Featured Stories
Mayer Brown Strengthens Leading Insurance Transactions Platform With Addition of John Grothaus in Chicago
CHICAGO, Illinois, Sept. 26 -- Mayer Brown, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
25 September 2026
Mayer Brown strengthens leading insurance transactions platform with addition of John Grothaus in Chicago
CHICAGO - Mayer Brown announced today that John Grothaus has joined the firm as a partner in its Corporate & Securities and Global Insurance practices in Chicago, further strengthening the firm's market-leading insurance transactions platform. John joins from Sidley Austin LLP.
John advises insurance, financial services, and private equity clients on a broad range of corporate and
... Show Full Article
CHICAGO, Illinois, Sept. 26 -- Mayer Brown, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
25 September 2026
Mayer Brown strengthens leading insurance transactions platform with addition of John Grothaus in Chicago
CHICAGO - Mayer Brown announced today that John Grothaus has joined the firm as a partner in its Corporate & Securities and Global Insurance practices in Chicago, further strengthening the firm's market-leading insurance transactions platform. John joins from Sidley Austin LLP.
John advises insurance, financial services, and private equity clients on a broad range of corporate andsecurities matters, including mergers and acquisitions, capital investments, public and private securities offerings, reinsurance transactions, and complex insurance financings. He is particularly known for his work in the life insurance sector, where he advises clients on sophisticated transactional matters involving strategic equity and hybrid capital raises, funding agreement-backed note transactions, strategic reinsurance arrangements, and cross-border transactions, including throughout the Asia-Pacific region, including a market-leading practice in outbound reinsurance from the Asia-Pacific region.
"John's arrival reflects our continued investment in the insurance and financial services sectors and our commitment to building one of the industry's premier transactional platforms," said David Alberts, co-leader of Mayer Brown's Corporate & Securities practice. "He brings a strong combination of technical excellence, deep industry knowledge, and a client-focused approach that will further enhance our ability to advise clients on their most important strategic transactions."
"I am thrilled to join Mayer Brown," John said. "The firm has built a truly exceptional insurance platform with deep transactional, regulatory, and international capabilities. I was particularly attracted to the firm's collaborative culture, global reach, and commitment to helping lawyers build and grow their practices. I look forward to working alongside my new colleagues to help clients capitalize on opportunities across the insurance and financial services industries."
The addition of John further strengthens Mayer Brown's ability to advise insurers, reinsurers, asset managers, private equity sponsors, and other market participants on complex transactions throughout the insurance lifecycle. His experience in reinsurance, insurance-linked capital solutions, and international insurance transactions enhances the firm's capabilities in areas that continue to experience significant growth and innovation.
"John is an outstanding addition to our Chicago office and our global insurance team," said Joanna Horsnail, managing partner of Mayer Brown's Chicago office. "His experience advising clients on complex insurance and financial services transactions, coupled with his collaborative style and entrepreneurial mindset, make him an excellent fit for our firm."
* * *
Original text here: https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/news/2026/09/mayer-brown-strengthens-leading-insurance-transactions-platform-with-addition-of-john-grothaus-in-chicago
[Category: BizLaw/Legal]
Littler: Flexible Working - UK Government Confirms Next Steps on Employment Rights Act 2025 Reforms
SAN FRANCISCO, California, Sept. 26 -- Littler, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Flexible Working: UK Government Confirms Next Steps on Employment Rights Act 2025 Reforms
The UK Government has published its response to the consultation launched on the ERA 2025 reforms to the right to request flexible working.
By Emily Bodger
September 25, 2026
The UK Government has now published its response to the consultation launched earlier this year on the Employment Rights Act 2025 ('ERA 2025') reforms to the right to request flexible working. Although further regulations are awaited, the
... Show Full Article
SAN FRANCISCO, California, Sept. 26 -- Littler, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Flexible Working: UK Government Confirms Next Steps on Employment Rights Act 2025 Reforms
The UK Government has published its response to the consultation launched on the ERA 2025 reforms to the right to request flexible working.
By Emily Bodger
September 25, 2026
The UK Government has now published its response to the consultation launched earlier this year on the Employment Rights Act 2025 ('ERA 2025') reforms to the right to request flexible working. Although further regulations are awaited, thedetail of the changes is beginning to take shape.
Background
Flexible working has been the subject of employment law reform in recent years, including changes made in April 2024 (see our previous article here), which made the right to request flexible working a day one right for employees and introduced a requirement for employers to consult before refusing a request.
