Attorney General
Here's a look at documents from state attorneys general
Featured Stories
Statement From Va. A.G. Jones on Republican National Committee V. Koski Tazewell County Circuit Court Ruling
RICHMOND, Virginia, Feb. 21 -- Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones issued the following statement on Feb. 20, 2026:
* * *
Statement from Attorney General Jay Jones on Republican National Committee v. Koski Tazewell County Circuit Court Ruling
Attorney General Jay Jones today made the following statement on the ruling issued by the Tazewell County Circuit Court in Republican National Committee v. Koski.
"My office will immediately appeal the ruling issued by the Tazewell County Circuit Court. These arguments are already before the Supreme Court of Virginia, the proper forum to consider the arguments,
... Show Full Article
RICHMOND, Virginia, Feb. 21 -- Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones issued the following statement on Feb. 20, 2026:
* * *
Statement from Attorney General Jay Jones on Republican National Committee v. Koski Tazewell County Circuit Court Ruling
Attorney General Jay Jones today made the following statement on the ruling issued by the Tazewell County Circuit Court in Republican National Committee v. Koski.
"My office will immediately appeal the ruling issued by the Tazewell County Circuit Court. These arguments are already before the Supreme Court of Virginia, the proper forum to consider the arguments,which has set a schedule for receiving arguments and has justifiably allowed the vote to proceed during this time."
* * *
Original text here: https://www.oag.state.va.us/media-center/news-releases/2965-statement-from-attorney-general-jay-jones-on-republican-national-committee-v-koski-tazewell-county-circuit-court-ruling
S.D. A.G. Jackley Announces State Circuit Court Orders Mayday Health Case to Move Forward to Trial
PIERRE, South Dakota, Feb. 21 -- South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley issued the following news release:
* * *
Attorney General Jackley Announces State Circuit Court Orders Mayday Health Case to Move Forward to Trial
South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley announces that a South Dakota Circuit Court has ruled that the state's lawsuit against Mayday Health over allegations of deceptive and unlawful abortion pill ads can move forward and ordered that a trial date be set.
"South Dakota's circuit court is the proper place to enforce South Dakota law, and we look forward to presenting
... Show Full Article
PIERRE, South Dakota, Feb. 21 -- South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley issued the following news release:
* * *
Attorney General Jackley Announces State Circuit Court Orders Mayday Health Case to Move Forward to Trial
South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley announces that a South Dakota Circuit Court has ruled that the state's lawsuit against Mayday Health over allegations of deceptive and unlawful abortion pill ads can move forward and ordered that a trial date be set.
"South Dakota's circuit court is the proper place to enforce South Dakota law, and we look forward to presentingour evidence at trial," said Attorney General Jackley.
Attorney General Jackley in December issued a letter to Mayday Health that it cease and desist from engaging in deceptive advertising regarding the availability of abortion pills in South Dakota which is illegal. Attorney General Jackley also filed a motion in state court requiring Mayday Health stop its advertising that is either untruthful or contrary to South Dakota law.
Mayday Health responded by filing an emergency temporary restraining order in New York U.S. Federal Court. A federal court judge in New York ruled last week that the state court was the proper place for the lawsuit to be heard.
Original text here: https://atg.sd.gov/OurOffice/Media/pressreleasesdetail.aspx?id=3014
R.I. A.G. Neronha: North Smithfield Man to Serve 17 Years in State Prison for Deadly DUI
PROVIDENCE, Rhode Island, Feb. 21 -- Rhode Island Attorney General Peter F. Neronha issued the following news release on Feb. 20, 2026:
* * *
North Smithfield man to serve 17 years in state prison for deadly DUI
Attorney General Peter F. Neronha announced today that a North Smithfield man was sentenced in Providence County Superior Court to serve 17 years at the Adult Correctional Institutions (ACI) for driving under the influence and causing a crash that killed 63-year-old Thomas Lamoureux and severely injured 36-year-old Jeremy Davis.
