Attorney General
Here's a look at documents from state attorneys general
Featured Stories
Okla. A.G. Drummond Sues OneMain Financial for Alleged Bait and Switch Lending Scheme
OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma, March 19 -- Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond issued the following news release on March 18, 2026:
* * *
Drummond sues OneMain Financial for alleged bait and switch lending scheme
Attorney General Genter Drummond and 12 other state attorneys general have announced a lawsuit against OneMain Financial, Inc. and related entities alleging that the installment lender charged consumers nationwide hundreds of millions of dollars in hidden fees and interest.
With 19 branches operating in Oklahoma, OneMain Financial advertises high-cost installment loans with "clear,
... Show Full Article
OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma, March 19 -- Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond issued the following news release on March 18, 2026:
* * *
Drummond sues OneMain Financial for alleged bait and switch lending scheme
Attorney General Genter Drummond and 12 other state attorneys general have announced a lawsuit against OneMain Financial, Inc. and related entities alleging that the installment lender charged consumers nationwide hundreds of millions of dollars in hidden fees and interest.
With 19 branches operating in Oklahoma, OneMain Financial advertises high-cost installment loans with "clear,upfront terms," but it packs those loans with hidden insurance policies and other add-on products that inflate the cost of the loans by hundreds or thousands of dollars. OneMain rushes consumers through fine-print loan documents containing dense terms and conditions for the add-ons. OneMain often hides the add-ons, sometimes misrepresents them, or even charges consumers who outright reject them.
"Oklahomans deserve honesty and transparency when they walk into a lender's office," Drummond said. "Lenders should not be hiding costly products in the fine print or rushing borrowers through contracts. My office will continue to hold companies accountable when they attempt to take advantage of hardworking consumers."
The lawsuit alleges the following about OneMain's bait and switch scheme:
* OneMain does not advertise that it sells add-on products, so consumers who come through its doors have no reason to expect the company to push these products.
* OneMain has written policies that purport to prevent unlawful add-on packing, but the company's actual processes operate nothing like its written policies.
* OneMain puts financial pressure on its employees to pack add-ons.
* OneMain rushes consumers through a loan closing process in which its employees often control the computer screen that shows the loan documents. This does not allow the consumer time to review each page of the loan application as the employee scrolls through the contract.
* OneMain buries the fine print that mentions the add-on products inside 50 pages of legalese, which OneMain prevents consumers from reading before accepting the loan contract.
* OneMain often closes loans on smartphones, where already small print shrinks to an illegible size.
* OneMain also misleads consumers when encouraging them to refinance their loans by tacking on add-on products and by hiding key terms.
With this lawsuit, Drummond and the coalition are seeking restitution for consumers who were unlawfully charged for these add-on products, penalties for violating state laws, and to release all unlawful profits. The lawsuit also seeks a court order preventing OneMain from continuing its illegal practices and requiring OneMain to withdraw any negative information reported to credit agencies that may impact its customers' credit scores and to abandon any legal proceedings against customers related to the add-on loan products.
Joining Drummond in this lawsuit are the attorneys general from Colorado, Maryland, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin.
Any consumers who believe that they or someone they know may be a victim of the business practices of OneMain Financial should file a complaint with Office of the Oklahoma Attorney General Consumer Protection Unit at 1-833-681-1895.
Read the lawsuit (https://oklahoma.gov/content/dam/ok/en/oag/news-documents/2026/march/OneMain%20filed%20complaint.pdf).
