Featured Stories
VA. A.G. JONES BLOCKS TRUMP ADMINISTRATION'S UNLAWFUL DEMAND OF CDL DRIVERS' PERSONAL INFORMATION
RICHMOND, Virginia, Aug. 22 -- Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones issued the following news release on Aug. 21, 2026:
* * *
ATTORNEY GENERAL JAY JONES BLOCKS TRUMP ADMINISTRATION'S UNLAWFUL DEMAND OF CDL DRIVERS' PERSONAL INFORMATION
Attorney General Jones and a coalition of 21 attorneys general announced a U.S. District Court judge granted a temporary restraining order that blocks the Trump administration from demanding the production of a database of state-owned records containing the sensitive personal information of 17 million drivers and from terminating more than $10 million in federal
... Show Full Article
RICHMOND, Virginia, Aug. 22 -- Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones issued the following news release on Aug. 21, 2026:
* * *
ATTORNEY GENERAL JAY JONES BLOCKS TRUMP ADMINISTRATION'S UNLAWFUL DEMAND OF CDL DRIVERS' PERSONAL INFORMATION
Attorney General Jones and a coalition of 21 attorneys general announced a U.S. District Court judge granted a temporary restraining order that blocks the Trump administration from demanding the production of a database of state-owned records containing the sensitive personal information of 17 million drivers and from terminating more than $10 million in federalfunding to the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) if it refuses to produce the database.
"The federal court's decision to grant a Temporary Restraining Order is an important win for protecting the privacy of millions of commercial drivers," said Attorney General Jay Jones. "By blocking the U.S. Department of Transportation from acquiring more than 17 million sensitive records and effectively pausing the Department of Homeland Security's subpoena, the ruling ensures Virginians' data remains secure and under state control while the legal process continues. The judge's decision reaffirms long standing privacy and governance protections around state-owned driver information."
Last week, Attorney General Jones and the coalition filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), which is an administration of the DOT, and AAMVA, as well as an additional related lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The lawsuits claim the DOT, FMCSA and DHS are violating multiple federal privacy laws by secretly setting up their own database with records extorted from AAMVA, with no guardrails on the use or sharing of drivers' Social Security numbers and other personal information, and no notice to the public. The lawsuits also allege that the demand violates the Administrative Procedure Act because the federal government has no legitimate need to take over this database of state records, and it failed to consult the states before making this drastic change.
In 1986, Congress established the Commercial Driver's License Information System (CDLIS) to provide states an efficient means of sharing information about commercial driver's license (CDL) applicants and determining if an applicant is licensed in another state. Since 1988, the DOT has contracted with AAMVA, a private nonprofit organization, to operate CDLIS for the benefit of the states.
To approve a CDL application, Attorney General Jones and the attorneys general explain in the lawsuits, states validate the driver's identity, medical fitness, immigration status and each applicant's licensing and driving history in any state where the driver could have been licensed. Once a license is issued, states maintain a record in CDLIS of each driver that includes personally identifiable information such as the driver's name, date of birth, Social Security number, driver's license number and the name of state that provided the record.
Attorney General Jones and the coalition will now seek a preliminary injunction to prevent the data from being turned over throughout the duration of this case.
Attorney General Jones filed these lawsuits with the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin, as well as the state of Pennsylvania. Additionally, the attorney general of Minnesota joined the DHS case.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.oag.state.va.us/media-center/news-releases/3100-attorney-general-jay-jones-blocks-trump-administrations-unlawful-demand-of-cdl-drivers-personal-information
Okla. A.G. Drummond Tells Muskogee Schools the First Amendment Did Not Require Canceling Prayer Walk, Offers Future Support
OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma, Aug. 22 -- Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond issued the following news release on Aug. 21, 2026:
* * *
Drummond tells Muskogee schools the First Amendment did not require canceling prayer walk, offers future support
Attorney General Gentner Drummond today advised Muskogee Public Schools that it was under no constitutional obligation to cancel a community prayer walk earlier this month, and offered this Office's assistance to any Oklahoma district that receives a similar demand.
Muskogee 6th and 7th Grade Academy had scheduled a Back to School Community Prayer
... Show Full Article
OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma, Aug. 22 -- Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond issued the following news release on Aug. 21, 2026:
* * *
Drummond tells Muskogee schools the First Amendment did not require canceling prayer walk, offers future support
Attorney General Gentner Drummond today advised Muskogee Public Schools that it was under no constitutional obligation to cancel a community prayer walk earlier this month, and offered this Office's assistance to any Oklahoma district that receives a similar demand.
