States, Cities and Counties
Here's a look at documents covering state government, cities and counties
States, Cities and Counties
Featured Stories
Mono Lake Kootzaduka'a Tribe of California and Nevada and California State Parks Sign Memorandum of Understanding
SACRAMENTO, California, Sept. 5 -- The California Department of Parks and Recreation State Parks unit issued the following news release:
* * *
Mono Lake Kootzaduka'a Tribe of California and Nevada and California State Parks Sign Memorandum of Understanding
California State Parks and the Mono Lake Kootzaduka'a Tribe of California and Nevada (Kootzaduka'a) gathered on Aug. 29 on the shore of Mono Lake to sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to formalize a relationship to promote successful consultation, collaboration, and co-stewardship for the mutual benefit of the Kootzaduka'a and State ... Show Full Article SACRAMENTO, California, Sept. 5 -- The California Department of Parks and Recreation State Parks unit issued the following news release: * * * Mono Lake Kootzaduka'a Tribe of California and Nevada and California State Parks Sign Memorandum of Understanding California State Parks and the Mono Lake Kootzaduka'a Tribe of California and Nevada (Kootzaduka'a) gathered on Aug. 29 on the shore of Mono Lake to sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to formalize a relationship to promote successful consultation, collaboration, and co-stewardship for the mutual benefit of the Kootzaduka'a and StateParks. State Parks manages two State Park units located within the traditional homelands of the Kootzaduka'a people - Bodie State Historic Park (SHP) and Mono Lake Tufa State Natural Reserve (SNR).
Tribal Chair Charlotte Lange at the signing event reflected that, "My Grandfather told me to always take care of the land and take care of the water. We are grateful we are partnering with State Parks to protect our tribal lands."
"These MOUs have created a blossoming of collaboration," State Parks Director Armando Quintero said at the signing, noting this is State Parks' 16th MOU with a California Native American tribe. "this MOU will facilitate the return of Native language, tribal members being able to gather their traditional materials, and the creation of a seed bank to be able to propagate California native plants to restore our ecosystems."
"This MOU is the culmination of months of hard work and planning between State Parks and the Kootzaduka'a Tribe," said Scott Green, Sierra District Coordinating Tribal Liaison. "It reflects our shared commitment to stewardship of the land."
California Native Americans have stewarded the lands, airs, and water of what is known today as California since time immemorial and have a unique connection to the environment and the natural, cultural, and historical resources. This MOU provides for access and traditional gathering for all Kootzaduka'a tribal members as well as facilitates State Parks working with the Kootzaduka'a within their traditional homelands to better care for natural, cultural, and historical resources at Mono Lake Tufa SNR, and cooperate on the protection of cultural resources and interpretation at Bodie SHP, a focus of State Park's Reexamining Our Past Initiative.
"This MOU helps California reach the goal of meaningful and durable Tribal Stewardship over at least 7.5 million acres of land and coastal waters by removing barriers members of the Mono Lake Kootzaduka'a Tribe face accessing State Parks lands, pursuant to the California Natural Resource Agency's Tribal Stewardship Policy, shared California Natural Resources Agency Deputy Secretary of Tribal Affairs Geneva E. B. Thompson at the event.
This MOU fosters a shared stewardship approach and will introduce Traditional Management Practices (TMPs) based on Kootzaduka'a priorities and Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) to the management of units of the California State Park System within the Sierra District. The Kootzaduka'a Tribe and State Parks recognize that a collaborative approach will facilitate the management and preservation of cultural, tribal, and natural resources.
* * *
California State Parks provides for the health, inspiration and education of the people of California by helping to preserve the state's extraordinary biological diversity, protecting its most valued natural and cultural resources, and creating opportunities for high quality outdoor recreation.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.parks.ca.gov/NewsRelease/1568
* * *
Mono Lake Kootzaduka'a Tribe of California and Nevada and California State Parks Sign Memorandum of Understanding
California State Parks and the Mono Lake Kootzaduka'a Tribe of California and Nevada (Kootzaduka'a) gathered on Aug. 29 on the shore of Mono Lake to sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to formalize a relationship to promote successful consultation, collaboration, and co-stewardship for the mutual benefit of the Kootzaduka'a and State ... Show Full Article SACRAMENTO, California, Sept. 5 -- The California Department of Parks and Recreation State Parks unit issued the following news release: * * * Mono Lake Kootzaduka'a Tribe of California and Nevada and California State Parks Sign Memorandum of Understanding California State Parks and the Mono Lake Kootzaduka'a Tribe of California and Nevada (Kootzaduka'a) gathered on Aug. 29 on the shore of Mono Lake to sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to formalize a relationship to promote successful consultation, collaboration, and co-stewardship for the mutual benefit of the Kootzaduka'a and StateParks. State Parks manages two State Park units located within the traditional homelands of the Kootzaduka'a people - Bodie State Historic Park (SHP) and Mono Lake Tufa State Natural Reserve (SNR).
Tribal Chair Charlotte Lange at the signing event reflected that, "My Grandfather told me to always take care of the land and take care of the water. We are grateful we are partnering with State Parks to protect our tribal lands."
"These MOUs have created a blossoming of collaboration," State Parks Director Armando Quintero said at the signing, noting this is State Parks' 16th MOU with a California Native American tribe. "this MOU will facilitate the return of Native language, tribal members being able to gather their traditional materials, and the creation of a seed bank to be able to propagate California native plants to restore our ecosystems."
"This MOU is the culmination of months of hard work and planning between State Parks and the Kootzaduka'a Tribe," said Scott Green, Sierra District Coordinating Tribal Liaison. "It reflects our shared commitment to stewardship of the land."
California Native Americans have stewarded the lands, airs, and water of what is known today as California since time immemorial and have a unique connection to the environment and the natural, cultural, and historical resources. This MOU provides for access and traditional gathering for all Kootzaduka'a tribal members as well as facilitates State Parks working with the Kootzaduka'a within their traditional homelands to better care for natural, cultural, and historical resources at Mono Lake Tufa SNR, and cooperate on the protection of cultural resources and interpretation at Bodie SHP, a focus of State Park's Reexamining Our Past Initiative.
"This MOU helps California reach the goal of meaningful and durable Tribal Stewardship over at least 7.5 million acres of land and coastal waters by removing barriers members of the Mono Lake Kootzaduka'a Tribe face accessing State Parks lands, pursuant to the California Natural Resource Agency's Tribal Stewardship Policy, shared California Natural Resources Agency Deputy Secretary of Tribal Affairs Geneva E. B. Thompson at the event.
This MOU fosters a shared stewardship approach and will introduce Traditional Management Practices (TMPs) based on Kootzaduka'a priorities and Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) to the management of units of the California State Park System within the Sierra District. The Kootzaduka'a Tribe and State Parks recognize that a collaborative approach will facilitate the management and preservation of cultural, tribal, and natural resources.
