Law/Legal
Here's a look at documents from law firms and legal groups
Featured Stories
McDonald Hopkins' Commitment to Mentoring Takes Center Stage: Celebrating 8 Years of Partnership With College Now
CLEVELAND, Ohio, March 21 -- McDonald Hopkins, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
McDonald Hopkins' commitment to mentoring takes center stage: Celebrating 8 years of partnership with College Now
For the eighth consecutive year, McDonald Hopkins is proud to support College Now and its mission to help students from the Cleveland Metropolitan School District navigate the path to and through college. Central to that mission is the Say Yes Cleveland scholarship, which helps bridge the financial gap for eligible students attending Ohio colleges and universities. A key component of the program
... Show Full Article
CLEVELAND, Ohio, March 21 -- McDonald Hopkins, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
McDonald Hopkins' commitment to mentoring takes center stage: Celebrating 8 years of partnership with College Now
For the eighth consecutive year, McDonald Hopkins is proud to support College Now and its mission to help students from the Cleveland Metropolitan School District navigate the path to and through college. Central to that mission is the Say Yes Cleveland scholarship, which helps bridge the financial gap for eligible students attending Ohio colleges and universities. A key component of the programis mentorship; each student is paired with a mentor to help guide them throughout their college journey.
That's where we come in. McDonald Hopkins employees have continued to step up year after year, volunteering their time and insight to support students as they transition into higher education and beyond. The program has gained strong momentum within the firm, with participation continuing to grow.
This March, the firm once again partnered with WKYC (Cleveland's NBC affiliate) to spotlight College Now's mentorship program and encourage others in the community to get involved. Throughout the month, a commercial, filmed in our Cleveland office, has been airing across the region, showcasing our mentors and sharing why this work matters. In addition, on March 11, attorneys Madison Massie and John Polinko joined the host of Lakeside Today to talk about why mentorship matters to them, and on March 18, Dave Kall, Cleveland's Managing Member, talked about how important our commitment to giving back is.
Madison told host Katherine Boyd, in part, "it's a very important cause that I feel personally connected to because I was a first-generation college grad myself, and I think that navigating a very difficult time like college, it's important to surround yourself with mentors," she said.
John Polinko said one of his professors in law school became a mentor to him, and he wanted to be that for someone else. "I am forever grateful to him for what he did for me, and it's my hope that I can emulate that for my mentee," he noted.
Dave Kall said giving back is integral to the firm.
"If we don't have an educated workforce, we are not going to have businesses stay or relocate to northeast Ohio," he said. "We believe we are a destination firm and what that means is it's important for us as attorneys to give back to the community."
* * *
Original text here: https://www.mcdonaldhopkins.com/insights/news/mcdonald-hopkins-celebrating-8-years-of-partnership-with-college-now
[Category: BizLaw/Legal]
Littler: Policy Week in Review - March 20, 2026
SAN FRANCISCO, California, March 21 -- Littler, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Policy Week in Review - March 20, 2026
Congressional and Administrative News
At a Glance
The Policy Week in Review, prepared by Littler's Workplace Policy Institute (WPI), sets forth WPI's updates on federal legislation, regulations, and congressional activity affecting the workplace.
By Shannon Meade, Jim Paretti, Alex MacDonald, and Maury Baskin
White House Releases National AI Framework
On March 20, the White House released a national policy framework for artificial intelligence (AI) available
... Show Full Article
SAN FRANCISCO, California, March 21 -- Littler, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Policy Week in Review - March 20, 2026
Congressional and Administrative News
At a Glance
The Policy Week in Review, prepared by Littler's Workplace Policy Institute (WPI), sets forth WPI's updates on federal legislation, regulations, and congressional activity affecting the workplace.
