *
Attorney General James and Bipartisan Coalition Urge FTC to Address Deceptive Rental Fees
*
April 13, 2026
NEW YORK - New York Attorney General Letitia James and a bipartisan coalition of 25 other attorneys general today called on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to enact a rule addressing unfair and deceptive fee practices in the rental housing market. In a comment letter submitted to the FTC, the coalition urged the agency to establish clear, nationwide standards to ensure transparencyin rental pricing and protect consumers. The letter comes in response to the FTC's Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on unfair or deceptive rental housing fee practices. The attorneys general support the FTC moving forward with rulemaking and highlight the growing impact of hidden fees on renters nationwide.
"Rent is already too high, but corporate landlords are adding hidden junk fees that make housing even less affordable," said Attorney General James. "Renters deserve to know the true cost of housing upfront, not after they have already committed their time and money. We are urging the FTC to take action so families can make informed decisions and avoid deceptive pricing."
In the letter, Attorney General James and the coalition emphasize that modern renters often encounter "bait-and-switch" pricing tactics in which advertised rents appear lower than the actual cost. Increasingly, mandatory fees are only disclosed late in the application process or after a lease is signed. These practices can increase the true cost of housing and limit consumers' ability to make informed financial decisions. The attorneys general also assert that deceptive rental fee practices undermine competition in the housing market. When landlords fail to disclose the full cost of rent upfront, it becomes more difficult for consumers to compare options, and housing providers that are transparent about pricing are placed at a disadvantage.
Attorney General James and the coalition are urging the FTC to adopt a rule requiring clear disclosure of the total cost of rental housing, including all mandatory fees, in advertisements and listings. They are also calling on the FTC to prohibit unfair or deceptive practices related to rental fees and establish a consistent federal baseline while preserving states' authority to enforce and strengthen consumer protections. The attorneys general highlight actions that states across the country are taking to address unfair or deceptive rental fee practices through legislation and enforcement. They argue, however, that federal rulemaking is needed to establish consistent minimum standards while allowing states to continue regulating rental markets based on local conditions.
Housing affordability remains a significant challenge for renters in New York, particularly as more households are cost-burdened by rent. Hidden or undisclosed fees can further increase housing costs and make it harder for New Yorkers to find and maintain stable housing. Establishing clear, nationwide standards would help ensure renters in New York can better understand and compare the true cost of housing.
Joining Attorney General James in sending the letter are the attorneys general of Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia.
***
Original text here: https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2026/attorney-general-james-and-bipartisan-coalition-urge-ftc-address-deceptive
Attorney General Brenna Bird Amends TikTok Lawsuit Asserting Risk of China Access to Iowans' Data
DES MOINES, Iowa, April 13 -- Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird issued the following news release:
* * *
Attorney General Brenna Bird Amends TikTok Lawsuit Asserting Risk of China Access to Iowans' Data
*
DES MOINES -Attorney General Brenna Bird announced she has added more violations of Iowa's consumer protection laws to her lawsuit against TikTok. The state asserts the social media giant uses dangerous, addictive features to cause children to become hooked on the app and hides the truth about the risk of users' data flowing to China.
As the lawsuit asserts, TikTok has knowingly designed
... Show Full Article
DES MOINES, Iowa, April 13 -- Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird issued the following news release:
* * *
Attorney General Brenna Bird Amends TikTok Lawsuit Asserting Risk of China Access to Iowans' Data
*
DES MOINES -Attorney General Brenna Bird announced she has added more violations of Iowa's consumer protection laws to her lawsuit against TikTok. The state asserts the social media giant uses dangerous, addictive features to cause children to become hooked on the app and hides the truth about the risk of users' data flowing to China.
As the lawsuit asserts, TikTok has knowingly designedits app to be addictive to children and teens, creating app features that prey upon young people's unique psychological vulnerabilities. They override young people's autonomy to decide how much time to spend on TikTok's platform through mechanisms that encourage compulsive use.
Additionally, the amended lawsuit asserts that TikTok deceives users into believing that the personal data they share is safe from the Chinese government. But the Chinese government can readily obtain TikTok users' personal information. TikTok's many public claims to the contrary are highly misleading and, sometimes, outright false.