* * *
California State Parks provides for the health, inspiration and education of the people of California by helping to preserve the state's extraordinary biological diversity, protecting its most valued natural and cultural resources, and creating opportunities for high quality outdoor recreation.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.parks.ca.gov/NewsRelease/1568
Mich. Education Dept.: State Must Continue Carrying Out Evidence-Based Plans to Improve Student Proficiency
LANSING, Michigan, Sept. 5 -- The Michigan Department of Education issued the following news release:
* * *
Michigan Must Continue Carrying Out Evidence-Based Plans to Improve Student Proficiency
State Test Scores Released Today Show Continued Collaboration Is Needed for Higher Achievement in English, Math, Science and Social Studies
-
Michigan education leaders are reiterating their commitment to evidence-based instruction proven to improve student proficiency as the Michigan Department of Education (MDE) releases the 2026 M-STEP and SAT/PSAT scores today.
Most proficiency rates are essentially ... Show Full Article LANSING, Michigan, Sept. 5 -- The Michigan Department of Education issued the following news release: * * * Michigan Must Continue Carrying Out Evidence-Based Plans to Improve Student Proficiency State Test Scores Released Today Show Continued Collaboration Is Needed for Higher Achievement in English, Math, Science and Social Studies - Michigan education leaders are reiterating their commitment to evidence-based instruction proven to improve student proficiency as the Michigan Department of Education (MDE) releases the 2026 M-STEP and SAT/PSAT scores today. Most proficiency rates are essentiallyflat when compared to 2025 results on the tests, with the rates on all except four of 20 tests staying within 2 percentage points of the numbers in 2025 and most staying within a percentage point.
"It will take continued hard work from everyone and a strong Students First approach to improve student achievement across Michigan," said State Superintendent Dr. Glenn Maleyko. "That means we must emphasize teamwork involving MDE, the State Board of Education, local school districts, parents, the governor, the legislature, the business and philanthropic communities, education associations, labor, higher education and libraries. The good news is that we have broad and bipartisan support for plans to use evidence-based methods such as the Science of Reading to improve student proficiency. However, we need to make improvements to help our students achieve at higher levels. We need to increase proficiency rates in all subject areas and show steady improvement over time."
The M-STEP and SAT/PSAT scores measure student proficiency in English language arts, math, science and social studies. The Center for Educational Performance and Information posts statewide results under "K-12 Grade" and "State Testing" on MI School Data (mischooldata.org), Michigan's official education data portal.
"MDE's top priority is literacy because reading is the foundation to students' success in other subjects and ultimately in postsecondary education and their careers," said Dr. Delsa Chapman, the deputy superintendent of the department's Division of Assessment, School Improvement, and Systems Support. "At the same time, the department also is focusing on using evidence-based methods to improve proficiency in math, science and social studies."
When it comes to literacy, the department is implementing historic measures passed by the legislature and signed into law by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in late 2024 and 2026. The 2024 law is just now getting close to being fully implemented and work is beginning on carrying out requirements in the July 2026 laws, so the state test results from assessments students took in spring 2026 don't yet fully reflect the benefits of the laws.
MDE and the Michigan Department of Lifelong Education, Advancement and Potential in March released the Every Child Reads Next Steps Forward plan and the governor in May issued Executive Order 2026-12: Every Child Reads Champions Council. On Thursday Gov. Whitmer announced appointments to the Every Child Reads Council that will advise the governor on Michigan's literacy agenda.
The department is implementing the 2024 literacy and dyslexia laws by:
* Awarding more than $150 million in total to more than 500 districts in each of two rounds of grants to purchase whole class or intervention literacy materials, professional learning for teachers, or literacy assessments that have been approved by the MDE Committee for Literacy Achievement.
* Approving a list of assessments to screen and monitor the progress of children who need extra support in learning to read and a list of evidence-based literacy curricula for Michigan schools to use.
* Requiring the state's teacher preparation programs by September 2027 to provide all teacher candidates with instruction in the characteristics of dyslexia, difficulties in learning to decode accurately and efficiently, and instructional adjustments for students with reading challenges.
* Developing a list of approved K-3 valid and reliable screening and progress monitoring reading assessments and a list of evidence-based tier 1, class-wide elementary reading curricula and materials that research has shown improves literacy outcomes and helps pupils achieve reading proficiency.
* Approving literacy curricula and screening and progress-monitoring assessments that use the Science of Reading to improve literacy instruction. The Science of Reading focuses on teaching students phonemic awareness (the ability to recognize sound), phonics, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension.
The 2026 literacy laws will ensure that the people who are responsible for teaching reading to Michigan children have the professional learning they need in the Science of Reading. One law requires state-funded Science of Reading professional learning for public school teachers who teach reading in grades K-5. Another requires faculty at educator preparation programs to receive training in the Science of Reading.
So far more than 7,600 educators in Michigan have completed Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling (LETRS) training in the Science of Reading, but the training has been voluntary.
To improve math achievement, among other things the department this fall is rolling out the Michigan Mathematics Framework, with a focus on a shared vision for mathematics learning; evidence-based curriculum, instruction, and assessment; and coordinated systems for mathematics. Together, these components will ensure all students have access to high-quality and engaging learning opportunities in mathematics.
Science efforts include the department's creation of a committee for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics--better known as STEM--achievement that will recommend tools and strategies with the goal of increasing student achievement in science.
In social studies, efforts to improve proficiency include an American history toolkit that MDE has made available to local educators to increase engagement and knowledge and other assistance being provided statewide by the department's social studies consultant.
"Michigan's educators remain deeply committed to ensuring every student has the opportunity to succeed," said Dr. Tina Kerr, executive director of the Michigan Association of Superintendents & Administrators. "State assessment results provide an important measure of our progress, while also helping us identify where additional focus and support are needed. We have seen the value of a sustained focus on strengthening literacy across Michigan, and we know meaningful improvement takes time, commitment and collaboration. The Michigan Association of Superintendents & Administrators looks forward to continuing to work alongside MDE, local school leaders and educators to build on this work and improve outcomes for students across our state."
The Michigan Student Test of Educational Progress, or M-STEP, is designed to gauge how well students are progressing toward state subject matter standards. These standards, developed for educators by educators, broadly outline what students should know and be able to do to be prepared to enter the workplace, career education training and college.
When combined with classroom work, report cards, local district assessments, formative assessment practices (daily information about students' knowledge, understanding, and skills to address their learning needs),and other local tools, M-STEP results help offer a comprehensive view of student progress and achievement.
The M-STEP assessments are rigorous and not meant to measure reading ability or math ability by themselves. They are meant to measure understanding of a broad set of rigorous subject matter standards. Because these assessments are high-bar tests, students who score partially proficient are not necessarily performing below their grade level, and many who are below the proficient benchmark are successful throughout school, in high school, in college and in their chosen professions.
