Featured Stories
Wisconsin Employee Files Class Action Lawsuit to Defend Wisconsin State Law That Guarantees Workplace Freedom
SPRINGFIELD, Virginia, Sept. 18 -- The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation posted the following news release:
* * *
Wisconsin Employee Files Class Action Lawsuit to Defend Wisconsin State Law That Guarantees Workplace Freedom
*
Suit: Outdated federal precedents wrongfully permit union officials to block workers from stopping union dues payments
Milwaukee, WI (September 18, 2026) - Caryn Johnson, an employee of Olympic Companies, has filed a new class action lawsuit against both International Union of Painters and Allied Trades (IUPAT) District Council 7 and her employer. The lawsuit
... Show Full Article
SPRINGFIELD, Virginia, Sept. 18 -- The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation posted the following news release:
* * *
Wisconsin Employee Files Class Action Lawsuit to Defend Wisconsin State Law That Guarantees Workplace Freedom
*
Suit: Outdated federal precedents wrongfully permit union officials to block workers from stopping union dues payments
Milwaukee, WI (September 18, 2026) - Caryn Johnson, an employee of Olympic Companies, has filed a new class action lawsuit against both International Union of Painters and Allied Trades (IUPAT) District Council 7 and her employer. The lawsuitstates that the union and employer continue to deduct union dues from Johnson's paycheck after she provided written notice of termination of her union membership, which violates Wisconsin state law.
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin with free legal aid from National Right to Work Foundation staff attorneys, and represents the latest in a line of violations that union officials have committed against Johnson. In June, Johnson and her Foundation staff attorneys filed charges at the National Labor Relations Board stating that union officials falsely claimed union membership was mandatory.
Johnson argues in the lawsuit that previous federal court decisions limiting Wisconsin's state Right to Work protections were decided incorrectly, and that she and others in similar situations deserve the full workplace freedoms Wisconsin law provides.
#Federal Courts Incorrectly Override State Laws Protecting Workers' Right to Stop Union Dues
Wisconsin is a Right to Work state, meaning that employees such as Johnson are not required to join or pay dues to a union in order to get or keep a job. Wisconsin's state Right to Work law is designed to be comprehensive, proactively guaranteeing that if an employee wants to stop payroll deductions of union dues, the employer must honor that request within 30 days.
This law should prevent union bosses in Wisconsin from imposing unilateral and arbitrary "window periods" to keep independent-minded employees from stopping dues payments except during a narrow time period established by union officials. However, in 2018, a divided panel of the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decided in Allen that Wisconsin's state law was preempted by federal law, citing the 1971 Sea Pak Supreme Court decision.
In Johnson's case, local IUPAT officials told her that she had to wait until a 10-day period in February 2027 to stop paying dues, despite the fact that Johnson was illegally coerced into the union in the first place and Wisconsin law protects her right to choose when to stop dues payments. Now, on behalf of other workers subject to the union's arbitrary window periods, Johnson is arguing that Allen and Sea Pak were wrongly decided, and Wisconsin's state law is a legitimate state protection for workplace freedoms.
Previously, the issue was presented to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2019 in the Allen case. However, Democrat Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, almost immediately after being elected, withdrew the state's petition to the U.S. Supreme Court asking the High Court to review and overturn the Allen decision. Reports show union officials gave Kaul's campaign hundreds of thousands of dollars in direct contributions, with union affiliates being his seven largest contributors.
"Wisconsin's popular Right to Work law is designed to fully protect workers from being forced to pay union dues against their will, yet that right is being improperly limited by union officials using arbitrary 'window periods' to stifle workers' attempts to stop dues," commented National Right to Work Foundation President Mark Mix. "We are proud to assist Ms. Johnson as she fights for not only her own rights, but to defend the workplace freedoms of all Wisconsinites."
FacebookTwitterLinkedInEmailPrintShare
The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation is a nonprofit, charitable organization providing free legal aid to employees whose human or civil rights have been violated by compulsory unionism abuses. The Foundation, which can be contacted toll-free at 1-800-336-3600, assists thousands of employees in about 200 cases nationwide per year.