The ERA 2025 builds on that framework and introduces three key changes:
1. "Reasonableness" requirement - An employer will only be able to reject a statutory flexible working request on one of the eight statutory business grounds where it is "reasonable" to do so.
2. Notification - If an employer refuses a request, the notification must state the ground(s) for refusing the application and explain why the employer considers that it is reasonable to refuse the application on that ground.
3. New statutory process - Secondary legislation will set out steps that an employer must take in order to comply with its obligation to consult an employee before rejecting a request.
These reforms form part of the Government's commitment to improving access to flexible working and encouraging more constructive discussion between employers and employees. While this is not a complete rewrite of the laws, employers will be required to follow a more structured statutory process when dealing with requests.
Earlier this year, the Government launched a consultation focused on the proposed new mandatory consultation process for employers where they are considering rejecting a statutory flexible working request. The Government recently published its response to the consultation on September 15, 2026, which confirms its intention to proceed with the ERA 2025 reforms and provides further insight on what we can expect for the new consultation process.
Continue reading here (https://littler.co.uk/insights/flexible-working-government-confirms-next-steps-on-employment-rights-act-2025-reforms/).
* * *
Authors
Emily Bodger
Knowledge Lawyer
ebodger@littler.co.uk
* * *
Original text here: https://www.littler.com/news-analysis/asap/flexible-working-uk-government-confirms-next-steps-employment-rights-act-2025
[Category: BizLaw/Legal]
Jackson Walker: Robert Soza to Receive 2026 C. Lee Cusenbary Ethical Life and Leadership Award
AUSTIN, Texas, Sept. 26 -- Jackson Walker, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Robert Soza to Receive 2026 C. Lee Cusenbary Ethical Life and Leadership Award
September 25, 2026
Jackson Walker partner Robert L. Soza Jr. has been named a recipient of the 2026 C. Lee Cusenbary Ethical Life and Leadership Award by the Association of Corporate Counsel's San Antonio Chapter and The Texas Lawbook.
The award honors one in-house lawyer or legal department and one private lawyer or law firm each year for exceptional ethical conduct and leadership in the practice of law.
Robert was nominated
... Show Full Article
AUSTIN, Texas, Sept. 26 -- Jackson Walker, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
Robert Soza to Receive 2026 C. Lee Cusenbary Ethical Life and Leadership Award
September 25, 2026
Jackson Walker partner Robert L. Soza Jr. has been named a recipient of the 2026 C. Lee Cusenbary Ethical Life and Leadership Award by the Association of Corporate Counsel's San Antonio Chapter and The Texas Lawbook.
The award honors one in-house lawyer or legal department and one private lawyer or law firm each year for exceptional ethical conduct and leadership in the practice of law.
Robert was nominatedby Julia W. Mann, managing partner of Jackson Walker's San Antonio office, who cited his professional excellence, principled leadership, sustained mentorship, and longstanding service to the community.
He will receive the honor alongside Vericast Deputy General Counsel Shelayne Clemmer at the 2026 San Antonio Corporate Counsel Awards on October 29.
To read the full The Texas Lawbook article, visit Vericast Deputy GC, Jackson Walker Partner Honored for Ethical Life, Leadership (https://texaslawbook.net/vericast-deputy-gc-jackson-walker-partner-honored-for-ethical-life-leadership/).
* * *
Meet Robert
Robert L. Soza Jr. is a seasoned attorney based in San Antonio with deep experience in international trade compliance and complex litigation. A licensed U.S. Customs Broker, he advises clients on FCPA, anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, export controls, trade sanctions, CFIUS, and U.S. Customs compliance--handling audits, enforcement counseling, voluntary disclosures, and government proceedings before agencies including the Departments of Commerce, State, and Treasury. He also brings significant first-chair trial and appellate experience in environmental, personal injury, and civil enforcement matters, having litigated cases across Texas, New Mexico, Colorado, Kansas, California, and New York.
Robert is a recognized leader in both his profession and his community. He received the President's Award from the San Antonio Bar Association in 2019, is a San Antonio Bar Foundation Fellow, and currently serves as President of the Board of Directors of the San Antonio Legal Services Association (SALSA). He has been named to Chambers USA, The Best Lawyers in America, Thomson Reuters' Super Lawyers, and Lawdragon's list of the 500 Leading Litigators in America.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.jw.com/news/soza-ethical-life-leadership-award/
[Category: BiLaw/Legal]
Hughes Hubbard: Patrice Jean Named President of Columbia Law School Alumni Association
NEW YORK, Sept. 26 -- Hughes Hubbard and Reed, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
September 25, 2026
Patrice Jean Named President of Columbia Law School Alumni Association
Hughes Hubbard partner and Columbia Law alum will lead the school's global alumni community.
