Foundations
Here's a look at documents from U.S. foundations
Featured Stories
Privacy Victory - Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in OPM/DOGE Lawsuit
WASHINGTON, June 11 -- The Electronic Frontier Foundation posted the following news release on June 9, 2025:
* * *
Privacy Victory! Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in OPM/DOGE Lawsuit
Court to Decide Scope of Injunction Later This Week
*
NEW YORK-In a victory for personal privacy, a New York federal district court judge today granted a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit challenging the U.S. Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) disclosure of records to DOGE and its agents.
Judge Denise L. Cote of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York found that OPM violated the
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 11 -- The Electronic Frontier Foundation posted the following news release on June 9, 2025:
* * *
Privacy Victory! Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in OPM/DOGE Lawsuit
Court to Decide Scope of Injunction Later This Week
*
NEW YORK-In a victory for personal privacy, a New York federal district court judge today granted a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit challenging the U.S. Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) disclosure of records to DOGE and its agents.
Judge Denise L. Cote of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York found that OPM violated thePrivacy Act and bypassed its established cybersecurity practices under the Administrative Procedures Act. The court will decide the scope of the injunction later this week. The plaintiffs have asked the court to halt DOGE agents' access to OPM records and for DOGE and its agents to delete any records that have already been disclosed. OPM's databases hold highly sensitive personal information about tens of millions of federal employees, retirees, and job applicants.
"The plaintiffs have shown that the defendants disclosed OPM records to individuals who had no legal right of access to those records," Cote found. "In doing so, the defendants violated the Privacy Act and departed from cybersecurity standards that they are obligated to follow. This was a breach of law and of trust. Tens of millions of Americans depend on the Government to safeguard records that reveal their most private and sensitive affairs."
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Lex Lumina LLP, Democracy Defenders Fund, and The Chandra Law Firm requested the injunction as part of their ongoing lawsuit against OPM and DOGE on behalf of two labor unions and individual current and former government workers across the country. The lawsuit's union plaintiffs are the American Federation of Government Employees AFL-CIO and the Association of Administrative Law Judges, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers Judicial Council 1 AFL-CIO.
The lawsuit argues that OPM and OPM Acting Director Charles Ezell illegally disclosed personnel records to DOGE agents in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act and the federal Privacy Act of 1974, a watershed anti-surveillance statute that prevents the federal government from abusing our personal information. In addition to seeking to permanently halt the disclosure of further OPM data to DOGE, the lawsuit asks for the deletion of any data previously disclosed by OPM to DOGE.
The federal government is the nation's largest employer, and the records held by OPM represent one of the largest collections of sensitive personal data in the country. In addition to personally identifiable information such as names, social security numbers, and demographic data, these records include work information like salaries and union activities; personal health records and information regarding life insurance and health benefits; financial information like death benefit designations and savings programs; nondisclosure agreements; and information concerning family members and other third parties referenced in background checks and health records.
OPM holds these records for tens of millions of Americans, including current and former federal workers and those who have applied for federal jobs. OPM has a history of privacy violations--an OPM breach in 2015 exposed the personal information of 22.1 million people--and its recent actions make its systems less secure.
With few exceptions, the Privacy Act limits the disclosure of federally maintained sensitive records on individuals without the consent of the individuals whose data is being shared. It protects all Americans from harms caused by government stockpiling of our personal data. This law was enacted in 1974, the last time Congress acted to limit the data collection and surveillance powers of an out-of-control President.
A number of courts have already found that DOGE's activities at other agencies likely violate the law, including at the Social Security Administration and the Treasury Department.