By Shannon Meade, Jim Paretti, Alex MacDonald, and Maury Baskin
White House Releases National AI Framework
On March 20, the White House released a national policy framework for artificial intelligence (AI) availableat White House National Policy Framework for AI - Legislative Recommendations. The framework is built along seven pillars: (1) AI services and platforms must take measures to protect children, while empowering parents to control their children's digital environment; (2) AI development should strengthen American communities and small businesses, while ensuring they are protected from harmful impacts; (3) American creators and publishers should be protected from AI outputs that infringe on their protected content without undermining lawful innovation and free expression; (4) the federal government must defend free speech and First Amendment protections and prevent AI systems from silencing or censoring lawful political expression or dissent; (5) the United States should remove barriers to AI innovation and accelerate development of AI applications in all sectors; (6) American workers should benefit from youth development and skills training in AI: and (7) the federal government should adopt a federal policy that preempts "cumbersome" state AI laws. The framework largely calls on Congress to adopt laws advancing these pillars, which given the current political climate, the partisan divide in Congress, and upcoming midterm elections seems unlikely to happen any time soon.
* * *
DOL Sends Joint Employer Proposed Rule to OIRA for Review
On March 16, the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) received a proposed rule from the Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division (WHD) on joint employer status under the Fair Labor Standards Act, Family and Medical Leave Act, and Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act. No further details or insights as to content or a timeline are available at this time. However, pursuant to the Administration's Spring 2025 Regulatory Agenda, the Department included its intent to consider a notice of proposed rulemaking "to adopt regulations that would guide WHD's enforcement of FLSA joint employer liability, and help promote greater uniformity among court decisions nationwide."
* * *
Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) Releases Draft AI Framework
Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) released, on March 18, a draft legislative proposal, titled "TRUMP AMERICA Act," which would create an AI national standard and preempt a patchwork of state AI laws. Additionally, the proposal incorporates legislation Senator Blackburn previously introduced to protect children from harm and creators from digital replicas related to the use of AI. Read here for a section-by-section summary of the draft proposal.
* * *
DOL Launches Data Visualization Tool for Union Reporting
In an effort to provide union members with a simplified way to see how their union dues are spent, the Department of Labor's Office of Labor-Management Standards announced the launch of a data visualization tool which takes often dense information reported by unions on the Form LM-2 and presents it in an easier way to understand.
* * *
OSHA Launches Initiative to Help Industry Meet Workplace Safety Requirements
On March 18, the Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) announced the launch of a new initiative, titled OSHA CARES, to help businesses comply with federal workplace safety and health requirements.
* * *
Senate HELP Committee to Hold Hearing on Student-Athletes
The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee will hold a hearing next week on Thursday, March 26 at 10:00 a.m. ET titled "Don't Fumble Their Future: Positioning Student-Athletes for Success in School and Beyond." The hearing will focus on whether student-athletes should be designated as employees and Title IX considerations.
* * *
Authors
Shannon Meade
Executive Director, Workplace Policy Institute
Washington, D.C.
Alexander T.
James A. Paretti
Shareholder
Washington, D.C.
Alexander T.
Alexander T. MacDonald
Shareholder
Washington, D.C.
* * *
Maury Baskin
Shareholder
Washington, D.C.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.littler.com/news-analysis/asap/policy-week-review-march-20-2026
[Category: BizLaw/Legal]
Taft Expands Denver Team with Addition of 4 Attorneys Across Key Practices
MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota, March 20 [Category: BizLaw/Legal] -- Taft, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Taft Expands Denver Team with Addition of 4 Attorneys Across Key Practices
*
Taft has added attorneys Angela Boettcher, Cassandra Elrod, Samantha Picans, and Hannah Schuppner to its Denver office, strengthening the firm's business, IP, and litigation groups while underscoring its commitment to growth in the region.
"We are excited to welcome Angela, Cassandra, Samantha, and Hannah to our team in Denver," said Colorado and Nevada Partner in Charge Lyle Wallace. "Each of them brings
... Show Full Article
MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota, March 20 [Category: BizLaw/Legal] -- Taft, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Taft Expands Denver Team with Addition of 4 Attorneys Across Key Practices
*
Taft has added attorneys Angela Boettcher, Cassandra Elrod, Samantha Picans, and Hannah Schuppner to its Denver office, strengthening the firm's business, IP, and litigation groups while underscoring its commitment to growth in the region.
"We are excited to welcome Angela, Cassandra, Samantha, and Hannah to our team in Denver," said Colorado and Nevada Partner in Charge Lyle Wallace. "Each of them bringsdemonstrated skill and experience, and we are thrilled they have chosen to continue building their practices at Taft. These additions reinforce Taft's continued momentum in Denver, where we are continuing to expand our platform across key practices."