Highlights
* Patrice Jean has been named president of the Columbia Law School Alumni Association.
* Jean graduated from Columbia Law School in 2002.
* She plans to help strengthen engagement among Columbia Law graduates worldwide.
-
Patrice Jean has been named president of the Columbia Law School Alumni Association.
A
... Show Full Article
NEW YORK, Sept. 26 -- Hughes Hubbard and Reed, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
September 25, 2026
Patrice Jean Named President of Columbia Law School Alumni Association
Hughes Hubbard partner and Columbia Law alum will lead the school's global alumni community.
Highlights
* Patrice Jean has been named president of the Columbia Law School Alumni Association.
* Jean graduated from Columbia Law School in 2002.
* She plans to help strengthen engagement among Columbia Law graduates worldwide.
-
Patrice Jean has been named president of the Columbia Law School Alumni Association.
A2002 graduate of Columbia Law School, Jean will help lead the association's efforts to strengthen connections among alumni and support the school's global community of more than 30,000 graduates.
In an address to her fellow Alumni Association members marking the start of the academic year, Jean reflected on her connection to the school and its students, as well as on the accomplishments of Columbia Law graduates and the bonds between them that continue long after graduation.
"Over the years, it has been an immense privilege to watch so many Columbia Law graduates... charting distinguished, groundbreaking careers that are reshaping the way law is understood and practiced," Jean said. "And all while we've maintained that collective bond."
Jean is Chair of Hughes Hubbard's Life Sciences Group. Prior to law school, she earned her Ph.D. in molecular biology from Princeton University.
* * *
Featured Lawyers
Patrice Jean
Partner
Locations
New York
patrice.jean@hugheshubbard.com
212/837-6264
* * *
Original text here: https://www.hugheshubbard.com/news-insights/news/patrice-jean-named-president-of-columbia-law-school-alumni-association
[Category: BizLaw/Legal]
Hughes Hubbard: Michael Salzman Discusses AI-Related Risks and Accountability Facing Lawyers
NEW YORK, Sept. 26 -- Hughes Hubbard and Reed, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
September 25, 2026
Michael Salzman Discusses AI-Related Risks and Accountability Facing Lawyers
Explores the risks and responsibilities associated with lawyers' use of AI.
Highlights
* Salzman discusses risks associated with AI use by lawyers, including fabricated citations, incorrect legal analysis, false factual claims and privilege concerns around' general-purpose AI systems.
* Salzman explains how differing AI rules and guidance across jurisdictions present manageable challenges for legal practitioners.
-
Michael
... Show Full Article
NEW YORK, Sept. 26 -- Hughes Hubbard and Reed, a law firm, issued the following news:
* * *
September 25, 2026
Michael Salzman Discusses AI-Related Risks and Accountability Facing Lawyers
Explores the risks and responsibilities associated with lawyers' use of AI.
Highlights
* Salzman discusses risks associated with AI use by lawyers, including fabricated citations, incorrect legal analysis, false factual claims and privilege concerns around' general-purpose AI systems.
* Salzman explains how differing AI rules and guidance across jurisdictions present manageable challenges for legal practitioners.
-
MichaelSalzman - who is senior counsel at Hughes Hubbard, and previously spent four decades as a litigation partner and the firm's general counsel - discussed the legal profession's evolving approach to AI and the risks associated with its use with Newsweek.
The article examines how courts and professional bodies are developing guidance governing AI use as lawyers continue to face accountability for AI use in their work product, including instances where AI-generated materials have resulted in fabricated citations and other errors.
Salzman, who also serves as the chair of the New York City Bar's Professional Ethics Committee, explained the risks associated with AI use, including fabricated citations, incorrect legal analysis, false factual claims, and potential confidentiality and privilege concerns when lawyers use general-purpose AI systems.
Salzman also discussed how lawyers can navigate differing AI guidance across jurisdictions.
"The differences are not fundamental, and lawyers are used to dealing with differences in the laws and court rules in different places within the U.S.," Salzman said.
Over the past two years, the New York City Bar's Professional Ethics Committee has issued several opinions discussing the ethical obligations of lawyers when employing AI.
Read the article (https://www.newsweek.com/lawyers-face-patchwork-of-ai-rules-as-courts-punish-hallucinated-filings-12477505).