For the preliminary injunction: https://www.eff.org/document/afge-v-opm-opinion-and-order-granting-preliminary-injunction
For the complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/afge-v-opm-complaint
For more about the case: https://www.eff.org/cases/american-federation-government-employees-v-us-office-personnel-management
Contacts:
Electronic Frontier Foundation: press@eff.org
Lex Lumina LLP: Managing Partner Rhett Millsaps, rhett@lex-lumina.com
* * *
Original text here: https://www.eff.org/press/releases/privacy-victory-judge-grants-preliminary-injunction-opmdoge-lawsuit
FGA Urges Congress to Quickly Codify $9B in DOGE Savings for Taxpayers
NAPLES, Florida, June 11 -- The Foundation for Government Accountability issued the following news release:
* * *
FGA Urges Congress to Quickly Codify $9 billion in DOGE Savings for Taxpayers
The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) applauds House Majority Leader Steve Scalise for introducing the Rescissions Act of 2025 (H.R.4). This landmark legislation will enshrine the Trump administration's rescission request and eliminate more than $9 billion in wasteful Washington spending. H.R. 4 delivers on the mandate voters gave President Trump to restore fiscal sanity in Washington and realize
... Show Full Article
NAPLES, Florida, June 11 -- The Foundation for Government Accountability issued the following news release:
* * *
FGA Urges Congress to Quickly Codify $9 billion in DOGE Savings for Taxpayers
The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) applauds House Majority Leader Steve Scalise for introducing the Rescissions Act of 2025 (H.R.4). This landmark legislation will enshrine the Trump administration's rescission request and eliminate more than $9 billion in wasteful Washington spending. H.R. 4 delivers on the mandate voters gave President Trump to restore fiscal sanity in Washington and realizethe Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) savings in law.
"The American people sent President Trump back to the White House to shake up the status quo in Washington. His DOGE effort became emblematic of the kind of positive disruption Americans voted for," said Tarren Bragdon, President and CEO of the Foundation for Government Accountability. "DOGE captured national attention with explosive revelations of fraud, abuse, and corruption coming out of the Washington bureaucracy. Now, Congress has the opportunity to lock the will of voters into law through a majority vote as part of the rescissions process."
"We applaud Leader Scalise for introducing H.R. 4 and taking bold action to reduce unnecessary federal spending. Congress should move quickly to pass this bill and show taxpayers their voices and votes are being heard loud and clear," Bragdon continued. "The is all-important opening salvo of what voters hope to be a series of rescission bills to realize taxpayer savings and deliver badly needed accountability to Washington's broken spending habits."
The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) is a non-profit, multi-state think tank that promotes public policy solutions to create opportunities for every American to experience the American Dream. To learn more, visit TheFGA.org.
* * *
Original text here: https://thefga.org/press/fga-urges-congress-to-quickly-codify-9-billion-in-doge-savings-for-taxpayers/
Court Clears Way for CLF Lawsuit to Protect Cape Cod Waters
BOSTON, Massachusetts, June 11 -- The Conservation Law Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
Court Clears Way for CLF Lawsuit to Protect Cape Cod Waters
Nitrogen pollution from Barnstable sewage plant leads to toxic algae blooms
*
A federal judge has ruled that Conservation Law Foundation's (CLF) lawsuit against the Town of Barnstable can move forward, rejecting key parts of a motion to dismiss. CLF's lawsuit targets harmful nitrogen pollution from Barnstable's Hyannis sewage treatment plant. The pollution leads to toxic algae outbreaks that destroy habitats and sicken people
... Show Full Article
BOSTON, Massachusetts, June 11 -- The Conservation Law Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
Court Clears Way for CLF Lawsuit to Protect Cape Cod Waters
Nitrogen pollution from Barnstable sewage plant leads to toxic algae blooms
*
A federal judge has ruled that Conservation Law Foundation's (CLF) lawsuit against the Town of Barnstable can move forward, rejecting key parts of a motion to dismiss. CLF's lawsuit targets harmful nitrogen pollution from Barnstable's Hyannis sewage treatment plant. The pollution leads to toxic algae outbreaks that destroy habitats and sicken peopleand pets.
The court's ruling marks the first time that a wastewater treatment plant on Cape Cod, discharging through the Cape's sandy soil and groundwater, has been found to be potentially subject to the Clean Water Act. Enforcement of the Clean Water Act will at long last require mandatory control of nitrogen pollution, which is killing Cape Cod's priceless estuaries.
"This is an important step in our fight to restore and protect Cape Cod's iconic waters," said CLF Vice President for Strategic Litigation Christopher Killian. "This pollution has been damaging Cape Cod's environment for far too long. We will continue our efforts to ensure that Barnstable is held accountable to stop its contribution of nitrogen pollution and protect the Cape's waters for future generations."
