Senate Bill Introductions
Here's a look at news stories involving U.S. Senate bills introduced in the 119th Congress
Featured Stories
Energy Consumer Protection Act Legislation by Sen. Cortez Masto Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Energy Consumer Protection Act, originally introduced by Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-NV, on April 21, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The bill aims to amend the Federal Power Act and the Natural Gas Act to enhance enforcement against violations related to energy transactions and reporting.
This legislation seeks to implement stricter prohibitions and penalties for entities engaged in fraudulent practices within the energy sector. Specifically, it empowers the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to prohibit individuals or organizations
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Energy Consumer Protection Act, originally introduced by Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-NV, on April 21, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The bill aims to amend the Federal Power Act and the Natural Gas Act to enhance enforcement against violations related to energy transactions and reporting.
This legislation seeks to implement stricter prohibitions and penalties for entities engaged in fraudulent practices within the energy sector. Specifically, it empowers the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to prohibit individuals or organizationsthat violate certain provisions from engaging in the business of purchasing or selling electric energy and natural gas. The bill addresses concerns about the integrity of energy markets and aims to protect consumers from the potential fallout of deceptive practices.
The motivation behind the Energy Consumer Protection Act stems from increasing instances of misconduct that have raised alarms among regulators and consumers alike. By imposing severe penalties for falsifying information related to energy prices or availability, the bill aims to ensure transparency and accountability in the market. This is particularly crucial in an era where rising energy costs and fluctuating supply demand consumer trust and regulatory scrutiny.
Furthermore, the legislation presents an opportunity to bolster the integrity of the nation's energy infrastructure. By enhancing enforcement mechanisms, it not only deters potential violators but also serves to create a more stable energy environment for consumers and businesses. With energy reliability becoming more essential in shaping economic landscapes, the passage of this bill could significantly impact how energy transactions are conducted moving forward.
The bill (S. 4351) has 1 co-sponsor: Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-WA.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/4351/text
Ending the Carried Interest Loophole Act Legislation by Sen. Wyden Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Ending the Carried Interest Loophole Act, originally introduced by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-OR, on April 16, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to revise how partnership interests received in connection with the performance of services are treated for tax purposes, effectively targeting a longstanding loophole.
This initiative addresses concerns over tax equity by closing the carried interest loophole, which allows certain fund managers to pay lower capital gains taxes on income earned
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Ending the Carried Interest Loophole Act, originally introduced by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-OR, on April 16, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to revise how partnership interests received in connection with the performance of services are treated for tax purposes, effectively targeting a longstanding loophole.
This initiative addresses concerns over tax equity by closing the carried interest loophole, which allows certain fund managers to pay lower capital gains taxes on income earnedfrom their partnerships. Proponents argue that this practice disproportionately favors wealthy individuals, enabling them to benefit from preferential tax rates that do not apply to ordinary income. By classifying such partnership interests as ordinary income rather than capital gains, the legislation seeks to ensure that individuals engaged in service-based earnings contribute a fair share to the tax system.
The bill lays out precise provisions regarding the valuation of partnership interests during their transfer. It establishes rules for recognizing deemed compensation amounts, aiming to create clarity around how these interests are taxed. As markets evolve, maintaining regulatory frameworks that prevent manipulative tax strategies is essential for fostering a fair economic landscape. This legislation is part of a broader push for tax reforms that emphasize equity and accountability among high-income earners.
As lawmakers consider this legislation, the implications extend beyond just tax policy; they reflect a growing societal demand for financial justice. By insisting on a more equitable tax structure, the Ending the Carried Interest Loophole Act promises to impact not only the investment community but also the broader economy, ensuring that tax burdens are shared more equitably.