Boettcher is joining Taft's litigation team in Denver. She has experience guiding clients through every stage of complex disputes, from the initial pleadings through appeals. Prior to joining Taft, Boettcher practiced at an Am Law 100 firm in Denver, and clerked for judges on the Colorado Supreme Court and the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. Boettcher received her J.D. from the University of Colorado Law School, where she served as the executive editor for the Colorado Law Review. She earned her bachelor's degree in political science, with an emphasis in public law, from Webster University.
Elrod is returning to Taft, bringing back her deep experience in drafting, negotiating, and advising on complex commercial agreements, including technology agreements, content licensing, intellectual property matters, vendor contracts, and marketing and sponsorship agreements. Prior to rejoining Taft, Elrod served as program director for a national coalition representing the outdoor recreation industry and practiced in-house for a leading outdoor media and technology company. Elrod earned her J.D. from Indiana University Maurer School of Law and her bachelor's degree in journalism from the University of Georgia. She earned a master's degree in the outdoor recreation economy from the University of Colorado Boulder.
Joining Taft's robust IP team, Picans helps clients enforce and protect their intellectual property. She has represented a variety of technology and manufacturing clients across all phases of litigation, primarily handling matters involving patent, trade secret, and trademark claims. In addition to litigation, Picans counsels clients on pre-litigation strategy, working proactively with businesses to identify risk, develop practical solutions, and position matters for successful resolution, including through negotiation and settlement. Picans received her J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law and her bachelor's degree from University of Central Florida.
Schuppner is a business attorney who focuses her practice on mergers and acquisitions. In addition to M&A, she counsels private equity funds, public and private companies, and investors on a broad range of corporate matters, including private equity transactions, venture capital financing, fund formation, and corporate restructuring. She has advised clients on entity formation, foreign qualifications, and corporate governance matters. Schuppner earned her J.D. from the University of Notre Dame Law School and received her bachelor's degree in communications studies and legal studies from Northwestern University.
About Taft
Founded in 1885, Taft is one of the nation's fastest-growing law firms, with a 140-year legacy rooted in the historic Taft family. With more than 1,250 attorneys and a modern, non-headquarter operating model, Taft is committed to delivering exceptional legal service to today's organizations and individuals. The firm is recognized nationally in the Am Law 100, Chambers USA, Best Lawyers(r), and Super Lawyers. Learn more at Taftlaw.com.
***
Original text here: https://www.taftlaw.com/news-events/news/taft-expands-denver-team-with-addition-of-4-attorneys-across-key-practices/
Lauren Bernton and Sasha Petrova Talk Post-Trial Issues for Young Litigators
PORTLAND, Oregon, March 20 -- Tonkon Torp, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Lauren Bernton and Sasha Petrova Talk Post-Trial Issues for Young Litigators
Tonkon Torp litigators Lauren Bernton and Sasha Petrova gave a presentation on "Post-Trial Matters" for a continuing legal education seminar hosted by the Multnomah Bar Association as part of its ongoing Young Litigators Forum.
Bernton and Petrova discussed post-trial motions and appeals. Bernton emphasized the importance of post-trial motions in preserving issues for appeal, influencing the outcome, and impacting settlement leverage.
... Show Full Article
PORTLAND, Oregon, March 20 -- Tonkon Torp, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Lauren Bernton and Sasha Petrova Talk Post-Trial Issues for Young Litigators
Tonkon Torp litigators Lauren Bernton and Sasha Petrova gave a presentation on "Post-Trial Matters" for a continuing legal education seminar hosted by the Multnomah Bar Association as part of its ongoing Young Litigators Forum.
Bernton and Petrova discussed post-trial motions and appeals. Bernton emphasized the importance of post-trial motions in preserving issues for appeal, influencing the outcome, and impacting settlement leverage.Petrova gave an overview of the appeals process, with an emphasis on traps for the unwary. They offered the audience of attorneys a road map for working up cases post-trial, and highlighted the importance of preserving the record, preparing for short deadlines, and filing any further motions with a strategic purpose.
