Featured Stories
Ropes and Gray: In Law360, Attorneys Examine What Amazon vs. Perplexity Decision Means for Agentic AI and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
BOSTON, Massachusetts, Aug. 22 -- Ropes and Gray, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
In Law360, Attorneys Examine What Amazon v. Perplexity Decision Means for Agentic AI and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
In a Law360 article, attorneys examined what the Amazon v. Perplexity decision means for agentic AI and the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). The decision addresses a question of first impression: whether an AI agent that assists a user in navigating a website constitutes unauthorized access under the CFAA.
The court held that, on the facts presented, it does not, because
... Show Full Article
BOSTON, Massachusetts, Aug. 22 -- Ropes and Gray, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
In Law360, Attorneys Examine What Amazon v. Perplexity Decision Means for Agentic AI and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
In a Law360 article, attorneys examined what the Amazon v. Perplexity decision means for agentic AI and the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). The decision addresses a question of first impression: whether an AI agent that assists a user in navigating a website constitutes unauthorized access under the CFAA.
The court held that, on the facts presented, it does not, becauseit is the user, not the AI tool, who accesses the website for purposes of the statute.
The authors note that the decision underscores that system architecture, specifically whether the user's device or the AI itself communicates with third-party servers, may be a critical factor in determining CFAA exposure. Under this interpretation, the statute offers limited protection against unwanted agentic AI interactions, leaving businesses to rely primarily on contractual terms and technical safeguards.
The article summarizes the practical implications of the decision for AI developers and deployers, as well as for businesses whose platforms or data may be implicated by AI-driven interactions.
The article was authored by partner Regina Sam Penti, co-lead of the firm's artificial intelligence industry group, and IP transactions associates Sabrina Kim and Chloe Meyers.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.ropesgray.com/en/news-and-events/news/2026/08/in-law360-attorneys-examine-what-amazon-v-perplexity-decision-means-for-agentic-ai-and-the-computer
[Category: BizLaw/Legal]
Thomas Hosts American College of Trial Lawyers Podcast Episode with Former U.S. District Judge A. Howard Matz
MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota, Aug. 21 [Category: BizLaw/Legal] -- Taft, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Thomas Hosts American College of Trial Lawyers Podcast Episode with Former U.S. District Judge A. Howard Matz
*
On August 19, Taft Columbus partner Dave Thomas hosted the season 15 premiere of the "Trial Tested" podcast for the American College of Trial Lawyers. In the episode, Thomas sat down with Judge A. Howard Matz, former U.S. District Judge for the Central District of California, to explore the concept of judicial independence - what it means in practice and why it matters to
... Show Full Article
MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota, Aug. 21 [Category: BizLaw/Legal] -- Taft, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Thomas Hosts American College of Trial Lawyers Podcast Episode with Former U.S. District Judge A. Howard Matz
*
On August 19, Taft Columbus partner Dave Thomas hosted the season 15 premiere of the "Trial Tested" podcast for the American College of Trial Lawyers. In the episode, Thomas sat down with Judge A. Howard Matz, former U.S. District Judge for the Central District of California, to explore the concept of judicial independence - what it means in practice and why it matters tothe rule of law.
Judge Matz also reflected on lessons learned from the courtroom, including the importance of listening, civility, and giving advocates room to do their jobs.
To listen to the full episode, visit here.
Thomas is a fellow in The American College of Trial Lawyers and is listed in Chambers USA as a leading lawyer in white-collar crime and government investigations. As a partner in Taft's Compliance, Investigations, and White Collar Defense practice group, he advises and represents companies, executives, public officials, health care providers, and other professionals subject to state and federal investigations and prosecutions.