The town has been violating the Clean Water Act by releasing nitrogen contaminated wastewater into the sandy soil of Cape Cod where it travels to various bodies of water throughout the Lewis Bay watershed. The pollution fuels harmful algae blooms, depletes oxygen in the water, and threatens marine life, recreational uses, and public health.
The judge's ruling excluded a narrow subset of ponds from CLF's case, but affirmed the majority of the claims. The case will now proceed toward trial.
The court ruling can be read here (https://www.clf.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Opinion-Barnstable.pdf).
* * *
Original text here: https://www.clf.org/newsroom/court-clears-way-for-clf-lawsuit-to-protect-cape-cod-waters/
WLF Urges Supreme Court to Clarify Materiality Standard in Securities Cases
WASHINGTON, June 10 -- The Washington Legal Foundation issued the following news release on June 9, 2025:
* * *
WLF Urges Supreme Court to Clarify Materiality Standard in Securities Cases
(Washington, DC)--Washington Legal Foundation (WLF) today urged the U.S. Supreme Court to review, and ultimately to overturn, a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that gutted the critical pleading requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA). WLF's amicus brief was drafted with pro bono assistance from Robert Loeb, Edward Williams, and Gavin B. McGimpsey of
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, June 10 -- The Washington Legal Foundation issued the following news release on June 9, 2025:
* * *
WLF Urges Supreme Court to Clarify Materiality Standard in Securities Cases
(Washington, DC)--Washington Legal Foundation (WLF) today urged the U.S. Supreme Court to review, and ultimately to overturn, a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that gutted the critical pleading requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA). WLF's amicus brief was drafted with pro bono assistance from Robert Loeb, Edward Williams, and Gavin B. McGimpsey ofOrrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
The case arises from plaintiffs' claim that BDO's certification of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) compliance was false because, in a rush to complete its audit report, BDO employees allegedly skipped over certain auditing procedures. Yet the complaint also concedes that once BDO discovered the missing procedures, it promptly completed them. Thus, it is undisputed that the information presented to investors about AmTrust's financial condition was unaffected by BDO's alleged noncompliance with PCAOB standards. The district court promptly dismissed the complaint for failure to plead materiality. The Second Circuit reversed, however, insisting that an accounting firm's certification of compliance with professional standards is per se material because it inherently communicates information investors are interested in knowing.
In its amicus brief urging review, WLF explained that the Second Circuit's per se rule substantially dilutes the heightened pleading standard Congress enacted in the PSLRA. Congress enacted the PSLRA to stem the tide of baseless securities litigation. The Second Circuit's per se rule guts the PSLRA's heightened pleading standards and allows plaintiffs to survive a motion to dismiss by merely alleging that the outside auditor's certificate of compliance was false. The decision below also creates uncertainty about the standard for materiality and incentivizes overly exhaustive disclosures that will not serve American businesses or the public.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.wlf.org/2025/06/09/communicating/wlf-urges-supreme-court-to-clarify-materiality-standard-in-securities-cases/
[Category: Law/Legal]
Rockefeller Foundation Announces First Class of Big Bets Fellows Focused on Asia-Pacific
NEW YORK, June 10 -- The Rockefeller Foundation posted the following news release:
* * *
Rockefeller Foundation Announces First Class of Big Bets Fellows Focused on Asia-Pacific
*
Over the four-month fellowship, these Asia-Pacific Big Bets Fellows will participate in intensive programming, peer learning, and global networking designed to amplify their potential impact and help translate their bold ideas into lasting systems change. Their immediate efforts encompass 26 countries in the region, including India, Indonesia, New Zealand, Bangladesh, Nepal, the Pacific Islands, Thailand, and Viet
... Show Full Article
NEW YORK, June 10 -- The Rockefeller Foundation posted the following news release:
* * *
Rockefeller Foundation Announces First Class of Big Bets Fellows Focused on Asia-Pacific
*
Over the four-month fellowship, these Asia-Pacific Big Bets Fellows will participate in intensive programming, peer learning, and global networking designed to amplify their potential impact and help translate their bold ideas into lasting systems change. Their immediate efforts encompass 26 countries in the region, including India, Indonesia, New Zealand, Bangladesh, Nepal, the Pacific Islands, Thailand, and VietNam.