The bill (S. 4330) has 13 co-sponsors: Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-RI; Angus S. King Jr., I-ME; Elizabeth Warren, D-MA; Bernard Sanders, I-VT; Tina Smith, D-MN; Ben Ray Lujan, D-NM; Brian Schatz, D-HI; Jack Reed, D-RI; Mazie K. Hirono, D-HI; Edward J. Markey, D-MA; John Fetterman, D-PA; Richard Blumenthal, D-CT; Chris Van Hollen, D-MD.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/4330/text
Critical Infrastructure Airspace Defense Act Legislation by Sen. Cotton Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Critical Infrastructure Airspace Defense Act, originally introduced by Sen. Tom Cotton, R-AR, on April 22, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation seeks to empower private owners of critical infrastructure facilities to use counter-unmanned aircraft system technologies to better protect against threats posed by drones.
The proposed Act addresses growing concerns regarding unmanned aerial vehicles, which pose significant security risks to vital infrastructure, including nuclear plants and energy substations. Current laws permit federal
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Critical Infrastructure Airspace Defense Act, originally introduced by Sen. Tom Cotton, R-AR, on April 22, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation seeks to empower private owners of critical infrastructure facilities to use counter-unmanned aircraft system technologies to better protect against threats posed by drones.
The proposed Act addresses growing concerns regarding unmanned aerial vehicles, which pose significant security risks to vital infrastructure, including nuclear plants and energy substations. Current laws permit federaland local law enforcement to counter these aerial threats, but they leave a legal gap for private operators of critical facilities, who often lack the authority to mitigate such risks independently. The legislation aims to bridge this gap, enabling those owners to detect, track, and respond to drone threats effectively.
Sen. Cotton's legislation is motivated by a pressing need for enhanced security measures amidst rising incidents of drone interference. It recognizes the vulnerabilities of the North American electric grid and other critical services, necessitating urgent action to ensure their reliability and safety. The Act mandates required training and certification for personnel authorized to use counter-drone technologies, establishing a structured program to support effective implementation.
Furthermore, the bill proposes a grant program funded with $250 million over five years, providing resources for critical infrastructure owners to acquire the technology needed for drone defense. Among its provisions is a measure that offers liability protection for actions taken under the bill, ensuring that unauthorized actions leading to civil claims are mitigated, except in cases of gross negligence.
The Critical Infrastructure Airspace Defense Act represents a crucial step in modernizing security frameworks to address the evolving landscape of aerial threats, ensuring that critical infrastructure can operate safely and effectively in an age of increasing drone activity.
The bill (S. 4380) has no co-sponsors.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/4380/text
Consumer Protection Remedies Act Legislation by Sen. Cantwell Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Consumer Protection Remedies Act, originally introduced by Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-WA, on April 15, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This bill seeks to amend section 13 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to enhance the ability of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to provide equitable relief for consumers harmed by violations of consumer protection laws.
The proposed legislation responds to growing concerns about the adequacy of current consumer protection measures. It aims to empower the FTC with expanded legal tools, enabling the Commission
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Consumer Protection Remedies Act, originally introduced by Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-WA, on April 15, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This bill seeks to amend section 13 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to enhance the ability of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to provide equitable relief for consumers harmed by violations of consumer protection laws.
The proposed legislation responds to growing concerns about the adequacy of current consumer protection measures. It aims to empower the FTC with expanded legal tools, enabling the Commissionto seek restitution, contract rescission, and disgorgement of unjust enrichment from violators. These changes would allow the FTC to more effectively address consumer losses and ensure that entities found in violation of the law cannot unjustly benefit from their actions.
By modifying existing provisions, the bill would introduce significant reforms, including expanded definitions of violations and enhanced remedies available in cases brought under the law. Additionally, the legislation establishes a ten-year limitations period for claims, which proponents argue is necessary to hold violators accountable and provide fair relief for consumers affected by unfair practices.
The motivation behind the Consumer Protection Remedies Act stems from the increasing complexity of consumer markets and the need for robust mechanisms to protect individuals from deceptive practices. As sectors such as e-commerce and digital services evolve, so too must the tools available to regulatory bodies like the FTC. This bill reflects a commitment to strengthening consumer rights and providing necessary enforcement mechanisms to navigate the challenges posed by modern economic landscapes.