On February 18, 2026, Nicholas Stone (age 27) pled nolo
... Show Full Article
PROVIDENCE, Rhode Island, Feb. 21 -- Rhode Island Attorney General Peter F. Neronha issued the following news release on Feb. 20, 2026:
* * *
North Smithfield man to serve 17 years in state prison for deadly DUI
Attorney General Peter F. Neronha announced today that a North Smithfield man was sentenced in Providence County Superior Court to serve 17 years at the Adult Correctional Institutions (ACI) for driving under the influence and causing a crash that killed 63-year-old Thomas Lamoureux and severely injured 36-year-old Jeremy Davis.
On February 18, 2026, Nicholas Stone (age 27) pled nolocontendere to one count of driving under the influence resulting in death, one count of driving under the influence resulting in serious bodily injury, one count of driving to endanger resulting in death, one count of driving to endanger resulting in serious bodily injury, one count of leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death, one count of leaving the scene of an accident resulting in serious bodily injury, one count of leaving the scene of an accident resulting in damage to a vehicle, one count of felony reckless driving, and one count of driving under the influence. Superior Court Justice Jeffrey A. Lanphear sentenced the defendant to 25 years with 17 years to serve at the ACI, 25 years of probation, an eight-year suspension of the defendant's license upon release, 60 hours of community service, substance abuse counseling, and $6,100 in fines.
"Because of this defendant's reckless actions, one man died and another suffered permanent injuries," said Attorney General Neronha. "Driving under the influence is an infuriating crime because every instance is entirely preventable, and so often it leads to severe injury or death, both of which occurred here. While I'm grateful that this defendant will pay significantly for his crimes, nothing can undo the harm caused to the victims and their families. I hope they now feel some sense of closure."
Had the case proceeded to trial, the State was prepared to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant drove under the influence, killing and severely injuring multiple victims.
On October 25, 2023, at approximately 9:40 PM, Rhode Island State Police received several reports of a hit-and-run motor vehicle crash on Route 146 North at the Sayles Hill Road intersection in North Smithfield. When troopers arrived on scene, they found two victims who had been hit by a motor vehicle. Emergency personnel pronounced Thomas Lamoureux dead at the scene and transported a second victim, Jeremy Davis to Rhode Island Hospital for severe bodily injuries.
Earlier in the evening, at 7:11 PM, the defendant purchased nine nips from Washington Hill Liquors in Lincoln, and at 9:20 PM the defendant returned to purchase nine more nips and a 40 oz can of Budweiser. Thereafter, the defendant drove his grey BMW sedan northbound on Route 146, struck Mr. Davis with the passenger side front bumper, and then struck Mr. Lamoureux, carrying his body on the hood of the vehicle for approximately 600 feet. The defendant then side-swiped a RIPTA passenger van before fleeing to the parking lot of a Walmart in North Smithfield. While parked, the defendant called his mother and confessed to the various crimes. His mother immediately called 9-1-1 and directed authorities to her son's location.
When troopers arrived on scene, they observed a 2011 gray BMW 328i with heavy damage to the hood, front windshield, roof, rear windshield, and driver-side of the motor vehicle. Police attempted to conduct field sobriety tests, but the defendant refused and requested an ambulance. Emergency personnel then transported the defendant to Landmark Medical Center.
At the hospital, after the defendant refused to submit to a chemical test, police sought and obtained a search warrant for the defendant's blood. The defendant's blood alcohol content was determined to be .161, more than double the legal limit, approximately one and a half hours after the collisions.
Special Assistant Attorney General Steve Regine and Rhode Island State Police Troopers Brendan Degnan and Joshua Dilibero of the Rhode Island State Police led the investigation and prosecution of the case.
* * *
Original text here: https://riag.ri.gov/press-releases/north-smithfield-man-serve-17-years-state-prison-deadly-dui
Okla. A.G. Drummond: Price Gouging, Pharmacy Protections in Effect for Counties Impacted by Wildfires
OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma, Feb. 21 -- Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond issued the following news release on Feb. 20, 2026:
* * *
Price gouging, pharmacy protections in effect for counties impacted by wildfires
Drummond also warns consumers about contractor fraud
*
Attorney General Gentner Drummond is warning businesses that the Emergency Price Stabilization Act is in effect in the four counties where a State of Emergency has been declared due to this week's wildfires.