Posted on Sep 18, 2026 in News Releases
***
Original text here: https://www.nrtw.org/news/johnson-wi-class-action-lawsuit-09182026/
Royal Society of Edinburgh: Irish President Receives Honorary Fellowship
EDINBURGH, Scotland, Sept. 18 -- The Royal Society of Edinburgh issued the following news:
* * *
17 September 2026
Irish President receives Honorary Fellowship
The President of Ireland, Catherine Connolly, has been made an Honorary Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, the highest honour it can bestow.
-
Her Fellowship was conferred during a visit to the RSE as part of her week-long series of engagements across Scotland. She becomes the third Irish President to receive this honour from the RSE and joins her predecessors Professor Mary Robinson HonFRSE and Professor Mary McAleese HonFRSE.
President
... Show Full Article
EDINBURGH, Scotland, Sept. 18 -- The Royal Society of Edinburgh issued the following news:
* * *
17 September 2026
Irish President receives Honorary Fellowship
The President of Ireland, Catherine Connolly, has been made an Honorary Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, the highest honour it can bestow.
-
Her Fellowship was conferred during a visit to the RSE as part of her week-long series of engagements across Scotland. She becomes the third Irish President to receive this honour from the RSE and joins her predecessors Professor Mary Robinson HonFRSE and Professor Mary McAleese HonFRSE.
PresidentConnolly said: "It is a privilege to receive this Honorary Fellowship from the Royal Society of Edinburgh and to have the opportunity of meeting with some of those working in such a wide range of disciplines for the public good.
"I particularly welcome the work that is being undertaken between researchers in Ireland and Scotland which will help inform public policy in both countries."
Galway-born President Connolly was elected as the 10th Irish President in 2025, serving as the third woman to do so. She was for many years an elected councillor and held senior offices such as the Mayor of Galway and Leas-Cheann Comhairle (Deputy Chairperson of Dail Eireann), before being elected as President. Ms Connolly has a master's in clinical psychology and a law degree - practising in both fields before entering politics in 1999. She has a long history of commitment to social justice issues and community wellbeing.
The citation for President Connolly highlights her commitment to cultural and linguistic heritage in her politics - which was a large feature of her electoral campaign in 2025. She pledged to use her Presidency as a voice for peace, bringing her longstanding commitment to dialogue, inclusion and public service.
Professor Jo Shaw, General Secretary of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, said: "It is a true honour to welcome President Connolly into the RSE's Fellowship.
"Throughout her career she has consistently demonstrated her passion and drive for helping others, from being a barrister and psychologist to her public service.
"An Honorary Fellowship is our Society's highest honour that we can bestow, so on behalf of our entire Fellowship and staff I am deeply proud that President Connolly has accepted."
President Connolly joins the ranks of the RSE Fellowship which numbers around 1800, who are elected in recognition of their commitment to public service, excellence in scientific endeavour or the world of business or the arts. Honorary Fellowships recognise individuals of truly exceptional distinction who are internationally renowned and widely known outside their specialism. Other notable Honorary Fellows include broadcaster Sir David Attenborough, Olympian Baroness Katherine Grainger, musician Dr Annie Lennox, and physicist Professor Peter Higgs.
The Royal Society of Edinburgh has a long history of working with Ireland through the Royal Irish Academy (RIA), supporting researchers in both countries through its Ireland-Scotland Bilateral Network Grants. This partnership has supported research into domestic violence and the impact of COVID-19 on children and young adults.
Following President Connolly's formal acceptance of her Honorary Fellowship, Professor Jemina Napier and Lucy Clark presented their research into domestic abuse of deaf women - one of the research projects that was a direct result of the Ireland-Scotland Bilateral Partnership. A roundtable discussion about deepening links and renewing the partnership then followed.
The partnership began in 2021, with the RIA and the RSE committing a maximum of pound sterling12,500 each to support two research projects. From 2026 this figure has increased to pound sterling15,000 each.
A total of 10 research projects have been supported between 2021 and last year, with five being administered by the RIA and five by the RSE. The projects that were funded covered a range of themes, including oceanography, rural, coastal or island communities, and diasporas.
Over the past five years, 40 applications were received from higher education institutions in Ireland and Scotland, with pound sterling122,000 being disbursed for projects in total.