As the bill progresses through Congress, stakeholders in the retail and technology sectors are closely monitoring its development, recognizing its potential impact on operational practices and consumer trust in the marketplace.
The bill (S. 4311) has 5 co-sponsors: Sens. Edward J. Markey, D-MA; Bernard Sanders, I-VT; Richard Blumenthal, D-CT; Amy Klobuchar, D-MN; Ben Ray Lujan, D-NM.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/4311/text
Climate Change Education Act Legislation by Sen. Markey Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Climate Change Education Act, originally introduced by Sen. Edward J. Markey, D-MA, on April 22, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation aims to mandate the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to establish a comprehensive Climate Change Education Program designed to enhance public understanding of climate change and its effects on society.
The motivation behind the Climate Change Education Act stems from a growing recognition of the urgent need for climate literacy across all age groups. With
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Climate Change Education Act, originally introduced by Sen. Edward J. Markey, D-MA, on April 22, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation aims to mandate the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to establish a comprehensive Climate Change Education Program designed to enhance public understanding of climate change and its effects on society.
The motivation behind the Climate Change Education Act stems from a growing recognition of the urgent need for climate literacy across all age groups. Withthe evidence of human-induced climate change becoming increasingly undeniable, the bill seeks to address the significant gap in climate knowledge within educational systems. Notably, only a fraction of middle and high school science teachers reportedly grasps the extent of the scientific consensus on climate change, highlighting a critical area for educational reform.
The proposed program would not only aim to improve climate literacy among students but also equip educators with essential training to effectively teach climate topics. By incorporating climate change education into existing curricula and establishing partnerships with local educational agencies and nonprofit organizations, the Act endeavors to create a robust framework for climate education at both formal and nonformal levels. This initiative aligns with broader goals of fostering a green economy and preparing future generations to confront the challenges posed by climate change.
Furthermore, funding allocations outlined in the bill emphasize support for projects in environmental justice communities, ensuring equitable access to education regarding climate adaptation and mitigation strategies. Through grants and cooperative agreements, the Climate Change Education Program aspires to facilitate community engagement, encouraging individuals to take meaningful action in response to climate-related challenges.
The bill (S. 4377) has 8 co-sponsors: Sens. Richard Blumenthal, D-CT; Cory A. Booker, D-NJ; Mazie K. Hirono, D-HI; Jeff Merkley, D-OR; Bernard Sanders, I-VT; Adam B. Schiff, D-CA; Chris Van Hollen, D-MD; Elizabeth Warren, D-MA.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/4377/text
America Grows Act of 2026 Legislation by Sen. Durbin Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The America Grows Act of 2026, originally introduced by Sen. Richard J. Durbin, D-IL, on April 20, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation aims to enhance funding for agricultural research on a national scale, ensuring sustained investment that encourages innovation and productivity in the sector.
Advocates of the bill emphasize the growing importance of agricultural research as a means to address challenges such as climate change, food security, and economic viability for farmers. The Act seeks to appropriate a budget that increases
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The America Grows Act of 2026, originally introduced by Sen. Richard J. Durbin, D-IL, on April 20, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation aims to enhance funding for agricultural research on a national scale, ensuring sustained investment that encourages innovation and productivity in the sector.
Advocates of the bill emphasize the growing importance of agricultural research as a means to address challenges such as climate change, food security, and economic viability for farmers. The Act seeks to appropriate a budget that increasesfunding for key agricultural agencies, such as the Agricultural Research Service and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, by a baseline of 105 percent each fiscal year. This systematic increase aligns funding with inflation and aims to stimulate rigorous research initiatives that can lead to breakthroughs in agricultural practices and technology.
The legislation responds to concerns within the agricultural community around lagging investments in research amid rising operational costs and the pressing need for sustainable practices to ensure food availability for future populations. By mandating a steady rise in funding, the America Grows Act positions agricultural research as a priority on the federal agenda, highlighting its critical role in securing the nation's food supply and enhancing economic growth in rural areas.