Muskogee 6th and 7th Grade Academy had scheduled a Back to School Community PrayerWalk for the morning of August 12, the day before classes began. A Wisconsin-based advocacy organization, the Freedom From Religion Foundation, sent the district a letter the day before the event demanding its cancellation. The district canceled the walk, removed the announcements and notified parents.
In a letter to Superintendent Jarod Mendenhall, Drummond concluded that no student was required to be on campus that day, that no student faced any consequence for staying away, and that the walk was scheduled at an hour when no instructional period existed to interrupt.
"Attendance was voluntary in the fullest sense of that word," Drummond wrote. "Any parent or student who preferred not to come simply did not come, at no cost whatever. On those facts there is no coercion. There is no captive audience. There is no Establishment Clause violation."
"The district was free to proceed," he added, "and I would have said so had the district asked."
The letter also observes that the demand rested on a legal test the Supreme Court no longer applies. Every decision cited by the organization was handed down between 1948 and 2000. None postdates Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, the 2022 ruling in which the Court abandoned the decades-old endorsement framework and held that an Establishment Clause violation requires coercion.
"Much of the advice districts received before 2022 is obsolete," Drummond wrote. "Offense is not injury."
Drummond further noted that the organization asked the district to ensure that all future school-sponsored events be entirely secular. No court has ever imposed that requirement. Taken literally, the letter states, it would bar a district from allowing a religious group to use its facilities on the same terms as a scout troop or a civic club, which is itself the discrimination the Free Speech Clause forbids.
The Attorney General was careful to mark the limits of the guidance. Districts must still exercise care where students are required to be present, such as during the instructional day or at a mandatory assembly, and nothing in the letter permits a school to direct the content of religious exercise or compel anyone to take part.
"The line is drawn by compulsion, and by the identity of the speaker," Drummond wrote. "It is not drawn by the presence of religion on public property."
The letter closes by encouraging superintendents statewide to contact the Attorney General's Office before modifying or canceling a program in response to an outside demand letter. The office will review the matter and provide an assessment at no cost to the district.
"No superintendent should have to resolve a contested constitutional question alone, on a short deadline, and under pressure from a party whose interests are adverse to the district's," Drummond wrote.
* * *
INFODOC: https://oklahoma.gov/content/dam/ok/en/oag/news-documents/2026/august/Letter_Dr.%20Mendenhall-RE%20Religious%20Expression%20on%20School%20Property%2008.21.2026.pdf
* * *
Original text here: https://oklahoma.gov/oag/news/newsroom/2026/august/drummond-tells-muskogee-schools-the-first-amendment-did-not-require-canceling-prayer-walk-offers-future-support.html
Okla. A.G. Drummond Fights to Return Inola Smelter Case to State Court
OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma, Aug. 22 -- Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond issued the following news release on Aug. 20, 2026:
* * *
Drummond fights to return Inola smelter case to state court
Attorney General Gentner Drummond is asking a federal court to send his lawsuit over the proposed Inola aluminum smelter back to Rogers County District Court. He is also asking the court to order the defendants to pay the State's costs and attorney fees for improperly removing the case.
In a filing with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, Drummond argues that every element
... Show Full Article
OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma, Aug. 22 -- Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond issued the following news release on Aug. 20, 2026:
* * *
Drummond fights to return Inola smelter case to state court
Attorney General Gentner Drummond is asking a federal court to send his lawsuit over the proposed Inola aluminum smelter back to Rogers County District Court. He is also asking the court to order the defendants to pay the State's costs and attorney fees for improperly removing the case.
In a filing with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, Drummond argues that every elementof the State's claims comes from Oklahoma law, and that the federal court therefore has no jurisdiction over the case.
"My responsibility as Attorney General is to defend Oklahomans and enforce the laws of this state," Drummond said. "I will not allow these corporations to use federal court as a means to evade Oklahoma law or delay our efforts to protect the people, livestock and natural resources of Rogers County. This case belongs in Oklahoma state court, under Oklahoma law, and I will continue fighting to ensure it is decided there."
Drummond's filing argues that binding precedent from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit makes clear that a federal defense, including an argument that federal law preempts state law, cannot provide a basis for removing a state-law case to federal court. The defendants themselves have acknowledged they are not arguing that the federal Clean Air Act completely preempts the State's claims. Because that rule is settled, the filing argues, the defendants had no objectively reasonable basis to remove and should bear the costs they caused.
"The law on this issue is clear, and the defendants had no reasonable basis to drag this case into federal court," Drummond said. "Oklahoma taxpayers should not be left footing the bill for an unnecessary legal detour. We are asking the court to send this case back where it belongs and hold the defendants responsible for the costs they created."