As a result of the partnership continuing, research projects in 2026 will cover the theme of culture, language and sport.
The bilateral agreement is accomplished with the support of the Scottish Government Office in Ireland and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
* * *
Original text here: https://rse.org.uk/irish-president-receives-honorary-fellowship/
Reason Foundation Issues Commentary: Ratepayer Protection Act Protects Against Higher Household Energy Bills When Data Centers Connect to the Grid
LOS ANGELES, California, Sept. 18 -- The Reason Foundation issued the following commentary:
* * *
The Ratepayer Protection Act protects against higher household energy bills when data centers connect to the grid
The bill offers an economically rational approach to federal advisory standards for a new class of energy customers larger than those seen before.
Max Gulker
Managing Director
Caden Rosenbaum
Managing Director of Technology Policy
September 17, 2026
Data centers should be regulated by the same laws, policies, and rules that apply to other commercial enterprises, with exceptions
... Show Full Article
LOS ANGELES, California, Sept. 18 -- The Reason Foundation issued the following commentary:
* * *
The Ratepayer Protection Act protects against higher household energy bills when data centers connect to the grid
The bill offers an economically rational approach to federal advisory standards for a new class of energy customers larger than those seen before.
Max Gulker
Managing Director
Caden Rosenbaum
Managing Director of Technology Policy
September 17, 2026
Data centers should be regulated by the same laws, policies, and rules that apply to other commercial enterprises, with exceptionsmade only to address fundamental differences. The power demands of the largest data centers are a key difference. The House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act yesterday, legislation that would set federal advisory standards that data centers pay for their own infrastructure upgrades to connect to electric grids. This act takes a common-sense approach by pinpointing a specific problem caused by the largest data centers and correcting it.
All energy customers are part of a network. They share the benefits of system upgrades, like increased generation and transmission capacity, but they also share the costs, distributed among each ratepayer. Public utilities traditionally roll these costs into the rates all business and residential customers pay, meaning they are shared across the grid. There is no perfect way to allocate such costs across a shared network, but this system has worked well enough, and for long enough, for the relatively small electric loads demanded by customers within a whole system that this model has persisted.
However, the largest data centers have higher relative power demand. Hyperscale data centers routinely demand between 500 megawatts (MW) and 1 gigawatt (GW) of power. For comparison, auto factories demand between 10 and 30 MW, and the largest traditional manufacturers, such as steel mills, demand between 100 and 200 MW. Connecting hyperscale data centers to the grid can require large discrete investments in grid infrastructure, which can put upward pressure on household rates if distributed across all customers.
The standards included in the Ratepayer Protection Act would change how these costs apply to data centers demanding over 100 MW at a single site, specifying that developers must pay the "full, incremental costs" of upgrades needed to connect, including those for generation, transmission, and distribution. It also stipulates that if large data centers shut down early, they'll cover any remaining unpaid amount.
The standards contained within the legislation would currently apply only to large-load customers that "require electric energy primarily to operate information technology infrastructure and related systems pertaining to data storage and computational applications and services," effectively targeting only data centers. Congress could improve the bill by dropping this provision and making the standards applicable to all future customers demanding more power than the 100 MW threshold.
The Ratepayer Protection Act offers an economically rational approach toward federal advisory standards for a new class of energy customers larger than those seen before. However, more fundamental fixes to our energy infrastructure will be necessary to meet the growing demand of data centers and all other consumers. In the long run, there is no substitute for expanding power generation capacity, both from public utilities and private sources. Reducing regulatory barriers to large-load customers generating their own power outside the public grid is an essential step for lawmakers to take toward the goal of meeting rising future demand.
* * *
Max Gulker, Ph.D., is managing director of technology policy at Reason Foundation.
Caden Rosenbaum is the managing director of technology policy at Reason Foundation.