* * *
Featured Lawyers
Michael E. Salzman
Senior Counsel
Locations
New York
michael.salzman@hugheshubbard.com
212/837-6833
* * *
Original text here: https://www.hugheshubbard.com/news-insights/insights/michael-salzman-discusses-ai-related-risks-and-accountability-facing-lawyers
[Category: BizLaw/Legal]
Fisher Phillips Issues Insight: EU Cyber Resilience Act Reporting Is Now Live - 7-Step Plan for Manufacturers Facing 24-Hour Deadlines
ATLANTA, Georgia, Sept. 26 -- Fisher Phillips, a law firm, issued the following Insight:
* * *
EU Cyber Resilience Act Reporting Is Now Live: A 7-Step Plan for Manufacturers Facing 24-Hour Deadlines
Sep 25, 2026
Manufacturers need to be aware of the European Union's cybersecurity law for products with digital elements. If your company sells a connected product, a software application, or a hardware component in the European Union, you are already on a 24-hour reporting clock. The EU Cyber Resilience Act's (CRA's) reporting requirements may apply even to products your company sold years ago,
... Show Full Article
ATLANTA, Georgia, Sept. 26 -- Fisher Phillips, a law firm, issued the following Insight:
* * *
EU Cyber Resilience Act Reporting Is Now Live: A 7-Step Plan for Manufacturers Facing 24-Hour Deadlines
Sep 25, 2026
Manufacturers need to be aware of the European Union's cybersecurity law for products with digital elements. If your company sells a connected product, a software application, or a hardware component in the European Union, you are already on a 24-hour reporting clock. The EU Cyber Resilience Act's (CRA's) reporting requirements may apply even to products your company sold years ago,and violations can trigger the law's highest penalties. Here's what manufacturers need to know about the reporting requirements that took effect September 11, which products are covered, and seven steps you should consider taking now to comply.
What the CRA Covers
The CRA establishes reporting obligations for actively exploited vulnerabilities and severe incidents. These requirements took effect on September 11, 2026, while the CRA's broader product-compliance regime does not apply until December 11, 2027. This cybersecurity law covers products with digital elements, which means software or hardware products and their remote data processing solutions, including software or hardware components placed on the market separately. The law's reach is broad, covering industrial controllers, connected consumer devices, operating systems, mobile applications, network equipment, and firmware.
Several categories, however, are not included because other EU regimes already govern their cybersecurity. Medical devices and in vitro diagnostics, type-approved motor vehicles, certified civil aviation equipment, and marine equipment are excluded. So are products developed or modified exclusively for national security or defense purposes, products designed to process classified information, and spare parts manufactured to the same specifications as the parts they replace.
Standalone software-as-a-service is generally outside the CRA. SaaS is captured only where it functions as a remote data processing solution, meaning remote processing that the manufacturer designs and develops and that the product could not perform its functions without. If your cloud service is the product rather than a component of a product, the CRA likely won't come into play, but NIS2 and DORA might.
Who Bears the Obligation
Manufacturers carry the reporting duty. A manufacturer is any natural or legal person that develops or manufactures products with digital elements, or has them designed, developed, or manufactured, and markets them under its own name or trademark, whether for payment, for monetization, or free of charge.
The product does not need to be created in the EU. Rather, the obligation is triggered when the product is placed on the EU market. A US company that sells into the EU through a distributor is a manufacturer under the CRA and must report. Manufacturers established outside the EU must also designate an authorized representative in the EU.
Importers and distributors do not file the reports themselves, but they do have some obligations. Both must inform the manufacturer without undue delay when becoming aware of a vulnerability in the product. Both must immediately inform the market surveillance authorities of the Member States where they made the product available if the product presents a significant cybersecurity risk.
An importer or distributor that markets a product under its own name or trademark, or that substantially modifies a product already on the market, becomes the manufacturer for CRA purposes and inherits the full reporting obligation. Be sure to carefully review private-label and white-label arrangements on this point.
Open-source software stewards are subject to a lighter, separate regime. The European Commission's stated position is that steward reporting obligations begin on December 11, 2027, not September 2026.
What Must Be Reported
The following two categories start the reporting clock:
* An actively exploited vulnerability, when there is reliable evidence that a malicious actor has exploited it in a system without the permission of the system owner. Good-faith security testing and coordinated disclosure without malicious intent do not trigger the duty.
* A severe incident that has an impact on the security of the product, meaning an incident that negatively affects or is capable of negatively affecting the product's ability to protect the availability, authenticity, integrity, or confidentiality of data or functions. It also covers an incident that has led or is capable of leading to the introduction or execution of malicious code in the product or in a user's network and information systems.