The law, also referred to as the price gouging statute, prohibits an increase of more than 10% for the price of goods
... Show Full Article
OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma, Feb. 21 -- Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond issued the following news release on Feb. 20, 2026:
* * *
Price gouging, pharmacy protections in effect for counties impacted by wildfires
Drummond also warns consumers about contractor fraud
*
Attorney General Gentner Drummond is warning businesses that the Emergency Price Stabilization Act is in effect in the four counties where a State of Emergency has been declared due to this week's wildfires.
The law, also referred to as the price gouging statute, prohibits an increase of more than 10% for the price of goodsand services and helps protect citizens from unfair price hikes. The statute is in effect for Beaver, Harper, Texas and Woodward counties.
Drummond cautioned that anyone who violates the Act is subject to legal consequences.
"Oklahomans recovering from the wildfires are protected from unfair price hikes and fraud," he said. "Any businesses that violate the law will be held accountable by my office."
Drummond is also reminding pharmacies and Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) of important legal protections that take effect during a declared emergency. The following statutory deadlines and audit activities are temporarily suspended in affected counties:
* Below-cost appeals - The deadline for a pharmacy to file a below-cost reimbursement appeal is paused during the declaration and for 30 days after it ends. PBMs cannot reject an appeal as "late" if it's filed during this paused period. A pharmacy can still submit appeals during the state of emergency.
* PBM audits - PBMs must pause audits for pharmacies in the affected counties during the state of emergency and for 30 days afterward. Limited exceptions apply in cases involving suspected fraud or audits required by other applicable laws.
Pharmacies with questions or concerns should contact Drummond's PBM Compliance and Enforcement Unit.
Drummond also encourages Oklahoma consumers to be on the lookout for scammers due to spikes in contractor fraud following disasters.
"In the wake of disaster, these bad actors often target vulnerable homeowners desperate to rebuild," Drummond said. "While the desire to quickly repair damage is understandable, taking time to carefully select a reputable contractor is crucial to protecting yourself, your family and your property."
Find tips to protect yourself from contractor fraud or report suspected fraud activity through Drummond's Consumer Protection Unit. Anyone can call the unit at 1-833-681-1895 to find out if complaints have been filed against a contractor or to file a complaint against a contractor.
* * *
Original text here: https://oklahoma.gov/oag/news/newsroom/2026/february/price-gouging-pharmacy-protections-in-effect-for-counties-impacted-by-wildfires.html
Okla. A.G. Drummond Praises Proposed EPA Rule to Rollback Misguided Risk Management Program
OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma, Feb. 21 -- Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond issued the following news release on Feb. 20, 2026:
* * *
Drummond praises proposed EPA rule to rollback misguided risk management program
Attorney General Gentner Drummond said today he is pleased the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is rolling back its risk management program rule with its Common Sense Approach to Chemical Accident Prevention proposal. Drummond sued the Biden Administration over the rule in May 2024.
Drummond also testified before a U.S. House subcommittee in 2024 that the revised risk management
... Show Full Article
OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma, Feb. 21 -- Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond issued the following news release on Feb. 20, 2026:
* * *
Drummond praises proposed EPA rule to rollback misguided risk management program
Attorney General Gentner Drummond said today he is pleased the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is rolling back its risk management program rule with its Common Sense Approach to Chemical Accident Prevention proposal. Drummond sued the Biden Administration over the rule in May 2024.
Drummond also testified before a U.S. House subcommittee in 2024 that the revised risk managementrule would have devastating consequences for Oklahoma and other states, noting it was bad for business, harmful to consumers and outright hostile to America's oil and gas industry. The expanded rule was aimed at petroleum refineries, chemical manufacturers and facilities that handle threshold quantities of specific chemicals.
In the lawsuit filed May 9, 2024 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, Drummond led 13 states and the Arizona Legislature in asking the court to declare the final rule unlawful and vacate the EPA's final action because it exceeded the agency's statutory authority.
"I am pleased the EPA is now taking action to correct what was an egregious overreach," Drummond said. "Rolling back the risk management program rule is in the best interest of businesses and consumers."