"Social Media giants need to be put on warning, Iowa will not allow you to hide the truth from parents about the harm your platform is doing to our kids," said Attorney General Bird. "We've sued because TikTok's content is mislabeled as safe for kids. But now, we've found TikTok is knowingly getting kids hooked on their app, to the detriment of kids' mental and physical health. And if that's not bad enough, it appears the Chinese government can freely access an Iowan's data if it wants. It's time for TikTok to come clean and change the way they do business in Iowa."
Iowa is seeking a permanent injunction under the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act to compel TikTok to cease its deceptive, misleading, false and unfair statements and conduct. The state is also seeking civil penalties.
Read the amended petition here.
For More Information:
Jen Green
jen.green@ag.iowa.gov
***
Original text here: https://www.iowaattorneygeneral.gov/newsroom/attorney-general-brenna-bird-amends-tiktok-lawsuit-asserting-risk-of-china-access-to-iowans-data/
Attorney General Alan Wilson defends the Second Amendment from legal attacks
COLUMBIA, South Carolina, April 13 -- South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson issued the following news:
* * *
Attorney General Alan Wilson defends the Second Amendment from legal attacks
*
(COLUMBIA, S.C.) - Attorney General Alan Wilson is joining a 22-state friend-of-the-court brief supporting the constitutional right to obtain firearms without undue burden or expense.
"As the state's top prosecutor, I want to ensure our communities are as safe as possible," Attorney General Wilson said. "Limiting the ability of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves only makes our streets and communities
... Show Full Article
COLUMBIA, South Carolina, April 13 -- South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson issued the following news:
* * *
Attorney General Alan Wilson defends the Second Amendment from legal attacks
*
(COLUMBIA, S.C.) - Attorney General Alan Wilson is joining a 22-state friend-of-the-court brief supporting the constitutional right to obtain firearms without undue burden or expense.
"As the state's top prosecutor, I want to ensure our communities are as safe as possible," Attorney General Wilson said. "Limiting the ability of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves only makes our streets and communitiesless safe for everyone."
The brief was filed in response to action taken by individuals following a shooting in Highland Park, Illinois. These individuals argue that gun manufacturers bear responsibility for the criminal actions taken by those using the guns they produce.
The states argue that the Second Amendment rights of citizens cannot be infringed upon by the actions of criminals, which is why federal law gives gun manufacturers immunity from these kinds of lawsuits.
"The Second Amendment is a right not limited by the actions of others," Attorney General Wilson stated. "Especially in high-crime areas, citizens' ability to purchase firearms and protect themselves shouldn't be infringed upon."
In addition to South Carolina, attorneys general from the following states joined the Montana-led brief: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
You can read the letter here.
***
Original text here: https://www.scag.gov/about-the-office/news/attorney-general-alan-wilson-defends-the-second-amendment-from-legal-attacks/
West Virginia Supreme Court Rules in Favor of State in Cabell County Election Integrity Case
CHARLESTON, West Virginia, April 11 -- The West Virginia Attorney General John B. McCuskey issued the following news release on April 10, 2026:
* * *
West Virginia Supreme Court rules in favor of State in Cabell County election integrity case
The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals has issued a ruling reinstating an indictment against two candidates charged with election-related offenses. In State of West Virginia ex rel. State of West Virginia v. The Honorable James Young, the Supreme Court granted the State's petition for a writ of prohibition.
In 2022, Jan Hite King and Kimberly Maynard
... Show Full Article
CHARLESTON, West Virginia, April 11 -- The West Virginia Attorney General John B. McCuskey issued the following news release on April 10, 2026:
* * *
West Virginia Supreme Court rules in favor of State in Cabell County election integrity case
The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals has issued a ruling reinstating an indictment against two candidates charged with election-related offenses. In State of West Virginia ex rel. State of West Virginia v. The Honorable James Young, the Supreme Court granted the State's petition for a writ of prohibition.
In 2022, Jan Hite King and Kimberly Maynardallegedly falsely certified their residency in Cabell County's Magisterial District 1 when filing as candidates for the Cabell County Commission. A Cabell County grand jury indicted both women in April 2025 on charges of false swearing, aiding and abetting, and conspiracy. But the circuit court dismissed the indictment as untimely, finding that the general one-year misdemeanor statute of limitations applied.