***
Original text here: https://www.taftlaw.com/news-events/news/thomas-hosts-american-college-of-trial-lawyers-podcast-episode-with-former-u-s-district-judge-a-howard-matz/
Steptoe Helps Secure Federal Court Injunction Blocking HUD Suspension of LAHSA and Protecting Critical Homelessness Funding for Los Angeles
WASHINGTON, Aug. 21 -- Steptoe, a law firm, issued the following news release:
* * *
Steptoe Helps Secure Federal Court Injunction Blocking HUD Suspension of LAHSA and Protecting Critical Homelessness Funding for Los Angeles
(Los Angeles) - Steptoe LLP was part of the legal team that secured a preliminary injunction preventing the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) from suspending the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA), preserving critical homelessness funding and services across the Los Angeles region. Steptoe represented the Los Angeles Continuum of Care (LA
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 21 -- Steptoe, a law firm, issued the following news release:
* * *
Steptoe Helps Secure Federal Court Injunction Blocking HUD Suspension of LAHSA and Protecting Critical Homelessness Funding for Los Angeles
(Los Angeles) - Steptoe LLP was part of the legal team that secured a preliminary injunction preventing the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) from suspending the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA), preserving critical homelessness funding and services across the Los Angeles region. Steptoe represented the Los Angeles Continuum of Care (LACoC) alongside Public Counsel and the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles. Court records identify Steptoe partner Robyn C. Crowther, associate Abigail Nicole Falk Orozco, and attorney Mary-Kate Planchet as counsel for the LA CoC intervenor in the case.
In LAHSA v. Trump et al., US District Judge David O. Carter ruled that HUD's abrupt suspension of LAHSA was likely unlawful under the Administrative Procedure Act, finding the agency's actions to be "arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law." The court concluded that HUD's actions threatened the Los Angeles region's ability to compete for federal homelessness funding and disrupted a framework that Congress established through the HEARTH Act to ensure local communities set homelessness response priorities.
The injunction restores LAHSA as the Collaborative Applicant for the Los Angeles Continuum of Care, requires HUD to execute pending FY 2025 grant agreements, and preserves the region's ability to pursue future federal homelessness funding opportunities. The ruling also protects the continued operation of key homelessness response infrastructure, including the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS), Coordinated Entry System (CES), and Point-in-Time Count.
* * *
About Steptoe
In more than 110 years of practice, Steptoe has earned an international reputation for vigorous representation of clients and innovative thinking before governmental agencies, successful advocacy in litigation and arbitration, and creative and practical advice in structuring business transactions. Steptoe has more than 500 lawyers and other professional staff across offices in Beijing, Brussels, Chicago, Hong Kong, Houston, London, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, and Washington, DC. For more information, visit www.steptoe.com.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.steptoe.com/en/news-publications/steptoe-helps-secure-federal-court-injunction-blocking-hud-suspension-of-lahsa-and-protecting-critical-homelessness-funding-for-los-angeles.html
[Category: BizLaw/Legal]
McGuireWoods Bolsters Commercial Litigation Prowess With Jeff Golimowski and Jeremy Baker
RICHMOND, Virginia, Aug. 21 -- McGuireWoods, a law firm, issued the following news release:
* * *
McGuireWoods Bolsters Commercial Litigation Prowess With Jeff Golimowski and Jeremy Baker
Partners Bring Deep Experience in Post-Acquisition Disputes, Construction Litigation and Government Contracts
-
McGuireWoods continues to grow its market-leading commercial litigation capabilities with the arrival of partners Jeff Golimowski and Jeremy Baker, who bring significant, trial-tested experience in post-acquisition disputes, construction litigation and government contracts matters to the firm's
... Show Full Article
RICHMOND, Virginia, Aug. 21 -- McGuireWoods, a law firm, issued the following news release:
* * *
McGuireWoods Bolsters Commercial Litigation Prowess With Jeff Golimowski and Jeremy Baker
Partners Bring Deep Experience in Post-Acquisition Disputes, Construction Litigation and Government Contracts
-
McGuireWoods continues to grow its market-leading commercial litigation capabilities with the arrival of partners Jeff Golimowski and Jeremy Baker, who bring significant, trial-tested experience in post-acquisition disputes, construction litigation and government contracts matters to the firm'sTysons, Virginia, office.
Golimowski represents businesses in high-stakes disputes, including post-merger and post-acquisition matters. His practice spans the full lifecycle of a deal, from counseling clients on asset protection during a transaction to enforcing holdback, indemnity and insurance rights after closing. He also represents Fortune 500 corporations and small-to-midsize companies in construction disputes involving highly regulated projects, including U.S. Department of Defense facility matters with exposure exceeding $150 million.
