Foundations
Here's a look at documents from U.S. foundations
Foundations
Featured Stories
Reason Foundation Issues Commentary: Trump's Department of Transportation Unevenly Advances Deregulation as Transparency Declines
LOS ANGELES, California, Aug. 1 -- The Reason Foundation issued the following commentary by senior transportation policy analyst Marc Scribner:
* * *
Trump's Department of Transportation unevenly advances deregulation as transparency declines
The 2026 Unified Agenda lists 315 active rulemaking projects at the U.S. Department of Transportation.
-
The White House Office of Management and Budget's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) published on July 3 the Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions along with the annual Regulatory Plan, which is composed of agency statements ... Show Full Article LOS ANGELES, California, Aug. 1 -- The Reason Foundation issued the following commentary by senior transportation policy analyst Marc Scribner: * * * Trump's Department of Transportation unevenly advances deregulation as transparency declines The 2026 Unified Agenda lists 315 active rulemaking projects at the U.S. Department of Transportation. - The White House Office of Management and Budget's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) published on July 3 the Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions along with the annual Regulatory Plan, which is composed of agency statementson regulatory priorities. The Unified Agenda is intended as a biannual snapshot of the federal administrative state and tracks the thousands of regulatory actions across hundreds of agencies. While imperfect in many ways, it does provide some valuable insight into forthcoming federal agency actions. For each edition of the Unified Agenda, Reason Foundation surveys the rulemaking activities at the U.S. Department of Transportation.
This edition indicates that the professed deregulatory mission of the second Trump administration continues to be implemented at the Department of Transportation. But this general commitment to deregulation is not uniform, with several rulemaking projects being proposed that would increase regulation. The regulatory proposals generally involve other Trump administration policy priorities, suggesting that the Trump administration's commitment to deregulation has its limits. In addition, the Trump administration's public documentation of its regulatory reform efforts has become noticeably less frequent, raising serious concerns about regulatory transparency.
While it doesn't explicitly spell out its publication schedule, OIRA suggests by the publication name and contents that this will be the only edition published in 2026 after having missed publication of the Fall 2025 Unified Agenda, which also should have included the 2025 Regulatory Plan. The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires the publication of agency regulatory flexibility agendas in April and October of each year (5 U.S.C. Sec. 602(a)). The publication of this edition of the Unified Agenda with an annual Regulatory Plan that accompanies the Fall editions of the Unified Agenda suggest that OIRA has forgone the Spring 2026 edition of the Unified Agenda. Consistent with that, OIRA has labeled it the "2026" edition without a seasonal identifier.
In its 2026 Regulatory Plan statement of regulatory priorities, the U.S. Department of Transportation states that it "oversaw the Federal Government's largest deregulatory program" during the first Trump administration and "intends to build upon this success in the second Trump [a]dministration."
According to OIRA's accounting of agency actions under the Executive Order (EO) 14192 requirement that agencies issue 10 deregulatory actions for each new regulatory action, the U.S. Department of Transportation initiated 78 deregulatory actions and zero regulatory actions in FY 2025 for a cost savings of $23 million. In terms of deregulatory actions, the U.S. Department of Transportation ranked third (after the Departments of Treasury and Veterans Affairs) and accounted for 12.1% of reported deregulatory actions across the federal government. In terms of cost savings, the U.S. Department of Transportation ranked 13th and accounted for just one-hundredth of one percent of federal-wide regulatory cost savings.
I previously examined the transportation rulemakings contained in Spring 2025, Fall 2024, Spring 2024, Fall 2023, Spring 2023, Fall 2022, Spring 2022, Fall 2021, Spring 2021, and Spring 2020 editions of the Unified Agenda for Reason Foundation. From a historical perspective, Figure 1 below shows that the 2026 volume of regulatory activity at the U.S. Department of Transportation has reverted to closer to the historical average after an unprecedented Spring 2025 edition that exceeded the previous record number of newly published rulemaking projects set in Spring 1996 by nearly 50%.
[View chart in the link at bottom.]
The 2026 Unified Agenda lists 315 active rulemaking projects at the U.S. Department of Transportation. Of those 315, 45 are new rulemaking projects first published in the 2026 edition. These new rulemaking projects are listed in Table 1 at the bottom of this article.
The Unified Agenda contains rules determined to be "significant regulatory actions," or "economically significant" rules, which had been defined by EO 12866 (1993) as regulations that would have an annual impact on the economy of $100 million or more, or otherwise "adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities." Rules deemed economically significant are subject to greater scrutiny, most notably a requirement that agencies conduct a benefit-cost analysis of the proposed regulation.
When the Biden administration issued EO 14094 (2023), the annual cost threshold for a rule to be considered a "significant regulatory action" doubled to $200 million plus an inflation adjustment every three years. A discussion of the rationale and implications of this change can be found in my review of the Fall 2023 edition of the Unified Agenda.
One important implication is that EO 14094 made historical comparisons of the stock and flow of "economically significant rules" more challenging. Fortunately, as part of the Congressional Review Act, Congress itself requires a separate "major" rule designation that retains the traditional $100 million threshold (5 U.S.C. Sec. 804(2)(A)), allowing for continued like-for-like historical accounting.
Figure 1 maintains the $100 million cost threshold by counting "major" rules instead of "economically significant" rules. While Trump revoked EO 14094 (2023) as part of EO 14148 (2025) and thereby restored the traditional $100 million cost threshold for "economically significant" rules, we have opted to count "major" rules rather than economically significant rules to ensure continuity and historical comparability.
There are currently 12 "major" rules under development at the Department of Transportation. Of the 45 new rulemaking projects that first appeared in the 2026 edition of the Unified Agenda, only one has been designated a "major" rule. However, 23 have a "major" status listed as "undetermined," meaning they could be later designated as "major" rules as they move through the rulemaking process and economic costs are estimated.
Transportation deregulation in the first half of the second Trump administration
Given that Trump signed an executive order titled "Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation," it should perhaps not be surprising that the U.S. Department of Transportation has categorized many of its newly announced rulemaking actions as "deregulatory." That order, EO 14192, established a regulatory budget, which necessitates the categorization of rules as "regulatory" or "deregulatory." OIRA issued a memo in March 2025 providing guidance on this process.
According to the 2026 Unified Agenda, of the Department of Transportation's 45 newly announced rulemaking projects, 30 are categorized as "deregulatory," seven are categorized as "regulatory," with the remainder being categorized as "fully or partially exempt," "not subject to, not significant," or "other." This works out to a deregulatory-to-regulatory action ratio of 4.29:1, less than half the targeted 10:1 ratio in EO 14192. However, adding the U.S. Department of Transportation's completed regulatory activities from FY 2025 yields a deregulatory-to-regulatory ratio of 15:1, which suggests the current pipeline of regulatory activities is still on track to comply with EO 14192.
Setting aside the raw counts of regulatory actions, the specific actions that are categorized as regulatory or deregulatory reveal Trump administration transportation priorities. The seven actions announced in the 2026 Unified Agenda that are categorized as regulatory are two aviation equipment mandates from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on shielding aircraft altimeters from 5G radio wave interference (2120-AM21) and increasing airliner cockpit voice recording times from two hours to 25 hours (2120-AM19), one that would apply Buy America domestic content requirements to electric vehicle chargers procured under the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program (2125-AG29), and four increasing requirements on the trucking workforce from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) (2126-AC99, 2126-AD00, 2126-AD03, 2126-AC98).
All but one of these actions is justified as addressing a purported safety market failure. The arguments for the FAA altimeter shielding and 25-hour flight recorder requirements, which reflect a safety policy consensus, are better grounded than the FMCSA's crackdown on noncitizen truck drivers, which appear to be motivated by the Trump administration's broader policy agenda against immigration and has already spawned litigation. The other action, FHWA's Buy America requirements for federally funded electric vehicle charging stations, increases burdens on vehicle technology disfavored by the administration while being consistent with the economic protectionism that has animated the past three presidential administrations.
In contrast, Department of Transportation rulemakings around technologies and practices favored by the Trump administration tend to be categorized as deregulatory. This is most obvious in the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's continued work to advance automated vehicle technologies. The 2026 edition of the Unified Agenda contains seven newly published rulemakings designed to clear a regulatory path for vehicle automation technologies and enable commercial deployment, all categorized as deregulatory, which are listed below:
* Automated Driving Systems (ADS) Performance Assessment (2127-AM99);
* Amending Bumper Standard 49 CFR part 581 (2127-AN02);
* Modernization of FMVSS No. 110 to Accommodate ADS-equipped Vehicles (2127-AM96);
* Modernization of FMVSS No. 135 to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicles (2127-AN00);
* Modernization of FMVSS No. 126, Electronic Stability Control Systems for Light Vehicles, to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicles (2127-AN03);
* Modernization of FMVSS No. 201 and FMVSS No. 208 to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicle (2127-AN04);
* Modernization of FMVSS No. 111, Rear Visibility, to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicles (2127-AN05).
The use of regulation by any presidential administration to advance its policy priorities is to be expected. Elections have consequences, after all. While its professed commitment to deregulation is being applied unevenly, the Trump Department of Transportation's attention is welcome. However, if political leadership wishes to see durable deregulatory reforms, action must come from Congress to limit Executive Branch opportunities to engage in discretionary regulation in the first place.
Short of major economic policy reforms, Congress should at the very least demand regulatory transparency. The inconsistent publication of the Unified Agenda by the second Trump administration is concerning in this regard. The failure to meet the Regulatory Flexibility Act's biannual publication requirements is not unprecedented--the Obama administration published just a single edition of the Unified Agenda in 2012--but it is highly atypical. As it stands, the second Trump administration is on track to miss publication of at least two Unified Agenda editions, which would be unprecedented.