* * *
Original text here: https://oklahoma.gov/oag/news/newsroom/2026/march/drummond-sues-onemain-financial-for-alleged-bait-and-switch-lend.html
Md. A.G. Brown Calls on EPA to Resume Enforcement Activity
BALTIMORE, Maryland, March 19 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on March 18, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Brown Calls on EPA to Resume Enforcement Activity
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown today joined a coalition of 13 other attorneys general in calling on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to rescind a new policy that would significantly weaken federal environmental enforcement and delay action against polluters. In a letter (https://oag.maryland.gov/News/pages/Attorney-General-Brown-Calls-on-EPA-to-Resume-Enforcement-Activity--.aspx)
... Show Full Article
BALTIMORE, Maryland, March 19 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on March 18, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Brown Calls on EPA to Resume Enforcement Activity
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown today joined a coalition of 13 other attorneys general in calling on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to rescind a new policy that would significantly weaken federal environmental enforcement and delay action against polluters. In a letter (https://oag.maryland.gov/News/pages/Attorney-General-Brown-Calls-on-EPA-to-Resume-Enforcement-Activity--.aspx)to EPA Commissioner Lee Zeldin, the coalition warns that EPA's December 2025 "Compliance First" memorandum would slow enforcement of environmental laws, create bureaucratic barriers to holding polluters accountable, and increase pollution that harms communities across the country. The attorneys general also counter EPA's recent Enforcement and Compliance Annual Results Report, which they contend distorts the agency's abysmal enforcement record by both taking credit for the prior administration's accomplishments and cherry-picking favorable statistics while omitting others.
In the letter, Attorney General Brown and the coalition raise serious concerns about the EPA's December 2025 memorandum titled "Reinforcing a 'Compliance First' Orientation for Compliance Assurance and Civil Enforcement Activities." The attorneys general warn that, despite its stated goal of encouraging compliance, the policy would, in practice, delay enforcement and allow polluters to stall investigations by raising legal challenges that must be elevated through multiple layers of political review. The policy memo discourages the use of key enforcement tools - including penalties, injunctive relief, and supplemental environmental projects - that are often used to stop pollution and address harm to communities. The attorneys general argue that weakening these tools would make it harder to quickly bring polluters into compliance and address environmental damage.
Attorney General Brown and the coalition emphasize that robust federal enforcement is essential because pollution often crosses state lines. Even states with strong environmental protections rely on consistent federal enforcement to prevent upstream pollution and ensure a level playing field for companies that follow the law. The attorneys general also warn that delays in enforcement would disproportionately harm communities already overburdened by pollution, including communities of color, low-income communities, and rural areas. Increased emissions and discharges caused by delayed enforcement could worsen public health outcomes and environmental conditions in those communities. The attorneys general are urging the EPA to immediately rescind the memorandum and restore long-standing enforcement practices that prioritize compliance while maintaining strong accountability for polluters.
Joining Attorney General Brown in sending this letter are the attorneys general of New York, Massachusetts, Washington, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Minnesota, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
* * *
Original text here: https://oag.maryland.gov/News/pages/Attorney-General-Brown-Calls-on-EPA-to-Resume-Enforcement-Activity--.aspx
Md. A.G. Brown Calls on Congress to Pass Legislation Requiring Tariff Refunds
BALTIMORE, Maryland, March 19 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on March 18, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Brown Calls on Congress to Pass Legislation Requiring Tariff Refunds
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown today joined a coalition of 11 other attorneys general in urging Congress to pass legislation that would require the government to provide swift refunds for extra costs paid by businesses and consumers due to President Trump's unlawful tariffs.
On February 20, the Supreme Court struck down tariffs the Trump administration imposed under the
... Show Full Article
BALTIMORE, Maryland, March 19 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on March 18, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Brown Calls on Congress to Pass Legislation Requiring Tariff Refunds
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown today joined a coalition of 11 other attorneys general in urging Congress to pass legislation that would require the government to provide swift refunds for extra costs paid by businesses and consumers due to President Trump's unlawful tariffs.
On February 20, the Supreme Court struck down tariffs the Trump administration imposed under theInternational Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Businesses and individuals nationwide have been charged approximately $166 billion in unlawful IEEPA tariffs, which resulted in higher prices that disproportionately strained low-income consumers' finances. Attorney General Brown and the coalition are calling on Congress to pass new legislation that would require the Trump administration to reimburse importers for these unlawful tariff charges with interest and direct businesses that passed along direct tariff costs to consumers to reimburse their customers who ultimately bore the financial burden.
In April 2025, President Trump imposed sweeping tariffs on countries across the globe by claiming he had the authority to do so under IEEPA. On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court struck down the IEEPA tariffs. While the Supreme Court did not make a decision regarding tariff reimbursements, the Administration had repeatedly committed in court filings that they would need to refund tariff costs with interest if the IEEPA tariffs were ruled unlawful.