Baker guides clients through commercial construction and public contracts disputes. His construction practice focuses on energy, defense and infrastructure matters, including those involving change orders, delays, design defects and other issues arising on large-scale projects. He represents prime and subcontractors in the defense industry, handling disputes and advising on teaming agreements, subcontract formation, government investigations and federal contracts counseling. Golimowski and Baker come to McGuireWoods from Womble Bond Dickinson.
"Jeff and Jeremy are skilled litigators with proven track records in matters that carry significant financial and strategic consequences for clients," said Noreen Kelly, McGuireWoods' deputy managing partner and head of litigation. "Their experience in post-acquisition disputes complements our growing transactional practices and enhances our ability to deliver integrated, industry-focused solutions."
Shelby Guilbert, chair of McGuireWoods' Commercial Litigation Department, added, "When clients face post-closing challenges or massive delays, they need trial lawyers who understand the commercial engines behind their businesses. Jeff and Jeremy bring that exact blend of technical skill and business acumen to our team."
McGuireWoods represents buyers, sellers, investors, sponsors, portfolio companies, founders, executives and other stakeholders in disputes arising from mergers, acquisitions, financings, joint ventures, strategic investments and other business transactions, including construction and government contract matters. The firm consistently earns nationwide rankings for commercial litigation from Chambers USA. McGuireWoods ranked among "The Most Feared Law Firms in Litigation" in BTI Consulting Group's annual survey of corporate counsel.
"McGuireWoods has built a powerhouse commercial litigation practice with tremendous depth across industries," said Golimowski. "I look forward to leveraging the firm's platform to deliver even greater results for clients, particularly those navigating post-transaction disputes."
Baker added, "McGuireWoods' strength in construction and government contracts litigation, combined with its national trial capabilities, makes the firm an ideal home for my practice. I am excited to join a team that shares my focus on detailed preparation and creative problem-solving for clients."
Jack L. White, managing partner of McGuireWoods' Tysons office, said, "Jeff and Jeremy have built reputations as trusted advisers for clients in industries that drive our region's economy, and we are delighted to welcome them to the firm."
* * *
Original text here: https://www.mcguirewoods.com/news/press-releases/2026/8/mcguirewoods-bolsters-commercial-litigation-prowess-with-jeff-golimowski-and-jeremy-baker/
[Category: BizLaw/Legal]
Clark Hill: Colorado's AI Act -- Attacked, Delayed, and Now Amended--Part II - What You Need to Do
BIRMINGHAM, Michigan, Aug. 21 -- Clark Hill, a law firm, issued the following legal update:
* * *
Colorado's AI Act --Attacked, Delayed, and Now Amended--Part II: What You Need to Do
Authors: Jason M. Schwent , Lauren M. Williams
In this series, we are discussing the Colorado AI Act (the "Act") as amended and as set to take effect on January 1, 2027. In the last article, we discussed who and what the Act covered. In this article, we'll dive into what those covered by the Act must do to comply.
The Act regulates the use of so-called "automated decision-making technology (ADMT)" - technology
... Show Full Article
BIRMINGHAM, Michigan, Aug. 21 -- Clark Hill, a law firm, issued the following legal update:
* * *
Colorado's AI Act --Attacked, Delayed, and Now Amended--Part II: What You Need to Do
Authors: Jason M. Schwent , Lauren M. Williams
In this series, we are discussing the Colorado AI Act (the "Act") as amended and as set to take effect on January 1, 2027. In the last article, we discussed who and what the Act covered. In this article, we'll dive into what those covered by the Act must do to comply.
The Act regulates the use of so-called "automated decision-making technology (ADMT)" - technologythat we commonly refer to as AI. As discussed in Part I, the Act applies when ADMT is used to make "consequential decisions." Those who develop, sell, license, or substantially modify the covered ADMT are referred to under the Act as "developers." Entities who use the covered ADMT to materially influence consequential decisions are referred to as "deployers." And those who have their data used in making the ADMT determinations or who have decisions, judgements, or determinations made about them by the ADMT are the "consumers."
Now that we know the players, what does the Act require or provide for each?
What Must Developers Do?