The EPA announced its Common Sense Approach to Chemical Accident Prevention rule late last week, noting the proposed changes would reduce regulatory burden by ensuring consistency, avoid duplicative requirements and bolster economic growth.
* * *
Original text here: https://oklahoma.gov/oag/news/newsroom/2026/february/drummond-praises-proposed-epa-rule-to-rollback-misguided-risk-management-program.html
Ga. A.G. Carr Pushes for Permanent Halt of Medicare and Medicaid Funding for Child Sex-Change Procedures
ATLANTA, Georgia, Feb. 21 -- Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr issued the following news release:
* * *
Carr Pushes for Permanent Halt of Medicare and Medicaid Funding for Child Sex-Change Procedures
Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr is urging the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to stop federal funding for child sex-change procedures.
"Children are not social experiments, they are not science experiments, and they are not political theories. They're children, and they deserve to be protected," said Carr. "We have continued to fight back here in Georgia - taking over 60 legal
... Show Full Article
ATLANTA, Georgia, Feb. 21 -- Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr issued the following news release:
* * *
Carr Pushes for Permanent Halt of Medicare and Medicaid Funding for Child Sex-Change Procedures
Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr is urging the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to stop federal funding for child sex-change procedures.
"Children are not social experiments, they are not science experiments, and they are not political theories. They're children, and they deserve to be protected," said Carr. "We have continued to fight back here in Georgia - taking over 60 legalactions to save women's sports, ban child mutilation, and prohibit taxpayer-funded transgender surgeries. Now, we're proud to support the administration's efforts to end this nonsense once and for all."
In a letter sent to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Carr and 23 other attorneys general issue direct comments on two proposed rules that would restrict government-subsidized sex-change procedures for minors under Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children's Health Insurance Program.
In the letter, the coalition discusses evidence uncovered in litigation regarding the "Standards of Care 8" (SOC-8), as published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH). The letter extensively discusses evidence showing that WPATH used SOC-8 to advance political and legal goals, changed its treatment recommendations based on politics, departed from well-accepted best practices for creating medical guidelines, hindered the publication of systematic evidence reviews appraising the safety and efficacy of sex-change procedures for minors, and even went so far as deeming castration "medically necessary" for males who self-identify as "eunuchs."
Carr is joined in sending this letter by the attorneys general of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
Find a copy of the letter here (https://law.georgia.gov/document/document/021726-letter-cmmspdf--UNPUBLISHED-document--DO-NOT-SHARE-this-URL--/download).
* * *
Original text here: https://law.georgia.gov/press-releases/2026-02-20/carr-pushes-permanent-halt-medicare-and-medicaid-funding-child-sex-change
Del. Chief Deputy A.G. Logan Issues Opinion on Freedom of Information Act Petition Regarding Sussex County
DOVER, Delaware, Feb. 21 -- Delaware Chief Deputy Attorney General Daniel Logan issued the following opinion (No. 26-IB09) on Feb. 20, 2026:
* * *
To: Keriann Conroy, keriann@energyandpolicy.org
RE: FOIA Petition Regarding Sussex County
Dear Ms. Conroy:
We write in response to your correspondence alleging that Sussex County violated Delaware's Freedom of Information Act, 29 Del. C. Sec.Sec. 10001-10008 ("FOIA"). We treat this correspondence as a Petition for a determination pursuant to 29 Del. C. Sec. 10005 of whether a violation of FOIA has occurred or is about to occur. As discussed more
... Show Full Article
DOVER, Delaware, Feb. 21 -- Delaware Chief Deputy Attorney General Daniel Logan issued the following opinion (No. 26-IB09) on Feb. 20, 2026:
* * *
To: Keriann Conroy, keriann@energyandpolicy.org
RE: FOIA Petition Regarding Sussex County
Dear Ms. Conroy:
We write in response to your correspondence alleging that Sussex County violated Delaware's Freedom of Information Act, 29 Del. C. Sec.Sec. 10001-10008 ("FOIA"). We treat this correspondence as a Petition for a determination pursuant to 29 Del. C. Sec. 10005 of whether a violation of FOIA has occurred or is about to occur. As discussed morefully herein, we determine that the County violated FOIA by failing to meet its burden to justify denying access to the full scope of records you requested.
