House Bill Introductions
Here's a look at news stories involving U.S. House bills introduced in the 119th Congress
Featured Stories
Rep. Biggs: American Sovereignty and Species Protection Act of 2025 Analyzed by CRS
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- American Sovereignty and Species Protection Act of 2025 (H.R 102), introduced by Rep. Andy Biggs, R-AZ, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The legislation aims to limit protections for endangered and threatened species strictly to those that are native to the United States and prevent the use of federal funding for acquiring lands or interests in foreign countries.
The bill proposes amendments to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, establishing that nonnative species cannot be classified as endangered or threatened. This significant
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- American Sovereignty and Species Protection Act of 2025 (H.R 102), introduced by Rep. Andy Biggs, R-AZ, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The legislation aims to limit protections for endangered and threatened species strictly to those that are native to the United States and prevent the use of federal funding for acquiring lands or interests in foreign countries.
The bill proposes amendments to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, establishing that nonnative species cannot be classified as endangered or threatened. This significantshift in policy reflects an emphasis on prioritizing native ecosystems over foreign species, seeking to enhance the protection of domestic biodiversity. Proponents argue that this focus will ensure resources in the Endangered Species Act are allocated effectively, protecting species integral to the U.S. environment.
Additionally, the bill stipulates that any financial assistance associated with endangered species must not be utilized for purchasing foreign lands or interests. This provision underscores a commitment to American sovereignty, suggesting a preference for investing in homegrown species while limiting involvement in international conservation efforts. The implications could redefine how conservation funding is deployed, insisting on more localized approaches in the pursuit of environmental stewardship.
As environmental challenges continue to mount globally, this legislation raises critical discussions about the balance between protecting native species and the potential consequences for nonnative species already established in the ecosystem. Conservationists may voice concerns regarding the narrowing of the Endangered Species Act's scope, especially for species that play crucial roles in their habitats.
The American Sovereignty and Species Protection Act of 2025 reflects an evolving approach to species protection, inviting further debate on how best to achieve ecological balance within the United States.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/102/text
Rep. Biggs: Accountability for Lawless Violence In our Neighborhoods Act Analyzed by CRS
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- The Accountability for Lawless Violence In our Neighborhoods Act (H.R 63), introduced by Rep. Andy Biggs, R-AZ, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation aims to prohibit federal funds from being awarded to the Manhattan District Attorney's Office and mandates the office to reimburse the federal government for funds previously used since January 1, 2022.
The bill arises amidst ongoing debates about crime rates and law enforcement practices in urban areas, particularly regarding the allocation of federal funding. Supporters
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- The Accountability for Lawless Violence In our Neighborhoods Act (H.R 63), introduced by Rep. Andy Biggs, R-AZ, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation aims to prohibit federal funds from being awarded to the Manhattan District Attorney's Office and mandates the office to reimburse the federal government for funds previously used since January 1, 2022.
The bill arises amidst ongoing debates about crime rates and law enforcement practices in urban areas, particularly regarding the allocation of federal funding. Supportersargue that stringent measures are necessary to ensure accountability and proper use of resources by local prosecutors, while critics contend it could undermine the autonomy of district attorneys to address crime in their jurisdictions.
Specifically, the bill rescinds any unobligated federal funds that were allocated to the Manhattan DA's office, effectively cutting off financial support. Additionally, it compels the Department of Justice to demand reimbursement for all federal funds spent on the office since the beginning of 2022. This dual approach intends to hold the office financially responsible for its actions and to discourage practices perceived as lenient towards crime.
The legislative move reflects a broader political strategy to address public concern over rising crime rates and perceived leniency in the justice system. By targeting a major urban prosecutor's office, the bill sends a message about accountability and the expectations on public officials regarding violent crime prevention.
If enacted, this legislation could significantly impact the operations of the Manhattan DA's office, forcing it to adapt to a new financial landscape and altering the funding dynamics that influence criminal justice policies within the city.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/63/text
Rep. Biggs: Abortion Is Not Health Care Act of 2025 Analyzed by CRS
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- Abortion Is Not Health Care Act of 2025 (H.R 73), introduced by Rep. Andy Biggs, R-AZ, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code by prohibiting taxpayers from including amounts paid for abortions when calculating itemized deductions for qualified medical and dental expenses.
The bill responds to ongoing debates surrounding the classification and funding of abortion in the healthcare system. Currently, individuals who itemize their tax deductions can deduct various medical expenses,
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- Abortion Is Not Health Care Act of 2025 (H.R 73), introduced by Rep. Andy Biggs, R-AZ, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code by prohibiting taxpayers from including amounts paid for abortions when calculating itemized deductions for qualified medical and dental expenses.
The bill responds to ongoing debates surrounding the classification and funding of abortion in the healthcare system. Currently, individuals who itemize their tax deductions can deduct various medical expenses,including the cost of legal abortions, if they exceed a certain percentage of their adjusted gross income. By excluding abortion costs from eligible deductions, proponents argue it aligns with their perspective that abortion should not be categorized as health care.