Bernton is a partner in Tonkon Torp's Litigation Department and Co-Chair of the firm's Real Estate Disputes Group. She is a seasoned commercial litigator with a strong track record successfully helping clients navigate high-stakes disputes. Bernton represents international and regional businesses in all types of commercial disputes, with a strong emphasis on complex real estate litigation.
Petrova is a partner in Tonkon Torp's Litigation Department and Chair of the firm's Appellate Practice Group. She handles a wide range of appeals at the state and federal levels with experience including appeals involving complex business disputes, administrative agency decisions, torts, employment issues, receiverships, and property disputes.
* * *
Original text here: https://tonkon.com/news/lauren-bernton-and-sasha-petrova-talk-post-trial-issues/
[Category: BizLaw/Legal]
Gibson Dunn Secures Seventh Circuit Victory in Major Insurance Dispute
LOS ANGELES, California, March 20 [Category: BizLaw/Legal] -- Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Gibson Dunn Secures Seventh Circuit Victory in Major Insurance Dispute
*
Gibson Dunn secured a significant victory for National Union in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in a high-profile insurance coverage dispute arising from ethylene oxide emissions in Willowbrook, Illinois. The firm's team successfully argued that coverage for nearly 1,000 underlying lawsuits was barred by the policies' pollution exclusion. Following a certified question
... Show Full Article
LOS ANGELES, California, March 20 [Category: BizLaw/Legal] -- Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Gibson Dunn Secures Seventh Circuit Victory in Major Insurance Dispute
*
Gibson Dunn secured a significant victory for National Union in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in a high-profile insurance coverage dispute arising from ethylene oxide emissions in Willowbrook, Illinois. The firm's team successfully argued that coverage for nearly 1,000 underlying lawsuits was barred by the policies' pollution exclusion. Following a certified questionto the Illinois Supreme Court -which ruled unanimously in National Union's favor and overruled prior precedent -the Seventh Circuit held that no coverage was owed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment accordingly.
The decision is a landmark for insurance law, with broad implications for coverage disputes involving environmental pollution nationwide.
The Gibson Dunn team included partners Tom Dupree and Nick Harper and associates Aaron Hauptman and Aly Cox.
***
Original text here: https://www.gibsondunn.com/gibson-dunn-secures-seventh-circuit-victory-in-major-insurance-dispute/
Faegre Drinker Biddle and Reath Issues Commentary: Moving From Generative AI to AI Agents
MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota, March 20 -- Faegre Drinker Biddle and Reath, a law firm, issued the following commentary on March 19, 2026, by partner Reeya Thakrar:
* * *
Moving from Generative AI to AI Agents
Changing the Service Model for Customer Trust and Adoption
At a Glance
* Because most AI agent solutions are still shoehorned into standard SaaS agreements -- with little or no modification -- the lack of meaningful performance protections could stall adoption before it even starts.
* In most generative AI agreements, vendors disclaim all liability regarding the accuracy and use of the output;
... Show Full Article
MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota, March 20 -- Faegre Drinker Biddle and Reath, a law firm, issued the following commentary on March 19, 2026, by partner Reeya Thakrar:
* * *
Moving from Generative AI to AI Agents
Changing the Service Model for Customer Trust and Adoption
At a Glance
* Because most AI agent solutions are still shoehorned into standard SaaS agreements -- with little or no modification -- the lack of meaningful performance protections could stall adoption before it even starts.
* In most generative AI agreements, vendors disclaim all liability regarding the accuracy and use of the output;but for AI agents, the "output" or outcome is a successful and accurate completion of the process.
* One way to address this gap on liability is to change the service model. Instead of the customer directly licensing the technology for the AI agent, the vendor could instead license, implement, and maintain an AI agent to perform services more efficiently, as part of a service offering.
* When SaaS models and standard agreements are combined with well-designed metrics tailored to specific business processes, customer trust and adoption of these solutions can grow.
*
The way businesses operate is on the cusp of significant transformation. Over the last year, attention has been shifting from generative AI to the implementation of AI agents -- semi- or fully autonomous systems that can sense, reason, and act on their own. Chatbots, which are essentially generative AI solutions, can answer questions by referencing specific and relevant data in real time. AI agents represent a step forward, as they integrate with other software systems to perform particular tasks with minimal human involvement.
