Attorney General
Here's a look at documents from state attorneys general
Featured Stories
Va. A.G. Jones Joins Multistate Effort to Oppose Postal Service Rule Undermining Federal Gun Law
RICHMOND, Virginia, May 6 -- Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones issued the following news release on May 5, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Jones Joins Multistate Effort to Oppose Postal Service Rule Undermining Federal Gun Law
Attorney General Jay Jones joined a multistate comment letter signed by 22 states opposing an unlawful proposal by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) to allow a flood of prohibited weapons to move across state borders by mail, endangering the public and further straining state and local law enforcement resources for no valid purpose.
"This loophole puts guns in the hands
... Show Full Article
RICHMOND, Virginia, May 6 -- Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones issued the following news release on May 5, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Jones Joins Multistate Effort to Oppose Postal Service Rule Undermining Federal Gun Law
Attorney General Jay Jones joined a multistate comment letter signed by 22 states opposing an unlawful proposal by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) to allow a flood of prohibited weapons to move across state borders by mail, endangering the public and further straining state and local law enforcement resources for no valid purpose.
"This loophole puts guns in the handsof those barred by Virginia law from buying weapons, and it allows people to blatantly dodge background checks and access illegal firearms," said Attorney General Jay Jones. "The federal government continues to undermine the law and putting our communities at risk in the process."
For almost one hundred years, dating back to 1927, federal law has barred the USPS from mailing certain concealable firearms. That statute has stood, without any court finding it invalid, since that time. But in January 2026, the Trump Administration decided to suddenly stop following the federal law. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued an opinion that the statute is unconstitutional; stated it will no longer enforce this commonsense statute; and instructed USPS to issue conforming regulations. On April 2, the USPS published a proposed rule to conform with this DOJ opinion.
Today's letter explains why the proposed rule is unlawful and will harm public safety in the states. The letter clearly states that the longstanding federal law restricting mailing firearms via the Postal Service is constitutional, and the executive branch cannot unilaterally permit conduct Congress has prohibited since 1927. The letter also adds that allowing individuals to send firearms through the mail without going through a licensed seller will make it easier for prohibited persons like felons and domestic abusers to access firearms, including illegal firearms. It will also make it more difficult, and more expensive, for states to solve gun crimes, reducing the effectiveness of law enforcement tracing tools.
The multistate letter outlines the danger if this rule takes effect. Individuals prohibited in from owning a firearm in their state--including convicted felons, domestic abusers, and individuals subject to restraining orders--could get a gun though the mail, despite that individual's state maintaining carefully crafted laws on who may possess guns. Of grave concern is that the types of guns that might be mailed across state lines may even include those prohibited by states' laws, such as assault weapons or silencers.
This sudden and inexplicable shift will have a significant impact on the states. Unlike private carriers like UPS, USPS recognizes no statutory obligation to ensure the packages it carries comply with state laws on the acquisition or transfer of firearms, creating a loophole in state laws.
Without federal firearms trace data, law enforcement agencies will have higher investigation costs. Indeed, state law enforcement will have to create a new tracking structure to account for the unregulated mailing of concealable firearms through USPS, harming state budgets that are already damaged by the devastating economic impacts of the second Trump Administration.
The Attorneys General also explain that the Second Amendment does not require USPS to issue this rule because the underlying federal law governs only whether and when USPS can mail firearms; it does not regulate the right to keep and bear arms. And the law is consistent with the nation's tradition; for most of our history, firearms were not accepted for mailing by USPS. Congress's decision in 1927 to avoid having USPS assist in mailing guns that may be in violation of state or local laws, and to make it more difficult for criminals to obtain concealable weapons, was a valid and entirely lawful choice.