This legislative effort underscores a broader movement among certain lawmakers aiming to restrict access to abortion services. Supporters believe that the measure will discourage the practice by reducing financial incentives. They argue that the reclassification reflects a moral stance while framing the bill within the context of responsible tax policy.
Critics of the measure contend that it could disproportionately impact low-income individuals who may rely on tax deductions to help cover healthcare costs, including abortions. They maintain that restricting deductions could limit access to necessary healthcare services for those already facing financial challenges.
The Abortion Is Not Health Care Act of 2025, if enacted, will apply to taxable years beginning after the enactment date, signifying a significant change in the tax treatment of abortion-related expenses within the healthcare framework. The bill raises crucial questions about healthcare definitions and the role of tax policy in influencing medical choices.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/73/text
Rep. Bergman: Victims Of Immigration Crime Engagement Restoration Act Analyzed by CRS
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- The Victims Of Immigration Crime Engagement Restoration Act (H.R 47), introduced by Rep. Jack Bergman, R-MI, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This bill aims to establish the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement Office within U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to provide support and resources to victims of crimes committed by individuals without lawful immigration status.
The proposed office, reinstating a similar initiative that was terminated in June 2021, seeks to offer a comprehensive support system for victims
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- The Victims Of Immigration Crime Engagement Restoration Act (H.R 47), introduced by Rep. Jack Bergman, R-MI, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This bill aims to establish the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement Office within U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to provide support and resources to victims of crimes committed by individuals without lawful immigration status.
The proposed office, reinstating a similar initiative that was terminated in June 2021, seeks to offer a comprehensive support system for victimsand witnesses impacted by such crimes. It is designed to promote awareness of available services, facilitate connections with local resources, and provide recovery assistance tailored to individual needs.
By creating a dedicated toll-free hotline and enhancing access to social service professionals, the VOICE office intends to create a victim-centered approach that emphasizes acknowledgment and support for those who have suffered from these incidents. This initiative reflects concerns regarding safety and justice for victims, as lawmakers respond to ongoing discussions about the intersection of immigration and crime. The bill also mandates that VOICE issue quarterly reports that evaluate the impact of crimes committed by non-U.S. nationals on local communities, ensuring transparency and accountability within the office's operations.
Supporters argue that the reinstatement of VOICE is crucial in addressing the specific needs of affected individuals and promoting public safety. Critics, however, may point to broader implications regarding immigration policy and enforcement priorities. The introduction of this bill comes as debates about comprehensive immigration reform continue to evolve, highlighting the complexities surrounding crime, immigration status, and victim support in the United States.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/47/text
Rep. Bergman: Rural Broadband Window of Opportunity Act Analyzed by CRS
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- Rural Broadband Window of Opportunity Act (H.R 46), introduced by Rep. Jack Bergman, R-MI, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The bill aims to enhance broadband access in rural areas by requiring the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to prioritize the processing of applications for broadband expansion projects in regions with shorter construction seasons, such as those affected by long winters and heavy snowfall.
This legislative move comes amid growing concerns about the digital divide affecting rural communities. Many areas
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- Rural Broadband Window of Opportunity Act (H.R 46), introduced by Rep. Jack Bergman, R-MI, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The bill aims to enhance broadband access in rural areas by requiring the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to prioritize the processing of applications for broadband expansion projects in regions with shorter construction seasons, such as those affected by long winters and heavy snowfall.
This legislative move comes amid growing concerns about the digital divide affecting rural communities. Many areasare only partially served by broadband, hampering residents' access to essential services like telehealth, remote education, and e-commerce. The Rural Digital Opportunity Fund Phase II auction, which this bill targets, focuses on expanding broadband services to these underserved regions. The first phase of the RDOF, currently in progress, addresses wholly unserved areas, but Phase II takes a crucial step toward improving connectivity for those who already have some service but require enhancements.
By expediting application processing for projects in areas faced with harsh weather conditions, the bill seeks to level the playing field for service providers who struggle to complete construction during limited seasons. This prioritization could significantly accelerate the deployment of necessary infrastructure, ultimately leading to better internet access for numerous residents.
The Rural Broadband Window of Opportunity Act reflects an increasing recognition of the critical need for reliable internet services in all parts of the country. With the FCC's support, this bill could be a key factor in bridging the digital gap and ensuring that rural communities benefit from modern communication technologies.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/46/text
Rep. Bergman: Rural 340B Access Act of 2025 Analyzed by CRS
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- Rural 340B Access Act of 2025 (H.R 44), introduced by Rep. Jack Bergman, R-MI, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation aims to make rural emergency hospitals (REHs) eligible for discounted drug purchases through the Health Resources and Services Administration's (HRSA) 340B drug pricing program, thereby improving access to affordable medication for patients in rural communities.
The 340B program, originally designed to help certain non-profit organizations, mandates that drug manufacturers sell specific outpatient drugs
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- Rural 340B Access Act of 2025 (H.R 44), introduced by Rep. Jack Bergman, R-MI, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This legislation aims to make rural emergency hospitals (REHs) eligible for discounted drug purchases through the Health Resources and Services Administration's (HRSA) 340B drug pricing program, thereby improving access to affordable medication for patients in rural communities.