In a letter to House and Senate leadership, Attorney General Brown and the coalition are urging Congress to pass legislation requiring the Administration to issue automatic tariff refunds as soon as possible. While the Administration has indicated that importers would need to apply or sue for refunds, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has a database of every unlawful IEEPA tariff paid by American direct importers. The CBP has stated that refunds will only be available via a new direct deposit platform for which only six percent of importers are currently registered. The Administration has also suggested that importers may need to navigate multiple refund processes depending on their shipment's status. A refund process controlled by the Administration would likely face delays and disadvantage small businesses and individuals that do not have the resources to navigate a complicated application process or sue for refunds. Attorney General Brown and the coalition are pushing for new legislation that could create an equitable, uniform, and fast process for all affected importers to be reimbursed for their tariff costs.
In addition, Attorney General Brown and the coalition urge Congress to hold accountable the businesses that directly passed on tariff costs to consumers and other businesses. Importers that raised prices due to tariff costs should pass the benefit of the refunds they receive to those who ultimately bore the financial burden of the Administration's illegal tariffs. Congress should also consider other ways to address the economic burden that the most financially vulnerable had to bear because of the Administration's unlawful policy. As the attorneys general explain, prices of cheaper products rose faster than prices of more expensive goods as a result of the tariffs, disproportionately impacting low-income consumers.
In sending this letter, Attorney General Brown joined the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Vermont, and Virginia.
* * *
Original text here: https://oag.maryland.gov/News/pages/Attorney-General-Brown-Calls-on-Congress-to-Pass-Legislation-Requiring-Tariff-Refunds--.aspx
Md. A.G. Brown Announces That No Charges Will Be Filed in the November 2, 2025 Fatal Police-Involved Shooting in Salisbury
BALTIMORE, Maryland, March 19 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on March 18, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Brown Announces That No Charges Will Be Filed in the November 2, 2025 Fatal Police-Involved Shooting in Salisbury
Today, Attorney General Anthony G. Brown announced his decision not to seek charges in the Sunday, November 2, 2025 fatal police-involved shooting that occurred in Salisbury, Wicomico County, Maryland.
On November 2, 2025, at approximately 7:00 p.m., officers with the Salisbury Police Department (SPD) were attempting to locate David
... Show Full Article
BALTIMORE, Maryland, March 19 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on March 18, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Brown Announces That No Charges Will Be Filed in the November 2, 2025 Fatal Police-Involved Shooting in Salisbury
Today, Attorney General Anthony G. Brown announced his decision not to seek charges in the Sunday, November 2, 2025 fatal police-involved shooting that occurred in Salisbury, Wicomico County, Maryland.
On November 2, 2025, at approximately 7:00 p.m., officers with the Salisbury Police Department (SPD) were attempting to locate DavidEvans, a suspect in a homicide that occurred earlier that day. Officers located Evans in the driveway of a residence in the 700 block of Jefferson Street. Evans walked over to the front of a pickup truck parked in the driveway and placed a handgun on the hood of the truck. At that time, an uninvolved individual was seated in the driver's seat of the truck. Officers took action to remove the individual from the truck before any further escalation with Evans occurred. Officers issued repeated commands for Evans to keep his hands raised and to move away from the truck. Evans did not comply. Instead, Evans grabbed the handgun. In response, multiple SPD officers discharged their department-issued handguns, striking Evans. Officers rendered medical aid until emergency medical services (EMS) arrived. EMS transported Evans to a local hospital, where he was pronounced deceased. No officers were injured during the incident. A handgun was recovered at the scene near Evans.
The Attorney General's Independent Investigations Division (IID) began investigating the fatal police-involved shooting on Sunday, November 2, 2025, and concluded its investigation on March 11, 2026. After completing its investigation and evaluating all the available evidence, the Office of the Attorney General has determined that the subject officers did not commit a crime under Maryland law. Accordingly, the Attorney General has declined to prosecute the subject officers in this case.
A copy of the IID's detailed investigative findings and analysis of relevant legal issues can be found in its declination report (https://oag.maryland.gov/News/pages/Attorney-General-Brown-Announces-That-No-Charges-Will-Be-Filed-in-the-November-2,-2025-Fatal-Police-Involved-Shooting-in-Sa.aspx).