The SAT is administered by the College Board and students' scores are among many criteria that universities and colleges may use to make admissions decisions. The PSAT is a pretest for the SAT.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.michigan.gov/mde/news-and-information/press-releases/2026/09/04/mi-must-continue-plans-to-improve-student-proficiency
* * *
Michigan Must Continue Carrying Out Evidence-Based Plans to Improve Student Proficiency
State Test Scores Released Today Show Continued Collaboration Is Needed for Higher Achievement in English, Math, Science and Social Studies
-
Michigan education leaders are reiterating their commitment to evidence-based instruction proven to improve student proficiency as the Michigan Department of Education (MDE) releases the 2026 M-STEP and SAT/PSAT scores today.
Most proficiency rates are essentially ... Show Full Article LANSING, Michigan, Sept. 5 -- The Michigan Department of Education issued the following news release: * * * Michigan Must Continue Carrying Out Evidence-Based Plans to Improve Student Proficiency State Test Scores Released Today Show Continued Collaboration Is Needed for Higher Achievement in English, Math, Science and Social Studies - Michigan education leaders are reiterating their commitment to evidence-based instruction proven to improve student proficiency as the Michigan Department of Education (MDE) releases the 2026 M-STEP and SAT/PSAT scores today. Most proficiency rates are essentiallyflat when compared to 2025 results on the tests, with the rates on all except four of 20 tests staying within 2 percentage points of the numbers in 2025 and most staying within a percentage point.
"It will take continued hard work from everyone and a strong Students First approach to improve student achievement across Michigan," said State Superintendent Dr. Glenn Maleyko. "That means we must emphasize teamwork involving MDE, the State Board of Education, local school districts, parents, the governor, the legislature, the business and philanthropic communities, education associations, labor, higher education and libraries. The good news is that we have broad and bipartisan support for plans to use evidence-based methods such as the Science of Reading to improve student proficiency. However, we need to make improvements to help our students achieve at higher levels. We need to increase proficiency rates in all subject areas and show steady improvement over time."
The M-STEP and SAT/PSAT scores measure student proficiency in English language arts, math, science and social studies. The Center for Educational Performance and Information posts statewide results under "K-12 Grade" and "State Testing" on MI School Data (mischooldata.org), Michigan's official education data portal.
"MDE's top priority is literacy because reading is the foundation to students' success in other subjects and ultimately in postsecondary education and their careers," said Dr. Delsa Chapman, the deputy superintendent of the department's Division of Assessment, School Improvement, and Systems Support. "At the same time, the department also is focusing on using evidence-based methods to improve proficiency in math, science and social studies."
When it comes to literacy, the department is implementing historic measures passed by the legislature and signed into law by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in late 2024 and 2026. The 2024 law is just now getting close to being fully implemented and work is beginning on carrying out requirements in the July 2026 laws, so the state test results from assessments students took in spring 2026 don't yet fully reflect the benefits of the laws.
MDE and the Michigan Department of Lifelong Education, Advancement and Potential in March released the Every Child Reads Next Steps Forward plan and the governor in May issued Executive Order 2026-12: Every Child Reads Champions Council. On Thursday Gov. Whitmer announced appointments to the Every Child Reads Council that will advise the governor on Michigan's literacy agenda.
The department is implementing the 2024 literacy and dyslexia laws by:
* Awarding more than $150 million in total to more than 500 districts in each of two rounds of grants to purchase whole class or intervention literacy materials, professional learning for teachers, or literacy assessments that have been approved by the MDE Committee for Literacy Achievement.
* Approving a list of assessments to screen and monitor the progress of children who need extra support in learning to read and a list of evidence-based literacy curricula for Michigan schools to use.
* Requiring the state's teacher preparation programs by September 2027 to provide all teacher candidates with instruction in the characteristics of dyslexia, difficulties in learning to decode accurately and efficiently, and instructional adjustments for students with reading challenges.
* Developing a list of approved K-3 valid and reliable screening and progress monitoring reading assessments and a list of evidence-based tier 1, class-wide elementary reading curricula and materials that research has shown improves literacy outcomes and helps pupils achieve reading proficiency.
* Approving literacy curricula and screening and progress-monitoring assessments that use the Science of Reading to improve literacy instruction. The Science of Reading focuses on teaching students phonemic awareness (the ability to recognize sound), phonics, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension.
The 2026 literacy laws will ensure that the people who are responsible for teaching reading to Michigan children have the professional learning they need in the Science of Reading. One law requires state-funded Science of Reading professional learning for public school teachers who teach reading in grades K-5. Another requires faculty at educator preparation programs to receive training in the Science of Reading.
So far more than 7,600 educators in Michigan have completed Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling (LETRS) training in the Science of Reading, but the training has been voluntary.
To improve math achievement, among other things the department this fall is rolling out the Michigan Mathematics Framework, with a focus on a shared vision for mathematics learning; evidence-based curriculum, instruction, and assessment; and coordinated systems for mathematics. Together, these components will ensure all students have access to high-quality and engaging learning opportunities in mathematics.
Science efforts include the department's creation of a committee for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics--better known as STEM--achievement that will recommend tools and strategies with the goal of increasing student achievement in science.
In social studies, efforts to improve proficiency include an American history toolkit that MDE has made available to local educators to increase engagement and knowledge and other assistance being provided statewide by the department's social studies consultant.
"Michigan's educators remain deeply committed to ensuring every student has the opportunity to succeed," said Dr. Tina Kerr, executive director of the Michigan Association of Superintendents & Administrators. "State assessment results provide an important measure of our progress, while also helping us identify where additional focus and support are needed. We have seen the value of a sustained focus on strengthening literacy across Michigan, and we know meaningful improvement takes time, commitment and collaboration. The Michigan Association of Superintendents & Administrators looks forward to continuing to work alongside MDE, local school leaders and educators to build on this work and improve outcomes for students across our state."
The Michigan Student Test of Educational Progress, or M-STEP, is designed to gauge how well students are progressing toward state subject matter standards. These standards, developed for educators by educators, broadly outline what students should know and be able to do to be prepared to enter the workplace, career education training and college.
When combined with classroom work, report cards, local district assessments, formative assessment practices (daily information about students' knowledge, understanding, and skills to address their learning needs),and other local tools, M-STEP results help offer a comprehensive view of student progress and achievement.
The M-STEP assessments are rigorous and not meant to measure reading ability or math ability by themselves. They are meant to measure understanding of a broad set of rigorous subject matter standards. Because these assessments are high-bar tests, students who score partially proficient are not necessarily performing below their grade level, and many who are below the proficient benchmark are successful throughout school, in high school, in college and in their chosen professions.
The SAT is administered by the College Board and students' scores are among many criteria that universities and colleges may use to make admissions decisions. The PSAT is a pretest for the SAT.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.michigan.gov/mde/news-and-information/press-releases/2026/09/04/mi-must-continue-plans-to-improve-student-proficiency
Gov. Newsom on California Securing Massive Victory for Democracy
SACRAMENTO, California, Sept. 5 -- Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-California, issued the following news release on Sept. 4, 2026:
* * *
Governor Gavin Newsom on California securing massive victory for democracy
Governor Gavin Newsom just issued the following statement in response to California, working with other states, securing a huge win for democracy against the Trump Administration's attempts to restrict voting rights via the U.S. Postal Service.