* * *
Original text here: https://reason.org/commentary/the-ratepayer-protection-act-protects-against-higher-household-energy-bills-when-data-centers-connect-to-the-grid/
Latin America's PAHO-Gilead HIV Prevention Deal Is a Victory for Civil Society
LOS ANGELES, California, Sept. 18 -- The AIDS Healthcare Foundation posted the following news:
* * *
Latin America's PAHO-Gilead HIV Prevention Deal Is a Victory for Civil Society
*
AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF), the world's largest HIV care provider, welcomes a new agreement between Gilead Sciences and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) that could expand access to lenacapavir for HIV prevention in 14 countries across Latin America. The agreement represents a positive step toward expanding access in the region and a victory for civil society.
AHF was among the first organizations
... Show Full Article
LOS ANGELES, California, Sept. 18 -- The AIDS Healthcare Foundation posted the following news:
* * *
Latin America's PAHO-Gilead HIV Prevention Deal Is a Victory for Civil Society
*
AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF), the world's largest HIV care provider, welcomes a new agreement between Gilead Sciences and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) that could expand access to lenacapavir for HIV prevention in 14 countries across Latin America. The agreement represents a positive step toward expanding access in the region and a victory for civil society.
AHF was among the first organizationsto mobilize around concerns that the initial Gilead-WHO agreement excluded Latin American countries and joined other civil society organizations in calling for the agreement to be expanded. The AHF Global Public Health Institute, in partnership with the National Institute of Public Health of Mexico, also conducted a study examining the potential impact of lenacapavir in Latin American countries. The study highlighted that achieving greater public health impact will depend on both a significantly reduced price and acceptability among potential users.
Whether PAHO or Gilead acknowledge the role played by civil society, other non-state actors and communities in getting this deal done might sound irrelevant to many, but it's a fact that since the beginning of the epidemic in the 1980s, these actors have played a key role in making HIV treatment and prevention deals happen.
"It is encouraging to see PAHO and Gilead creating a pathway for access in countries that were excluded from the previous Gilead-WHO agreement. However, because this is a separate arrangement from the initial agreement, it must aim not simply for a fair price, but for a genuinely affordable one," said Dr. Jorge Saavedra, Executive Director of the AHF Global Public Health Institute and former Director General of Mexico's National AIDS Program. "In public health, we often say that it is better to prevent than to cure. For us, that also means prevention should be less expensive than treatment."
Dr. Saavedra added, "How can a Latin American government be convinced to pay more for lenacapavir for prevention if antiretroviral treatment is less expensive and also serves as secondary prevention? That would create a major public health and economic contradiction."
"Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and Peru helped generate the clinical evidence for lenacapavir through Gilead's pivotal PURPOSE 2 trial, yet they were excluded from the company's original voluntary licensing arrangement," said Dr. Patricia Campos, AHF Bureau Chief for Latin America and the Caribbean. "People who help make medical innovation possible should not then find themselves on the wrong side of an access barrier."
Important questions also remain about what the new arrangement will mean in practice. AHF urges Gilead and PAHO to make pricing, timelines, regulatory requirements, and other key terms transparent and to ensure the agreement results in genuinely affordable and timely access. A new procurement mechanism is welcome, but access cannot exist only on paper.
AHF recognizes that lenacapavir is highly effective, but it remains far from being a silver bullet for controlling the HIV epidemic. Acceptability among populations at greatest risk will also be a key part of the equation. AHF will continue working with governments, civil society, and partners throughout the region to advocate for equitable and sustainable access to lenacapavir alongside the full range of proven HIV prevention tools, including condoms.
***
Original text here: https://www.aidshealth.org/2026/09/latin-americas-paho-gilead-hiv-prevention-deal-is-a-victory-for-civil-society/
FFRF Insists Tenn. School District Must End Coach-led Prayer and Proselytizing
MADISON, Wisconsin, Sept. 18 -- The Freedom From Religion Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
September 17, 2026
FFRF insists Tenn. school district must end coach-led prayer and proselytizing
The Freedom From Religion Foundation is urging that the Robertson County Schools system in Tennessee put an immediate stop to coach-led prayer and religious proselytizing in its football program.
A concerned parent has reported to FFRF that football coaches at White House Heritage High School and Middle School regularly lead players in prayer, including recitations of the Lord's Prayer,
... Show Full Article
MADISON, Wisconsin, Sept. 18 -- The Freedom From Religion Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
September 17, 2026
FFRF insists Tenn. school district must end coach-led prayer and proselytizing
The Freedom From Religion Foundation is urging that the Robertson County Schools system in Tennessee put an immediate stop to coach-led prayer and religious proselytizing in its football program.