Additionally, the Act includes provisions to exempt allocated funds from budget sequestration, further safeguarding agricultural research investments from potential cuts. This strategic move not only underlines the importance of agriculture in U.S. policy but also seeks to bolster the country's resilience against evolving agricultural challenges in the years to come.
The bill (S. 4347) has 1 co-sponsor: Sen. Jerry Moran, R-KS.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/4347/text
Airpower Acceleration Act of 2026 Legislation by Sen. Budd Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Airpower Acceleration Act of 2026, originally introduced by Sen. Ted Budd, R-NC, on April 22, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The legislation aims to grant the Secretary of Defense the authority to enter into multiyear contracts for the procurement of F-35 and F-15EX aircraft, addressing crucial needs within the United States military aviation sector.
This bill is designed to enhance the U.S. Air Force's combat capabilities by ensuring a stable supply of advanced fighter aircraft, which is essential for maintaining national defense readiness.
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Airpower Acceleration Act of 2026, originally introduced by Sen. Ted Budd, R-NC, on April 22, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The legislation aims to grant the Secretary of Defense the authority to enter into multiyear contracts for the procurement of F-35 and F-15EX aircraft, addressing crucial needs within the United States military aviation sector.
This bill is designed to enhance the U.S. Air Force's combat capabilities by ensuring a stable supply of advanced fighter aircraft, which is essential for maintaining national defense readiness.By allowing multiyear contracts, the legislation seeks to streamline the procurement process, reduce costs, and improve the efficiency of military spending.
Motivated by the increasing complexity of global security threats and the need to modernize the U.S. Air Force's fleet, this legislation underscores the importance of maintaining a robust air defense system. Proponents argue that the multiyear procurement authority will not only expedite the acquisition of critical aircraft but also bolster the defense industrial base by providing more predictable financing for subcontractors and suppliers.
In addition to permitting the procurement of F-35A, F-35B, F-35C, and F-15EX aircraft, the Airpower Acceleration Act includes provisions for advance procurement of key aircraft components in economic order quantities. This strategic planning is intended to prevent delays in production and ensure that the Air Force can meet its operational readiness objectives.
Furthermore, the act modifies inventory requirements for fighter aircraft, mandating that the Air Force maintains an adequate fleet size over the next decade. As security dynamics evolve, this legislation is positioned to support the Air Force in adapting to new challenges while ensuring the long-term viability of its operational capabilities.
The bill (S. 4374) has 6 co-sponsors: Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, D-NH; Angus S. King Jr., I-ME; Eric Schmitt, R-MO; Tim Sheehy, R-MT; Mike Rounds, R-SD; Kevin Cramer, R-ND.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/4374/text
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Water Rights Settlement Act Legislation by Sen. Padilla Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Water Rights Settlement Act, originally introduced by Sen. Alex Padilla, D-CA, on April 22, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This proposed legislation aims to settle longstanding water rights claims of the Agua Caliente Band, ensuring equitable access to vital water resources for the tribe while affirming their sovereign rights.
The legislation is designed to comprehensively address and resolve conflicts surrounding water rights in California, specifically affecting the Indio Subbasin area. It seeks to
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Water Rights Settlement Act, originally introduced by Sen. Alex Padilla, D-CA, on April 22, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This proposed legislation aims to settle longstanding water rights claims of the Agua Caliente Band, ensuring equitable access to vital water resources for the tribe while affirming their sovereign rights.
The legislation is designed to comprehensively address and resolve conflicts surrounding water rights in California, specifically affecting the Indio Subbasin area. It seeks tofacilitate a fair settlement for the Agua Caliente Band while overcoming litigation hurdles that have persisted for years. By ratifying an agreement between the tribe and local water districts, the bill aims to secure an allocation of up to 20,000 acre-feet per year of groundwater for the tribe's use.
This legislative proposal reflects a growing recognition of Indigenous tribes' rights to ancestral lands and resources, catalyzed by historic grievances and the need for sustainable water management practices. By authorizing federal appropriations for water-related projects and establishing a trust fund for the management of those resources, the bill promises to address both immediate needs and future water infrastructure challenges.