* * *
California teamed up with other states and just beat the Trump Administration in defending democracy.
They tried to restrict voting rights via ... Show Full Article SACRAMENTO, California, Sept. 5 -- Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-California, issued the following news release on Sept. 4, 2026: * * * Governor Gavin Newsom on California securing massive victory for democracy Governor Gavin Newsom just issued the following statement in response to California, working with other states, securing a huge win for democracy against the Trump Administration's attempts to restrict voting rights via the U.S. Postal Service. * * * California teamed up with other states and just beat the Trump Administration in defending democracy. They tried to restrict voting rights viathe USPS system, we sued, and we won an order blocking the USPS rule through the November elections!
As ballots begin to be mailed out across the country, we must all continue to take concrete action to safeguard our republic.
- Governor Gavin Newsom
* * *
This ruling, which comes in the aftermath of the Governor promising action, means a Preliminary Injunction is in place blocking the USPS' rule as litigation takes place in the courts.
Importantly, this order moots the appeal pending with the U.S. Supreme Court.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.gov.ca.gov/2026/09/04/governor-gavin-newsom-on-california-securing-massive-victory-for-democracy/
* * *
Governor Gavin Newsom on California securing massive victory for democracy
Governor Gavin Newsom just issued the following statement in response to California, working with other states, securing a huge win for democracy against the Trump Administration's attempts to restrict voting rights via the U.S. Postal Service.
* * *
California teamed up with other states and just beat the Trump Administration in defending democracy.
They tried to restrict voting rights via ... Show Full Article SACRAMENTO, California, Sept. 5 -- Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-California, issued the following news release on Sept. 4, 2026: * * * Governor Gavin Newsom on California securing massive victory for democracy Governor Gavin Newsom just issued the following statement in response to California, working with other states, securing a huge win for democracy against the Trump Administration's attempts to restrict voting rights via the U.S. Postal Service. * * * California teamed up with other states and just beat the Trump Administration in defending democracy. They tried to restrict voting rights viathe USPS system, we sued, and we won an order blocking the USPS rule through the November elections!
As ballots begin to be mailed out across the country, we must all continue to take concrete action to safeguard our republic.
- Governor Gavin Newsom
* * *
This ruling, which comes in the aftermath of the Governor promising action, means a Preliminary Injunction is in place blocking the USPS' rule as litigation takes place in the courts.
Importantly, this order moots the appeal pending with the U.S. Supreme Court.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.gov.ca.gov/2026/09/04/governor-gavin-newsom-on-california-securing-massive-victory-for-democracy/
Ga. Dept. of Audits & Accounts: Southwest Georgia Regional Educational Service Agency
ATLANTA, Georgia, Sept. 5 -- The Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts issued the following report entitled "Southwest Georgia Regional Educational Service Agency."
Here are excerpts:
* * *
Independent Auditor's Report
The Honorable Brian P. Kemp, Governor of Georgia
Members of the General Assembly of the State of Georgia
Members of the State Board of Education
and
Dr. Jason Miller, Executive Director and Members of the
Southwest Georgia Regional Educational Service Agency Board of Control
Opinion
We have audited the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance ... Show Full Article ATLANTA, Georgia, Sept. 5 -- The Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts issued the following report entitled "Southwest Georgia Regional Educational Service Agency." Here are excerpts: * * * Independent Auditor's Report The Honorable Brian P. Kemp, Governor of Georgia Members of the General Assembly of the State of Georgia Members of the State Board of Education and Dr. Jason Miller, Executive Director and Members of the Southwest Georgia Regional Educational Service Agency Board of Control Opinion We have audited the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balanceand the related notes (financial statement) of the Southwest Georgia Regional Educational Service Agency (RESA), a component unit of the State of Georgia, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2024.
In our opinion, the financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the respective changes in fund balance of the general fund and the related notes of the RESA for the year ended June 30, 2024,
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statement section of our report.
We are required to be independent of the RESA, and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statement, the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance was prepared for the purpose of meeting the requirements of the RESA and the Georgia Department of Education and is not intended to be a complete presentation of the RESA's assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses nor does it constitute a complete set of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statement
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statement in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and for the design, implementation,
and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statement that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statement, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the RESA's ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the date of the financial statement, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.
Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statement
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement as a whole is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate,
they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statement.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, we:
* Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
* Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statement, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include
examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement.
* Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the RESA's internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
* Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statement.
* Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the RESA's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control related matters that we identified during the audit.
Restriction on Use
Our report is intended solely for the information and use of the RESA's management, members of the Board of Control, and the Georgia Department of Education and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone
other than these specified parties.
A copy of this report has been filed as a permanent record and made available to the press of the State, as provided for by Official Code of Georgia Annotated section 50-6-24.
Respectfully submitted,
Greg S. Griffin
State Auditor
August 7, 2026
* * *
The report is posted at: https://www.audits.ga.gov/ReportSearch/download/34260?_gl=1*16tnek3*_ga*MjEyMDA0Nzk3NC4xNzg4NjAxMzAz*_ga_8Z4RV13R5J*czE3ODg2MDEzMDMkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODg2MDEzMDMkajYwJGwwJGgw*_ga_65FL79Y113*czE3ODg2MDEzMDMkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODg2MDEzMDMkajYwJGwwJGgw
Here are excerpts:
* * *
Independent Auditor's Report
The Honorable Brian P. Kemp, Governor of Georgia
Members of the General Assembly of the State of Georgia
Members of the State Board of Education
and
Dr. Jason Miller, Executive Director and Members of the
Southwest Georgia Regional Educational Service Agency Board of Control
Opinion
We have audited the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance ... Show Full Article ATLANTA, Georgia, Sept. 5 -- The Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts issued the following report entitled "Southwest Georgia Regional Educational Service Agency." Here are excerpts: * * * Independent Auditor's Report The Honorable Brian P. Kemp, Governor of Georgia Members of the General Assembly of the State of Georgia Members of the State Board of Education and Dr. Jason Miller, Executive Director and Members of the Southwest Georgia Regional Educational Service Agency Board of Control Opinion We have audited the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balanceand the related notes (financial statement) of the Southwest Georgia Regional Educational Service Agency (RESA), a component unit of the State of Georgia, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2024.
In our opinion, the financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the respective changes in fund balance of the general fund and the related notes of the RESA for the year ended June 30, 2024,
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statement section of our report.
We are required to be independent of the RESA, and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statement, the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance was prepared for the purpose of meeting the requirements of the RESA and the Georgia Department of Education and is not intended to be a complete presentation of the RESA's assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses nor does it constitute a complete set of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statement
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statement in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and for the design, implementation,
and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statement that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statement, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the RESA's ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the date of the financial statement, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.
Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statement
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement as a whole is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate,
they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statement.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, we:
* Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
* Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statement, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include
examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement.
* Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the RESA's internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
* Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statement.
* Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the RESA's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control related matters that we identified during the audit.
Restriction on Use
Our report is intended solely for the information and use of the RESA's management, members of the Board of Control, and the Georgia Department of Education and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone
other than these specified parties.
A copy of this report has been filed as a permanent record and made available to the press of the State, as provided for by Official Code of Georgia Annotated section 50-6-24.
Respectfully submitted,
Greg S. Griffin
State Auditor
August 7, 2026
* * *
The report is posted at: https://www.audits.ga.gov/ReportSearch/download/34260?_gl=1*16tnek3*_ga*MjEyMDA0Nzk3NC4xNzg4NjAxMzAz*_ga_8Z4RV13R5J*czE3ODg2MDEzMDMkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODg2MDEzMDMkajYwJGwwJGgw*_ga_65FL79Y113*czE3ODg2MDEzMDMkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODg2MDEzMDMkajYwJGwwJGgw
Ga. Dept. of Audits & Accounts: Central Savannah River Area Regional Educational Service Agency
ATLANTA, Georgia, Sept. 5 -- The Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts issued the following report entitled "Central Savannah River Area Regional Educational Service Agency."
Here are excerpts:
* * *
Independent Auditor's Report
The Honorable Brian P. Kemp, Governor of Georgia
Members of the General Assembly of the State of Georgia
Members of the State Board of Education
and
Dr. Debbie Alexander, Executive Director and Members of the
Central Savannah River Area Regional Educational Service Agency Board of Control
Opinion
We have audited the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and ... Show Full Article ATLANTA, Georgia, Sept. 5 -- The Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts issued the following report entitled "Central Savannah River Area Regional Educational Service Agency." Here are excerpts: * * * Independent Auditor's Report The Honorable Brian P. Kemp, Governor of Georgia Members of the General Assembly of the State of Georgia Members of the State Board of Education and Dr. Debbie Alexander, Executive Director and Members of the Central Savannah River Area Regional Educational Service Agency Board of Control Opinion We have audited the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, andChanges in Fund Balance and the related notes (financial statement) of the Central Savannah River Area Regional Educational Service Agency (RESA), a component unit of the State of Georgia, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025.
In our opinion, the financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the respective changes in fund balance of the general fund and the related notes of the RESA for the year ended June 30, 2025 in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statement section of our report.
We are required to be independent of the RESA, and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statement, the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance was prepared for the purpose of meeting the requirements of the RESA and the Georgia Department of
Education and is not intended to be a complete presentation of the RESA's assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses nor does it constitute a complete set of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statement
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statement in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and for the design, implementation,
and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statement that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statement, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the RESA's ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the date of the financial statement, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.
Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statement
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement as a whole is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate,
they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statement.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, we:
* Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
* Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statement, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement.
* Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the RESA's internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
* Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statement.
* Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the RESA's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control related matters that
we identified during the audit.
Restriction on Use
Our report is intended solely for the information and use of the RESA's management, members of the Board of Control, and the Georgia Department of Education and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone
other than these specified parties.
A copy of this report has been filed as a permanent record and made available to the press of the State, as provided for by Official Code of Georgia Annotated section 50-6-24.
Respectfully submitted,
Greg S. Griffin
State Auditor
August 11, 2026
* * *
The report is posted at: https://www.audits.ga.gov/ReportSearch/download/34270?_gl=1*12fue2l*_ga*MjEyMDA0Nzk3NC4xNzg4NjAxMzAz*_ga_8Z4RV13R5J*czE3ODg2MDQyMjgkbzIkZzEkdDE3ODg2MDQyMzAkajU4JGwwJGgw*_ga_65FL79Y113*czE3ODg2MDQyMjgkbzIkZzEkdDE3ODg2MDQyMzAkajU4JGwwJGgw
Here are excerpts:
* * *
Independent Auditor's Report
The Honorable Brian P. Kemp, Governor of Georgia
Members of the General Assembly of the State of Georgia
Members of the State Board of Education
and
Dr. Debbie Alexander, Executive Director and Members of the
Central Savannah River Area Regional Educational Service Agency Board of Control
Opinion
We have audited the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and ... Show Full Article ATLANTA, Georgia, Sept. 5 -- The Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts issued the following report entitled "Central Savannah River Area Regional Educational Service Agency." Here are excerpts: * * * Independent Auditor's Report The Honorable Brian P. Kemp, Governor of Georgia Members of the General Assembly of the State of Georgia Members of the State Board of Education and Dr. Debbie Alexander, Executive Director and Members of the Central Savannah River Area Regional Educational Service Agency Board of Control Opinion We have audited the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, andChanges in Fund Balance and the related notes (financial statement) of the Central Savannah River Area Regional Educational Service Agency (RESA), a component unit of the State of Georgia, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025.
In our opinion, the financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the respective changes in fund balance of the general fund and the related notes of the RESA for the year ended June 30, 2025 in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statement section of our report.
We are required to be independent of the RESA, and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statement, the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance was prepared for the purpose of meeting the requirements of the RESA and the Georgia Department of
Education and is not intended to be a complete presentation of the RESA's assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses nor does it constitute a complete set of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statement
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statement in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and for the design, implementation,
and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statement that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statement, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the RESA's ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the date of the financial statement, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.
Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statement
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement as a whole is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate,
they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statement.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, we:
* Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
* Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statement, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement.
* Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the RESA's internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
* Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statement.
* Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the RESA's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control related matters that
we identified during the audit.
Restriction on Use
Our report is intended solely for the information and use of the RESA's management, members of the Board of Control, and the Georgia Department of Education and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone
other than these specified parties.
A copy of this report has been filed as a permanent record and made available to the press of the State, as provided for by Official Code of Georgia Annotated section 50-6-24.
Respectfully submitted,
Greg S. Griffin
State Auditor
August 11, 2026
* * *
The report is posted at: https://www.audits.ga.gov/ReportSearch/download/34270?_gl=1*12fue2l*_ga*MjEyMDA0Nzk3NC4xNzg4NjAxMzAz*_ga_8Z4RV13R5J*czE3ODg2MDQyMjgkbzIkZzEkdDE3ODg2MDQyMzAkajU4JGwwJGgw*_ga_65FL79Y113*czE3ODg2MDQyMjgkbzIkZzEkdDE3ODg2MDQyMzAkajU4JGwwJGgw
Ga. Dept. of Audits & Accounts: Brantley County Board of Education
ATLANTA, Georgia, Sept. 5 -- The Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts issued the following report entitled "Brantley County Board of Education."