Congress should seek an explanation from the administration for this decline in regulatory transparency as well as a commitment to resume regular regulatory agenda publication consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act. To further advance regulatory transparency, the U.S. Department of Transportation should resume publication of the Monthly Significant Rulemaking Report, which offered more frequent updates on the development economically significant rules. This report ceased regular publication during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic at the end of the first Trump administration, was published only twice during the Biden administration, and was then terminated by the second Trump administration, also without explanation.
* * *
Table 1: U.S. Department of Transportation Rulemaking Projects First Published in the 2026 Unified Agenda
Agency ... Stage of Rulemaking ... Title ... RIN
OST ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Revisions to Subtitle B of Title 2 on Federal Financial Assistance ... 2105-AF44
OST ... Final Rule Stage ... Eliminating T-8 Report of All Cargo Operations ... 2105-AF41
OST ... Final Rule Stage ... Technical Corrections to DOT Operating Administration Titles ... 2105-AF42
OST ... Final Rule Stage ... Updates to Aviation Economic Procedural Regulations ... 2105-AF43
OST ... Final Rule Stage ... Rescinding Portions of Department of Transportation's Title VI Regulations to Conform More Closely With the Statutory Text and to Implement Executive Order 14281 ... 2105-AF45
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernizing to Electronic Payments ... 2120-AM16
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Flexibility Enhancements of Weather Reporting Systems ... 2120-AM17
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Improving Emergency Medical Kit Efficacy and Flexibility in Commercial Airline Operations ... 2120-AM18
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Removal of the Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Safety Inspector Observation of Pilot-in-Command Requirement ... 2120-AM20
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Requirements for Certain Aircraft to be Equipped with Interference Tolerant NextGen Radio Altimeter Systems ... 2120-AM21
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Space Launch and Reentry Licensing and Permitting User Fees ... 2120-AM22
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Removal of FAA Third-Class Medical Certificate Requirement for Military Pilot Trainees ... 2120-AM23
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Flight Operations: Pilot requirements; Use of oxygen ... 2120-AM24
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernizing Medical Standards For Certain Low-Risk Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Cases ... 2120-AM25
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Streamlined Launch and Reentry License Requirements Improvement ... 2120-AM26
FAA ... Final Rule Stage ... 25 Hour Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) Requirements for Existing Aircraft ... 2120-AM19
FHWA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Standards and Requirements - Buy America Standard for Electric Vehicle Chargers ... 2125-AG29
FHWA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Revisions to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act ... 2125-AG30
FMCSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... English Language Proficiency, Out of Service Criteria ... 2126-AC99
FMCSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Entry Level Driver Training (ELDT) Program for Strengthening Certification Requirements of Training Providers ... 2126-AD00
FMCSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Passenger Carrier Regulations in 49 CFR Part 374 ... 2126-AD01
FMCSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Standards for Broker and Freight Forwarder Qualifications/Knowledge ... 2126-AD02
FMCSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Commercial Driver's License (CDL) Standards ... 2126-AD03
FMCSA ... Final Rule Stage ... Restoring Integrity to the Issuance of Non-Domiciled Commercial Drivers Licenses (NDCDL) ... 2126-AC98
FMCSA ... Final Rule Stage ... Technical Amendments ... 2126-AD04
NHTSA Prerule Stage ... Automated Driving Systems (ADS) Performance Assessment ... 2127-AM99
NHTSA ... Prerule Stage ... Seat Belt Assurance System Compliance Option for Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 208, "Occupant Crash Protection" ... 2127-AN01
NHTSA ... Prerule Stage ... Amending Bumper Standard 49 CFR part 581 ... 2127-AN02
NHTSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernization of FMVSS No. 110 to Accommodate ADS-equipped Vehicles ... 2127-AM96
NHTSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernize FMVSS No. 208, "Occupant Crash Protection" ... 2127-AM97
NHTSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernize FMVSS No. 122a, "Motorcycle Brake Systems" ... 2127-AM98
NHTSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernization of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 135 to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicles ... 2127-AN00
NHTSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernization of FMVSS No. 126, Electronic Stability Control Systems for Light Vehicles, to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicles. ... 2127-AN03
NHTSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernization of FMVSS No. 201 and FMVSS No. 208 to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicles. ... 2127-AN04
NHTSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernization of FMVSS No. 111, Rear Visibility, to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicles. ... 2127-AN05
FRA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Litigation Protections for System Safety Program and Risk Reduction Program Information ... 2130-AD62
FRA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Amendments to Streamline and Modernize Regulations Pertaining to New Safety Technology ... 2130-AD63
FRA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Revisions to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Regulations Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) ... 2130-AD64
FTA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Major Capital Investment Projects ... 2132-AB62
FTA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Charter Service ... 2132-AB63
FTA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Revisions to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Regulations Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act ... 2132-AB64
SLSDC ... Final Rule Stage ... Seaway Rules and Regulations: Periodic Updates, Various Categories ... 2135-AA59
SLSDC ... Final Rule Stage ... Tariff of Tolls ... 2135-AA60
PHMSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Hazardous Materials: Providing Regulatory Relief for Last Mile Delivery of Retail Products ... 2137-AG20
PHMSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Hazardous Materials: Advancing Safety of Highway, Rail, and Vessel Transportation ... 2137-AG21
Source: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions, 2026
Note: RIN = Regulation Identifier Number, a unique alphanumeric code assigned by the Regulatory Information Service Center to each rulemaking project listed in the Unified Agenda. An explanation of Stage of Rulemaking terms can be found on page 13 of the Introduction to the Unified Agenda from the Regulatory Information Service Center.
* * *
Marc Scribner is a senior transportation policy analyst at Reason Foundation.
* * *
Original text here: https://reason.org/commentary/trumps-department-of-transportation-unevenly-advances-deregulation-as-transparency-declines/
* * *
Trump's Department of Transportation unevenly advances deregulation as transparency declines
The 2026 Unified Agenda lists 315 active rulemaking projects at the U.S. Department of Transportation.
-
The White House Office of Management and Budget's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) published on July 3 the Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions along with the annual Regulatory Plan, which is composed of agency statements ... Show Full Article LOS ANGELES, California, Aug. 1 -- The Reason Foundation issued the following commentary by senior transportation policy analyst Marc Scribner: * * * Trump's Department of Transportation unevenly advances deregulation as transparency declines The 2026 Unified Agenda lists 315 active rulemaking projects at the U.S. Department of Transportation. - The White House Office of Management and Budget's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) published on July 3 the Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions along with the annual Regulatory Plan, which is composed of agency statementson regulatory priorities. The Unified Agenda is intended as a biannual snapshot of the federal administrative state and tracks the thousands of regulatory actions across hundreds of agencies. While imperfect in many ways, it does provide some valuable insight into forthcoming federal agency actions. For each edition of the Unified Agenda, Reason Foundation surveys the rulemaking activities at the U.S. Department of Transportation.
This edition indicates that the professed deregulatory mission of the second Trump administration continues to be implemented at the Department of Transportation. But this general commitment to deregulation is not uniform, with several rulemaking projects being proposed that would increase regulation. The regulatory proposals generally involve other Trump administration policy priorities, suggesting that the Trump administration's commitment to deregulation has its limits. In addition, the Trump administration's public documentation of its regulatory reform efforts has become noticeably less frequent, raising serious concerns about regulatory transparency.
While it doesn't explicitly spell out its publication schedule, OIRA suggests by the publication name and contents that this will be the only edition published in 2026 after having missed publication of the Fall 2025 Unified Agenda, which also should have included the 2025 Regulatory Plan. The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires the publication of agency regulatory flexibility agendas in April and October of each year (5 U.S.C. Sec. 602(a)). The publication of this edition of the Unified Agenda with an annual Regulatory Plan that accompanies the Fall editions of the Unified Agenda suggest that OIRA has forgone the Spring 2026 edition of the Unified Agenda. Consistent with that, OIRA has labeled it the "2026" edition without a seasonal identifier.
In its 2026 Regulatory Plan statement of regulatory priorities, the U.S. Department of Transportation states that it "oversaw the Federal Government's largest deregulatory program" during the first Trump administration and "intends to build upon this success in the second Trump [a]dministration."
According to OIRA's accounting of agency actions under the Executive Order (EO) 14192 requirement that agencies issue 10 deregulatory actions for each new regulatory action, the U.S. Department of Transportation initiated 78 deregulatory actions and zero regulatory actions in FY 2025 for a cost savings of $23 million. In terms of deregulatory actions, the U.S. Department of Transportation ranked third (after the Departments of Treasury and Veterans Affairs) and accounted for 12.1% of reported deregulatory actions across the federal government. In terms of cost savings, the U.S. Department of Transportation ranked 13th and accounted for just one-hundredth of one percent of federal-wide regulatory cost savings.
I previously examined the transportation rulemakings contained in Spring 2025, Fall 2024, Spring 2024, Fall 2023, Spring 2023, Fall 2022, Spring 2022, Fall 2021, Spring 2021, and Spring 2020 editions of the Unified Agenda for Reason Foundation. From a historical perspective, Figure 1 below shows that the 2026 volume of regulatory activity at the U.S. Department of Transportation has reverted to closer to the historical average after an unprecedented Spring 2025 edition that exceeded the previous record number of newly published rulemaking projects set in Spring 1996 by nearly 50%.
[View chart in the link at bottom.]
The 2026 Unified Agenda lists 315 active rulemaking projects at the U.S. Department of Transportation. Of those 315, 45 are new rulemaking projects first published in the 2026 edition. These new rulemaking projects are listed in Table 1 at the bottom of this article.
The Unified Agenda contains rules determined to be "significant regulatory actions," or "economically significant" rules, which had been defined by EO 12866 (1993) as regulations that would have an annual impact on the economy of $100 million or more, or otherwise "adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities." Rules deemed economically significant are subject to greater scrutiny, most notably a requirement that agencies conduct a benefit-cost analysis of the proposed regulation.