The Attorney General's Office, representing both the state of West Virginia and the Secretary of State's Office, argued the five-year statute of limitations found in the Election Code applied. The Supreme Court agreed.
"This decision affirms that those who seek to defraud West Virginia's voters will be held accountable," Attorney General JB McCuskey said. "I want to applaud the Secretary of State's Office for their work in bringing these charges. I am also incredibly proud of the exceptional legal team in our office for their work ensuring that the Election Code means what it says."
The Secretary of State's Office conducted the initial investigation into King and Maynard. The charges will be reinstated.
Read the Supreme Court's order here (https://ago.wv.gov/media/37701/download?inline).
* * *
Original text here: https://ago.wv.gov/article/west-virginia-supreme-court-rules-favor-state-cabell-county-election-integrity-case
N.J. A.G. Davenport Announces Recent Landmark Victories Strengthening Protections Against Gun Violence for New Jersey Communities
TRENTON, New Jersey, April 11 -- New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport issued the following news release on April 9, 2026:
* * *
AG Davenport Announces Recent Landmark Victories Strengthening Protections Against Gun Violence for New Jersey Communities
Attorney General Jennifer Davenport today announced several landmark victories and key actions advancing her office's ongoing efforts to protect New Jersey residents from gun violence, including judgments totaling more than $500,000 against out-of-state retailers for illegally selling banned firearm accessories to New Jersey consumers
... Show Full Article
TRENTON, New Jersey, April 11 -- New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport issued the following news release on April 9, 2026:
* * *
AG Davenport Announces Recent Landmark Victories Strengthening Protections Against Gun Violence for New Jersey Communities
Attorney General Jennifer Davenport today announced several landmark victories and key actions advancing her office's ongoing efforts to protect New Jersey residents from gun violence, including judgments totaling more than $500,000 against out-of-state retailers for illegally selling banned firearm accessories to New Jersey consumersand important victories in court defending New Jersey's commonsense gun safety laws and enforcement efforts.
The actions announced today are part of New Jersey's comprehensive and innovative approach to tackling the gun violence epidemic, which has helped drive the number of shootings and gun-related murders to record lows in the state and made the Garden State one of the safest states in the country.
"Every New Jersey resident deserves to live, work, and raise a family without fear of gun violence. That is why we are using every tool we can to combat the gun violence epidemic--and why driving down gun violence will continue to be a top priority for our office," said Attorney General Davenport. "The actions we're announcing today build on the progress we have made in preventing tragedies before they happen. But our work is far from over. We owe it to our kids and our communities to do everything we can protect them from the scourge of gun violence."
Attorney General Davenport highlighted her office's latest achievements in strengthening gun protections and safeguarding communities in conjunction with an in-depth convening with representatives from Brady, the nation's oldest gun violence prevention organization. The convening will focus on shared priorities in litigation, policy implementation, legislation, and public education.
"We're excited to continue our longstanding collaboration with the New Jersey Attorney General to fight against gun violence in the Garden State and beyond," said Christian Heyne, Chief Policy and Programs Officer for Brady. "Today's announcements further demonstrate how Attorney General Davenport intends to continue this legacy of leadership in addressing our uniquely American public health crisis. While New Jersey remains at the forefront of the country with robust gun laws and, as a result, low rates of gun violence, we know all too well that more work must be done as long as gun violence persists in any form. From public education and robust implementation of existing laws to identifying policy needs and opportunities for oversight and accountability that can stem the flow of crime guns into our communities, there are many ways we can continue to combat gun violence in New Jersey and beyond. We are grateful to Attorney General Davenport and Governor Sherrill for their continued leadership as champions in this fight to free New Jersey from the scourge of gun violence."
The victories announced today include landmark judgments won by the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) and the Division of Consumer Affairs against RW Arms, Ltd., a Texas firearms part retailer, for illegally selling bump stocks to New Jersey consumers, and against Arms Unlimited, Inc., a Nevada firearms retailer, for illegally selling large capacity magazines (LCMs) to New Jersey consumers.