AI agent solutions are being offered through "off-the-shelf" agents, which have been trained and developed to specialize in specific tasks. Vendors also offer agent-builders, which can be used to develop an AI agent quickly for your specific business operations. AI agents can also leverage machine-learning techniques to continuously improve their skillsets and efficiencies.
According to IEEE, "a strong majority of technologists globally (96%) agree that agentic AI innovation, exploration and adoption will continue at lightning speed in 2026, as both established enterprises and start-ups deepen investments and commitments to the technology." This means that you will probably see a shift this year in the way you order food or groceries to your home, interact with retailers, and conduct day-to-day repetitive tasks.
Despite the efficiencies offered by AI agents, "human-in-the-loop" verification remains important. Vendors of AI agent solutions continue to take on minimal risk regarding the "output" or "performance" of their solutions. This construct made sense, at least to a certain extent, for generative AI applications, where customers understand that they needed to check the "outputs" for accuracy. But this concept does not work the same way for AI agents. The financial benefit of developing AI agents is centered on autonomy, but how can customers trust or rely on AI agents when their developers refuse to stand behind their performance?
In many ways, the AI agent model is similar to outsourcing, in that one or more processes are being performed by a contractor -- albeit a nonhuman one. In outsourcing models, the outsourcing provider takes on responsibility for the performance of its personnel through service warranties, indemnities, and service-level agreements. These protections are not common in off-the-shelf AI agent contracts, which currently still appear to be Software as a Service (SaaS) agreements. Such agreements typically provide only "availability" commitments and remedies. Because most AI agent solutions are still shoehorned into standard SaaS agreements -- with little or no modification -- the lack of meaningful performance protections could stall adoption before it even starts. The stakes are even higher when AI agents are tasked with higher-risk tasks like making payments to a third party.
This article explores two paths forward: (a) a hybrid service model that leverages AI agents for efficiency, or (b) a hybrid contracting model that mitigates performance risks. Vendors tout the transformative efficiencies of AI agents, and the contracting and operating model should tell the same story.
Hybrid Service Offering
SaaS is a cloud-based model where applications are hosted and access is provided over the internet via web browsers or apps. Users subscribe to a software service, typically paying a recurring fee. As part of the service, the software provider typically bundles maintenance, updates, and infrastructure costs, allowing end users to access and use the software without managing installation or hardware. SaaS is generally scalable and appealing for businesses seeking lower upfront costs. Generative AI applications, such as chatbots, are typically delivered to end users as a service utilizing the SaaS model. Therefore, most traditional SaaS concepts and contracting principles remain applicable when contracting for a generative AI application.
Likewise, the technology that hosts and allows development of AI agents is accessed through a similar SaaS model; however, that is only half of the story. Business or technical operations are also being outsourced to the AI agent. Traditional SaaS agreements do not account for this change and typically draw a line with respect to how you use the software application. In most generative AI agreements, vendors also disclaim all liability regarding the accuracy and use of the output; but for AI agents, the "output" or outcome is a successful and accurate completion of the process.
One way to address this gap on liability is to change the service model. Instead of the customer directly licensing the technology for the AI agent, the vendor could instead license, implement, and maintain an AI agent to perform services more efficiently, as part of a service offering. Therefore, the vendor remains responsible for the quality of the services, as in a traditional service agreement, but can incorporate the cost-savings in the ultimate fee structure for the overall service offering.
For this model, the service provider should provide transparency on its use of AI agents and obtain approval for the specific functions. The service agreement should also address intellectual property rights, privacy, security and data usage (which may not always be included in standard service agreements), and also address when and what customer data can be used to train models and how those trained models can be used. Concepts related to SaaS offerings, such as availability and maintenance and support would no longer be important, because the vendor is acting as a service provider and remains responsible for these components indirectly.
The parties should also define quantifiable service-level agreement (SLA) metrics -- such as timeliness, quality, throughput, and response/resolution time -- to create accountability and provide a basis for remedies, much like in standard outsourcing arrangements. The agreement may also include reduced SLAs to account for any drop in efficiency if the tools become temporarily unavailable for reasons outside either party's control.