When the Biden administration issued EO 14094 (2023), the annual cost threshold for a rule to be considered a "significant regulatory action" doubled to $200 million plus an inflation adjustment every three years. A discussion of the rationale and implications of this change can be found in my review of the Fall 2023 edition of the Unified Agenda.
One important implication is that EO 14094 made historical comparisons of the stock and flow of "economically significant rules" more challenging. Fortunately, as part of the Congressional Review Act, Congress itself requires a separate "major" rule designation that retains the traditional $100 million threshold (5 U.S.C. Sec. 804(2)(A)), allowing for continued like-for-like historical accounting.
Figure 1 maintains the $100 million cost threshold by counting "major" rules instead of "economically significant" rules. While Trump revoked EO 14094 (2023) as part of EO 14148 (2025) and thereby restored the traditional $100 million cost threshold for "economically significant" rules, we have opted to count "major" rules rather than economically significant rules to ensure continuity and historical comparability.
There are currently 12 "major" rules under development at the Department of Transportation. Of the 45 new rulemaking projects that first appeared in the 2026 edition of the Unified Agenda, only one has been designated a "major" rule. However, 23 have a "major" status listed as "undetermined," meaning they could be later designated as "major" rules as they move through the rulemaking process and economic costs are estimated.
Transportation deregulation in the first half of the second Trump administration
Given that Trump signed an executive order titled "Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation," it should perhaps not be surprising that the U.S. Department of Transportation has categorized many of its newly announced rulemaking actions as "deregulatory." That order, EO 14192, established a regulatory budget, which necessitates the categorization of rules as "regulatory" or "deregulatory." OIRA issued a memo in March 2025 providing guidance on this process.
According to the 2026 Unified Agenda, of the Department of Transportation's 45 newly announced rulemaking projects, 30 are categorized as "deregulatory," seven are categorized as "regulatory," with the remainder being categorized as "fully or partially exempt," "not subject to, not significant," or "other." This works out to a deregulatory-to-regulatory action ratio of 4.29:1, less than half the targeted 10:1 ratio in EO 14192. However, adding the U.S. Department of Transportation's completed regulatory activities from FY 2025 yields a deregulatory-to-regulatory ratio of 15:1, which suggests the current pipeline of regulatory activities is still on track to comply with EO 14192.
Setting aside the raw counts of regulatory actions, the specific actions that are categorized as regulatory or deregulatory reveal Trump administration transportation priorities. The seven actions announced in the 2026 Unified Agenda that are categorized as regulatory are two aviation equipment mandates from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on shielding aircraft altimeters from 5G radio wave interference (2120-AM21) and increasing airliner cockpit voice recording times from two hours to 25 hours (2120-AM19), one that would apply Buy America domestic content requirements to electric vehicle chargers procured under the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program (2125-AG29), and four increasing requirements on the trucking workforce from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) (2126-AC99, 2126-AD00, 2126-AD03, 2126-AC98).
All but one of these actions is justified as addressing a purported safety market failure. The arguments for the FAA altimeter shielding and 25-hour flight recorder requirements, which reflect a safety policy consensus, are better grounded than the FMCSA's crackdown on noncitizen truck drivers, which appear to be motivated by the Trump administration's broader policy agenda against immigration and has already spawned litigation. The other action, FHWA's Buy America requirements for federally funded electric vehicle charging stations, increases burdens on vehicle technology disfavored by the administration while being consistent with the economic protectionism that has animated the past three presidential administrations.
In contrast, Department of Transportation rulemakings around technologies and practices favored by the Trump administration tend to be categorized as deregulatory. This is most obvious in the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's continued work to advance automated vehicle technologies. The 2026 edition of the Unified Agenda contains seven newly published rulemakings designed to clear a regulatory path for vehicle automation technologies and enable commercial deployment, all categorized as deregulatory, which are listed below:
* Automated Driving Systems (ADS) Performance Assessment (2127-AM99);
* Amending Bumper Standard 49 CFR part 581 (2127-AN02);
* Modernization of FMVSS No. 110 to Accommodate ADS-equipped Vehicles (2127-AM96);
* Modernization of FMVSS No. 135 to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicles (2127-AN00);
* Modernization of FMVSS No. 126, Electronic Stability Control Systems for Light Vehicles, to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicles (2127-AN03);
* Modernization of FMVSS No. 201 and FMVSS No. 208 to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicle (2127-AN04);
* Modernization of FMVSS No. 111, Rear Visibility, to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicles (2127-AN05).
The use of regulation by any presidential administration to advance its policy priorities is to be expected. Elections have consequences, after all. While its professed commitment to deregulation is being applied unevenly, the Trump Department of Transportation's attention is welcome. However, if political leadership wishes to see durable deregulatory reforms, action must come from Congress to limit Executive Branch opportunities to engage in discretionary regulation in the first place.
Short of major economic policy reforms, Congress should at the very least demand regulatory transparency. The inconsistent publication of the Unified Agenda by the second Trump administration is concerning in this regard. The failure to meet the Regulatory Flexibility Act's biannual publication requirements is not unprecedented--the Obama administration published just a single edition of the Unified Agenda in 2012--but it is highly atypical. As it stands, the second Trump administration is on track to miss publication of at least two Unified Agenda editions, which would be unprecedented.
Congress should seek an explanation from the administration for this decline in regulatory transparency as well as a commitment to resume regular regulatory agenda publication consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act. To further advance regulatory transparency, the U.S. Department of Transportation should resume publication of the Monthly Significant Rulemaking Report, which offered more frequent updates on the development economically significant rules. This report ceased regular publication during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic at the end of the first Trump administration, was published only twice during the Biden administration, and was then terminated by the second Trump administration, also without explanation.
* * *
Table 1: U.S. Department of Transportation Rulemaking Projects First Published in the 2026 Unified Agenda
Agency ... Stage of Rulemaking ... Title ... RIN
OST ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Revisions to Subtitle B of Title 2 on Federal Financial Assistance ... 2105-AF44
OST ... Final Rule Stage ... Eliminating T-8 Report of All Cargo Operations ... 2105-AF41
OST ... Final Rule Stage ... Technical Corrections to DOT Operating Administration Titles ... 2105-AF42
OST ... Final Rule Stage ... Updates to Aviation Economic Procedural Regulations ... 2105-AF43
OST ... Final Rule Stage ... Rescinding Portions of Department of Transportation's Title VI Regulations to Conform More Closely With the Statutory Text and to Implement Executive Order 14281 ... 2105-AF45
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernizing to Electronic Payments ... 2120-AM16
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Flexibility Enhancements of Weather Reporting Systems ... 2120-AM17
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Improving Emergency Medical Kit Efficacy and Flexibility in Commercial Airline Operations ... 2120-AM18
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Removal of the Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Safety Inspector Observation of Pilot-in-Command Requirement ... 2120-AM20
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Requirements for Certain Aircraft to be Equipped with Interference Tolerant NextGen Radio Altimeter Systems ... 2120-AM21
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Space Launch and Reentry Licensing and Permitting User Fees ... 2120-AM22
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Removal of FAA Third-Class Medical Certificate Requirement for Military Pilot Trainees ... 2120-AM23
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Flight Operations: Pilot requirements; Use of oxygen ... 2120-AM24
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernizing Medical Standards For Certain Low-Risk Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Cases ... 2120-AM25
FAA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Streamlined Launch and Reentry License Requirements Improvement ... 2120-AM26
FAA ... Final Rule Stage ... 25 Hour Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) Requirements for Existing Aircraft ... 2120-AM19
FHWA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Standards and Requirements - Buy America Standard for Electric Vehicle Chargers ... 2125-AG29
FHWA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Revisions to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act ... 2125-AG30
FMCSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... English Language Proficiency, Out of Service Criteria ... 2126-AC99
FMCSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Entry Level Driver Training (ELDT) Program for Strengthening Certification Requirements of Training Providers ... 2126-AD00
FMCSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Passenger Carrier Regulations in 49 CFR Part 374 ... 2126-AD01
FMCSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Standards for Broker and Freight Forwarder Qualifications/Knowledge ... 2126-AD02
FMCSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Commercial Driver's License (CDL) Standards ... 2126-AD03
FMCSA ... Final Rule Stage ... Restoring Integrity to the Issuance of Non-Domiciled Commercial Drivers Licenses (NDCDL) ... 2126-AC98
FMCSA ... Final Rule Stage ... Technical Amendments ... 2126-AD04
NHTSA Prerule Stage ... Automated Driving Systems (ADS) Performance Assessment ... 2127-AM99
NHTSA ... Prerule Stage ... Seat Belt Assurance System Compliance Option for Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 208, "Occupant Crash Protection" ... 2127-AN01
NHTSA ... Prerule Stage ... Amending Bumper Standard 49 CFR part 581 ... 2127-AN02
NHTSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernization of FMVSS No. 110 to Accommodate ADS-equipped Vehicles ... 2127-AM96
NHTSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernize FMVSS No. 208, "Occupant Crash Protection" ... 2127-AM97
NHTSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernize FMVSS No. 122a, "Motorcycle Brake Systems" ... 2127-AM98
NHTSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernization of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 135 to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicles ... 2127-AN00
NHTSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernization of FMVSS No. 126, Electronic Stability Control Systems for Light Vehicles, to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicles. ... 2127-AN03
NHTSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernization of FMVSS No. 201 and FMVSS No. 208 to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicles. ... 2127-AN04
NHTSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Modernization of FMVSS No. 111, Rear Visibility, to Accommodate ADS-Equipped Vehicles. ... 2127-AN05
FRA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Litigation Protections for System Safety Program and Risk Reduction Program Information ... 2130-AD62
FRA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Amendments to Streamline and Modernize Regulations Pertaining to New Safety Technology ... 2130-AD63
FRA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Revisions to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Regulations Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) ... 2130-AD64
FTA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Major Capital Investment Projects ... 2132-AB62
FTA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Charter Service ... 2132-AB63
FTA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Revisions to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Regulations Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act ... 2132-AB64
SLSDC ... Final Rule Stage ... Seaway Rules and Regulations: Periodic Updates, Various Categories ... 2135-AA59
SLSDC ... Final Rule Stage ... Tariff of Tolls ... 2135-AA60
PHMSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Hazardous Materials: Providing Regulatory Relief for Last Mile Delivery of Retail Products ... 2137-AG20
PHMSA ... Proposed Rule Stage ... Hazardous Materials: Advancing Safety of Highway, Rail, and Vessel Transportation ... 2137-AG21
Source: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions, 2026
Note: RIN = Regulation Identifier Number, a unique alphanumeric code assigned by the Regulatory Information Service Center to each rulemaking project listed in the Unified Agenda. An explanation of Stage of Rulemaking terms can be found on page 13 of the Introduction to the Unified Agenda from the Regulatory Information Service Center.