LCMs are ammunition magazines holding more than ten rounds that enable a shooter to fire a dangerously high number of bullets without pausing to reload. Bump stocks are devices that cause semi-automatic rifles to fire almost as quickly as machine guns. Possessing these devices in New Jersey is a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment and fines.
The judgment against RW Arms secured over $194,000, and the judgment against Arms Unlimited secured over $332,000, in monetary relief, including civil penalties. Both judgments also obtained injunctive relief that blocks future shipments of bump stocks and LCMs into New Jersey. Those judgments follow consent orders won by OAG and the Division against two other out-of-state companies--CSS Holdings LLC and Firequest International, Inc.--for illegally selling LCMs and bump stocks, respectively, into the state.
"Subjecting New Jersey consumers to possible criminal liability by failing to warn them that the products they are buying are illegal to possess here is bad enough. But doing so in connection with the sale of alarming products capable of causing grave harm like LCMs and bump stocks is especially troubling," said Jeremy E. Hollander, Acting Director of the Division of Consumer Affairs. "We will continue to take action against retailers who violate our consumer protection laws and endanger our residents by selling these banned products into our state."
In addition to these enforcement actions, OAG has also secured two critical victories in court defending New Jersey's gun safety laws and enforcement efforts: the office has successfully defended the state's law prohibiting people under the age of 21 from possessing a handgun except in defined circumstances, and it has successfully defended New Jersey's ban on sharing digital gun design files that allow anyone with a 3D printer to produce untraceable "ghost guns"--plastic pistols that have no serial number and cannot be traced by law enforcement.
Actions taken by OAG and the Division in recent months include:
* Obtaining a judgment against RW Arms, Ltd. The March 2026 Superior Court order granting final judgment resolves the State's first consumer protection lawsuit tied to the sale of bump stocks. The judgment provides $194,528 in monetary relief, including $170,000 in civil penalties. The State's lawsuit alleged RW Arms violated New Jersey's CFA and Hazardous Products Regulations in selling and shipping bump stocks to an undercover investigator in New Jersey. In addition to imposing a monetary judgment, the Court ordered RW Arms to block future shipments of LCMs to New Jersey and to clearly and conspicuously disclose on its website that it is a third-degree crime punishable by a fine not to exceed $15,000 and by a term of imprisonment between three and five years to knowingly possess a bump stock in New Jersey.
* Obtaining a judgment against Arms Unlimited, Inc. The March 2026 Superior Court order granting relief after summary judgment resolves the State's lawsuit alleging Arms Unlimited violated New Jersey's CFA and Hazardous Products Regulations in selling at least 30 LCMs into New Jersey over a three-year period, including 17 sold and shipped to an undercover investigator. The judgment includes $332,800 in monetary relief, including $275,500 in civil penalties. In addition to imposing a monetary penalty, the Court permanently enjoined Arms Unlimited from continuing to violate the law, including by advertising or selling LCMs in New Jersey without clearly and conspicuously disclosing on its website that LCMs are illegal to possess in New Jersey.
* Securing a legal victory in New Jersey's efforts to defend its commonsense gun laws. In a March 2026 published decision in State v. Glover, a three-judge panel of the New Jersey Appellate Division unanimously held that New Jersey's statute prohibiting people under the age of twenty-one from possessing a handgun except in defined circumstances is constitutional because it is consistent with our Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation. OAG successfully defended the constitutionality of the law.
* Securing a legal victory in an ongoing legal challenge to New Jersey's efforts to keep untraceable "ghost guns" out of the state. In a February 2026 ruling, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit unanimously upheld New Jersey's ban on sharing digital gun design files that allow anyone with a 3D printer to produce a plastic pistol that has no serial number and cannot be traced by law enforcement. The court affirmed the dismissal of Defense Distributed's lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the ban.