Drummond initially filed a petition in June to stop development of Oklahoma Primary Aluminum, a massive proposed smelter near Inola. Drummond's lawsuit seeks to protect the health of area residents, livestock and natural resources from the threatened public nuisance posed by the project. The defendants subsequently removed the case to federal court on July 21.
Drummond also has a pending motion for preliminary injunction seeking to block construction of the proposed smelter while the lawsuit is decided.
Read the Motion to Remand (https://oklahoma.gov/content/dam/ok/en/oag/news-documents/2026/august/Motion%20to%20Remand%20-%20Inola%20Smelter.pdf)
Read the Reply to the Response to the Motion to Remand (https://oklahoma.gov/content/dam/ok/en/oag/news-documents/2026/august/Inola%20Smelter%20-%20Reply%20to%20Response%20to%20Motion%20to%20Remand.pdf)
* * *
Original text here: https://oklahoma.gov/oag/news/newsroom/2026/august/drummond-fights-to-return-inola-smelter-case-to-state-court.html
N.J. A.G. Davenport: Ex-Paterson Zoning Inspector Sentenced to Three Years in Prison for Scam Involving Bogus City Construction Permits Bearing Forged Signatures
TRENTON, New Jersey, Aug. 22 -- New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport issued the following news release on Aug. 21, 2026:
* * *
AG Davenport: Ex-Paterson Zoning Inspector Sentenced to Three Years in Prison for Scam Involving Bogus City Construction Permits Bearing Forged Signatures
Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and the Office of Public Integrity and Accountability (OPIA) announced the sentencing today of a former Paterson zoning inspector and two of his codefendants, in connection with a criminal scheme to provide applicants seeking Paterson zoning permits with expedited, invalid,
... Show Full Article
TRENTON, New Jersey, Aug. 22 -- New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport issued the following news release on Aug. 21, 2026:
* * *
AG Davenport: Ex-Paterson Zoning Inspector Sentenced to Three Years in Prison for Scam Involving Bogus City Construction Permits Bearing Forged Signatures
Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and the Office of Public Integrity and Accountability (OPIA) announced the sentencing today of a former Paterson zoning inspector and two of his codefendants, in connection with a criminal scheme to provide applicants seeking Paterson zoning permits with expedited, invalid,fraudulent permits bearing forged signatures in exchange for payment for approximately two years, starting in late 2020.
Jose Fermin, 54, of Prospect Park, New Jersey, the public official charged in the case, was sentenced on August 21, 2026, to three years in state prison by New Jersey Superior Court Judge Sohail Mohammed, presiding in Passaic County. Fermin also has been ordered to forfeit all public employment and has been permanently barred from holding any future public office or employment in New Jersey.
Fermin pleaded guilty on May 8, 2026, to second-degree conspiracy to commit official misconduct. His two codefendants in the case, who also entered guilty pleas, were previously sentenced. Jose Juan Guerrero-Cruz, 46, of Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania, was sentenced on June 25 to three years' non-custodial probation, after pleading guilty to third-degree official misconduct. Alfonlly Monegro-Camilo, 28, of Paterson, New Jersey, was sentenced on June 29 to two years' non-custodial probation, after pleading guilty to third-degree forgery.
"This case illustrates how corruption hurts our communities financially and erodes the credibility of government and public workers," said Attorney General Davenport. "Residents looking to make home improvements thought they were getting legitimate permits to move forward with renovations, but they were getting scammed by these defendants. We take abuses of the public trust seriously and will bring offenders to justice."
As set forth in publicly filed documents in this case and statements made in court:
The conspiracy took place between approximately December 2020 and February 2022. Investigators uncovered evidence showing Fermin and his co-defendants arranged to supply applicants for official city permits with illegitimate ones and with other bogus documents. The phony documents bore the forged signature of Paterson's Planning and Zoning Director. Some applicants were told they could obtain permits without submitting building plans, and Fermin then received payments in exchange for producing the forged, illegitimate documents.
On February 20, 2024, a state grand jury returned a seven-count indictment against Fermin as well as co-defendant Guerrero-Cruz. A superseding indictment adding Monegro-Camilo as an additional defendant in the case was returned by a state grand jury on October 1, 2025.
There is no information to suggest the scam resulted in the construction of any unsafe structures that would put the public in jeopardy.
The case was handled by Deputy Attorneys General Adam Gerken and Lisa Cialino with the OPIA Corruption Bureau. The investigation was conducted by detectives from OPIA.