* * *
Marc Scribner is a senior transportation policy analyst at Reason Foundation.
* * *
Original text here: https://reason.org/commentary/trumps-department-of-transportation-unevenly-advances-deregulation-as-transparency-declines/
Voters Deeply Concerned about National Debt, Inflation and Affordability
NEW YORK, July 31 -- The Peter G. Peterson Foundation posted the following news release:
* * *
Voters Deeply Concerned about National Debt, Inflation and Affordability
*
As Congress weighs a new reconciliation package that could add to federal deficits, and with a government funding deadline looming before the mid-term elections, a new Peter G. Peterson Foundation survey shows Americans are deeply concerned about the rising national debt and its effect on the cost of living. The U.S. Fiscal Confidence Index in July remains at 39 (100 is neutral), reflecting the importance of fiscal responsibility ... Show Full Article NEW YORK, July 31 -- The Peter G. Peterson Foundation posted the following news release: * * * Voters Deeply Concerned about National Debt, Inflation and Affordability * As Congress weighs a new reconciliation package that could add to federal deficits, and with a government funding deadline looming before the mid-term elections, a new Peter G. Peterson Foundation survey shows Americans are deeply concerned about the rising national debt and its effect on the cost of living. The U.S. Fiscal Confidence Index in July remains at 39 (100 is neutral), reflecting the importance of fiscal responsibilityfor voters this campaign season.
The new national survey, jointly conducted by Democratic firm Global Strategy Group and Republican firm North Star Opinion Research, finds:
* 90% of voters (including 95% of Democrats, 87% of independents and 87% of Republicans) are concerned that the national debt's effect on inflation is increasing the cost of living, including prices for groceries, energy, housing, transportation, and other goods and services.
* 86% of voters (including 90% of Democrats, 83% of independents and 84% of Republicans) are concerned that the national debt is contributing to higher borrowing costs, such as credit card interest, car loan rates, and mortgage rates.
* 94% say they are more likely to support a candidate with a plan to address the debt, including 95% of Democrats, 92% of independents and 94% of Republicans.
* 82% say a candidate having a plan to address the national debt is a factor in deciding their support in the 2026 election, including 84% of Democrats, 79% of independents and 82% of Republicans.
* 73% of voters (including 64% of Democrats, 83% of independents and 75% of Republicans) say they would consider supporting a candidate from a political party they do not usually support, if that candidate had a clear plan to address the debt.
* 95% of voters want Senate candidates this year to clearly explain their plans to prevent automatic Social Security benefit cuts, with virtually unanimous agreement in each age bracket and across party lines.
"As Congress considers election year budget proposals, the national debt keeps rising and American families are paying the price through higher interest rates and inflation," said Michael A. Peterson, CEO of the Peterson Foundation. "Voters understand that the growing debt adds to their cost of living, and they are calling for a more responsible approach that will improve our economic future. With less than 100 days until the election, candidates have the opportunity to put forward solutions that help address affordability, stabilize the national debt and put our nation on a stronger path."
July's U.S. Fiscal Confidence Index shows rising concern about the national debt among the vast majority of voters, with 81% saying their level of concern about the debt has increased over the last few years. Additionally, 67% of voters believe elected officials are on the wrong track when it comes to addressing the debt, tying this year's high.
The Fiscal Confidence Index measures public opinion about the national debt by asking six questions in three key areas:
* CONCERN: Level of concern and views about the direction of the national debt.
* PRIORITY: How high a priority addressing the debt should be for elected leaders.
* EXPECTATIONS: Expectations about whether the debt situation will get better or worse in the next few years.
The survey results from these three areas are weighted equally and averaged to produce the Fiscal Confidence Index value. The Fiscal Confidence Index, like the Consumer Confidence Index, is indexed on a scale of 0 to 200, with a neutral midpoint of 100. A reading above 100 indicates positive sentiment. A reading below 100 indicates negative sentiment.
Fiscal Confidence Index Key Data Points:
* The July 2026 Fiscal Confidence Index value is 39. (The June value was 39. The May value was 36.)
* The current Fiscal Confidence Index score for CONCERN about the debt is 34, indicating deep concern about the debt. The score for debt as a PRIORITY that leaders must address is 22, indicating that Americans want elected leaders to make addressing long-term debt a high priority. The score for EXPECTATIONS about progress on the debt is 61. The Fiscal Confidence Index is the average of these three sub-category scores.
This online poll surveyed 1,000 registered voters nationwide between July 20 and July 22, 2026. It has a margin of error of +/- 3.1%.
Detailed results can be found online at www.pgpf.org/FiscalConfidenceIndex.
***
Original text here: https://www.pgpf.org/press/voters-deeply-concerned-about-national-debt-inflation-and-affordability/
* * *
Voters Deeply Concerned about National Debt, Inflation and Affordability
*
As Congress weighs a new reconciliation package that could add to federal deficits, and with a government funding deadline looming before the mid-term elections, a new Peter G. Peterson Foundation survey shows Americans are deeply concerned about the rising national debt and its effect on the cost of living. The U.S. Fiscal Confidence Index in July remains at 39 (100 is neutral), reflecting the importance of fiscal responsibility ... Show Full Article NEW YORK, July 31 -- The Peter G. Peterson Foundation posted the following news release: * * * Voters Deeply Concerned about National Debt, Inflation and Affordability * As Congress weighs a new reconciliation package that could add to federal deficits, and with a government funding deadline looming before the mid-term elections, a new Peter G. Peterson Foundation survey shows Americans are deeply concerned about the rising national debt and its effect on the cost of living. The U.S. Fiscal Confidence Index in July remains at 39 (100 is neutral), reflecting the importance of fiscal responsibilityfor voters this campaign season.
The new national survey, jointly conducted by Democratic firm Global Strategy Group and Republican firm North Star Opinion Research, finds:
* 90% of voters (including 95% of Democrats, 87% of independents and 87% of Republicans) are concerned that the national debt's effect on inflation is increasing the cost of living, including prices for groceries, energy, housing, transportation, and other goods and services.
* 86% of voters (including 90% of Democrats, 83% of independents and 84% of Republicans) are concerned that the national debt is contributing to higher borrowing costs, such as credit card interest, car loan rates, and mortgage rates.
* 94% say they are more likely to support a candidate with a plan to address the debt, including 95% of Democrats, 92% of independents and 94% of Republicans.
* 82% say a candidate having a plan to address the national debt is a factor in deciding their support in the 2026 election, including 84% of Democrats, 79% of independents and 82% of Republicans.
* 73% of voters (including 64% of Democrats, 83% of independents and 75% of Republicans) say they would consider supporting a candidate from a political party they do not usually support, if that candidate had a clear plan to address the debt.
* 95% of voters want Senate candidates this year to clearly explain their plans to prevent automatic Social Security benefit cuts, with virtually unanimous agreement in each age bracket and across party lines.
"As Congress considers election year budget proposals, the national debt keeps rising and American families are paying the price through higher interest rates and inflation," said Michael A. Peterson, CEO of the Peterson Foundation. "Voters understand that the growing debt adds to their cost of living, and they are calling for a more responsible approach that will improve our economic future. With less than 100 days until the election, candidates have the opportunity to put forward solutions that help address affordability, stabilize the national debt and put our nation on a stronger path."
July's U.S. Fiscal Confidence Index shows rising concern about the national debt among the vast majority of voters, with 81% saying their level of concern about the debt has increased over the last few years. Additionally, 67% of voters believe elected officials are on the wrong track when it comes to addressing the debt, tying this year's high.
The Fiscal Confidence Index measures public opinion about the national debt by asking six questions in three key areas:
* CONCERN: Level of concern and views about the direction of the national debt.
* PRIORITY: How high a priority addressing the debt should be for elected leaders.
* EXPECTATIONS: Expectations about whether the debt situation will get better or worse in the next few years.
The survey results from these three areas are weighted equally and averaged to produce the Fiscal Confidence Index value. The Fiscal Confidence Index, like the Consumer Confidence Index, is indexed on a scale of 0 to 200, with a neutral midpoint of 100. A reading above 100 indicates positive sentiment. A reading below 100 indicates negative sentiment.
Fiscal Confidence Index Key Data Points:
* The July 2026 Fiscal Confidence Index value is 39. (The June value was 39. The May value was 36.)
* The current Fiscal Confidence Index score for CONCERN about the debt is 34, indicating deep concern about the debt. The score for debt as a PRIORITY that leaders must address is 22, indicating that Americans want elected leaders to make addressing long-term debt a high priority. The score for EXPECTATIONS about progress on the debt is 61. The Fiscal Confidence Index is the average of these three sub-category scores.