* Obtaining a favorable resolution with CSS Holdings LLC (d/b/a Carolina Shooters). The settlement resolves allegations that Carolina Shooters, a North Carolina firearms accessories seller, violated New Jersey's CFA and Hazardous Products Regulations in its online advertisement and sales of LCMs to New Jersey consumers, including three to an undercover New Jersey address. In a Consent Order filed with the Division, Carolina Shooters agreed to pay a $25,000 civil penalty and make changes to its business practice, including preventing the ordering and shipping of LCMs to any New Jersey address and clearly and conspicuously disclosing on the LCM product pages of its website that "New Jersey law prohibits large capacity ammunition magazines with a capacity of more than ten rounds of ammunition - and any person who knowingly possesses an LCM is guilty of a crime of the fourth degree, punishable by fines an imprisonment."
* Obtaining a favorable resolution with Firequest International Inc. The Division alleged that Firequest, an Arkansas-based tactical equipment and ammunition seller, violated New Jersey's CFA and Hazardous Products Regulations through its online advertisement and sales of bump stocks to New Jersey consumers, including to an undercover New Jersey address. In a Consent Order, Firequest agreed to pay a $10,000 civil penalty and make changes to its business practices, including preventing the ordering and shipping of its bump stocks to any New Jersey address. Firequest also agreed to clearly and conspicuously disclose on the bump stock product pages of its website, either directly or through a link to a web page containing such information, that "New Jersey law prohibits the knowing possession of a bump stock, regardless of whether the person also has a firearm. Such possession is a crime of the third degree, punishable by fines and imprisonment."
The State was represented by Deputy Attorney General Sara J. Koste in the RW Arms, Arms Unlimited, and Firequest matters; and Deputy Attorney General Claire Corea in the CSS Holdings matter, all under the supervision of Section Chief Jesse J. Sierant and Assistant Section Chief Monisha A. Kumar of the Consumer Fraud Prosecution Section, within the Affirmative Civil Enforcement Practice Group of the Division of Law. The investigations were conducted by Investigators Aziza Salikhova and Angela Medina of the Office of Consumer Protection within the Division of Consumer Affairs.
The State was represented by Assistant Attorney General Timothy Sheehan in the Defense Distributed matter. The State was represented by Deputy Solicitor General Stephen Ehrlich and Deputy Attorney General Marie V. Cepeda Mekosh in State v. Glover.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.njoag.gov/ag-davenport-announces-recent-landmark-victories-strengthening-protections-against-gun-violence-for-new-jersey-communities/
Md. A.G. Brown: Former Anne Arundel County Police Officer Pleads Guilty to Felony Charge for Leaving the Scene of an Accident Resulting in Death
BALTIMORE, Maryland, April 11 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on April 9, 2026:
* * *
Former Anne Arundel County Police Officer Pleads Guilty to Felony Charge for Leaving the Scene of an Accident Resulting in Death
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown announced today that Alexander Rodriguez, a former officer with the Anne Arundel County Police Department (AACOPD), pleaded guilty to one felony count of leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death and failing to remain at the scene. Rodriguez entered his guilty plea in the Circuit Court for
... Show Full Article
BALTIMORE, Maryland, April 11 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on April 9, 2026:
* * *
Former Anne Arundel County Police Officer Pleads Guilty to Felony Charge for Leaving the Scene of an Accident Resulting in Death
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown announced today that Alexander Rodriguez, a former officer with the Anne Arundel County Police Department (AACOPD), pleaded guilty to one felony count of leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death and failing to remain at the scene. Rodriguez entered his guilty plea in the Circuit Court forHoward County before the Honorable Maurice Frazier today, Thursday, April 9, 2026.
Per the plea agreement, Rodriguez pleaded guilty in exchange for a sentence of 5 years' incarceration, with all but 120 days suspended, and 2 years of supervised probation to include 100 hours of community service and an agreement not to seek a career in law enforcement.
"No one who endangers lives and then abandons a crash that resulted in a man's death on the side of the road should be allowed to wear a police uniform. By accepting this plea agreement, Rodriguez will never again serve as a law enforcement officer in Maryland," said Attorney General Brown. "We cannot keep our communities safe if we do not hold people accountable when they break the law. The outcome that our Office secured makes clear that no one is above the law, regardless of their career."