* * *
Defense counsel:
For Fermin: Darryl Richardson, Esq., of Freehold, New Jersey
For Guerrero-Cruz: James Durgana, Esq., of West Caldwell, New Jersey
For Alfonlly Monegro-Camilo: John C. Grey, Esq., of Rockaway, New Jersey
* * *
Original text here: https://www.njoag.gov/ag-davenport-ex-paterson-zoning-inspector-sentenced-to-three-years-in-prison-for-scam-involving-bogus-city-construction-permits-bearing-forged-signatures/
N.J. A.G. Davenport Co-Leads Fight to Protect Law Enforcement Funding
TRENTON, New Jersey, Aug. 22 -- New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport issued the following news release on Aug. 21, 2026:
* * *
AG Davenport Co-Leads Fight to Protect Law Enforcement Funding
Multistate Coalition Sues Trump Administration for Illegal Conditions on Law Enforcement Grants
-
Today, Attorney General Jennifer Davenport co-led a coalition of 22 attorneys general and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in filing an updated and amended lawsuit challenging the federal government's imposition of illegal immigration-enforcement conditions on Congressionally-authorized public safety
... Show Full Article
TRENTON, New Jersey, Aug. 22 -- New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport issued the following news release on Aug. 21, 2026:
* * *
AG Davenport Co-Leads Fight to Protect Law Enforcement Funding
Multistate Coalition Sues Trump Administration for Illegal Conditions on Law Enforcement Grants
-
Today, Attorney General Jennifer Davenport co-led a coalition of 22 attorneys general and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in filing an updated and amended lawsuit challenging the federal government's imposition of illegal immigration-enforcement conditions on Congressionally-authorized public safetygrants, including grants intended to keep law enforcement officers safe and fight crime.
"This is an outrageous maneuver that uses our dedicated law enforcement personnel as pawns in a political game," said Attorney General Davenport. "This administration is holding up funding that helps pay for protective equipment for law enforcement, fight drug trafficking, enforce Megan's Law, and find violent criminals. We will not let this administration attach illegal conditions to essential federal funding - funding that New Jerseyans send to Washington, D.C., through our tax dollars."
Last year, the Trump Administration, disregarding the clear letter of the law and intent of Congress, declared that states will be unable to access Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) funds unless they agree to the Administration's extreme immigration demands. The multistate coalition succeeded in getting the federal government to remove those conditions on over $1.3 billion of VOCA funds.
However, this year, the U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) has applied these illegal conditions to new grants, including funds dedicated to law enforcement and juvenile justice.
Among the affected programs is the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Formula Grants (known as the Byrne JAG Program). The Byrne JAG Program was named after a rookie New York City Police Department officer who was ambushed in his patrol car while protecting a witness in a drug case in 1988. For decades, regardless of which political party held power, the Byrne JAG Program has been the leading federal source of criminal justice funding to state and local governments.
In New Jersey, law enforcement agencies have received over $21 million from Byrne JAG funds through the State from FY 2019 to FY 2024. Beyond just the Byrne JAG program, this action also impacts funding for crisis intervention and youth justice programs.
Civil immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility and not a state government responsibility. The Trump Administration's unlawful attempts to coerce states into doing their bidding conflict with core principles of American governance - the separation of powers and federalism. The Administration's actions violate the Administrative Procedures Act and the Spending Clause of the U.S. Constitution in multiple ways.
As such, Attorney General Davenport and the coalition are requesting that the court declare the Trump Administration's actions unlawful and permanently enjoin any implementation or enforcement of these illegal conditions.
Attorney General Davenport is represented in this matter by Deputy Attorneys General Bassam F. Gergi, Nathaniel F. Rubin, Phoenix N. Meyers, Sarah Nealon, and Surinder K. Aggarwal, under the supervision of Assistant Attorney General Mayur P. Saxena, Deputy Solicitor General Shankar Duraiswamy, and Solicitor General Jeremy M. Feigenbaum.
In addition to New Jersey, this lawsuit is being co-led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings, Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, and Rhode Island Attorney General Peter F. Neronha. It is joined by the Attorneys General of Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia, as well as the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Amended and Supplemental Complaint (http://www.njoag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/2026-0821_52-First-Amended-and-Supplemental-Complaint.pdf)
* * *
Original text here: https://www.njoag.gov/ag-davenport-co-leads-fight-to-protect-law-enforcement-funding/
Md. A.G. Brown Joins Multistate Coalition to Protect Law Enforcement Funding
BALTIMORE, Maryland, Aug. 22 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on Aug. 21, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Brown Joins Multistate Coalition to Protect Law Enforcement Funding
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown today joined a coalition of 22 attorneys general and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in filing an updated and amended lawsuit over the unlawful imposition of immigration-enforcement conditions on Congressionally-authorized public safety grants, including grants intended to keep law enforcement officers safe and fight crime.