This online poll surveyed 1,000 registered voters nationwide between July 20 and July 22, 2026. It has a margin of error of +/- 3.1%.
Detailed results can be found online at www.pgpf.org/FiscalConfidenceIndex.
***
Original text here: https://www.pgpf.org/press/voters-deeply-concerned-about-national-debt-inflation-and-affordability/
Lumina Foundation Issues Commentary: Hidden Student Success Strategy? Rethink Course Scheduling
INDIANAPOLIS, Indiana, July 31 -- The Lumina Foundation issued the following commentary by Strategy Director for Research and Evaluation Wendy Sedlak and Grantmaking Portfolio Director Wayne Taliaferro:
* * *
A hidden student success strategy? Rethink course scheduling.
A student's course schedule is one of the most consequential (and often overlooked) factors shaping whether they stay on track for their degree or credential.
Yet the path to earning a degree or credential remains unnecessarily difficult for far too many students. Beyond juggling work, family, financial, and academic demands, ... Show Full Article INDIANAPOLIS, Indiana, July 31 -- The Lumina Foundation issued the following commentary by Strategy Director for Research and Evaluation Wendy Sedlak and Grantmaking Portfolio Director Wayne Taliaferro: * * * A hidden student success strategy? Rethink course scheduling. A student's course schedule is one of the most consequential (and often overlooked) factors shaping whether they stay on track for their degree or credential. Yet the path to earning a degree or credential remains unnecessarily difficult for far too many students. Beyond juggling work, family, financial, and academic demands,they can also encounter barriers created by the institutions themselves. Administrative friction points such as registration, enrollment, and course access can disrupt momentum and, in some cases, derail progress altogether.
Colleges can't control every challenge students face. But they can look at whether their own systems help or hinder progress. By reducing unnecessary roadblocks, they can make it easier for students to move through their programs. Scheduling isn't just an operational decision. It's a student success one.
When students can't access the courses they need, run into course availability issues, struggle to build schedules around their lives, or are unable to plan ahead, progress can quickly stall. Delayed completion often means additional costs, lost time, and a greater risk that students will stop out before earning a credential.
A required course that's unavailable can delay graduation. A class offered only during working hours can force students to choose between their paycheck or their education. Courses that routinely conflict with one another can slow students' progress. These are consequences that far too many students face.
Of course, scheduling reform is not as simple as it sounds. Colleges must balance a range of dynamics and demands, from faculty availability and workloads to department structures and course sequences, as well as the realities of physical space, available resources, and change management, among many other considerations. The complexity is real, but so is the need and opportunity for change.
The shift is less about creating a perfect schedule than about recognizing that scheduling decisions are student success decisions.
The American Association of State Colleges and Universities (AASCU) is helping colleges rethink scheduling through its Student-Centered Course Scheduling initiative. AASCU is working with over 30 institutions to redesign how courses are offered, sequenced, and staffed, using data to better align course availability with student demand. The work combines data, policy review, cross-campus collaboration, and continuous improvement to transform course scheduling from an administrative exercise into a student success strategy. With support from Lumina Foundation, AASCU recently expanded the initiative to bring these strategies to more colleges.
Participating institutions use real-time data to identify capacity constraints, add sections where demand is highest, resolve conflicts between required courses, revisit outdated scheduling policies, and build multi-term schedules that give students greater confidence about what courses will be available in future semesters. Rather than rebuilding schedules each term, institutions continuously evaluate whether course offerings are helping students make steady progress toward a credential.
Early results show that, across AASCU's pilot institutions, completion of first-year English and math courses increased by 12 percent, and students earned an average of 1.4 additional productive credits per year. Individual campuses also improved classroom utilization, reduced scheduling conflicts, and increased the number of students taking full course loads. These are all solid indicators that better scheduling can help students maintain momentum toward graduation.
Recent research from our partners at Persistence Plus reinforces this idea. Through their work on continuous enrollment, they found that students value greater predictability, clearer pathways, and fewer administrative hurdles that can interrupt their momentum. Campus administrators understand this, too. The findings point to a simple but powerful insight: students are more likely to persist when institutions make it easier to keep moving forward.
Student-centered scheduling isn't the magical fix for every issue facing higher ed. But it addresses one challenge within an institution's control.
When students can reliably enroll in the courses they need, when they need them, they're more likely to maintain momentum, complete their programs, and, ultimately, earn the credential they came for.
* * *
About the Authors
Wayne Taliaferro directs Lumina's grantmaking portfolio focused on enhancing student success at two- and four-year colleges.
Wendy Sedlak, Ph.D., is the strategy director for research and evaluation at Lumina Foundation, which works to help all Americans continue to learn and train after high school. Before joining Lumina, Sedlak worked at Equal Measure, where she directed projects to benefit students, including many complex national systems-change evaluations.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.luminafoundation.org/news-and-views/a-hidden-student-success-strategy-rethink-course-scheduling/
* * *
A hidden student success strategy? Rethink course scheduling.
A student's course schedule is one of the most consequential (and often overlooked) factors shaping whether they stay on track for their degree or credential.
Yet the path to earning a degree or credential remains unnecessarily difficult for far too many students. Beyond juggling work, family, financial, and academic demands, ... Show Full Article INDIANAPOLIS, Indiana, July 31 -- The Lumina Foundation issued the following commentary by Strategy Director for Research and Evaluation Wendy Sedlak and Grantmaking Portfolio Director Wayne Taliaferro: * * * A hidden student success strategy? Rethink course scheduling. A student's course schedule is one of the most consequential (and often overlooked) factors shaping whether they stay on track for their degree or credential. Yet the path to earning a degree or credential remains unnecessarily difficult for far too many students. Beyond juggling work, family, financial, and academic demands,they can also encounter barriers created by the institutions themselves. Administrative friction points such as registration, enrollment, and course access can disrupt momentum and, in some cases, derail progress altogether.
Colleges can't control every challenge students face. But they can look at whether their own systems help or hinder progress. By reducing unnecessary roadblocks, they can make it easier for students to move through their programs. Scheduling isn't just an operational decision. It's a student success one.
When students can't access the courses they need, run into course availability issues, struggle to build schedules around their lives, or are unable to plan ahead, progress can quickly stall. Delayed completion often means additional costs, lost time, and a greater risk that students will stop out before earning a credential.
A required course that's unavailable can delay graduation. A class offered only during working hours can force students to choose between their paycheck or their education. Courses that routinely conflict with one another can slow students' progress. These are consequences that far too many students face.
Of course, scheduling reform is not as simple as it sounds. Colleges must balance a range of dynamics and demands, from faculty availability and workloads to department structures and course sequences, as well as the realities of physical space, available resources, and change management, among many other considerations. The complexity is real, but so is the need and opportunity for change.
The shift is less about creating a perfect schedule than about recognizing that scheduling decisions are student success decisions.
The American Association of State Colleges and Universities (AASCU) is helping colleges rethink scheduling through its Student-Centered Course Scheduling initiative. AASCU is working with over 30 institutions to redesign how courses are offered, sequenced, and staffed, using data to better align course availability with student demand. The work combines data, policy review, cross-campus collaboration, and continuous improvement to transform course scheduling from an administrative exercise into a student success strategy. With support from Lumina Foundation, AASCU recently expanded the initiative to bring these strategies to more colleges.
Participating institutions use real-time data to identify capacity constraints, add sections where demand is highest, resolve conflicts between required courses, revisit outdated scheduling policies, and build multi-term schedules that give students greater confidence about what courses will be available in future semesters. Rather than rebuilding schedules each term, institutions continuously evaluate whether course offerings are helping students make steady progress toward a credential.
Early results show that, across AASCU's pilot institutions, completion of first-year English and math courses increased by 12 percent, and students earned an average of 1.4 additional productive credits per year. Individual campuses also improved classroom utilization, reduced scheduling conflicts, and increased the number of students taking full course loads. These are all solid indicators that better scheduling can help students maintain momentum toward graduation.
Recent research from our partners at Persistence Plus reinforces this idea. Through their work on continuous enrollment, they found that students value greater predictability, clearer pathways, and fewer administrative hurdles that can interrupt their momentum. Campus administrators understand this, too. The findings point to a simple but powerful insight: students are more likely to persist when institutions make it easier to keep moving forward.
Student-centered scheduling isn't the magical fix for every issue facing higher ed. But it addresses one challenge within an institution's control.
When students can reliably enroll in the courses they need, when they need them, they're more likely to maintain momentum, complete their programs, and, ultimately, earn the credential they came for.
* * *
About the Authors
Wayne Taliaferro directs Lumina's grantmaking portfolio focused on enhancing student success at two- and four-year colleges.
Wendy Sedlak, Ph.D., is the strategy director for research and evaluation at Lumina Foundation, which works to help all Americans continue to learn and train after high school. Before joining Lumina, Sedlak worked at Equal Measure, where she directed projects to benefit students, including many complex national systems-change evaluations.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.luminafoundation.org/news-and-views/a-hidden-student-success-strategy-rethink-course-scheduling/
Henry Ford + MSU Innovation Fund Announces First Investments
EAST LANSING, Michigan, July 31 -- The Michigan State University Research Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
Henry Ford + MSU Innovation Fund Announces First Investments
LightHearted AI and M3D are the first companies to receive investment from the healthcare-focused venture fund backed by Henry Ford Health, Michigan State University, and the MSU Research Foundation.
-
Henry Ford Health + Michigan State University Health Sciences has announced the first investments from the Henry Ford + MSU Innovation Fund, providing funding and strategic support to LightHearted AI and M3D, ... Show Full Article EAST LANSING, Michigan, July 31 -- The Michigan State University Research Foundation issued the following news release: * * * Henry Ford + MSU Innovation Fund Announces First Investments LightHearted AI and M3D are the first companies to receive investment from the healthcare-focused venture fund backed by Henry Ford Health, Michigan State University, and the MSU Research Foundation. - Henry Ford Health + Michigan State University Health Sciences has announced the first investments from the Henry Ford + MSU Innovation Fund, providing funding and strategic support to LightHearted AI and M3D,two early-stage companies developing technologies that improve diagnosis, treatment, and patient care.