* * *
Case background:
On August 10, 2024, at approximately 4:00 a.m., Rodriguez, an AACOPD officer at the time, was on patrol and driving his marked patrol cruiser. Officer Rodriguez followed a motorcycle, driven by Joshua Vanderziel, into a gas station in Anne Arundel County. Officer Rodriguez attempted to use his cruiser to block the motorcycle at the gas pump. Mr. Vanderziel drove around Officer Rodriguez's police cruiser and exited the gas station. Officer Rodriguez initiated an unauthorized pursuit, ultimately chasing Mr. Vanderziel through three jurisdictions: Anne Arundel County, Prince George's County, and, finally, Howard County. The unauthorized pursuit by Officer Rodriguez lasted for approximately 4.3 miles, with both vehicles reaching speeds in excess of 90 miles per hour. Officer Rodriguez did not activate his emergency lights or sirens on his patrol vehicle, did not activate his body-worn camera, and did not notify dispatch or his supervisor in Anne Arundel County to get permission for the pursuit. Officer Rodriguez did not notify law enforcement that he had entered Laurel or Howard County during the pursuit.
After Officer Rodriguez pursued Mr. Vanderziel into Howard County, Mr. Vanderziel crashed into a commercial flatbed truck that was turning left on Washington Boulevard. Mr. Vanderziel was thrown from his motorcycle and into the street. Following this crash, Officer Rodriguez slammed on his brakes, made a U-turn on Washington Boulevard, and returned to Anne Arundel County, heading in the opposite direction of the crash. Contrary to his training and duties with AACOPD, Officer Rodriguez did not stop at the scene, did not exit his patrol cruiser at the crash site, did not provide aid, and did not return to secure the crash scene. Howard County Emergency arrived on scene and pronounced Mr. Vanderziel deceased. Officer Rodriguez returned to his patrol duties without notifying supervisors of the accident.
Alexander Rodriguez will be sentenced on April 20, 2026, in the Circuit Court for Howard County.
In making today's announcement, Attorney General Brown thanked the Independent Investigations Division, Howard County Police Department, Maryland State Police, Anne Arundel County Police Department, and Laurel Police Department for their assistance and cooperation with the investigation of this matter.
* * *
Original text here: https://oag.maryland.gov/News/pages/Former-Anne-Arundel-County-Police-Officer-Pleads-Guilty-to-Felony-Charge-for-Leaving-the-Scene-of-an-Accident-Resulting-in-.aspx
Md. A.G. Brown Announces That No Charges Will Be Filed in the February 11, 2026 Fatal Police-Involved Shooting in Charles County
BALTIMORE, Maryland, April 11 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on April 9, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Brown Announces that No Charges Will Be Filed in the February 11, 2026 Fatal Police-Involved Shooting in Charles County
Today, Attorney General Anthony G. Brown announced his decision not to seek charges in the Wednesday, February 11, 2026 fatal police-involved shooting that occurred in White Plains, Charles County, Maryland.
On February 11, 2026, at approximately 2:30 p.m., Charles County Sheriff's Office (CCSO) Sergeant Andrew Coulby and CCSO
... Show Full Article
BALTIMORE, Maryland, April 11 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on April 9, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Brown Announces that No Charges Will Be Filed in the February 11, 2026 Fatal Police-Involved Shooting in Charles County
Today, Attorney General Anthony G. Brown announced his decision not to seek charges in the Wednesday, February 11, 2026 fatal police-involved shooting that occurred in White Plains, Charles County, Maryland.
On February 11, 2026, at approximately 2:30 p.m., Charles County Sheriff's Office (CCSO) Sergeant Andrew Coulby and CCSOPolice Officer First Class (PFC) Brennan Kunz, both assigned to the Domestic Violence Unit, responded to White Plains, Maryland, to locate Demarcus Lamar Irish, who was the subject of an active arrest warrant and an unserved protective order. Officers located Irish in the vicinity of the address of the person who had sought the protective order. The officers issued verbal commands, but Irish refused to comply. Instead, he produced a machete and raised it in the air. When Irish advanced toward the officers - within only feet from one of the officers - with the machete in a striking position, both officers discharged their firearms, firing multiple rounds, striking Irish. Officers removed a tactical vest worn by Irish and immediately rendered medical aid until emergency medical services (EMS) arrived. Irish was pronounced dead at the scene. No officers were injured during the incident.