"Our 12 Asia-Pacific Big Bets Fellows are working toward bold, transformative change in a region that will shape all of our futures," said Dr. Rajiv J. Shah, President of The Rockefeller Foundation. "These ambitious, creative young leaders are precisely the types of changemakers The Rockefeller Foundation has always proudly supported. We're thrilled to be working with them as they advance economic opportunity in their communities, build sustainable ecosystems, and so much more."
This Asia-Pacific cohort follows the successful launches of previous Big Bets Fellowships in Latin America and the Caribbean (2024) and the United States (2025), and reflects The Rockefeller Foundation's commitment to supporting locally-led innovation to tackle global challenges.
"Our Asia-Pacific Big Bets Fellows are lighting the path to the future with bold ideas rooted in deep commitment to their communities," said Deepali Khanna, Head of Asia at The Rockefeller Foundation. "Whether on remote islands or in rapidly growing cities, these leaders are blending their experience and expertise with modern innovation to create a more resilient and hopeful future. We are proud to walk alongside them as they take on the region's toughest challenges with determination and heart."
The 2025 Asia-Pacific Fellows are implementing a wide range of ambitious initiatives:
* Aafreen Siddiqui, Our Common Air: Catalyze collective action through stronger commitments, smarter investments, and streamlined accountability to combat air pollution across Asia-Pacific for better public health and economic growth.
* Alexia Hilbertidou, GirlBoss New Zealand: Empower a growing community of more than 17,000 young women across the Pacific to solve local problems at scale, teaching them practical skills in science, technology, and sustainability.
* Anusha Meher Bhargava, Tech4Good Community: Safeguard natural habitats and support biodiversity by harnessing the latest open-source technology and creating a new digital platform for conservationists, researchers, and policymakers to share data, monitor ecosystems, and improve environmental outcomes.
* Bobuchi Ken-Opurum, Barefoot Story x Re-HOUSED: Equip low-income individuals who build their own homes in India with the tools, data, and know-how to improve safety, comfort, and resilience to heat stress.
* Eshrat Waris, British Asian Trust: Support smallholder farmers as they transition to sustainable agriculture practices, which de-risks this traditionally high-cost period, enables greater credit flow in these communities, and supports smallholder networks in communities.
* Gaurav Godhwani, CivicDataLab: Unlock data collaborations and AI innovations to protect the most vulnerable regions in the Asia-Pacific.
* Mustika Wijaya, Solar Chapter: Expand the use of innovative solar-powered water pumping systems to reduce food insecurity, address water scarcity, and improve livelihoods in Indonesia.
* Ristika Putri Istanti, Lingkar Temu Kabupaten Lestari: Boost economic opportunity while conserving natural landscapes and resources in regional areas in Indonesia.
* Supatchaya Techachoochert, Mae Fah Luang Foundation: Generate economic opportunities and strengthen communities in Thailand by disincentivizing the deforestation that accompanies the production of monoculture crops.
* Uttam Pudasaini, NAXA: Leverage the latest technology, including artificial intelligence and geospatial analytics, to enhance anticipatory action by focusing on household-level risk assessments, delivering targeted and inclusive early warnings for climate-induced hazards, ultimately protecting lives and livelihoods, starting in Bangladesh and Nepal, and expanding to climate-vulnerable countries in the Asia-Pacific.
* Yasser Naqvi, CSEP: Foreground evidence and build capacity to raise awareness among policy stakeholders on environmental issues in India.
* Yumi Son, BOBLME II: Restore marine habitats and coastal ecosystems, reduce overfishing and illegal fishing, strengthen governance, ensure broad community participation, and support sustainable, long-term livelihoods in the Asia-Pacific.
These leaders were selected from a diverse pool of changemakers nominated through the Big Bets community and external networks. Their work spans technology, finance, governance, and environmental initiatives, which will directly impact millions of underserved communities across the Asia-Pacific.
Elizabeth Yee, Executive Vice President of Programs at The Rockefeller Foundation, who formally announced the Fellows during the Big Bets Live 2025 event in New York, said, "I am thrilled to congratulate this class of Fellows and can't wait to see what more they'll accomplish. We're proud to support their big bets that will define humanity's future."