Importantly, a severe incident doesn't have to directly affect a customer. It includes a compromise of your own development, production, or maintenance environment where that compromise could increase cybersecurity risk for users, including malicious code injected into a build pipeline or a security-update channel. It does not require that any customer has actually been harmed. Being "capable of negatively affecting" is enough. So, teams that focus only on the US breach-notification standard, which usually requires unauthorized acquisition of data, may fail to meet reporting requirements under the CRA.
The Reporting Timeline
Reports are submitted through the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity's (ENISA's) CRA Single Reporting Platform to two recipients: the ENISA and the Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT) that serves as the coordinator for the Member State of your main EU establishment. The platform went live on September 11.
Timeline for an actively exploited vulnerability:
* Early warning within 24 hours of becoming aware, identifying the Member States where the product has been made available.
* Vulnerability notification within 72 hours of becoming aware, covering the general nature of the vulnerability and of the exploit, an initial assessment, and any corrective or mitigating measures taken or available to users.
* Final report within 14 days after a corrective or mitigating measure becomes available, covering a description of the vulnerability, its severity and impact, information about the malicious actor where available, and details of the security update.
Timeline for a severe incident:
* Early warning within 24 hours of becoming aware, stating whether the incident is suspected to have been caused by unlawful or malicious acts and identifying the affected Member States.
* Incident notification within 72 hours of becoming aware, covering the nature of the incident and an initial assessment, including its severity and impact.
* Final report within one month of the 72-hour notification, covering a detailed description of the incident, the type of threat or root cause, and the mitigation measures applied and ongoing.
The 72-hour filing is mandatory for both categories, even if you submit a detailed 24-hour early warning.
Don't Forget to Notify Your Customers
After becoming aware of an actively exploited vulnerability or a severe incident, the manufacturer must inform impacted users, and, where appropriate, all users, about the vulnerability or incident and, when necessary, about risk mitigation and any corrective measures the user can deploy. Where appropriate, that information must be provided in a machine-readable format that is easily and automatically processable.
Be sure to review your CRA customer-notice obligations, because your existing customer agreements, confidentiality provisions, and other disclosure requirements may not fully address what the CRA requires. Public companies should also consider how the CRA's customer-notice requirements may interact with their disclosure obligations under SEC Item 1.05. You'll want to identify and address any gaps before an incident occurs.
Older Products May Still Be Subject to CRA Reporting
There's an important exception for older products. Although products placed on the EU market before December 11, 2027, are generally exempt from the CRA's broader product requirements, they are still subject to the new reporting rules. So, if you sold a covered product in the EU years ago, you may still have to report a newly discovered vulnerability or severe security incident involving that product.
What Noncompliance Costs
The reporting obligations are in the CRA's top enforcement tier, alongside breaches of the essential cybersecurity requirements. Maximum administrative fines are 15 million euros or 2.5% of total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher. Supplying incorrect, incomplete, or misleading information to notified bodies or market surveillance authorities carries a separate tier of up to 5 million euros or 1% of worldwide turnover. Member States set the actual penalties within those limits, and enforcement will vary.
What the CRA Will Require by December 2027
Products with digital elements must be designed, developed, and produced so that they deliver an appropriate level of cybersecurity based on the risks. Among other things, covered products must:
* not contain known exploitable vulnerabilities;
* be made available with a secure-by-default configuration, unless otherwise agreed between the manufacturer and a business user for a tailor-made product, including the ability to reset the product to its original state;
* ensure that vulnerabilities can be addressed through security updates, including automatic security updates enabled by default where applicable, with a clear opt-out mechanism, user notification of available updates, and the option to postpone them temporarily;
* protect against unauthorized access through appropriate control mechanisms, including authentication and identity or access management systems, and report possible unauthorized access;
* protect the confidentiality of stored, transmitted, or otherwise processed data;
* protect the integrity of stored, transmitted, or otherwise processed data;
* process only data that is adequate, relevant, and limited to what is necessary for the product's intended purpose;
* protect the availability of essential and basic functions, including after an incident, through resilience and mitigation measures against denial-of-service attacks;
* minimize the negative impact of the product or connected devices on the availability of services provided by other devices or networks;
* limit attack surfaces, including external interfaces;
* reduce the impact of an incident through appropriate exploitation mitigation mechanisms and techniques;
* provide security-related information by recording and monitoring relevant internal activity, including access to or modification of data, services, or functions, with a user opt-out; and
* allow users to securely and permanently remove all data and settings, and to transfer that data to other products or systems securely where transfer is supported.