The Attorney General's Independent Investigations Division (IID) began investigating the fatal police-involved shooting on Wednesday, February 11, 2026, and concluded its investigation on Friday, March 27, 2026. After completing its investigation and evaluating all the available evidence, the Office of the Attorney General has determined that the subject officers did not commit a crime under Maryland law. Accordingly, the Attorney General has declined to prosecute the subject officers in this case.
A copy of the IID's detailed investigative findings and analysis of relevant legal issues can be found in its declination report (https://oag.maryland.gov/News/pages/Attorney-General-Brown-Announces-that-No-Charges-Will-Be-Filed-in-the-February-11,-2026-Fatal-Police-Involved-Shooting-in-C.aspx).
* * *
Original text here: https://oag.maryland.gov/News/pages/Attorney-General-Brown-Announces-that-No-Charges-Will-Be-Filed-in-the-February-11,-2026-Fatal-Police-Involved-Shooting-in-C.aspx
Md. A.G. Brown Announces Settlement in Principle With Owners and Operators of the M/V Dali in Francis Scott Key Bridge Collapse Case
BALTIMORE, Maryland, April 11 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on April 9, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Brown Announces Settlement in Principle with Owners and Operators of the M/V Dali in Francis Scott Key Bridge Collapse Case
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown today announced that the State of Maryland has reached a settlement in principle with Grace Ocean Private Limited and Synergy Marine Pte Ltd., the owner and operator of the M/V Dali, resolving a portion of the State's claims arising from the cargo ship's March 26, 2024 allision with the Francis
... Show Full Article
BALTIMORE, Maryland, April 11 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on April 9, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Brown Announces Settlement in Principle with Owners and Operators of the M/V Dali in Francis Scott Key Bridge Collapse Case
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown today announced that the State of Maryland has reached a settlement in principle with Grace Ocean Private Limited and Synergy Marine Pte Ltd., the owner and operator of the M/V Dali, resolving a portion of the State's claims arising from the cargo ship's March 26, 2024 allision with the FrancisScott Key Bridge.
The settlement resolves claims brought against the vessel interest by the Office of the Attorney General's Civil Litigation Division on behalf of the State and its agencies, including the Maryland Transportation Authority (MDTA), the Maryland Port Administration (MPA), and the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), in coordination with a team of outside counsel with expertise in maritime law and complex litigation. This settlement does not resolve any claims the State may have against the shipbuilder, Hyundai.
"For two years, Maryland workers, families, and communities have carried the weight of a disaster that should never have happened. The Dali's crash into the Key Bridge disrupted the Port of Baltimore, devastated livelihoods, and sent economic shockwaves across our State that are still being felt today," said Attorney General Brown. "Our work is not finished, but this settlement is an important step toward making Maryland whole."
The settlement is being finalized. The Office of the Attorney General will have no further comment on the matter at this time.
* * *
Background
Two years ago, the M/V Dali's allision with the Francis Scott Key Bridge set off an unprecedented catastrophe for the State of Maryland. Six construction workers lost their lives. Thousands more felt the economic and human consequences in the months and years that followed. The collapse of one of the region's most vital infrastructure arteries brought shipping at the Port of Baltimore to a complete halt, disrupted the livelihoods of thousands of workers, rerouted traffic through communities already bearing disproportionate burdens, and triggered economic ripple effects still being felt across the state.
The State's claims, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in September 2024, alleged that the disaster was the result of negligence, mismanagement, and the reckless operation of a vessel that was not seaworthy and should never have left port. The State sought damages on behalf of its agencies for the destruction of the bridge, harm to the Patapsco River and surrounding environment, lost revenues, and the wide-ranging economic losses sustained by Maryland and its residents.