The occasion marked the Foundation's 112th anniversary, celebrating the power of bold, collaborative action and honoring the changemakers and partners turning ambitious ideas into breakthrough solutions.
Since its founding in 1913, The Rockefeller Foundation has supported transformative initiatives in public health, food security, and equitable economic opportunity around the world. The Big Bets Fellowship is a cornerstone of this legacy, investing in leaders who bet big on a better future, and back it up with bold, data-driven action.
About The Rockefeller Foundation
The Rockefeller Foundation is a pioneering philanthropy built on collaborative partnerships at the frontiers of science, technology, and innovation that enable individuals, families, and communities to flourish. We make big bets to promote the well-being of humanity. Today, we are focused on advancing human opportunity and reversing the climate crisis by transforming systems in food, health, energy, and finance. For more information, sign up for our newsletter at www.rockefellerfoundation.org/subscribe and follow us on X @RockefellerFdn and LinkedIn @the-rockefeller-foundation.
***
Original text here: https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/rockefeller-foundation-announces-first-class-of-big-bets-fellows-focused-on-asia-pacific/
Georgia Public Policy Foundation Issues Commentary: School choice means more than just one program
ATLANTA, Georgia, June 10 -- The Georgia Public Policy Foundation posted the following commentary by President and CEO Kyle Wingfield:
* * *
School choice means more than just one program
Proponents of educational freedom in Georgia often hold up Florida as a paragon of empowering families to choose the education that best fits their children's needs. But with so much of the focus on private choice, it's easy to forget that freedom also means the ability to move among public schools.
That's particularly worth remembering as Florida has hit a new milestone : 51% of all K-12 students there exercised
... Show Full Article
ATLANTA, Georgia, June 10 -- The Georgia Public Policy Foundation posted the following commentary by President and CEO Kyle Wingfield:
* * *
School choice means more than just one program
Proponents of educational freedom in Georgia often hold up Florida as a paragon of empowering families to choose the education that best fits their children's needs. But with so much of the focus on private choice, it's easy to forget that freedom also means the ability to move among public schools.
That's particularly worth remembering as Florida has hit a new milestone : 51% of all K-12 students there exercisededucational choice in 2023-24, the latest year for which data are available. That's nearly 1.8 million students out of about 3.5 million, according to Step Up for Students, a nonprofit that administers private choice programs in Florida.
Surprisingly, most of those 1.8 million students were still enrolled in a public school.
The largest segment of choice students in Florida, almost 400,000 kids, attended public charter schools. The second-largest group, almost 275,000 kids, took advantage of Florida's open enrollment laws to attend a traditional public school other than the one they were zoned for.
Other options - such as career and professional academies, magnet schools, university-run lab schools and more - brought the total number of students making a public-school choice to about 1.1 million.
So, even in arguably the No. 1 state for school choice, where just over half the students exercise it, kids outside the public system remain the smallest group.
You have about 1.7 million Florida kids in their zoned, traditional public school taking a standard course of study.
You have about 1.1 million doing something else but still in a public school.
And you have about 700,000 attending a private school or homeschooling, with or without using taxpayer funds.
What does all that mean?
First, it means that even advocates for educational freedom are selling it short. Educational freedom means a lot more than a voucher program here or a tax-credit scholarship there. Those are essential elements of ensuring all students can access the education that best meets their needs, but they aren't the only ones.
Second, it means opponents of educational freedom are equally but differently short-sighted. They fight almost all alternatives to sending kids to their zoned, traditional school.
But as Florida demonstrates, even if students can easily leave the public schools altogether, more families will stay in a public school if there are robust options available to them. That includes students at their zoned schools.
As Step Up's Patrick Gibbons writes, "If families are surrounded by options and still choose their assigned public school, isn't that a choice, too? In that light, Florida may already have a 100% choice system, because staying is just as much a decision as leaving."
But that's only true if families are truly surrounded by options -- which isn't what we have in Georgia.