Seven Steps to Consider Taking Now
1. Register on the Single Reporting Platform before an incident occurs. Onboarding is not something you can complete inside a 24-hour window. Each manufacturer will need to designate one Primary Assigned Representative who can then invite Secondary Assigned Representatives. Identify those people now and get them credentialed.
2. Identify your CSIRT coordinator now. Determine which Member State's CSIRT will serve as your coordinator and document your decision in writing. Generally, this will be based on where decisions about your products' cybersecurity are made. If you don't have an EU establishment, you'll need to consider other factors, including the location of your authorized representative, importers, distributors, and users. Make this determination now so you know where to report if a vulnerability or security incident occurs.
3. Create a clear process for deciding when a CRA report is required. Assign a decision-maker and a backup person to assess each of the following:
* whether a vulnerability is being actively exploited, and what evidence meets the "reliable evidence" threshold;
* whether an event meets the severe-incident definition, including the "capable of negatively affecting" aspect;
* which product versions, SKUs, and customers are affected, and in which Member States; and
* what corrective or mitigating measures are available or being developed, and when they will be available.
4. Add the CRA deadlines to your existing incident response plan. Identify who will determine whether a CRA report is required, who will prepare and approve the filing, and how the CRA's 24-hour, 72-hour, 14-day, and one-month deadlines fit with your other reporting obligations, such as GDPR, NIS2, SEC, HIPAA, and US state breach-notification laws. Then test the process with a tabletop exercise involving an incident that could trigger more than one reporting requirement.
5. Review your customer agreements for potential conflicts with the CRA. Identify notice deadlines, content restrictions, and confidentiality terms that may conflict with the CRA's requirements. Draft template customer notices now, including a machine-readable version, and have them reviewed before an incident occurs.
6. Start planning for the December 2027 deadlines now. Make sure your product inventory includes older products that may still be covered by the CRA, and determine how each product is classified under the law. Identify and address any gaps in your software bill of materials (SBOM) and coordinated vulnerability disclosure processes. If any of your products will require a conformity assessment by a notified body, start that process early.
7. Reach out to counsel with compliance questions. The CRA's requirements will vary depending on your products, where they are sold, and your role in the supply chain. Work with counsel to determine which requirements apply to your organization and address any compliance gaps before a vulnerability or security incident occurs.
* * *
Related People
Daniel Pepper, CIPP/US
Partner
dpepper@fisherphillips.com
303/218-3661
* * *
Jillian Seifrit, CIPP/US
Associate
jseifrit@fisherphillips.com
610/230-6129
* * *
Original text here: https://www.fisherphillips.com/en/insights/insights/eu-cyber-resilience-act-reporting-is-now-live
[Category: BizLaw/Legal]
Asian Legal Business Honors Morgan Lewis in 2026 M&A Rankings
PHILADELPHIA, Pennsylvania, Sept. 26 -- Morgan Lewis, a law firm, issued the following news release:
* * *
Asian Legal Business Honors Morgan Lewis in 2026 M&A Rankings
SINGAPORE, HONG KONG, BEIJING, SHANGHAI, and TOKYO, September 25, 2026: Morgan Lewis has been recognized among the leading firms in the region by Asian Legal Business in its 2026 M&A rankings.
The annual rankings are based on the volume, complexity, and size of work undertaken and the firm's presence across Asia and in individual jurisdictions.
PRACTICE RANKINGS
* Singapore Domestic - Tier 2
* China International - Tier
... Show Full Article
PHILADELPHIA, Pennsylvania, Sept. 26 -- Morgan Lewis, a law firm, issued the following news release:
* * *
Asian Legal Business Honors Morgan Lewis in 2026 M&A Rankings
SINGAPORE, HONG KONG, BEIJING, SHANGHAI, and TOKYO, September 25, 2026: Morgan Lewis has been recognized among the leading firms in the region by Asian Legal Business in its 2026 M&A rankings.
The annual rankings are based on the volume, complexity, and size of work undertaken and the firm's presence across Asia and in individual jurisdictions.
PRACTICE RANKINGS
* Singapore Domestic - Tier 2
* China International - Tier3
* Japan International - Tier 3
* Hong Kong - Notable Firm
* * *
Original text here: https://www.morganlewis.com/news/2026/09/asian-legal-business-honors-morgan-lewis-in-2026-ma-rankings
[Category: BizLaw/Legal]