Attorney General Jones was joined by the Attorneys General of New Jersey, New York and Delaware, which co-led the letter, as well as Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.oag.state.va.us/media-center/news-releases/3017-attorney-general-jones-joins-multistate-effort-to-oppose-postal-service-rule-undermining-federal-gun-law
Supreme Court Issues Stay of Restrictions on Mifepristone Following Advocacy by Del. A.G. Jennings, Coalition
DOVER, Delaware, May 6 -- Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings issued the following news release on May 5, 2026:
* * *
Supreme Court issues stay of restrictions on mifepristone following advocacy by AG Jennings, coalition
Attorney General Kathy Jennings yesterday joined a coalition of 22 states and the District of Columbia in urging the U.S. Supreme Court to stay a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that would restrict access to mifepristone, a safe and effective abortion medication. Shortly after, the U.S. Supreme Court entered an administrative stay, granting a one-week
... Show Full Article
DOVER, Delaware, May 6 -- Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings issued the following news release on May 5, 2026:
* * *
Supreme Court issues stay of restrictions on mifepristone following advocacy by AG Jennings, coalition
Attorney General Kathy Jennings yesterday joined a coalition of 22 states and the District of Columbia in urging the U.S. Supreme Court to stay a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that would restrict access to mifepristone, a safe and effective abortion medication. Shortly after, the U.S. Supreme Court entered an administrative stay, granting a one-weekpause of the order. The Fifth Circuit ruling would reinstate a medically unnecessary in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone, which can be safely provided through telehealth. In the amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court, Attorney General Jennings and the coalition argued that the Fifth Circuit's ruling is not supported by law or science, would create regulatory and administrative chaos nationwide, and would interfere with states' ability to protect access to reproductive health care within their borders, particularly in rural and medically-underserved areas. In February 2026, while the case was pending in the district court, Attorney General Jennings joined a multistate amicus briefOpen this document with ReadSpeaker docReader to support the availability of mifepristone via telehealth.
"There is no reason whatsoever to restrict access to a medicine that is demonstrably safe, effective, and necessary for reproductive healthcare," said Attorney General Kathy Jennings. "The Fifth Circuit's ruling is a fig leaf for an extreme ideological crusade against the right to choose. This is a dangerous ruling that the Supreme Court must not allow to stand."
Mifepristone, when used in combination with misoprostol, is the standard medication used to terminate a pregnancy through 10 weeks. Since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved mifepristone in 2000, an estimated 7.5 million people in the United States have used the medication safely. Medication abortion now accounts for 63 percent of all abortions in the formal U.S. health care system, with approximately one in four abortions provided via telehealth. Studies have consistently found mifepristone to be safe and effective.
In 2023, after extensive review, the FDA eliminated the in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone as medically unnecessary. That decision followed years of evidence, including during the COVID-19 pandemic, showing that mifepristone could be safely provided without requiring patients to appear in person. The FDA's action allowed providers to offer mifepristone through telehealth and enabled patients to obtain the medication through certified mail-order pharmacies and other approved channels, expanding access for patients who face significant barriers to in-person care.
Attorney General Jennings and the coalition argued that reinstating the in-person dispensing requirement would curtail telehealth access to mifepristone, forcing patients to rely on more difficult alternatives or travel for in-person care. Telehealth has become an increasingly important way for patients in Delaware to access abortion care, with the nationwide share of abortions provided through telemedicine growing from five percent in 2022 to 27 percent in 2025.
The attorneys general also argued that the ruling would disrupt care in states like Delaware, where abortion remains legal and protected. Since the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, clinics in states that protect abortion access have faced increased demand from both in-state and out-of-state patients. Forcing more patients to seek in-person care would place new strain on clinics and health care systems that are already stretched.
Attorney General Jennings and the coalition asserted that the Fifth Circuit's ruling undermines states' sovereign authority to protect and expand access to reproductive health care. In the wake of the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision, which eliminated the federal constitutional right to abortion and returned regulation of abortion to the states, many states took swift executive and legislative action to safeguard reproductive rights and expand access to medication abortion. The attorneys general argued that courts cannot leverage medically unnecessary federal drug regulations to override those state policy choices or impose unnecessary barriers to care in states where abortion is legal.