LightHearted AI is developing LightScope, a non-invasive technology that uses visible light to capture high-quality heart sound data and detect heart valve disease in less than 10 seconds. Co-founded by Lucrezia Cester, Ph.D., and Dilip Rajeswari, the company's technology has demonstrated promise for improving early diagnosis, addressing an important gap in current screening methods. The investment will support the company's continued clinical validation and commercialization efforts as it prepares for regulatory approvals.
"Working with Henry Ford Health helps us validate how LightScope can be deployed across multiple care settings through a single health-system partnership," said Cester. "The Innovation Fund's investment is an important milestone as we prepare for broader deployment across U.S. health systems."
M3D is developing advanced radiation imaging technologies that enable clinicians to identify, localize, and visualize sources of radiation in real time. The company's platform is designed to improve radiation safety, treatment accuracy, and workflow across a range of healthcare applications. The investment will support continued product development, clinical validation, and commercialization.
"Henry Ford Health brings the clinical perspective that's essential for translating innovative technologies into everyday practice," said Mike Hopkins, co-founder and CEO of M3D. "Together with the Innovation Fund, the partnership provides more than capital by connecting us with the expertise needed to accelerate commercialization."
Launched in 2025, the healthcare-focused venture fund was established through an initial $10 million commitment from its founding members, Henry Ford Health, Michigan State University and the MSU Research Foundation. The fund supports early-stage companies developing technologies that improve patient care, accelerate access to innovation, and deliver measurable impact. These investments further complement the clinical expertise, research environments, and commercialization resources available through the Henry Ford + MSU partnership.
"These first investments reflect exactly why the Henry Ford + MSU Innovation Fund was created," said Jeff Wesley, executive director of ventures at the MSU Research Foundation, where he manages the Innovation Fund. "Our goal is to help founders move promising healthcare technologies farther and faster by giving them the investment and support they need at each stage of company growth."
The Henry Ford + MSU Innovation Fund focuses on early-stage companies working in areas such as precision medicine, digital health, artificial intelligence, medical devices, and remote monitoring. Initial investments typically support companies from the pre-seed through Series A stages.
"When we evaluate opportunities for the fund, we're looking for technologies that have the potential to solve meaningful clinical problems," said Lisa Prasad, vice president and chief innovation officer for Henry Ford Health, who also serves on the Innovation Fund board. "LightHearted AI and M3D are strong examples of companies developing practical solutions that could improve how care is delivered, and we're excited to work alongside their teams as they continue validating and advancing these technologies."
The investments in LightHearted AI and M3D mark an important milestone for the Innovation Fund and its work to support early-stage healthcare companies developing technologies with the potential to improve patient care. Early-stage companies interested in advancing health care innovation can learn more about funding opportunities, focus areas and how to connect with the Henry Ford + MSU Innovation Fund at henryfordmsu.org.
* * *
Original text here: https://msufoundation.org/henry-ford-msu-innovation-fund-announces-first-investments/
* * *
Henry Ford + MSU Innovation Fund Announces First Investments
LightHearted AI and M3D are the first companies to receive investment from the healthcare-focused venture fund backed by Henry Ford Health, Michigan State University, and the MSU Research Foundation.
-
Henry Ford Health + Michigan State University Health Sciences has announced the first investments from the Henry Ford + MSU Innovation Fund, providing funding and strategic support to LightHearted AI and M3D, ... Show Full Article EAST LANSING, Michigan, July 31 -- The Michigan State University Research Foundation issued the following news release: * * * Henry Ford + MSU Innovation Fund Announces First Investments LightHearted AI and M3D are the first companies to receive investment from the healthcare-focused venture fund backed by Henry Ford Health, Michigan State University, and the MSU Research Foundation. - Henry Ford Health + Michigan State University Health Sciences has announced the first investments from the Henry Ford + MSU Innovation Fund, providing funding and strategic support to LightHearted AI and M3D,two early-stage companies developing technologies that improve diagnosis, treatment, and patient care.
LightHearted AI is developing LightScope, a non-invasive technology that uses visible light to capture high-quality heart sound data and detect heart valve disease in less than 10 seconds. Co-founded by Lucrezia Cester, Ph.D., and Dilip Rajeswari, the company's technology has demonstrated promise for improving early diagnosis, addressing an important gap in current screening methods. The investment will support the company's continued clinical validation and commercialization efforts as it prepares for regulatory approvals.
"Working with Henry Ford Health helps us validate how LightScope can be deployed across multiple care settings through a single health-system partnership," said Cester. "The Innovation Fund's investment is an important milestone as we prepare for broader deployment across U.S. health systems."
M3D is developing advanced radiation imaging technologies that enable clinicians to identify, localize, and visualize sources of radiation in real time. The company's platform is designed to improve radiation safety, treatment accuracy, and workflow across a range of healthcare applications. The investment will support continued product development, clinical validation, and commercialization.
"Henry Ford Health brings the clinical perspective that's essential for translating innovative technologies into everyday practice," said Mike Hopkins, co-founder and CEO of M3D. "Together with the Innovation Fund, the partnership provides more than capital by connecting us with the expertise needed to accelerate commercialization."
Launched in 2025, the healthcare-focused venture fund was established through an initial $10 million commitment from its founding members, Henry Ford Health, Michigan State University and the MSU Research Foundation. The fund supports early-stage companies developing technologies that improve patient care, accelerate access to innovation, and deliver measurable impact. These investments further complement the clinical expertise, research environments, and commercialization resources available through the Henry Ford + MSU partnership.
"These first investments reflect exactly why the Henry Ford + MSU Innovation Fund was created," said Jeff Wesley, executive director of ventures at the MSU Research Foundation, where he manages the Innovation Fund. "Our goal is to help founders move promising healthcare technologies farther and faster by giving them the investment and support they need at each stage of company growth."
The Henry Ford + MSU Innovation Fund focuses on early-stage companies working in areas such as precision medicine, digital health, artificial intelligence, medical devices, and remote monitoring. Initial investments typically support companies from the pre-seed through Series A stages.
"When we evaluate opportunities for the fund, we're looking for technologies that have the potential to solve meaningful clinical problems," said Lisa Prasad, vice president and chief innovation officer for Henry Ford Health, who also serves on the Innovation Fund board. "LightHearted AI and M3D are strong examples of companies developing practical solutions that could improve how care is delivered, and we're excited to work alongside their teams as they continue validating and advancing these technologies."
The investments in LightHearted AI and M3D mark an important milestone for the Innovation Fund and its work to support early-stage healthcare companies developing technologies with the potential to improve patient care. Early-stage companies interested in advancing health care innovation can learn more about funding opportunities, focus areas and how to connect with the Henry Ford + MSU Innovation Fund at henryfordmsu.org.
* * *
Original text here: https://msufoundation.org/henry-ford-msu-innovation-fund-announces-first-investments/
FFRF Stops School-Organized Religious Club at Ala. Elementary School
MADISON, Wisconsin, July 31 -- The Freedom From Religion Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
FFRF stops school-organized religious club at Ala. elementary school
The Freedom From Religion Foundation has successfully stymied a proposed school-organized religious club in the Madison City Schools (Ala.) system that aimed to indoctrinate elementary school students.
A concerned district parent reported that the principal of Madison Elementary School, near Huntsville, advertised the Fellowship of Christian Athletes club using an official school communication sent to parents. The May ... Show Full Article MADISON, Wisconsin, July 31 -- The Freedom From Religion Foundation issued the following news release: * * * FFRF stops school-organized religious club at Ala. elementary school The Freedom From Religion Foundation has successfully stymied a proposed school-organized religious club in the Madison City Schools (Ala.) system that aimed to indoctrinate elementary school students. A concerned district parent reported that the principal of Madison Elementary School, near Huntsville, advertised the Fellowship of Christian Athletes club using an official school communication sent to parents. The May12 communication from the principal told parents that the coach was starting a fellowship club at the elementary school next year, and the message invited parents to attend a "planning kickoff." According to a flyer for the club, students would unite their "passions, faith and athletics to impact the world for Jesus Christ" if they joined the club.
Additionally, on May 13, the coach sent a communication to parents via what appeared to be an official district platform to again advertise the club and encourage parents to send their children to the "first FCA huddle" in the elementary school's gym. The coach's communication made it clear that he was the one starting the club at Madison Elementary School, not students. The parent expressed concern that elementary-age students were likely to view the Fellowship of Christian Athletes club as a "school-endorsed religious activity."
FFRF pointed out how the club would have been a direct violation of students' rights.
"It is inappropriate and unconstitutional for an elementary school to organize, lead or encourage student participation in a religious club like the FCA, especially when that club is clearly run by an adult staff member and not students," FFRF Staff Attorney Sammi Lawrence wrote to the district.
Elementary students cannot realistically initiate and operate a religious club independent of adult involvement. Because the club was organized and promoted by school employees through official district communications, it constituted unconstitutional government endorsement of religion rather than protected student religious expression. Madison Elementary School should strive to be welcoming and inclusive of all students, not just those who subscribe to a particular brand of Christianity, FFRF emphasized.
Following FFRF's letter, the district confirmed that the proposed club would not move forward.
"We have discussed this matter with the interim superintendent and with the principal of Madison Elementary School," the district's legal officer responded. "Madison Elementary School has not implemented the FCA club that was considered in the spring and will not do so."
FFRF is once again pleased to champion students' rights.