The 340B program, originally designed to help certain non-profit organizations, mandates that drug manufacturers sell specific outpatient drugsat reduced prices to eligible entities. In light of the establishment of REHs as critical healthcare providers for rural communities in 2020, the bill seeks to amend the Public Health Service Act to include these hospitals as covered entities under the 340B program. REHs provide vital emergency department services and other outpatient care, often in areas where access to healthcare is limited.
By enabling REHs to purchase drugs at discounted rates, the Rural 340B Access Act of 2025 aims to alleviate the financial burden on rural hospitals and enhance their ability to serve low-income patients. Many rural hospitals face significant challenges in funding and resource allocation, and this enhancement to the 340B program is intended to support their operational sustainability and improve health outcomes for patients in underserved regions.
Overall, the bill reflects a growing recognition of the unique healthcare challenges faced by rural communities and the need for policies that promote equitable access to medical resources. With the potential to significantly impact patient care in these areas, the Rural 340B Access Act represents a critical step toward ensuring that rural emergency hospitals can continue to provide essential services.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/44/text
Rep. Bergman: Firearm Industry Non-Discrimination Act Analyzed by CRS
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- The Firearm Industry Non-Discrimination Act (H.R 45), introduced by Rep. Jack Bergman, R-MI, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The bill aims to prohibit the federal government from engaging in contracts with entities that exhibit discrimination against businesses involved in the firearm and ammunition industry.
This legislation arises from concerns regarding perceived bias against the firearm industry by certain organizations and government agencies. Under the bill, federal agencies must include a clause in contracts that requires
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- The Firearm Industry Non-Discrimination Act (H.R 45), introduced by Rep. Jack Bergman, R-MI, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. The bill aims to prohibit the federal government from engaging in contracts with entities that exhibit discrimination against businesses involved in the firearm and ammunition industry.
This legislation arises from concerns regarding perceived bias against the firearm industry by certain organizations and government agencies. Under the bill, federal agencies must include a clause in contracts that requiresprime contractors to certify they have no discriminatory policies against firearm entities or trade associations. This same requirement extends to any subcontracts awarded, with penalties set for violations, including potential contract termination and debarment proceedings for non-compliance.
The FIND Act underscores the growing division over firearms in the United States. Proponents argue that discrimination against the firearm industry undermines free market principles and infringes on Second Amendment rights. They contend that it is essential for businesses in this sector to receive fair treatment in government procurement processes.
Additionally, the bill seeks to protect the interests of companies that produce firearms, ammunition, and related products, which supporters claim are critical to national security and constitutional rights. While the legislation expressly does not apply to sole-source contracts, it aims to expand opportunities for these businesses in federal contracting.
As the bill progresses, it highlights the ongoing debate over gun rights, regulation, and the interplay of federal contracting practices with industries that are often embroiled in political controversy. The implications of this legislation could significantly shape the relationship between the federal government and the firearm industry in the coming years.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/45/text
Rep. Begich: Unrecognized Southeast Alaska Native Communities Recognition and Compensation Act Analyzed by CRS
Bailey Malota
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- The Unrecognized Southeast Alaska Native Communities Recognition and Compensation Act (H.R 41), introduced by Rep. Nicholas J. Begich III, R-AK, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This bill aims to enable five Alaska Native communities in Southeast Alaska-Haines, Ketchikan, Petersburg, Tenakee, and Wrangell-to form urban corporations and receive land entitlements, addressing a historical omission in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.
By allowing these communities to organize as Urban Corporations, the bill facilitates the
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16 -- The Unrecognized Southeast Alaska Native Communities Recognition and Compensation Act (H.R 41), introduced by Rep. Nicholas J. Begich III, R-AK, on January 3, 2025, has been analyzed by the Congressional Research Service. This bill aims to enable five Alaska Native communities in Southeast Alaska-Haines, Ketchikan, Petersburg, Tenakee, and Wrangell-to form urban corporations and receive land entitlements, addressing a historical omission in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.
By allowing these communities to organize as Urban Corporations, the bill facilitates theconveyance of specified federal lands, approximately 23,040 acres for each community, as part of a settlement for unrecognized claims. This initiative not only aims to compensate for their exclusion from previous land distributions but also seeks to promote the health, education, and welfare of the Native beneficiaries through the establishment of settlement trusts.
The bill mandates the Department of the Interior to convey both surface and subsurface estates of the designated lands, ensuring broader ownership rights and benefits for the communities involved. Each Urban Corporation will also inherit existing rights related to roads, trails, and other appurtenances, thus reinforcing their autonomy over local resources.
Furthermore, the legislative effort reflects a growing acknowledgment of the importance of recognizing Indigenous rights and fostering economic development through land ownership. The establishment of these Urban Corporations is anticipated to empower local leaders to preserve Alaska Native culture and heritage while enhancing crucial community services.
Overall, this bill represents a significant step forward in addressing long-standing issues faced by these Southeast Alaska Native communities, providing them with necessary tools for self-determination and sustainable growth in a changing economic landscape.
* * # * *
Primary source of information: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/41/text