Joining Attorney General Jennings in today's coalition are the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and the District of Columbia, as well as the Governor of Pennsylvania.
* * *
Original text here: https://news.delaware.gov/2026/05/05/supreme-court-issues-stay-of-restrictions-on-mifepristone-following-advocacy-by-ag-jennings-coalition/
Okla. A.G. Drummond: Stitt's Veto of Open Meeting Act Bill Raises Questions About Who He's Protecting
OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma, May 6 -- Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond issued the following news release on May 5, 2026:
* * *
Drummond: Stitt's veto of Open Meeting Act bill raises questions about who he's protecting
Attorney General Gentner Drummond called Gov. Stitt's veto of a transparency bill a betrayal of Oklahoma taxpayers, saying the governor's rejection raises serious questions about who he is protecting and why.
House Bill 3278 passed both chambers of the Legislature with bipartisan support before Stitt vetoed it last night. The bill would have strengthened enforcement of
... Show Full Article
OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma, May 6 -- Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond issued the following news release on May 5, 2026:
* * *
Drummond: Stitt's veto of Open Meeting Act bill raises questions about who he's protecting
Attorney General Gentner Drummond called Gov. Stitt's veto of a transparency bill a betrayal of Oklahoma taxpayers, saying the governor's rejection raises serious questions about who he is protecting and why.
House Bill 3278 passed both chambers of the Legislature with bipartisan support before Stitt vetoed it last night. The bill would have strengthened enforcement ofOklahoma's Open Meeting Act, empowering the Attorney General to issue findings of violation, impose civil penalties and seek court enforcement against public bodies that violate Oklahomans' right to open government.
"Gov. Stitt just sided with bureaucrats and against every Oklahoman who expects their government to operate in the open and play by the rules," Drummond said. "This wasn't a controversial bill.
It was a commonsense reform that sailed through the Legislature because the people's representatives understood what the governor apparently does not: accountability isn't optional. When a governor vetoes a law that would expose corruption and punish officials who violate the public trust, you have to ask who he's protecting."
The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote on each measure. Last year, Stitt also vetoed House Bill 2163, a measure designed to strengthen accountability and transparency in open records requests, before the Legislature ultimately overrode that veto.
"I hope every member of the House and Senate will finish what they started, override this veto and show their constituents that transparency isn't negotiable," Drummond said.
* * *
Original text here: https://oklahoma.gov/oag/news/newsroom/2026/may/drummond-stitts-veto-of-open-meeting-act-bill-raises-questions-about-who-hes-protecting.html
N.J. A.G. Davenport: Mercer County Correctional Officer Pleads Guilty After Accepting Bribes to Bring Contraband Into County Jail
TRENTON, New Jersey, May 6 -- New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport issued the following news release on May 5, 2026:
* * *
Mercer County Correctional Officer Pleads Guilty After Accepting Bribes to Bring Contraband into County Jail
Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and the Office of Public Integrity and Accountability (OPIA) today announced that a Mercer County correctional officer has pleaded guilty after he took bribes in exchange for smuggling contraband into the Mercer County Correctional Center for inmates.
Tyree L. Hobbs, 42, of Hamilton, New Jersey, pleaded guilty to Conspiracy
... Show Full Article
TRENTON, New Jersey, May 6 -- New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport issued the following news release on May 5, 2026:
* * *
Mercer County Correctional Officer Pleads Guilty After Accepting Bribes to Bring Contraband into County Jail
Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and the Office of Public Integrity and Accountability (OPIA) today announced that a Mercer County correctional officer has pleaded guilty after he took bribes in exchange for smuggling contraband into the Mercer County Correctional Center for inmates.