A concerned parent has reported to FFRF that football coaches at White House Heritage High School and Middle School regularly lead players in prayer, including recitations of the Lord's Prayer,at practices and before and after games. Some students reportedly fear that they could be penalized for refusing to participate and therefore feel compelled to recite the prayer against their conscience.
The parent also reports that the high school football coach has brought Christian speakers to official team events on a weekly basis and that coaches regularly encourage players to attend Fellowship of Christian Athletes meetings.
FFRF is urging the district to investigate this situation and ensure that coaches immediately stop proselytizing and leading football players in prayer and promoting participation in Christian religious activities.
"Student-athletes have the First Amendment right to be free from religious indoctrination when participating in their public school's athletics program," FFRF Patrick O'Reiley Legal Fellow Charlotte R. Gude writes to the school's legal counsel.
Here, the football coaches seem to have crossed the constitutional line by leading students in the Lord's Prayer while acting in their official capacities as school employees, bringing in outside adults to proselytize players, and promoting attendance at a Christian club. Student-athletes are especially susceptible to coercion, and the relationship between student-athletes and their coaches is inherently coercive. Students know that their coaches control their positions on the team, including who plays in each game.
When coaches lead students in prayer and direct or encourage them to pray or engage in other religious activities, student-athletes will no doubt feel that participating in that prayer is essential to pleasing their coach and being viewed as a team player. Students are unlikely to speak up against coach-led prayer and proselytizing even if they do not feel comfortable. It is unrealistic and unconstitutional to make student-athletes choose between allowing their constitutional rights to be violated to maintain good standing with their coach and peers or openly dissenting at the risk of retaliation. By allowing coaches to lead students in prayer and foist their personal religious beliefs onto student-athletes, the district needlessly marginalizes students among the 24 percent of Tennessee residents who are religiously unaffiliated, including the 43 percent of Generation Z members who are nonreligious.
To protect students' First Amendment rights, Robertson County Schools must investigate the situation and ensure that football coaches refrain from leading students in prayer and promoting religion.
"Public school coaches have enormous authority over their players, and they cannot use that authority to pressure students to pray or attend religious athletic clubs," says FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor. "There should be no 'pray to play' practices or other overstepping of the professional boundary between coaches and vulnerable public school students. Robertson County Schools must ensure that participation in athletics does not come with a religious test."
* * *
The Freedom From Religion Foundation is a U.S.-based nonprofit dedicated to defending the constitutional principle of separation between state and church and educating the public on matters relating to nontheism. With more than 40,000 members and several chapters across the country, including nearly 500 members and a chapter in Tennessee, FFRF is the largest association of freethinkers (atheists, agnostics and humanists) in North America. For more information, visit ffrf.org.
* * *
Original text here: https://ffrf.org/news/releases/ffrf-insists-tenn-school-district-must-end-coach-led-prayer-proselytizing/
[Category: Religion]
Court Strikes Down Trump's EPA Cancellation of $7B Solar for All Program
BOSTON, Massachusetts, Sept. 18 -- Conservation Law Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
Court Strikes Down Trump's EPA Cancellation of $7B Solar for All Program
*
September 18, 2026 (Boston, MA) - A federal judge has ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency unlawfully canceled the $7 billion Solar for All program, striking down the agency's decision to end a nationwide program designed to lower electricity bills and bring affordable solar power to families and communities across the country.
"Clean, affordable power like solar shouldn't be a closed-door luxury," said
... Show Full Article
BOSTON, Massachusetts, Sept. 18 -- Conservation Law Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
Court Strikes Down Trump's EPA Cancellation of $7B Solar for All Program
*
September 18, 2026 (Boston, MA) - A federal judge has ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency unlawfully canceled the $7 billion Solar for All program, striking down the agency's decision to end a nationwide program designed to lower electricity bills and bring affordable solar power to families and communities across the country.