If the vendor is not willing to take on the role of a service provider, then the standard SaaS contract should be updated to include quantifiable performance metrics.
Hybrid Contract
In particular, a standard SaaS contract will not account for relevant metrics -- such as error rates, accuracy rates, turnaround time, and customer satisfaction. Instead, service availability, maintenance, and support SLAs are usually provided. While these SLAs remain important, as the AI agent solution is still a SaaS application, specific and quantifiable metrics related to the performance of the AI agent will mitigate risk and increase customer adoption of these solutions.
If such quantifiable performance metrics are difficult to calculate, then the parties should consider gainsharing or cost avoidance metrics as an alternative route. These are metrics that can prove out the efficiencies touted by AI companies. With these models, actual expenditures are calculated against historic figures to demonstrate the financial benefits / costs savings of the AI agent. This solution will help prove out the return on investment (ROI) of the AI agent, but it will not solve the concerns surrounding accuracy.
Therefore, the time required for human review by the customer of the processes should be included in the calculations to ensure that the anticipated ROI is achieved. In addition, software vendors should develop functionality that allows for detailed auditing as well as real-time monitoring of the AI agents' activities. These requirements should also be included in the SaaS agreements. As they stand today, SaaS agreements typically permit the SaaS vendors to audit the customer for license compliance, but customers are not given the rights to audit the SaaS systems. The lack of transparency and documentation is another weakness when relying on a standard SaaS contract for agentic solutions.
The parties should reassess whether conventional SaaS warranties, liability caps, and indemnification obligations sufficiently address the risks of using AI agents. Standard SaaS agreements typically address IP infringement and data breaches, but even these protections are often subject to significant limitations. While those risks remain relevant, AI agents introduce a new category of concern: performance liability. What happens when an AI agent exceeds its authorization, discloses sensitive data or proprietary information, or transfers funds to the wrong recipient?
Traditional software applications are rule-based and predictable -- the inputs produce the outputs based on the application of set rules. AI agents, by contrast, operate on probabilistic and adaptive models, making their behavior context-dependent and harder to anticipate. This unpredictability is precisely what makes AI agents valuable, it is also why standard SaaS agreements fail to account for these risks.
Conclusion
While traditional SaaS models and contracts provide a framework for AI agent use cases, they are not sufficient on their own to address the unique characteristics of these solutions. When these models and standard agreements are combined with well-designed metrics tailored to specific business processes, customer trust and adoption of these solutions can grow. As the AI agent market matures, the vendors and customers who proactively address these contracting challenges will be best positioned to realize the full potential of this technology.
The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.
* * *
Meet the Authors
Reeya Thakrar
Partner
Chicago
+1 312 569 1467
reeya.thakrar@faegredrinker.com
* * *
Original text here: https://www.faegredrinker.com/en/insights/publications/2026/3/moving-from-generative-ai-to-ai-agents
[Category: BizLaw/Legal]
Doug Mishkin shares insight with The Athletic
ST. LOUIS, Missouri, March 20 [Category: BizLaw/Legal] -- Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Doug Mishkin shares insight with The Athletic
*
Doug Mishkin, a partner in BCLP's Technology, Commercial and Data practice, recently spoke with The Athletic about Major League Baseball's partnership with Polymarket and the broader legal and integrity issues surrounding prediction markets in professional sports.
Doug discussed the parallels between today's prediction market landscape and the legalization of sports betting in 2018, contract negotiation and legal
... Show Full Article
ST. LOUIS, Missouri, March 20 [Category: BizLaw/Legal] -- Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Doug Mishkin shares insight with The Athletic
*
Doug Mishkin, a partner in BCLP's Technology, Commercial and Data practice, recently spoke with The Athletic about Major League Baseball's partnership with Polymarket and the broader legal and integrity issues surrounding prediction markets in professional sports.
Doug discussed the parallels between today's prediction market landscape and the legalization of sports betting in 2018, contract negotiation and legalbattles being waged in various states over whether prediction markets should be treated as traditional sports gambling.
Read the full article here to explore Doug's insights.
***
Original text here: https://www.bclplaw.com/en-US/events-insights-news/doug-mishkin-shares-insight-with-the-athletic.html