Tyree L. Hobbs, 42, of Hamilton, New Jersey, pleaded guilty to Conspiracyto Commit Bribery (third degree) during a hearing on May 1, 2026 before Criminal Presiding Judge Peter E. Warshaw in Mercer County Superior Court.
As part of a plea agreement with OPIA, prosecutors will recommend at sentencing that the court impose a sentence of probation with the condition that the defendant serve 364 days in county jail. The defendant also will be required to forfeit all public employment and will be forever disqualified from holding any public office or position of honor, trust, or profit in New Jersey government, at any level. Sentencing is scheduled for July 17, 2026.
"Corrections officers have challenging jobs that are integral to public safety, and the vast majority of them fulfill their roles with integrity," said Attorney General Davenport. "But in this case, the defendant admitted to exploiting his access to a correctional facility for personal gain. Any public employee that betrays the public trust in this way should not be working in government, and this resolution ensures that."
Hobbs was indicted following an investigation by OPIA that found he periodically accepted bribes from inmates between approximately November 2017 until July 2022, when he was suspended without pay. According to the complaint, the criminal conduct began roughly 10 months after Hobbs joined the Mercer County Department of Corrections in February 2017.
The investigation revealed Hobbs would receive bribes in exchange for bringing into the Hopewell Township-based county jail packages for inmates containing contraband, including, in some cases, illicit narcotics and tobacco.
The investigation revealed that Hobbs would receive sealed packages outside the Mercer County Corrections Center (MCCC) from inmate affiliates -- packages he would then bring into the facility and hide in locations accessible to the inmates for whom the deliveries were intended.
State regulations as well as policies of the Mercer County DOC prohibit the possession, sale, or use of contraband in the MCCC and prohibit officers from establishing a personal relationship with an inmate, from trading and bartering with inmates, and from giving or receiving gifts from any inmate or any inmate's relative, friend, or representative.
The case was prosecuted by Deputy Attorneys General Kathryn Deal and Richard T. Bobbe III for the OPIA Corruption Bureau.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.njoag.gov/mercer-county-correctional-officer-pleads-guilty-after-accepting-bribes-to-bring-contraband-into-county-jail/
N.J. A.G. Davenport: Ex-Department of Children and Families Employee Pleads Guilty After Misrepresenting Her DCF Role to Further Illegal Payment Scheme
TRENTON, New Jersey, May 6 -- New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport issued the following news release on May 5, 2026:
* * *
Ex-Department of Children and Families Employee Pleads Guilty After Misrepresenting Her DCF Role to Further Illegal Payment Scheme
Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and the Office of Public Integrity and Accountability (OPIA) today announced that a former employee of the Department of Children and Families (DCF) pleaded guilty after pretending she was a caseworker in a scam that involved illegal payments in exchange for offering to improperly disclose confidential
... Show Full Article
TRENTON, New Jersey, May 6 -- New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport issued the following news release on May 5, 2026:
* * *
Ex-Department of Children and Families Employee Pleads Guilty After Misrepresenting Her DCF Role to Further Illegal Payment Scheme
Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and the Office of Public Integrity and Accountability (OPIA) today announced that a former employee of the Department of Children and Families (DCF) pleaded guilty after pretending she was a caseworker in a scam that involved illegal payments in exchange for offering to improperly disclose confidentialinformation.
Susaida Nazario, 44, of Trenton, New Jersey, pleaded guilty to theft by deception (3rd degree) during a hearing on May 4, 2026 before Criminal Presiding Judge Peter E. Warshaw at the Mercer County Superior Court.
As part of a plea agreement with OPIA, Nazario forfeited all public employment and will be permanently disqualified from holding any public office or public job in New Jersey. She will also be required to pay restitution, and prosecutors will recommend she be sentenced to a term of probation to be determined by the court, with the condition that the defendant serve 180 days in county jail. Sentencing is scheduled for July 17, 2026.