* * *
Original text here: https://oag.maryland.gov/News/pages/Attorney-General-Brown-Announces-That-No-Charges-Will-Be-Filed-in-the-November-2,-2025-Fatal-Police-Involved-Shooting-in-Sa.aspx
HAWAII COUNTY POLICE OFFICER ENTERS PLEA IN EVIDENCE TAMPERING CASE
HONOLULU, Hawaii, March 19 -- The Hawaii Department of the Attorney General issued the following news release on March 18, 2026:
* * *
HAWAII COUNTY POLICE OFFICER ENTERS PLEA IN EVIDENCE TAMPERING CASE
HILO, Hawaii - On March 17, 2026, Hawaii Police Department Officer Noah Serrao pleaded no contest to the criminal charges of Perjury, False Swearing in Official Matters and Tampering with a Government Record. Serrao asked the presiding court to defer acceptance of his no contest pleas. The charges stemmed from an unconstitutional search of an arrestee's belongings inside the Hilo Police Station.
... Show Full Article
HONOLULU, Hawaii, March 19 -- The Hawaii Department of the Attorney General issued the following news release on March 18, 2026:
* * *
HAWAII COUNTY POLICE OFFICER ENTERS PLEA IN EVIDENCE TAMPERING CASE
HILO, Hawaii - On March 17, 2026, Hawaii Police Department Officer Noah Serrao pleaded no contest to the criminal charges of Perjury, False Swearing in Official Matters and Tampering with a Government Record. Serrao asked the presiding court to defer acceptance of his no contest pleas. The charges stemmed from an unconstitutional search of an arrestee's belongings inside the Hilo Police Station.Serrao later made false statements about the unconstitutional search to a presiding judge in an Application for Judicial Determination of Probable Cause for Warrantless Arrest and for the Extended Restraint of Liberty of Warrantless Arrestee.
The investigation was conducted by the Department of the Attorney General's Special Investigation and Prosecution Division (SIPD) and the Hawaii County Police Department.
"The people of Hawaii rely on the integrity of our justice system at every stage. The rule of law depends on honesty, accountability and respect for constitutional rights," said Attorney General Anne Lopez. "Our office is committed to ensuring that all individuals, regardless of position, are held to these standards. We extend our appreciation to the Hawaii Police Department for its proactive cooperation and close coordination with our office throughout this investigation." "The Hawaii Police Department holds its officers to the highest standards of integrity and truthfulness," said Hawaii Police Department Chief Reed Mahuna. "When those standards are violated, we fully support a fair and independent process to ensure accountability. We appreciate the thorough work of the Department of the Attorney General and remain committed to maintaining the trust of our community." The case, State v. Noah Serrao et al., 3CPC-26-0000022, is being prosecuted by SIPD Deputy Attorney General Benjamin Rose. Perjury is a class C felony punishable by up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine. False Swearing in Official Matters and Tampering with a Government Record are misdemeanor offenses punishable by up to one year in jail and a $2,000 fine.
Sentencing is scheduled for June 30, 2026, at 9:00 a.m.
* * *
Original text here: https://ag.hawaii.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/News-Release-2026-13.pdf
Ga. A.G. Carr Fights for Parental Rights in School
ATLANTA, Georgia, March 19 -- Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr issued the following news release on March 18, 2026:
* * *
Carr Fights for Parental Rights in School
Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr has filed an amicus brief to defend the constitutional rights of a mother whose public school deliberately hid efforts to "socially transition" her child.
"This is not about just one parent - it's about all parents and protecting their rights to direct their child's care," said Carr. "For any school official to secretly 'transition' a student is not just unconstitutional - it's unconscionable.
... Show Full Article
ATLANTA, Georgia, March 19 -- Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr issued the following news release on March 18, 2026:
* * *
Carr Fights for Parental Rights in School
Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr has filed an amicus brief to defend the constitutional rights of a mother whose public school deliberately hid efforts to "socially transition" her child.
"This is not about just one parent - it's about all parents and protecting their rights to direct their child's care," said Carr. "For any school official to secretly 'transition' a student is not just unconstitutional - it's unconscionable.The classroom must be preserved for education, not indoctrination."