"FFRF firmly believes in students' right to be free from religious indoctrination," FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor says. "Young children are especially susceptible to viewing school-sponsored religious activities as official endorsements of faith. We're pleased the district chose to uphold its constitutional obligations and ensure all students are equally welcome."
* * *
The Freedom From Religion Foundation is a U.S.-based nonprofit dedicated to defending the constitutional principle of separation between state and church and educating the public on matters relating to nontheism. With more than 41,000 members across the country, including hundreds of members in Alabama, FFRF is the largest association of freethinkers (atheists, agnostics and humanists) in North America. For more information, visit ffrf.org.
* * *
Original text here: https://ffrf.org/news/releases/ffrf-stops-school-sponsored-religious-club-at-ala-elementary-school/
[Category: Religion]
* * *
FFRF stops school-organized religious club at Ala. elementary school
The Freedom From Religion Foundation has successfully stymied a proposed school-organized religious club in the Madison City Schools (Ala.) system that aimed to indoctrinate elementary school students.
A concerned district parent reported that the principal of Madison Elementary School, near Huntsville, advertised the Fellowship of Christian Athletes club using an official school communication sent to parents. The May ... Show Full Article MADISON, Wisconsin, July 31 -- The Freedom From Religion Foundation issued the following news release: * * * FFRF stops school-organized religious club at Ala. elementary school The Freedom From Religion Foundation has successfully stymied a proposed school-organized religious club in the Madison City Schools (Ala.) system that aimed to indoctrinate elementary school students. A concerned district parent reported that the principal of Madison Elementary School, near Huntsville, advertised the Fellowship of Christian Athletes club using an official school communication sent to parents. The May12 communication from the principal told parents that the coach was starting a fellowship club at the elementary school next year, and the message invited parents to attend a "planning kickoff." According to a flyer for the club, students would unite their "passions, faith and athletics to impact the world for Jesus Christ" if they joined the club.
Additionally, on May 13, the coach sent a communication to parents via what appeared to be an official district platform to again advertise the club and encourage parents to send their children to the "first FCA huddle" in the elementary school's gym. The coach's communication made it clear that he was the one starting the club at Madison Elementary School, not students. The parent expressed concern that elementary-age students were likely to view the Fellowship of Christian Athletes club as a "school-endorsed religious activity."
FFRF pointed out how the club would have been a direct violation of students' rights.
"It is inappropriate and unconstitutional for an elementary school to organize, lead or encourage student participation in a religious club like the FCA, especially when that club is clearly run by an adult staff member and not students," FFRF Staff Attorney Sammi Lawrence wrote to the district.
Elementary students cannot realistically initiate and operate a religious club independent of adult involvement. Because the club was organized and promoted by school employees through official district communications, it constituted unconstitutional government endorsement of religion rather than protected student religious expression. Madison Elementary School should strive to be welcoming and inclusive of all students, not just those who subscribe to a particular brand of Christianity, FFRF emphasized.
Following FFRF's letter, the district confirmed that the proposed club would not move forward.
"We have discussed this matter with the interim superintendent and with the principal of Madison Elementary School," the district's legal officer responded. "Madison Elementary School has not implemented the FCA club that was considered in the spring and will not do so."
FFRF is once again pleased to champion students' rights.
"FFRF firmly believes in students' right to be free from religious indoctrination," FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor says. "Young children are especially susceptible to viewing school-sponsored religious activities as official endorsements of faith. We're pleased the district chose to uphold its constitutional obligations and ensure all students are equally welcome."
* * *
The Freedom From Religion Foundation is a U.S.-based nonprofit dedicated to defending the constitutional principle of separation between state and church and educating the public on matters relating to nontheism. With more than 41,000 members across the country, including hundreds of members in Alabama, FFRF is the largest association of freethinkers (atheists, agnostics and humanists) in North America. For more information, visit ffrf.org.
* * *
Original text here: https://ffrf.org/news/releases/ffrf-stops-school-sponsored-religious-club-at-ala-elementary-school/
[Category: Religion]
Central New York Community Foundation: Pulaski Fund Distributes $41,220 in Grants
SYRACUSE, New York, July 31 -- The Central New York Community Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
Pulaski Fund Distributes $41,220 in Grants
Over $40,000 in grants will assist nonprofits serving the Village of Pulaski and the Town of Richland.
-
The Greater Pulaski Community Endowment Fund recently distributed more than $40,000 in grants to nonprofit organizations serving the Town of Richland and the greater Pulaski area.
Pulaski Area Pop Warner received $4,000 to purchase helmets and training equipment for Pop Warner players.
Fernwood Community Center received $6,800 for ... Show Full Article SYRACUSE, New York, July 31 -- The Central New York Community Foundation issued the following news release: * * * Pulaski Fund Distributes $41,220 in Grants Over $40,000 in grants will assist nonprofits serving the Village of Pulaski and the Town of Richland. - The Greater Pulaski Community Endowment Fund recently distributed more than $40,000 in grants to nonprofit organizations serving the Town of Richland and the greater Pulaski area. Pulaski Area Pop Warner received $4,000 to purchase helmets and training equipment for Pop Warner players. Fernwood Community Center received $6,800 forrestoration of the building and walkway between the Social Hall and Sunday School room.
Pulaski Historical Society received $4,925 in support of upgrades to technology and archival software.
Salmon River Fine Arts Center received $6,500 for upgrades to the pottery studio.
Rural and Migrant Ministry of Oswego County received $4,360 for renovation of the south porch.
Bethel Community Center received $5,000 for the replacement of windows in the Bethel School building.
Aurora of CNY received $5,275 to provide sensory loss services in Pulaski and Richland, including mobility training, assistive technology, and support for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing.
Half-Shire Historical Society received $4,360 for additions to the second-floor library.
* * *
The Greater Pulaski Community Endowment Fund is a union of gifts contributed by the people of the Pulaski community that makes grants to support programs and projects of importance to the area. Established in 1991 with seed funding from the John Ben Snow Memorial Trust and sustained through critical community matching challenge grants, the endowment exists to ensure that the citizens of the Pulaski area have a means of supporting the nonprofit services and resources that are so important to the vitality of a community. Since its inception, the Fund has provided more than $490,000 in grants to nonprofit organizations addressing community needs in the Village of Pulaski and the Town of Richland and has grown its endowment to more than $1 million. People can learn more about the Fund and contribute at cnycf.org/Pulaski. The Pulaski Fund is an affiliate fund of the Central New York Community Foundation.
* * *
The Central New York Community Foundation is a public charity that turns community dollars into community change. Established in 1927, it receives contributions from donors, manages them to grow over time and then distributes funding to address the region's greatest needs. The foundation has invested more than $350 million in community projects that benefit Central New York. It also serves as a civic leader, convener and sponsor of strategic initiatives that foster a thriving and equitable region and address the most critical issues of our time.
* * *
Original text here: https://cnycf.org/pulaski-fund-distributes-41220-in-grants/
* * *
Pulaski Fund Distributes $41,220 in Grants
Over $40,000 in grants will assist nonprofits serving the Village of Pulaski and the Town of Richland.
-
The Greater Pulaski Community Endowment Fund recently distributed more than $40,000 in grants to nonprofit organizations serving the Town of Richland and the greater Pulaski area.
Pulaski Area Pop Warner received $4,000 to purchase helmets and training equipment for Pop Warner players.
Fernwood Community Center received $6,800 for ... Show Full Article SYRACUSE, New York, July 31 -- The Central New York Community Foundation issued the following news release: * * * Pulaski Fund Distributes $41,220 in Grants Over $40,000 in grants will assist nonprofits serving the Village of Pulaski and the Town of Richland. - The Greater Pulaski Community Endowment Fund recently distributed more than $40,000 in grants to nonprofit organizations serving the Town of Richland and the greater Pulaski area. Pulaski Area Pop Warner received $4,000 to purchase helmets and training equipment for Pop Warner players. Fernwood Community Center received $6,800 forrestoration of the building and walkway between the Social Hall and Sunday School room.
Pulaski Historical Society received $4,925 in support of upgrades to technology and archival software.
Salmon River Fine Arts Center received $6,500 for upgrades to the pottery studio.
Rural and Migrant Ministry of Oswego County received $4,360 for renovation of the south porch.
Bethel Community Center received $5,000 for the replacement of windows in the Bethel School building.
Aurora of CNY received $5,275 to provide sensory loss services in Pulaski and Richland, including mobility training, assistive technology, and support for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing.
Half-Shire Historical Society received $4,360 for additions to the second-floor library.
* * *
The Greater Pulaski Community Endowment Fund is a union of gifts contributed by the people of the Pulaski community that makes grants to support programs and projects of importance to the area. Established in 1991 with seed funding from the John Ben Snow Memorial Trust and sustained through critical community matching challenge grants, the endowment exists to ensure that the citizens of the Pulaski area have a means of supporting the nonprofit services and resources that are so important to the vitality of a community. Since its inception, the Fund has provided more than $490,000 in grants to nonprofit organizations addressing community needs in the Village of Pulaski and the Town of Richland and has grown its endowment to more than $1 million. People can learn more about the Fund and contribute at cnycf.org/Pulaski. The Pulaski Fund is an affiliate fund of the Central New York Community Foundation.
* * *
The Central New York Community Foundation is a public charity that turns community dollars into community change. Established in 1927, it receives contributions from donors, manages them to grow over time and then distributes funding to address the region's greatest needs. The foundation has invested more than $350 million in community projects that benefit Central New York. It also serves as a civic leader, convener and sponsor of strategic initiatives that foster a thriving and equitable region and address the most critical issues of our time.
* * *
Original text here: https://cnycf.org/pulaski-fund-distributes-41220-in-grants/
Cayuga Community Fund Distributes More Than $165,000 in Grants
SYRACUSE, New York, July 31 -- The Cayuga Community Fund, a geographically-specific fund administered by the Central New York Community Foundation, issued the following news release:
* * *
Cayuga Community Fund Distributes More Than $165,000 in Grants
The Cayuga Community Fund has announced its 2026 grant recipients.