"The federal government
... Show Full Article
BALTIMORE, Maryland, Aug. 22 -- Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown issued the following news release on Aug. 21, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Brown Joins Multistate Coalition to Protect Law Enforcement Funding
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown today joined a coalition of 22 attorneys general and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in filing an updated and amended lawsuit over the unlawful imposition of immigration-enforcement conditions on Congressionally-authorized public safety grants, including grants intended to keep law enforcement officers safe and fight crime.
"The federal governmentis unlawfully conditioning grants that keep Maryland officers safe, prevent violence, and promote firearm safety in our communities," said Attorney General Brown. "We joined this lawsuit because public safety should never be used as leverage to force states into doing Washington's immigration work."
Last year, the Trump administration, disregarding the clear letter of the law and intent of Congress, declared that states will be unable to access Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) funds unless they agree to the Administration's extreme immigration demands. The multistate coalition succeeded in getting the federal government to remove those conditions on over $1.3 billion of VOCA funds.
However, this year, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has applied these unlawful conditions to new grants, including funds dedicated to law enforcement and juvenile justice.
Among the affected programs is the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Formula Grants (known as the Byrne JAG Program). The Byrne JAG Program was named after a rookie New York City Police Department officer who was ambushed in his patrol car while protecting a witness in a drug case in 1988. For decades, regardless of which political party held power, the Byrne JAG Program has been the leading federal source of criminal justice funding to state and local governments.
In Maryland, DOJ grants fund a broad range of programs and services supporting public safety, victim services, and the administration of justice. For example, the Baltimore City Sheriff's Office Safe Pathways project uses Byrne State Crisis Intervention Program funds, which is separate from the Byrne JAG Program and is also affected by these conditions, to support firearm safe-storage education, community outreach, behavioral health referrals, and violence prevention. The program has served more than 17,000 individuals, engaged over 10,400 participants, conducted 97 outreach events, delivered 890 firearm safety trainings, and made 173 referrals for supportive services.
Civil immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility and not a state government responsibility. The Trump administration's unlawful attempts to coerce states into doing its bidding conflict with core principles of American governance - the separation of powers and federalism. The Administration's actions violate the Administrative Procedures Act and the Spending Clause of the U.S. Constitution in multiple ways.
As such, Attorney General Brown and the coalition are requesting that the court declare the Trump administration's actions unlawful and permanently enjoin any implementation or enforcement of these unlawful conditions.
Joining Attorney General Brown in this lawsuit are the attorneys general of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, as well as the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
* * *
Original text here: https://oag.maryland.gov/News/pages/Attorney-General-Brown-Joins-Multistate-Coalition-to-Protect-Law-Enforcement-Funding-.aspx
Ariz. A.G. Mayes Issues Findings in Sunshine Residential Homes Investigation, Calls for Legislative Reform
PHOENIX, Arizona, Aug. 22 -- Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes issued the following news release on Aug. 21, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Mayes Issues Findings in Sunshine Residential Homes Investigation, Calls for Legislative Reform
Attorney General Kris Mayes today issued findings in the investigation of the allegations that Sunshine Residential Homes, LLC obtained rate increases from the Department of Child Safety in exchange for political contributions to Governor Katie Hobbs.
"After two years of investigation, consisting of multiple interviews, reviews of campaign-finance records, procurement
... Show Full Article
PHOENIX, Arizona, Aug. 22 -- Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes issued the following news release on Aug. 21, 2026:
* * *
Attorney General Mayes Issues Findings in Sunshine Residential Homes Investigation, Calls for Legislative Reform
Attorney General Kris Mayes today issued findings in the investigation of the allegations that Sunshine Residential Homes, LLC obtained rate increases from the Department of Child Safety in exchange for political contributions to Governor Katie Hobbs.
"After two years of investigation, consisting of multiple interviews, reviews of campaign-finance records, procurementrecords, bank documents, and State emails and chats, totaling over one terabyte of data, including more than 100,000 documents, the investigation has not uncovered any evidence of the necessary quid pro quo to support a bribery charge," said Attorney General Mayes.
"Declining prosecution is a conclusion about the legal standard for charging a case, but this case shows there is a need for legislative reform. The Legislature and the Governor have the power to ensure greater transparency with regard to political donations made by state contractors.
I am urging them to work together and try again to pass legislation that does so."
A copy of the legal analysis (https://mcusercontent.com/cc1fad182b6d6f8b1e352e206/files/ca192d79-0d0b-b203-60e5-63b88a01c563/Sunshine_Investigation_Memo_8.21.26.pdf) is available.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.azag.gov/press-release/attorney-general-mayes-issues-findings-sunshine-residential-homes-investigation-calls