Here are excerpts:
* * *
Independent Auditor's Report
The Honorable Brian P. Kemp, Governor of Georgia
Members of the General Assembly of the State of Georgia
Members of the State Board of Education
and
Dr. Walker Todd, Superintendent and Members of the
Brantley County Board of Education
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, each major ... Show Full Article ATLANTA, Georgia, Sept. 5 -- The Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts issued the following report entitled "Brantley County Board of Education." Here are excerpts: * * * Independent Auditor's Report The Honorable Brian P. Kemp, Governor of Georgia Members of the General Assembly of the State of Georgia Members of the State Board of Education and Dr. Walker Todd, Superintendent and Members of the Brantley County Board of Education Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements Opinions We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, each majorfund, and fiduciary activities of the Brantley County Board of Education (School District) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the School District's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, each major fund, and fiduciary activities of the School District as of June 30, 2025, and the respective changes in financial position for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS) and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report.
We are required to be independent of the School District and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we
have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.
Emphasis of Matter
As described in Note 2 to the financial statements, in 2025, the School District adopted new accounting guidance, Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 101, Compensated Absences. The School District
restated beginning balances for the effect of GASB Statement No. 101. Our opinions are not modified with respect to this matter.
Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation,
and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the School District's ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.
Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinions.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a
material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS and Government Auditing Standards, we:
* Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
* Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
* Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the School District's internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
* Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements.
* Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the School District's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control related matters that we identified during the audit.
Required Supplementary Information
Management has omitted the Management's Discussion and Analysis that accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require to be presented to supplement the basic financial statements.
Such missing information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. Our opinions on the basic financial statements are not affected by this missing information.
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the required supplementary information listed in the table of contents be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such
information is the responsibility of management and, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial
reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with GAAS,
which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.
Supplementary Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the School District's basic financial statements. The accompanying supplementary information, as listed in the table of contents, is presented for the purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented for purposes of additional
analysis as required by Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, and is also not a required part of the
basic financial statements.
The supplementary information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has
been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with GAAS. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated August 21, 2026 on our consideration of the School District's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the School
District's internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the School District's internal control over financial reporting and compliance.
A copy of this report has been filed as a permanent record and made available to the press of the State, as provided for by Official Code of Georgia Annotated section 50-6-24.
Respectfully submitted,
Greg S. Griffin
State Auditor
August 21, 2026
* * *
The report is posted at: https://www.audits.ga.gov/ReportSearch/download/34291?_gl=1*el9wdg*_ga*MjEyMDA0Nzk3NC4xNzg4NjAxMzAz*_ga_8Z4RV13R5J*czE3ODg2MDQyMjgkbzIkZzEkdDE3ODg2MDYwNDMkajU4JGwwJGgw*_ga_65FL79Y113*czE3ODg2MDQyMjgkbzIkZzEkdDE3ODg2MDYwNDMkajU4JGwwJGgw
Here are excerpts:
* * *
Independent Auditor's Report
The Honorable Brian P. Kemp, Governor of Georgia
Members of the General Assembly of the State of Georgia
Members of the State Board of Education
and
Dr. Walker Todd, Superintendent and Members of the
Brantley County Board of Education
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, each major ... Show Full Article ATLANTA, Georgia, Sept. 5 -- The Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts issued the following report entitled "Brantley County Board of Education." Here are excerpts: * * * Independent Auditor's Report The Honorable Brian P. Kemp, Governor of Georgia Members of the General Assembly of the State of Georgia Members of the State Board of Education and Dr. Walker Todd, Superintendent and Members of the Brantley County Board of Education Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements Opinions We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, each majorfund, and fiduciary activities of the Brantley County Board of Education (School District) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the School District's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, each major fund, and fiduciary activities of the School District as of June 30, 2025, and the respective changes in financial position for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS) and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report.
We are required to be independent of the School District and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we
have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.
Emphasis of Matter
As described in Note 2 to the financial statements, in 2025, the School District adopted new accounting guidance, Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 101, Compensated Absences. The School District
restated beginning balances for the effect of GASB Statement No. 101. Our opinions are not modified with respect to this matter.
Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation,
and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the School District's ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.
Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinions.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a
material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS and Government Auditing Standards, we:
* Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
* Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
* Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the School District's internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
* Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements.
* Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the School District's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control related matters that we identified during the audit.
Required Supplementary Information
Management has omitted the Management's Discussion and Analysis that accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require to be presented to supplement the basic financial statements.
Such missing information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. Our opinions on the basic financial statements are not affected by this missing information.
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the required supplementary information listed in the table of contents be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such
information is the responsibility of management and, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial
reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with GAAS,
which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.
Supplementary Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the School District's basic financial statements. The accompanying supplementary information, as listed in the table of contents, is presented for the purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented for purposes of additional
analysis as required by Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, and is also not a required part of the
basic financial statements.
The supplementary information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has
been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with GAAS. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated August 21, 2026 on our consideration of the School District's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the School
District's internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the School District's internal control over financial reporting and compliance.
A copy of this report has been filed as a permanent record and made available to the press of the State, as provided for by Official Code of Georgia Annotated section 50-6-24.
Respectfully submitted,
Greg S. Griffin
State Auditor
August 21, 2026
* * *
The report is posted at: https://www.audits.ga.gov/ReportSearch/download/34291?_gl=1*el9wdg*_ga*MjEyMDA0Nzk3NC4xNzg4NjAxMzAz*_ga_8Z4RV13R5J*czE3ODg2MDQyMjgkbzIkZzEkdDE3ODg2MDYwNDMkajU4JGwwJGgw*_ga_65FL79Y113*czE3ODg2MDQyMjgkbzIkZzEkdDE3ODg2MDYwNDMkajU4JGwwJGgw
California's Public Safety Strategy Works: Gov. Newsom's Commitment Helps Lower Crime as New Study Shows Violence Prevention Saves Lives
SACRAMENTO, California, Sept. 5 (TNSrep) -- Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-California, issued the following news release on Sept. 4, 2026:
* * *
California's public safety strategy works: Governor Newsom's commitment helps lower crime as new study shows violence prevention saves lives
New UC Berkeley study finds a community violence intervention program caused a 61% decline in the city's firearm homicides and shootings
What you need to know: Governor Newsom reaffirms his public safety priorities - protecting communities, supporting law enforcement, preventing violence and holding people who commit crimes ... Show Full Article SACRAMENTO, California, Sept. 5 (TNSrep) -- Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-California, issued the following news release on Sept. 4, 2026: * * * California's public safety strategy works: Governor Newsom's commitment helps lower crime as new study shows violence prevention saves lives New UC Berkeley study finds a community violence intervention program caused a 61% decline in the city's firearm homicides and shootings What you need to know: Governor Newsom reaffirms his public safety priorities - protecting communities, supporting law enforcement, preventing violence and holding people who commit crimesaccountable. A new study just released confirms that California's violence prevention strategies work, leading to record low crime in the state.
-
From putting more law enforcement officers on the streets and taking fentanyl and stolen goods out of circulation to investing in community violence prevention programs that save lives, Governor Gavin Newsom this week highlighted the results of California's sustained commitment to public safety which has helped California achieve record-low crime rates.