* * *
Original text here: https://oag.maryland.gov/News/pages/Attorney-General-Brown-Announces-Settlement-in-Principle-with-Owners-and-Operators-of-the-MV-Dali-in-Francis-Scott-Key-Bri.aspx
HAWAII A.G. LOPEZ PROVIDES BIWEEKLY UPDATE ON PUBLIC CORRUPTION INVESTIGATION
HONOLULU, Hawaii, April 11 -- Hawaii Attorney General Anne E. Lopez issued the following news release on April 10, 2026:
* * *
ATTORNEY GENERAL LOPEZ PROVIDES BIWEEKLY UPDATE ON PUBLIC CORRUPTION INVESTIGATION
The Department of the Attorney General today issued its regular biweekly update regarding the ongoing criminal investigation into the previously federally disclosed transfer of approximately $35,000 in funds.
The Department's Special Investigation and Prosecution Division (SIPD) has advanced its investigation by reviewing thousands of pages of subpoenaed materials and conducting 18 interviews
... Show Full Article
HONOLULU, Hawaii, April 11 -- Hawaii Attorney General Anne E. Lopez issued the following news release on April 10, 2026:
* * *
ATTORNEY GENERAL LOPEZ PROVIDES BIWEEKLY UPDATE ON PUBLIC CORRUPTION INVESTIGATION
The Department of the Attorney General today issued its regular biweekly update regarding the ongoing criminal investigation into the previously federally disclosed transfer of approximately $35,000 in funds.
The Department's Special Investigation and Prosecution Division (SIPD) has advanced its investigation by reviewing thousands of pages of subpoenaed materials and conducting 18 interviewsthat have helped refine the timeline of events surrounding the transaction and is bringing investigators closer to resolving key questions.
"I understand that people want answers and we want the same," said Attorney General Anne Lopez. "Following the rule of law is paramount to ensure that individual constitutional rights are protected. Releasing information for any purpose other than to further the investigation would violate my oath of office and my promise to the people of Hawaii.
Lopez added: "I appreciate the responsible reporting from the news media. More than anyone, journalists understand the importance of being absolutely certain of the facts before releasing information."
The criminal investigation remains active. As such, the department cannot identify any individuals or discuss specific evidence. These standard investigative practices are necessary to maintain integrity of the investigation and uphold due process rights.
In line with its commitment to transparency, the department will continue providing biweekly public updates while safeguarding the integrity of the investigation. The next scheduled public update will be provided on Friday, April 24, 2026.
* * *
Original text here: https://ag.hawaii.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/News-Release-2026-15.pdf
Alaska Law Dept.: Office of Special Prosecutions Completes Review of Fairbanks Officer-Involved Shooting
JUNEAU, Alaska, April 11 -- The Alaska Department of Law Office of Special Prosecutions issued the following news release on April 10, 2026:
* * *
Office of Special Prosecutions Completes Review of Fairbanks Officer-Involved Shooting
(Anchorage, AK) - The Office of Special Prosecutions has completed its review of an officer-involved shooting from Jan. 1, 2026, involving Alaska State Troopers John Faul and Wyatt Miller in Fairbanks.
The State will not file criminal charges against Trooper John Faul or Trooper Wyatt Miller relating to their use of deadly force against William Rexford from Jan.
... Show Full Article
JUNEAU, Alaska, April 11 -- The Alaska Department of Law Office of Special Prosecutions issued the following news release on April 10, 2026:
* * *
Office of Special Prosecutions Completes Review of Fairbanks Officer-Involved Shooting
(Anchorage, AK) - The Office of Special Prosecutions has completed its review of an officer-involved shooting from Jan. 1, 2026, involving Alaska State Troopers John Faul and Wyatt Miller in Fairbanks.
The State will not file criminal charges against Trooper John Faul or Trooper Wyatt Miller relating to their use of deadly force against William Rexford from Jan.1, 2026 in Fairbanks, Alaska. The review determined that Troopers Faul and Miller were legally justified in using deadly force under the circumstances.
The Troopers responded to a residence following reports of a domestic disturbance and were attempting to take Rexford into protective custody when he suddenly armed himself with two large kitchen knives and advanced rapidly toward Trooper Faul. In response, both Trooper Faul and Trooper Miller fired their weapons at Rexford. Rexford was killed during the encounter. A second individual was also injured; the review determined that this injury occurred inadvertently during the Troopers' lawful use of force in self-defense.
* * *
Original text here: https://law.alaska.gov/press/releases/2026/041026-OSP.html