Under the Act, developers of ADMT have certain responsibilities with respect to their ADMT. Beginning on January 1, 2027, developers of ADMT used (or intended to be used) in connection with consequential decisions must make the following available to any deployers using their ADMT:
* A general statement describing the intended uses and known harmful, or inappropriate uses of the ADMT
* A description of the categories of data, including personal data, used to train their ADMT
* Known limitations of the ADMT, including known risks and circumstances where their ADMT should not be used
* Instructions for deployer's appropriate use, monitoring, and meaningful human review where appropriate
* Information reasonably necessary for deployers of their ADMT to meet their disclosure requirements (see below) and, if information is withheld, notice to the deployer of this withholding
In addition, developers of ADMT used or intended to be used in connection with consequential decisions must provide deployers of their ADMT with notices of any material updates, intentional or substantial modifications, and "changes to the intended use of, limitations for, or risk mitigation for their ADMT within a reasonable time." The developer must keep the records related to these notices and disclosures for at least three years.
Of note, the requirements of this section only apply if the developer's ADMT is intended, documented, marketed, advertised, configured, or contracted to be used to make consequential decisions or when the developer becomes aware that its ADMT is being used to make consequential decisions (so long as that use is consistent with the intended and contracted-for uses). Put differently, this appears to create an exception to these requirements for developers who sell ADMT but expressly prohibit its use in connection with the making of consequential decisions.
What Must Deployers Do?
Deployers who use ADMT materially influence the making of consequential decisions and must provide consumers with certain disclosures regarding that ADMT and the decisions being made.
The deployer must provide "clear and conspicuous" notice to consumers that the deployer uses or will use ADMT in making consequential decisions affecting the consumer. The deployer must also provide instructions for how the consumer can obtain more information about that use and decisions made. This notice must be prominent and reasonably accessible where the deployer interacts with the consumer. For example, the Act provides that the deployer could meet this requirement by providing a link or posting where the information is collected to make such consequential decision or where the transaction that impacts the consumer occurs.
If the ADMT materially influences a consequential decision that results in an adverse outcome for the consumer, the deployer must provide the following notices within thirty days of making that adverse consequential decision:
* A plain language description of the consequential decision and the role the ADMT played in making that decision
* Instructions and a "simple-to-follow" process to request additional information about the ADMT used, including the name of the ADMT, its version number, the developer's name, and the types, categories, and sources of any personal data that was used to make the decision
* Information regarding the rights consumers are provided under the Act, as described further below
Of note, the deployer's obligation to provide additional information regarding the ADMT use is limited by what information the deployer receives from the developer about the ADMT technology in connection with an adverse decision. It is not clear what obligations a deployer would have where the developer fails to provide any of the information necessary for the deployer to meet this requirement.
Consumers and Their Rights
Under the Act, when ADMT materially influences a consequential decision resulting in an adverse outcome for a consumer, that consumer may request and deployers must provide:
* Instructions for requesting the personal data used in the consequential decision and the ability to correct any factually incorrect or materially inaccurate personal data relied upon
* An opportunity for meaningful human review and reconsideration of the consequential decision
What Comes Next: Proposed Rules
The Act also requires the Colorado Attorney General's Office to promulgate rules to implement these requirements. On August 11, 2026, the Attorney General's Office filed its first set of proposed rules that begin to provide additional detail regarding how developers and deployers are expected to comply with the Act. In Part III of this series, we will take a closer look at the proposed rules and what they may mean for developers and deployers preparing for the Act's January 1, 2027, effective date.
* * *
This publication is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. The views and opinions expressed herein represent those of the individual author only and are not necessarily the views of Clark Hill PLC. Although we attempt to ensure that postings on our website are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.clarkhill.com/news-events/news/colorado-ai-act-developer-deployer-compliance/
[Category: BizLaw/Legal]
Ashurst Perkins Coie appointed on Government Commercial Agency Legal Panel for Public Sector
SEATTLE, Washington, Aug. 21 [Category: BizLaw/Legal] -- Ashurst Perkins Coie, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Ashurst Perkins Coie appointed on Government Commercial Agency Legal Panel for Public Sector
*
Global law firm Ashurst Perkins Coie has been named as a supplier on three lots of Government Commercial Agency's Legal Panel for Public Sector. This panel serves as the framework for the provision of legal services for all the public sector, including Local and Regional Government, Health, Education, Infrastructure, Emergency Services, Central Government and Third Sector organisations.