California's homicide rate fell to 3.5 per 100,000 people in 2025 -- the lowest rate since statewide reporting began in 1966 -- while every major crime category declined. A new UC Berkeley study (https://publichealth.berkeley.edu/articles/spotlight/research/gun-violence-program-responsible-for-decline) released this week confirmed what the data already shows: that California's violence prevention strategies are producing nation-leading results.
* * *
Public safety is about results - and Californians are seeing them. Crime is down, our homicide rate is at its lowest level since statewide reporting began, we've put more CHP officers on the streets, and we're taking deadly drugs, illegal guns and stolen goods out of our communities. We're going to keep investing in what works -- enforcement, accountability and prevention -- because every Californian deserves to feel safe in their community.
- Governor Gavin Newsom
* * *
New study confirms California's strategies work
Researchers found Richmond's community violence intervention program was responsible for an estimated 61% reduction in firearm homicides and injury shootings over 14 years. In addition to a steady stream of funding from the city, Richmond's Office of Neighborhood Safety has received $10 million from the California Violence Intervention and Prevention Program, administered by the Board of State and Community Corrections.
This new study from the UC Berkeley Center for Global Healthy Cities documents the sustained, citywide impact of a community violence intervention program over more than a decade. Researchers compared Richmond with dozens of similar U.S. cities and found that the reductions in firearm violence grew as the program continued operating.
The findings underscore California's broader approach to public safety - when pairing strong law enforcement with targeted prevention and intervention strategies that interrupt violence before it happens.
California put robust state investment in community violence intervention on the map. What began as a $9 million-a-year program grew roughly eightfold--more than the state had invested in all prior years combined--and the Governor signed Assembly Bill 28, creating the first dedicated funding stream for the California Violence Intervention and Prevention Program.
In addition, the state is ranked #1 in the nation for gun law strength by both the Giffords Law Center and Everytown for Gun Safety and consistently maintains one of the nation's lowest firearm death rates.
California crime rates fall to historic lows
California's latest statewide crime data show declines across every major category in 2025.
Compared with 2024, California saw:
* Homicide: 18.6%
* Robbery: 19.9%
* Property crime: 14.3%
* Motor vehicle theft: 25.8%
* Violent crime: 10.2%
Since Governor Newsom took office, homicide is down 20%, robbery is down 31%, property crime is down 24%, motor vehicle theft is down 19%, and violent crime is down 3%.
The Governor's public safety strategy has included investments in law enforcement, partnerships with local agencies, organized crime enforcement, gun safety, drug interdiction and violence prevention.
Crime Suppression Teams deliver results statewide
Governor Newsom has expanded the California Highway Patrol's (CHP) capacity to target the criminals and organized networks driving crime.
Since launching in 2023, CHP Crime Suppression Teams have made 15,197 arrests, recovered 7,042 stolen vehicles and seized 656 illicit firearms.
CHP Crime Suppression Teams operate across six regions, working alongside local law enforcement to bring more officers, intelligence and sustained enforcement to communities where it is needed most. The partnership between CHP and local law enforcement agencies targets auto theft, violent crime, organized criminal activity, illegal firearms, drug trafficking and other crimes that do not stop at a city or county line.
Investing in the next generation of CHP officers
Governor Newsom also visited the CHP Academy this week to meet with senior cadets preparing to serve communities across California.
Nearly 400 cadets are expected to graduate in 2026, bringing the total number of CHP cadets who have entered the department since Governor Newsom took office to more than 2,900.
The Governor's commitment to adding 1,000 CHP officers -- announced in 2022 -- was achieved ahead of schedule in 2024. The additional capacity has helped CHP expand its role in combating auto theft, organized crime and illegal firearms.
Cracking down on organized retail theft
California is also continuing its aggressive crackdown on organized retail theft, backed by the largest-ever state investment in the effort.
Since October 2023, California law enforcement agencies have made 35,907 arrests, referred 28,667 cases for prosecution and recovered more than $293.4 million in stolen property.
The state has invested more than $242 million in 38 law enforcement agencies and provided more than $24 million to 13 district attorneys for vertical prosecution of organized retail theft cases.
Taking fentanyl off California streets
California's public safety strategy is also focused on disrupting the criminal networks trafficking fentanyl into communities.
Since 2021, California National Guard Counterdrug Task Force analysts have supported law enforcement in intercepting approximately 39,644 pounds of fentanyl and 54.6 million fentanyl pills, with an estimated street value of $534 million.
At the same time, California has paired enforcement with lifesaving prevention measures. The state's Naloxone Distribution Project has supported more than 460,000 overdose reversals.
Keeping dangerous hemp, kratom and 7-OH products off store shelves
Governor Newsom is also taking action to protect Californians from illegal and potentially dangerous intoxicating products, with nearly 15,300 illegal hemp, kratom and 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) products removed from California store shelves.
California's latest enforcement results show continued near-universal compliance among Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) licensees. State officials conducted 23,667 site visits related to hemp, identifying 158 violations and removing 7,403 illegal hemp products from store shelves, with 99.33% compliance. For kratom and 7-OH, officials conducted 8,038 site visits, identified 181 violations and removed 7,888 prohibited products, with 97.75% compliance.
The results reflect the Governor's approach of making the rules clear, working directly with businesses to achieve compliance and using targeted enforcement against those who refuse to follow the law.
A public safety strategy built around what works
From historic investments in law enforcement to community-based violence prevention, California is taking a comprehensive approach to making communities safer.
Governor Newsom began making public safety a priority from day one -- building the foundation for safer communities through stronger gun laws, expanded violence prevention, tougher action against organized crime and fentanyl trafficking, and deeper partnerships between state and local law enforcement.
Year after year, his Administration added capacity: more CHP officers, new Crime Suppression Teams, expanded counterdrug operations, record investments in community violence prevention and stronger tools to hold offenders accountable.
Then, he took his properties statewide - and that sustained commitment is now delivering results.
Crime is falling, law enforcement capacity is growing, deadly drugs and illegal firearms are being seized, stolen property is being recovered, and new research is showing that targeted violence prevention can save lives.
This progress didn't happen overnight; it reflects years of investing in enforcement, accountability and prevention -- and staying focused on what works.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.gov.ca.gov/2026/09/04/californias-public-safety-strategy-works-governor-newsoms-commitment-helps-lower-crime-as-new-study-shows-violence-prevention-saves-lives/
* * *
California's public safety strategy works: Governor Newsom's commitment helps lower crime as new study shows violence prevention saves lives
New UC Berkeley study finds a community violence intervention program caused a 61% decline in the city's firearm homicides and shootings
What you need to know: Governor Newsom reaffirms his public safety priorities - protecting communities, supporting law enforcement, preventing violence and holding people who commit crimes ... Show Full Article SACRAMENTO, California, Sept. 5 (TNSrep) -- Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-California, issued the following news release on Sept. 4, 2026: * * * California's public safety strategy works: Governor Newsom's commitment helps lower crime as new study shows violence prevention saves lives New UC Berkeley study finds a community violence intervention program caused a 61% decline in the city's firearm homicides and shootings What you need to know: Governor Newsom reaffirms his public safety priorities - protecting communities, supporting law enforcement, preventing violence and holding people who commit crimesaccountable. A new study just released confirms that California's violence prevention strategies work, leading to record low crime in the state.