"Clean, affordable power like solar shouldn't be a closed-door luxury," saidAlex St. Pierre, vice president for environmental justice at Conservation Law Foundation (CLF). "Solar for All was built to open that door, and EPA tried to slam it shut. Today's ruling pushes it back open. Communities have waited long enough. Nearly every family is looking for ways to cut their energy bill. These dollars should go where Congress intended: toward lower energy bills, less climate pollution, good jobs, and cleaner air."
"The court ruled the Trump Administration never should have terminated Solar for All because Congress intended it to continue, and EPA broke the law when it killed the program and pocketed the money," said Southern Environmental Law Center Senior Attorney Nick Torrey. "Electricity bills are skyrocketing, so low-cost solar projects -which guarantee big savings -are needed now more than ever. Today's victory means EPA must stop sitting on the $7 billion in funding for this program and start getting it out into communities to provide hardworking American families much-needed relief."
"Today's ruling confirms what we have argued from the beginning: EPA cannot erase a $7 billion program that Congress created and funded. For more than a year, families and communities have seen higher energy bills while billions of dollars intended to lower electricity costs sat out of reach. Today's decision makes clear that EPA unlawfully terminated the Solar for All Program," said Jillian Blanchard, Senior Vice President of Climate Change and Environmental Justice at L4GG.
In 2024, the EPA awarded $7 billion for "Solar for All," estimating the program would reach more than 900,000 households, save families $350 million a year on electricity bills, and support 200,000 jobs and workforce training opportunities.
In August 2025, the Trump administration abruptly canceled the program before much of that funding could reach communities. CLF, the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC), Lawyers for Good Government (L4GG), and the Lawyers Committee for Rhode Island, filed the lawsuit last October on behalf of workers, businesses, nonprofits, and individuals harmed by EPA's cancellation. Plaintiffs include the Rhode Island AFL-CIO, Rhode Island Center for Justice, Solar United Neighbors, an individual homeowner, and solar businesses.
The full ruling can be read here.
***
Original text here: https://www.clf.org/newsroom/court-strikes-down-trumps-epa-cancellation-of-7b-solar-for-all-program/
Another New England Offshore Wind Project Completes Construction
BOSTON, Massachusetts, Sept. 18 -- Conservation Law Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
Another New England Offshore Wind Project Completes Construction
*
Wind projects in the region will continue to provide reliable, homegrown energy and prevent more than 3 million tons of carbon from fouling our air and lungs each year by replacing fossil fuels. Photo: Shutterstock
September 18, 2026 (Boston, MA) - Revolution Wind has completed construction of its 65-turbine development off of Rhode Island, marking a major milestone in the development of clean, affordable energy for New England's
... Show Full Article
BOSTON, Massachusetts, Sept. 18 -- Conservation Law Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
Another New England Offshore Wind Project Completes Construction
*
Wind projects in the region will continue to provide reliable, homegrown energy and prevent more than 3 million tons of carbon from fouling our air and lungs each year by replacing fossil fuels. Photo: Shutterstock
September 18, 2026 (Boston, MA) - Revolution Wind has completed construction of its 65-turbine development off of Rhode Island, marking a major milestone in the development of clean, affordable energy for New England'shomes and businesses.
"This marks another major milestone for New England's clean energy transformation," said Anxhela Mile, staff attorney at Conservation Law Foundation (CLF). "As another offshore wind project completes construction, New England is expanding its supply of homegrown energy that will not only protect families and businesses from the volatility of fossil fuel prices, but bring cleaner air, good jobs, and more reliable, affordable energy to communities across the region."
Revolution Wind delivered its first power to the grid in March and will power 350,000 homes in Connecticut and Rhode Island. The project is expected to fully come online later this year.
Earlier this year, Vineyard Wind completed installation of its 62 turbines in the waters off Massachusetts that will power 400,000 homes and businesses.
South Fork Wind, which completed construction and is located less than 20 miles from Block Island, powers 70,000 homes and businesses on Long Island with a dozen turbines.
These three projects will continue to provide reliable, homegrown energy and prevent more than 3 million tons of carbon from fouling our air and lungs each year by replacing fossil fuels. That's the equivalent of taking more than 650,000 cars off the road.
CLF experts are available for further comment.
***
Original text here: https://www.clf.org/newsroom/another-new-england-offshore-wind-project-completes-construction/