"The defendant held herself out to be a caseworker for the Department of Children and Families, pretending she could provide case assistance and offering to reveal sensitive, confidential information in exchange for money," said Attorney General Davenport. "Working in public service is an honor and a privilege. Anyone who uses it as a chance to make ill-gotten side income is not fit to serve the people of New Jersey."
Nazario was indicted on March 6, 2025 on charges connected with her solicitation and acceptance of illegal payments between approximately January 2021 and August 2021, while she was working as a technical assistant for the DCF Information Technology Division in Trenton.
The investigation revealed that Nazario misrepresented herself as a DCF caseworker to an individual who was involved in a matter being handled by the Division of Child Protection & Permanency (DCPP). Nazario further pursued and received monetary payments from that individual in exchange for offering to provide assistance with their DCPP case, including offering to disclose confidential case information to that individual, who was not entitled to those non-public details. DCF records are kept confidential by law to protect the life, safety, and welfare of children.
Deputy Attorneys General Robert J. Serrano and Randolph Mershon prosecuted the case for the OPIA Corruption Bureau.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.njoag.gov/ex-department-of-children-and-families-employee-pleads-guilty-after-misrepresenting-her-dcf-role-to-further-illegal-payment-scheme/
Md. A.G. Brown Files Brief Urging Supreme Court to Stay Restrictions on Mifepristone
BALTIMORE, Maryland, May 6 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on May 5, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Brown Files Brief Urging Supreme Court to Stay Restrictions on Mifepristone
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown joined a coalition of 22 states and the District Columbia in urging the Supreme Court of the United States to stay a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that would restrict access to mifepristone, a safe and effective abortion medication.
The Fifth Circuit ruling would reinstate a medically unnecessary in-person dispensing
... Show Full Article
BALTIMORE, Maryland, May 6 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on May 5, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Brown Files Brief Urging Supreme Court to Stay Restrictions on Mifepristone
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown joined a coalition of 22 states and the District Columbia in urging the Supreme Court of the United States to stay a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that would restrict access to mifepristone, a safe and effective abortion medication.
The Fifth Circuit ruling would reinstate a medically unnecessary in-person dispensingrequirement for mifepristone, which can be safely provided through telehealth. In an amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court, Attorney General Brown and the coalition argue that the Fifth Circuit's ruling is not supported by law or science, would create regulatory and administrative chaos nationwide, and would interfere with states' ability to protect access to reproductive healthcare within their borders, particularly in rural and medically-underserved areas. They are calling on the Court to stay the lower court's order and prevent these restrictions from taking effect. On May 4, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States granted an administrative stay that puts the Fifth Circuit's decision on pause until 5 p.m. on May 11, 2026, while the Court considers emergency appeals. In February 2026, while the case was pending in the district court, Attorney General Brown joined a multistate amicus brief to support the availability of mifepristone via telehealth.
"The Fifth Circuit's ruling is a direct threat to the health of anyone who relies on telehealth to access reproductive care," said Attorney General Brown. "We oppose this harmful ruling that is based on neither science nor the law and that stands between our residents and their reproductive freedom."
Mifepristone, when used in combination with misoprostol, is the standard medication used to terminate a pregnancy through 10 weeks, and it is commonly used by physicians to complete the termination of a pregnancy once a miscarriage has begun. Since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved mifepristone in 2000, an estimated 7.5 million people in the United States have used the medication safely. Medication abortion now accounts for 63 percent of all abortions in the formal U.S. healthcare system, with approximately one in four abortions provided via telehealth. Studies have consistently found mifepristone to be safe and effective.
In 2023, after extensive review, the FDA eliminated the in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone as medically unnecessary. That decision followed years of evidence, including during the COVID-19 pandemic, showing that mifepristone could be safely provided without requiring patients to appear in person. The FDA's action allowed providers to offer mifepristone through telehealth and enabled patients to obtain the medication through certified mail-order pharmacies and other approved channels, expanding access for patients who face significant barriers to in-person care.