The
... Show Full Article
SEATTLE, Washington, Aug. 21 [Category: BizLaw/Legal] -- Ashurst Perkins Coie, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Ashurst Perkins Coie appointed on Government Commercial Agency Legal Panel for Public Sector
*
Global law firm Ashurst Perkins Coie has been named as a supplier on three lots of Government Commercial Agency's Legal Panel for Public Sector. This panel serves as the framework for the provision of legal services for all the public sector, including Local and Regional Government, Health, Education, Infrastructure, Emergency Services, Central Government and Third Sector organisations.
Thethree lots are Lot 2: Focused Legal Support, Lot 4: Projects and Complex Advice including PPP and Lot 5: Transport and Rail which covers a wide spectrum of legal specialisms, including, commercial and contracts, property, real estate and construction, litigation and dispute resolution, PPP (public-private partnership), projects, employment, public procurement, social housing, infrastructure, transport and rail, health and social care, and costs law.
Sam Outtridge, Partner at Ashurst Perkins Coie, commented, "We are delighted to have been appointed to Government Commercial Agency's legal panel for public sector, which builds on our long-term relationship with the UK Government, and we are looking forward to working together with the Government's highly experienced in-house legal teams to support their future success. This appointment reflects our expertise and ability to advise on some of the most high-profile and complex transactions in the market."
Government Commercial Agency (GCA) is the UK's central commercial and procurement organisation, connecting public and private sectors to achieve the best outcomes for the UK and its citizens. GCA uses its commercial expertise to create a simpler procurement experience that redirects valuable resources into essential public services - creating value for the nation.
***
Original text here: https://www.ashurstperkinscoie.com/en/who-we-are/our-news-work-market-recognition/ashurst-perkins-coie-appointed-on-government-commercial-agency-legal-panel-for-public-sector/
Akin Advises Kennedy Lewis on Financing for The Greenbrier Joint Venture
WASHINGTON, Aug. 21 -- Akin Gump, a law firm, issued the following news release:
* * *
Akin Advises Kennedy Lewis on Financing for The Greenbrier Joint Venture
(New York) - Akin advised Kennedy Lewis Investment Management (Kennedy Lewis) in connection with a loan provided to The Greenbrier and a joint venture between Kennedy Lewis and The Justice Family Group designed to support the long-term vision for The Greenbrier.
The Akin team was led by corporate practice co-head Zachary Wittenberg and finance partner Heather Waters Borthwick and included finance counsel Nell Ethridge and Gerry Griffith
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Aug. 21 -- Akin Gump, a law firm, issued the following news release:
* * *
Akin Advises Kennedy Lewis on Financing for The Greenbrier Joint Venture
(New York) - Akin advised Kennedy Lewis Investment Management (Kennedy Lewis) in connection with a loan provided to The Greenbrier and a joint venture between Kennedy Lewis and The Justice Family Group designed to support the long-term vision for The Greenbrier.
The Akin team was led by corporate practice co-head Zachary Wittenberg and finance partner Heather Waters Borthwick and included finance counsel Nell Ethridge and Gerry GriffithII and associates Benjamin Marsico and Meg Gilligan; capital markets partner Anthony Ameduri and counsel Andrew McDonough; real estate counsel Alex Agahzadeh, senior practice attorney Ashley Todd and associates Ben Lancaster and Joseph Newman; labor & employment partner Lauren Leyden, counsel Alexandra Johnson and associate Daniel Glicker; executive compensation & employee benefits partner Stephanie Bollheimer and associate Dilara Kesir; tax partner Joshua Williams, counsel Tim Higgins and associate Simon Furney; and corporate associates Jordan Adams, Christine Wang, Kimberly Moyal and Jarod Manuel.
For additional information on the transaction, please click here (https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/justice-family-and-kennedy-lewis-complete-transformational-joint-venture-for-the-greenbrier-302852128.html).
Akin is a leading international law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers in offices throughout the United States, Europe, Asia and the Middle East.
* * *
URL: Kennedy Lewis Investment Management
* * *
Original text here: https://www.akingump.com/en/insights/press-releases/akin-advises-kennedy-lewis-on-financing-for-the-greenbrier-joint-venture
[Category: BizLaw/Legal]