-
From putting more law enforcement officers on the streets and taking fentanyl and stolen goods out of circulation to investing in community violence prevention programs that save lives, Governor Gavin Newsom this week highlighted the results of California's sustained commitment to public safety which has helped California achieve record-low crime rates.
California's homicide rate fell to 3.5 per 100,000 people in 2025 -- the lowest rate since statewide reporting began in 1966 -- while every major crime category declined. A new UC Berkeley study (https://publichealth.berkeley.edu/articles/spotlight/research/gun-violence-program-responsible-for-decline) released this week confirmed what the data already shows: that California's violence prevention strategies are producing nation-leading results.
* * *
Public safety is about results - and Californians are seeing them. Crime is down, our homicide rate is at its lowest level since statewide reporting began, we've put more CHP officers on the streets, and we're taking deadly drugs, illegal guns and stolen goods out of our communities. We're going to keep investing in what works -- enforcement, accountability and prevention -- because every Californian deserves to feel safe in their community.
- Governor Gavin Newsom
* * *
New study confirms California's strategies work
Researchers found Richmond's community violence intervention program was responsible for an estimated 61% reduction in firearm homicides and injury shootings over 14 years. In addition to a steady stream of funding from the city, Richmond's Office of Neighborhood Safety has received $10 million from the California Violence Intervention and Prevention Program, administered by the Board of State and Community Corrections.
This new study from the UC Berkeley Center for Global Healthy Cities documents the sustained, citywide impact of a community violence intervention program over more than a decade. Researchers compared Richmond with dozens of similar U.S. cities and found that the reductions in firearm violence grew as the program continued operating.
The findings underscore California's broader approach to public safety - when pairing strong law enforcement with targeted prevention and intervention strategies that interrupt violence before it happens.
California put robust state investment in community violence intervention on the map. What began as a $9 million-a-year program grew roughly eightfold--more than the state had invested in all prior years combined--and the Governor signed Assembly Bill 28, creating the first dedicated funding stream for the California Violence Intervention and Prevention Program.
In addition, the state is ranked #1 in the nation for gun law strength by both the Giffords Law Center and Everytown for Gun Safety and consistently maintains one of the nation's lowest firearm death rates.
California crime rates fall to historic lows
California's latest statewide crime data show declines across every major category in 2025.
Compared with 2024, California saw:
* Homicide: 18.6%
* Robbery: 19.9%
* Property crime: 14.3%
* Motor vehicle theft: 25.8%
* Violent crime: 10.2%
Since Governor Newsom took office, homicide is down 20%, robbery is down 31%, property crime is down 24%, motor vehicle theft is down 19%, and violent crime is down 3%.
The Governor's public safety strategy has included investments in law enforcement, partnerships with local agencies, organized crime enforcement, gun safety, drug interdiction and violence prevention.
Crime Suppression Teams deliver results statewide
Governor Newsom has expanded the California Highway Patrol's (CHP) capacity to target the criminals and organized networks driving crime.
Since launching in 2023, CHP Crime Suppression Teams have made 15,197 arrests, recovered 7,042 stolen vehicles and seized 656 illicit firearms.
CHP Crime Suppression Teams operate across six regions, working alongside local law enforcement to bring more officers, intelligence and sustained enforcement to communities where it is needed most. The partnership between CHP and local law enforcement agencies targets auto theft, violent crime, organized criminal activity, illegal firearms, drug trafficking and other crimes that do not stop at a city or county line.
Investing in the next generation of CHP officers
Governor Newsom also visited the CHP Academy this week to meet with senior cadets preparing to serve communities across California.
Nearly 400 cadets are expected to graduate in 2026, bringing the total number of CHP cadets who have entered the department since Governor Newsom took office to more than 2,900.
The Governor's commitment to adding 1,000 CHP officers -- announced in 2022 -- was achieved ahead of schedule in 2024. The additional capacity has helped CHP expand its role in combating auto theft, organized crime and illegal firearms.
Cracking down on organized retail theft
California is also continuing its aggressive crackdown on organized retail theft, backed by the largest-ever state investment in the effort.
Since October 2023, California law enforcement agencies have made 35,907 arrests, referred 28,667 cases for prosecution and recovered more than $293.4 million in stolen property.
The state has invested more than $242 million in 38 law enforcement agencies and provided more than $24 million to 13 district attorneys for vertical prosecution of organized retail theft cases.
Taking fentanyl off California streets
California's public safety strategy is also focused on disrupting the criminal networks trafficking fentanyl into communities.
Since 2021, California National Guard Counterdrug Task Force analysts have supported law enforcement in intercepting approximately 39,644 pounds of fentanyl and 54.6 million fentanyl pills, with an estimated street value of $534 million.
At the same time, California has paired enforcement with lifesaving prevention measures. The state's Naloxone Distribution Project has supported more than 460,000 overdose reversals.
Keeping dangerous hemp, kratom and 7-OH products off store shelves
Governor Newsom is also taking action to protect Californians from illegal and potentially dangerous intoxicating products, with nearly 15,300 illegal hemp, kratom and 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) products removed from California store shelves.
California's latest enforcement results show continued near-universal compliance among Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) licensees. State officials conducted 23,667 site visits related to hemp, identifying 158 violations and removing 7,403 illegal hemp products from store shelves, with 99.33% compliance. For kratom and 7-OH, officials conducted 8,038 site visits, identified 181 violations and removed 7,888 prohibited products, with 97.75% compliance.
The results reflect the Governor's approach of making the rules clear, working directly with businesses to achieve compliance and using targeted enforcement against those who refuse to follow the law.
A public safety strategy built around what works
From historic investments in law enforcement to community-based violence prevention, California is taking a comprehensive approach to making communities safer.
Governor Newsom began making public safety a priority from day one -- building the foundation for safer communities through stronger gun laws, expanded violence prevention, tougher action against organized crime and fentanyl trafficking, and deeper partnerships between state and local law enforcement.
Year after year, his Administration added capacity: more CHP officers, new Crime Suppression Teams, expanded counterdrug operations, record investments in community violence prevention and stronger tools to hold offenders accountable.
Then, he took his properties statewide - and that sustained commitment is now delivering results.
Crime is falling, law enforcement capacity is growing, deadly drugs and illegal firearms are being seized, stolen property is being recovered, and new research is showing that targeted violence prevention can save lives.
This progress didn't happen overnight; it reflects years of investing in enforcement, accountability and prevention -- and staying focused on what works.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.gov.ca.gov/2026/09/04/californias-public-safety-strategy-works-governor-newsoms-commitment-helps-lower-crime-as-new-study-shows-violence-prevention-saves-lives/