BACKGROUND
On December 3, 2025, you submitted a FOIA request to Sussex County seeking records regarding "Caesar Rodney Institute," as follows:
Any and all communications, including emails (sent, received, BCC, and CC), email attachments, as well as entire threads in which responsive emails may be nestled within and communications via messaging apps (ex, Signal, Slack, Whats App) sent to or from City Council members Douglas Hudson and/or John Rieley which include the following emails and email domains: [@caesarrodney.org, @townofdeweybeach.com, and a list of individual emails]. Please limit the timeline of this request from January 1, 2024 to the date of processing this request.
Any and all communications, including emails (sent, received, BCC, and CC), email attachments, as well as entire threads in which responsive emails may be nestled within and communications via messaging apps (ex, Signal, Slack, Whats App) sent to or from City Council members Cynthia Green and/or Mark Schaeffer which include the following emails and email domains: [@caesarrodney.org, @townofdeweybeach.com, and a list of individual emails]. Please limit the timeline of this request from January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024.[1]
The County denied access to these records on December 27, 2025 due to the pending litigation related to the offshore wind project. The County also notes that this request is substantively identical to your previous request that was the subject of a previous FOIA Attorney General Opinion, except that the topic was changed to "Caesar Rodney Institute" and omitted two email addresses. This Petition followed.
In the Petition, you argue that the County has not sufficiently explained the application of the pending litigation exemption in this case, as the cited case is not mentioned and the Caesar Rodney Institute is not a party to the cited litigation. You believe that the County has improperly relied on the previous FOIA opinion to deny this request and impermissibly speculated about the purpose of your request; you claim the County's assertion in its response to the former petition that you are coordinating with the litigants on this matter is false and baseless. You assert that the County has not identified how all the potentially responsive records to your request pertain to the pending litigation and the County has wrongfully declined to conduct a records search. You contend that the County should be required to search, provide records unrelated to the litigation, explain which records pertain to the litigation, and how.
The County, through its legal counsel, replied to this Petition ("Response") and enclosed the affidavits of the County Administrator and the Assistant Sussex County Attorney, who attests that the County is a named party in the litigation, Renewable Redevelopment, LLC v. Sussex County Council, Del. Super. C.A. No. S24A-12-002-MHC. The sworn statements of the County's counsel indicate this case continues to be active and was subject to a stay which was expected, at that time, to be shortly lifted. Both affiants verify that this litigation involves the appeal of the denial of a conditional use application for an electric substation for an offshore wind farm. The County Administrator also attests that the County is now a party to a second lawsuit in the Court of Chancery regarding the constitutionality of certain legislation related to offshore wind. The County reiterates its position from the last opinion that your organization, the Energy and Policy Institute ("EPI"), is "an interested entity with an agenda which could work in tandem with the Appellant in the pending litigation" because the EPI website states a mission which includes efforts to challenge politicians who oppose renewable energy sources, such as wind.[2]
The County further contends that the requested records meet both prongs of the test for the pending litigation exemption, including that litigation is pending, and the request pertains to that pending litigation. The County asserts that this second prong is met because this request is substantively the same as your former request seeking emails related to offshore wind and each of the councilmembers whose emails were requested voted on the conditional use that was appealed in the Renewable Redevelopment Litigation. The County denies its response was based on an analysis of your purpose; rather, it considered the context of your request and noted the objective similarity between this request and your former request which was denied. The County maintains that this request is not subject to FOIA on its face and a search therefore is not required. The County argues that you should not be able to obtain records by merely framing the request broadly or referencing third parties that are tangentially related to the litigation; a public body should be able to recognize when a requesting party is seeking to circumvent an established FOIA exemption, especially when the requesting party's position is opposed to the County's litigation position. The County states it is a pretextual attempt to obtain the records that were already denied and considered in a previous Attorney General Opinion.