Furthermore, the legislation is presented as a means to enhance cooperation among various stakeholders, including local government and water districts, which are essential for ensuring compliance with federal and state regulations. The act not only formalizes the tribe's water rights but also empowers them with necessary revenue mechanisms, such as the ability to impose a Tribal Tax on possessory interests, thus establishing financial independence critical for the tribe's development projects.
This bill, if passed, could serve as a landmark in improving water equity and environmental sustainability for Indigenous communities across the nation.
The bill (S. 4368) has 1 co-sponsor: Sen. Adam B. Schiff, D-CA.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/4368/text
Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act Legislation by Sen. Padilla Analyzed
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act, originally introduced by Sen. Alex Padilla, D-CA, on April 22, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The legislation aims to repeal a controversial executive order that restricts mail-in voting and the use of state citizenship lists in federal elections.
The motivation for the bill stems from growing concerns over voting accessibility and the integrity of the electoral process. Proponents argue that the executive order, signed earlier this year, imposes unnecessary and sweeping regulations that could disenfranchise
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, May 1 -- The Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act, originally introduced by Sen. Alex Padilla, D-CA, on April 22, 2026, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The legislation aims to repeal a controversial executive order that restricts mail-in voting and the use of state citizenship lists in federal elections.
The motivation for the bill stems from growing concerns over voting accessibility and the integrity of the electoral process. Proponents argue that the executive order, signed earlier this year, imposes unnecessary and sweeping regulations that could disenfranchisemillions of voters. The proposed legislation emphasizes Congress's constitutional authority to regulate elections, arguing that the executive branch has overstepped its boundaries. By repealing the executive order, the bill seeks to ensure that all eligible voters have the ability to participate in elections, particularly through absentee and mail-in voting.
Historical context underscores the importance of mail-in voting, which has been utilized for over a century during various conflicts and pandemics. The bill outlines a significant increase in the use of absentee ballots, noting that over 66 million Americans voted by mail during the 2020 pandemic election and a substantial number continued to do so in subsequent elections. This reinforces the claim that mail voting is a secure and essential component of modern electoral practices.
In addition to repealing the executive order, the legislation prohibits federal funds from being used to enforce similar regulations. This includes restrictions on mail-in voting and the establishment of citizenship databases for electoral purposes. By safeguarding mail-in voting, the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act aims to promote fairer electoral practices and adapt to the changing landscape of voter participation.
The bill (S. 4369) has 40 co-sponsors: Sens. Gary C. Peters, D-MI; Richard J. Durbin, D-IL; Charles E. Schumer, D-NY; Jeff Merkley, D-OR; Angela D. Alsobrooks, D-MD; Tammy Baldwin, D-WI; Michael F. Bennet, D-CO; Richard Blumenthal, D-CT; Lisa Blunt Rochester, D-DE; Cory A. Booker, D-NJ; Maria Cantwell, D-WA; Christopher A. Coons, D-DE; Catherine Cortez Masto, D-NV; Tammy Duckworth, D-IL; Ruben Gallego, D-AZ; Kirsten E. Gillibrand, D-NY; Martin Heinrich, D-NM; John W. Hickenlooper, D-CO; Mazie K. Hirono, D-HI; Tim Kaine, D-VA; Mark Kelly, D-AZ; Andy Kim, D-NJ; Angus S. King Jr., I-ME; Amy Klobuchar, D-MN; Ben Ray Lujan, D-NM; Edward J. Markey, D-MA; Christopher Murphy, D-CT; Patty Murray, D-WA; Jacky Rosen, D-NV; Bernard Sanders, I-VT; Adam B. Schiff, D-CA; Jeanne Shaheen, D-NH; Chris Van Hollen, D-MD; Mark R. Warner, D-VA; Elizabeth Warren, D-MA; Peter Welch, D-VT; Sheldon Whitehouse, D-RI; Ron Wyden, D-OR; Elissa Slotkin, D-MI; Jack Reed, D-RI.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/4369/text