In 2021, Aurora Regino's daughter, A.S., was a fifth-grade student at Sierra View Elementary School in Chico, California, when she began to experience anxiety and depression. School officials allowed and encouraged her to "socially transition" to a boy without Regino's permission or consent. The school's counselor even advised A.S. not to tell her mother and suggested confiding in another family member instead. As the school year went on, A.S.'s feelings about being a boy lessened, amplifying her stress and anxiety since, by that time, her school community viewed her as a boy.
Regino filed a lawsuit against the school district, claiming her constitutional rights were violated under the district's flawed policy to not inform parents of such decisions unless given express permission by the student. Carr and other attorneys general previously filed a brief in support of Regino's case - asking the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse a district court's dismissal. The Ninth Circuit agreed and remanded the case back to the district court. After reviewing the case again, the district court ruled once more in favor of the school - leading to this latest filing by the attorneys general.
As stated in the brief, "Schools across the nation have adopted similar policies, shutting parents out of the decision-making process whenever a student declines to authorize disclosure. Though the policies vary in content, all impair parents' fundamental right to be involved in important decisions regarding their children's mental health and well-being. Here, the district court failed to recognize that this right is deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition and is therefore protected by the Due Process Clause. This Court should correct this error and reverse."
Along with Carr, the attorneys general of the following states also joined in filing this brief: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia.
Find a copy of the brief here (https://law.georgia.gov/document/document/031326-amicus-brief-support-plaintiff-appellantpdf--UNPUBLISHED-document--DO-NOT-SHARE-this-URL--/download).
* * *
Original text here: https://law.georgia.gov/press-releases/2026-03-18/carr-fights-parental-rights-school
Ariz. A.G. Mayes Highlights Major Multi-Agency Drug Bust
PHOENIX, Arizona, March 19 -- Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes issued the following news release on March 18, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Mayes Highlights Major Multi-Agency Drug Bust
Attorney General Kris Mayes this week joined DEA Special Agent in Charge Apolonio Ruiz, Maricopa County Sheriff Jerry Sheridan, and HIDTA Director Dawn Mertz to announce the results of a major multi-agency drug operation targeting criminal organizations operating in Arizona communities.
The operation yielded significant seizures, including nearly 1,750 pounds of methamphetamine, more than 113 pounds of cocaine,
... Show Full Article
PHOENIX, Arizona, March 19 -- Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes issued the following news release on March 18, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Mayes Highlights Major Multi-Agency Drug Bust
Attorney General Kris Mayes this week joined DEA Special Agent in Charge Apolonio Ruiz, Maricopa County Sheriff Jerry Sheridan, and HIDTA Director Dawn Mertz to announce the results of a major multi-agency drug operation targeting criminal organizations operating in Arizona communities.
The operation yielded significant seizures, including nearly 1,750 pounds of methamphetamine, more than 113 pounds of cocaine,over 11 pounds of fentanyl in pills and powder form, heroin, marijuana, and spice. Law enforcement also confiscated nearly two dozen firearms, more than two dozen vehicles, over $612,000 in cash, and $300,000 in cryptocurrency.
* * *
"Every gram of narcotics we take off the street is a potential overdose that doesn't happen, an addiction that doesn't take root, a kid who gets to keep their parent," said Attorney General Mayes. "The results of this operation represent agencies that stayed focused on a common goal: taking dangerous drugs off Arizona streets, keeping families safe, and holding the people responsible accountable."
* * *
The operation was a joint effort between the Arizona Attorney General's Office, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area program, the Surprise Police Department, the Casa Grande Police Department, the Buckeye Police Department, the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, Homeland Security Investigations, and the Phoenix Police Department. Officials credited the breadth of the seizures to close coordination between agencies, each of which contributed distinct resources and expertise.
"My office remains committed to working with our partners to disrupt the flow of illicit drugs into Arizona communities and dismantle the organized criminal networks responsible for trafficking them," said Attorney General Mayes.
The Arizona Attorney General's Office will prosecute the cases related to these seizures.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.azag.gov/press-release/attorney-general-mayes-highlights-major-multi-agency-drug-bust