Here it's extremely difficult to determine how many families use our open-enrollment laws to send students to traditional public schools outside their attendance zone. The Georgia Public Policy Foundation reported last year that these data are hard to get and inconsistently reported. But the best we could tell, fewer than 21,000 Georgia students chose open enrollment - about 1/13th as many as in Florida, even though we have about half as many students.
The development of charter schools has also lagged behind, as local school districts each year turn down high-quality applications to create innovative new public schools. Georgia has about one-sixth as many charter school students as Florida - again, despite having half as many students overall.
There are reforms that could help Georgia's public schools compete better with private schools, whether students have state programs to help them make choices or not. It's telling that public-school advocates at the Gold Dome would rather kill new private choice programs than loosen any restrictions keeping public schools from competing.
As Florida shows us, there's a better way.
***
Original text here: https://www.georgiapolicy.org/news/school-choice-means-more-than-just-one-program/
CLF Reaches Clean Air Lawsuit Settlement With CT School Bus Operator
BOSTON, Massachusetts, June 10 -- The Conservation Law Foundation issued the following news release on June 9, 2025:
* * *
CLF Reaches Clean Air Lawsuit Settlement with CT School Bus Operator
Connecticut bus company to buy electric buses, fund air quality monitoring
*
(New Haven, CT) - Conservation Law Foundation (CLF) and All-Star Transportation settled a lawsuit over Clean Air Act violations from harmful tailpipe emissions in Brookfield, New Milford, Seymour, and Waterbury, Connecticut. The settlement requires the school bus company to stop unlawful idling and purchase six electric school
... Show Full Article
BOSTON, Massachusetts, June 10 -- The Conservation Law Foundation issued the following news release on June 9, 2025:
* * *
CLF Reaches Clean Air Lawsuit Settlement with CT School Bus Operator
Connecticut bus company to buy electric buses, fund air quality monitoring
*
(New Haven, CT) - Conservation Law Foundation (CLF) and All-Star Transportation settled a lawsuit over Clean Air Act violations from harmful tailpipe emissions in Brookfield, New Milford, Seymour, and Waterbury, Connecticut. The settlement requires the school bus company to stop unlawful idling and purchase six electric schoolbuses and charging infrastructure, estimated to cost $2.5 million.
"Holding polluters accountable to idling laws protects public health and the environment," said Ameya Gehi, CLF staff attorney. "When a vehicle idles, it spews harmful tailpipe pollution into the air, harming our lungs and communities. Less idling and fewer fossil-fueled buses means cleaner, safer air for Connecticut residents."
In addition to revising its anti-idling policy, improving idling training, and conducting walkthroughs to monitor idling, All-Star will pay $300,000 to R.A.C.C.E. Inc. to fund air quality monitoring projects in Waterbury.
"While we were saddened and disappointed to learn the extent of additional and unwarranted amounts of pollutants emitted into the air we breathe by All Star Transportation, we are equally excited and encouraged to learn of the legal advocacy conducted by CLF to bring increased levels of accountability, transparency, and partnership with All Star Transportation," said Robert Goodrich, executive director of R.A.C.C.E. Inc., a nonprofit group working to improve air quality in Waterbury. "As a result of CLF's efforts, Waterbury students and families will have an opportunity to benefit from cleaner air as well as more timely and accurate air quality data."
Idling vehicles emit harmful exhaust containing particulate matter and toxins, which accumulate in the surrounding air. Breathing in this pollution can damage the lungs, worsen conditions such as asthma and bronchitis, and is associated with reduced cognitive function, higher rates of heart disease, various cancers, and premature death. Children are particularly vulnerable to the effects of air pollution--their lungs are developing and they breathe faster than adults, resulting in higher exposure. Reducing exposure to diesel exhaust for schoolchildren significantly improves school attendance, helping students succeed in the classroom.
The lawsuit was part of CLF's anti-idling campaign. Since 2019, CLF has filed nine cases in Connecticut and Massachusetts against transportation companies in violation of anti-idling laws.
The settlement can be found here (https://www.clf.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/AllStar-Ordered-CD-6.5.25.pdf).
* * *
Original text here: https://www.clf.org/newsroom/clf-reaches-clean-air-lawsuit-settlement-with-ct-school-bus-operator/