DISCUSSION
Delaware's FOIA law "was enacted to ensure governmental accountability by providing Delaware's citizens access to open meetings and meeting records of governmental or public bodies, as well as access to the public records of those entities."[3] FOIA requires that citizens be provided reasonable access to and reasonable facilities for the copying of public records.[4] The public body has the burden of proof to justify its denial of access to records.[5] In certain circumstances, a sworn affidavit may be required to meet that burden.[6]
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. University of Delaware provides that Section 10005(c) "requires a public body to establish facts on the record that justify its denial of a FOIA request."[7] "[U]nless it is clear on the face of the request that the demanded records are not subject to FOIA, to meet the burden of proof under Section 10005(c), a public body must state, under oath, the efforts taken to determine whether there are responsive records and the results of those efforts."[8] Generalized assertions in the affidavit will not meet the burden.[9] For example, the Superior Court of Delaware determined that an affidavit outlining that legal counsel inquired about several issues, without indicating who was consulted, when the inquiries were made, and what, if any documents, were reviewed, was too generalized to meet this standard.[10] In addition to these standards, when records are withheld, the reasons for withholding the records must be stated in the response to the requesting party.[11] Depending on the asserted exemptions, an affidavit may be required to support the assertion of the exemptions.[12]
The request at issue in this Petition is substantially similar to the request considered in Attorney General Opinion No. 25-IB50, except that its scope has been expanded by replacing the topic "offshore wind" with "Caesar Rodney Institute" and adding two email addresses. With its broadened scope, particularly changing the topic of records you seek, it is unclear from the face of the request whether all the requested records would be subject to FOIA. Although a subset of these communications pertaining to the pending offshore wind litigation would not be subject to disclosure as previously decided, we find that the County violated FOIA by failing to demonstrate its denial of access to all requested records under this request was appropriate under FOIA.[13]
The Petition's proposed remedy includes a request that the County provide a list of the exempt litigation-related records it withheld and include justifications for withholding them; that proposal is declined, as this is not authorized under FOIA.[14] Rather, we recommend that the County, in compliance with the timeframes set forth in Section 10003, search for responsive records and supplement its response to this request with any additional records, responses, or information, if appropriate under FOIA. To the extent access to any responsive records is denied, the reasons for such denials are recommended to be stated in the supplemental response. To the extent authorized fees for processing this request are anticipated, the County may present a cost estimate, compliant with Section 10003(m), in connection with this supplemental response.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, we conclude that the County violated FOIA by failing to meet its burden to justify denying access to the full scope of records you requested.
Very truly yours,
Daniel Logan, Chief Deputy Attorney General
cc: J. Everett Moore, Jr., County Attorney
Dorey L. Cole, Deputy Attorney General
* * *
Footnotes:
[1] Petition.
[2] Response, p. 4.
[3] Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Univ. of Del., 267 A.3d 996, 1004 (Del. 2021).
[4] 29 Del. C. Sec. 10003(a).
[5] 29 Del. C. Sec. 10005(c).
[6] Judicial Watch, Inc.,267 A.3d at 1008-1012.
[7] Id. at 1010.
[8] Id. at 1012.
[9] Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Univ. of Del., 2022 WL 2037923, at *3 (Del. Super. Jun. 7, 2022) ("The Court finds that the generalized statements in the Affidavit do not meet 'the burden to create a record from which the Superior Court can determine whether the University performed an adequate search for responsive documents.'").
[10] Id.
[11] 29 Del. C. Sec. 10003(h)(2).
[12] See Flowers v. Office of the Governor, 167 A.3d 530, 549 (Del. Super. 2017); see also Judicial Watch, Inc., 267 A.3d at 1010-11.
[13] The reasons for exempting communications related to the offshore wind litigation from disclosure was addressed in Attorney General Opinion No. 25-IB50. Likewise, in this case, the County presented sworn statements in its Response that two pending suits pertain to offshore wind, and the County is not required to produce the councilmembers' communications pertaining to those pending suits.
[14] 29 Del. C. Sec. 10003(h)(2) ("If the public body denies a request in whole or in part, the public body's response shall indicate the reasons for the denial. The public body shall not be required to provide an index, or any other compilation, as to each record or part of a record denied.").
* * *
Original text here: https://attorneygeneral.delaware.gov/2026/02/20/26-ib09-02-20-2026-foia-opinion-letter-to-keriann-conroy-re-sussex-county/