Attorney General Brown and the coalition argue that reinstating the in-person dispensing requirement would curtail telehealth access to mifepristone, forcing patients to rely on more difficult alternatives or travel for in-person care. Telehealth has become an increasingly important way for patients in Maryland to access abortion care, with the share of abortions provided through telemedicine growing nationwide from five percent in 2022 to 27 percent in 2025.
The attorneys general also argue that the ruling would disrupt care in states like Maryland, where abortion remains legal and protected. Since the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, clinics in states that protect abortion access have faced increased demand from both in-state and out-of-state patients. By forcing more patients to seek in-person care, the Fifth Circuit's ruling would place new strain on clinics and healthcare systems that are already stretched.
Attorney General Brown and the coalition assert that the Fifth Circuit's ruling undermines states' sovereign authority to protect and expand access to reproductive healthcare. In the wake of the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision, which eliminated the federal constitutional right to abortion and returned regulation of abortion to the states, many states took swift executive and legislative action to safeguard reproductive rights and expand access to medication abortion. The attorneys general argue that courts cannot leverage medically unnecessary federal drug regulations to override those state policy choices or impose unnecessary barriers to care in states where abortion is legal.
The attorneys general are urging the Supreme Court to act swiftly to stay the Fifth Circuit's decision and protect patients' access to mifepristone.
Joining Attorney General Brown in filing the brief, which was led by the attorneys general of New York, California, Massachusetts, and Washington, are the attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Virginia, as well as the Governor of Pennsylvania.
* * *
Original text here: https://oag.maryland.gov/News/pages/Attorney-General-Brown-Files-Brief-Urging-Supreme-Court-to-Stay-Restrictions-on-Mifepristone--.aspx
Ariz. A.G. Mayes Announces Sentencing in Methamphetamine Trafficking Case
PHOENIX, Arizona, May 6 -- Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes issued the following news release on May 5, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Mayes Announces Sentencing in Methamphetamine Trafficking Case
Attorney General Kris Mayes today announced that Miguel Leon has been sentenced to five years in state prison following his conviction on felony drug trafficking and weapons charges.
"My office works tirelessly every day to take illicit drugs and those who traffic them off our streets," said Attorney General Mayes. "This case is yet another example of our efforts to keep our communities safe. Those
... Show Full Article
PHOENIX, Arizona, May 6 -- Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes issued the following news release on May 5, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Mayes Announces Sentencing in Methamphetamine Trafficking Case
Attorney General Kris Mayes today announced that Miguel Leon has been sentenced to five years in state prison following his conviction on felony drug trafficking and weapons charges.
"My office works tirelessly every day to take illicit drugs and those who traffic them off our streets," said Attorney General Mayes. "This case is yet another example of our efforts to keep our communities safe. Thosewho flood our state with poison will be held accountable."
On October 29, 2025, Leon delivered 32.6 pounds of methamphetamine to a confidential informant in the parking lot of a Phoenix business. The transaction followed negotiations between the informant and a Mexico-based coordinator to purchase 30 pounds of methamphetamine for $30,000. Upon his arrest, Leon was found in possession of a loaded 9mm handgun inside his vehicle.
On April 17, 2026, Leon pleaded guilty to two felony counts: Possession of a Dangerous Drug for Sale and Misconduct Involving Weapons.
On May 1, 2026, the Maricopa County Superior Court sentenced Leon to five calendar years in prison for the methamphetamine sale, with a concurrent sentence of 2.5 years for possessing a firearm during the course of a drug offense. The Court also imposed more than $5,000 in fines and surcharges and ordered Leon to forfeit both the weapon and the vehicle used in the drug transaction.
The case was prosecuted by Assistant Attorney General Brett George of the Attorney General's Drug and Racketeering Enforcement Section and was investigated by the Arizona Department of Public Safety.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.azag.gov/press-release/attorney-general-mayes-announces-sentencing-methamphetamine-trafficking-case