-
The Cayuga Community Fund, an affiliate fund of the Central New York Community Foundation, distributed $169,509 to 26 nonprofit organizations that serve residents of Cayuga County.
Auburn Church of the Nazarene received $10,000 for continuation of the Free Laundry Saturdays ... Show Full Article SYRACUSE, New York, July 31 -- The Cayuga Community Fund, a geographically-specific fund administered by the Central New York Community Foundation, issued the following news release: * * * Cayuga Community Fund Distributes More Than $165,000 in Grants The Cayuga Community Fund has announced its 2026 grant recipients. - The Cayuga Community Fund, an affiliate fund of the Central New York Community Foundation, distributed $169,509 to 26 nonprofit organizations that serve residents of Cayuga County. Auburn Church of the Nazarene received $10,000 for continuation of the Free Laundry Saturdaysevent. The monthly program provides free laundry services, complimentary supplies, and access to an on-site mobile pantry for Auburn-area residents.
Auburn Community Cats TNR received $7,500 for the expansion of TNR clinic services. The program provides humane trapping, spay and neuter surgeries, vaccinations and colony management support to help stabilize and reduce the outdoor cat population.
Auburn Community Garden received $4,850 for the creation of an urban youth education farm. An urban youth education farm is a small city farm used to teach kids how to grow food, learn about sustainable agriculture, and donate fresh produce to people in need.
Auburn Public Theater received $9,089 for the purchase of wireless audio equipment.
Aurora of CNY received $7,603 for the Sense of Inclusion program, which delivers educational presentations to schools, medical providers, community groups, first responders, and law enforcement to promote greater understanding and inclusion for individuals with sensory loss.
Booker T. Washington Community Center received $3,444 for the purchase of an adaptive swing. An inclusive play and therapy seat designed to securely support children or adults with physical, sensory, or cognitive disabilities.
Cayuga Counseling Services received $10,000 to train staff in Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR).
Cayuga Museum of History and Art received $3,500 for additional safety and accessibility upgrades to the museum.
Central New York Lyme and Tick-Borne Disease Alliance received $10,000 to expand the Tick-Borne Disease Prevention and Education Program into Cayuga County.
Healing H'Arts Equestrian Center received $2,000 for an Equine Assisted Learning Course. The program provides equine-assisted educational experiences through interactive horse workshops and therapeutic services led by occupational therapist Kirsta Malone.
King Ferry Food Pantry received $10,000 for the purchase of food items for pantry clients.
Literacy Volunteers of Cayuga County received $5,000 to purchase supplies for the training and tutor workbook and resource library.
Merry-Go-Round Playhouse | The Rev Theatre Company received $5,000 for the continuation of the REV On Tour program in Cayuga County. The program brings live theatrical performances and educational arts experiences directly to schools, libraries and community venues throughout Cayuga County.
Mozaic received $5,000 for the launch of a community closet in Auburn. The Community Closet offers free clothing and other essential items to individuals and families in need, helping remove barriers to everyday living.
Nutrition Education For All received $2,000 to expand the Healthy Start nutrition education program for second-grade students at Genesee Elementary School.
NYS Equal Rights Heritage Center received $5,000 in support of the "Harriet: A Taste of Freedom" exhibition.
Perform 4 Purpose received $10,000 to purchase a second set of professional sound and stage equipment.
Rising Phoenix Sports Program received $7,800 for implementation of its program at the Harriet Tubman Residential Center. Through sports-based activities, the program helps girls in juvenile justice facilities build resilience, strengthen leadership skills and support their social and emotional well-being.
Running Start received $10,000 for the expansion of the 1st Amendment 1st Vote program to all high schools in Cayuga County. The program educates students about the First Amendment, civic engagement and the importance of informed participation in the democratic process.
Safe & Warm received $10,000 for the creation of the "Home at Last" rental deposit fund. The fund helps individuals and families overcome financial barriers to securing stable housing by assisting with rental security deposits.
Schweinfurth Art Center | Schweinfurth Memorial Art Center received $7,500 for the expansion of scholarship opportunities for children and adults.
Seward House Museum received $9,269 to purchase audio equipment for museum accessibility.
Sleep in Heavenly Peace received $4,054 to construct and deliver beds to children in Auburn.
Syracuse Rescue Mission Alliance received $8,400 for a summer youth recreation program that provides local educational outings, seasonal events, and enriching activities that encourage connection, recreation and positive youth development.
Syracuse Shakespeare in the Park received $1,000 for a future performance of "The Taming of the Shrew" at the Seward House.
Westminster Presbyterian Church received $1,500 for the installation of a hearing assistance system.
* * *
The Cayuga Community Fund, created in 2008, is a geographically-specific fund created to serve as a source of permanent charitable dollars available to nonprofits serving residents of Cayuga County. Grants are awarded from the endowment fund annually to aid vital programs in education, health, social services, the arts, civic and environmental concerns, as well as the preservation of historic resources in Cayuga County. The Cayuga Community Fund has granted more than $775,000 to nonprofit groups since 2010. To learn more about the Cayuga Community Fund, including how to make a contribution, visit cnycf.org/cayuga. The Cayuga Community Fund is an affiliate fund of the Central New York Community Foundation, cnycf.org.
* * *
About the Central New York Community Foundation
The Central New York Community Foundation is a public charity that turns community dollars into community change. Established in 1927, it receives contributions from donors, manages them to grow over time and then distributes funding to address the region's greatest needs. The foundation has invested more than $350 million in community projects that benefit Central New York. It also serves as a civic leader, convener and sponsor of strategic initiatives that foster a thriving and equitable region and address the most critical issues of our time.
* * *
Original text here: https://cnycf.org/cayuga-community-fund-distributes-more-than-165000-in-grants/
* * *
Cayuga Community Fund Distributes More Than $165,000 in Grants
The Cayuga Community Fund has announced its 2026 grant recipients.
-
The Cayuga Community Fund, an affiliate fund of the Central New York Community Foundation, distributed $169,509 to 26 nonprofit organizations that serve residents of Cayuga County.
Auburn Church of the Nazarene received $10,000 for continuation of the Free Laundry Saturdays ... Show Full Article SYRACUSE, New York, July 31 -- The Cayuga Community Fund, a geographically-specific fund administered by the Central New York Community Foundation, issued the following news release: * * * Cayuga Community Fund Distributes More Than $165,000 in Grants The Cayuga Community Fund has announced its 2026 grant recipients. - The Cayuga Community Fund, an affiliate fund of the Central New York Community Foundation, distributed $169,509 to 26 nonprofit organizations that serve residents of Cayuga County. Auburn Church of the Nazarene received $10,000 for continuation of the Free Laundry Saturdaysevent. The monthly program provides free laundry services, complimentary supplies, and access to an on-site mobile pantry for Auburn-area residents.
Auburn Community Cats TNR received $7,500 for the expansion of TNR clinic services. The program provides humane trapping, spay and neuter surgeries, vaccinations and colony management support to help stabilize and reduce the outdoor cat population.
Auburn Community Garden received $4,850 for the creation of an urban youth education farm. An urban youth education farm is a small city farm used to teach kids how to grow food, learn about sustainable agriculture, and donate fresh produce to people in need.
Auburn Public Theater received $9,089 for the purchase of wireless audio equipment.
Aurora of CNY received $7,603 for the Sense of Inclusion program, which delivers educational presentations to schools, medical providers, community groups, first responders, and law enforcement to promote greater understanding and inclusion for individuals with sensory loss.
Booker T. Washington Community Center received $3,444 for the purchase of an adaptive swing. An inclusive play and therapy seat designed to securely support children or adults with physical, sensory, or cognitive disabilities.
Cayuga Counseling Services received $10,000 to train staff in Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR).
Cayuga Museum of History and Art received $3,500 for additional safety and accessibility upgrades to the museum.
Central New York Lyme and Tick-Borne Disease Alliance received $10,000 to expand the Tick-Borne Disease Prevention and Education Program into Cayuga County.
Healing H'Arts Equestrian Center received $2,000 for an Equine Assisted Learning Course. The program provides equine-assisted educational experiences through interactive horse workshops and therapeutic services led by occupational therapist Kirsta Malone.
King Ferry Food Pantry received $10,000 for the purchase of food items for pantry clients.
Literacy Volunteers of Cayuga County received $5,000 to purchase supplies for the training and tutor workbook and resource library.
Merry-Go-Round Playhouse | The Rev Theatre Company received $5,000 for the continuation of the REV On Tour program in Cayuga County. The program brings live theatrical performances and educational arts experiences directly to schools, libraries and community venues throughout Cayuga County.
Mozaic received $5,000 for the launch of a community closet in Auburn. The Community Closet offers free clothing and other essential items to individuals and families in need, helping remove barriers to everyday living.
Nutrition Education For All received $2,000 to expand the Healthy Start nutrition education program for second-grade students at Genesee Elementary School.
NYS Equal Rights Heritage Center received $5,000 in support of the "Harriet: A Taste of Freedom" exhibition.
Perform 4 Purpose received $10,000 to purchase a second set of professional sound and stage equipment.
Rising Phoenix Sports Program received $7,800 for implementation of its program at the Harriet Tubman Residential Center. Through sports-based activities, the program helps girls in juvenile justice facilities build resilience, strengthen leadership skills and support their social and emotional well-being.
Running Start received $10,000 for the expansion of the 1st Amendment 1st Vote program to all high schools in Cayuga County. The program educates students about the First Amendment, civic engagement and the importance of informed participation in the democratic process.
Safe & Warm received $10,000 for the creation of the "Home at Last" rental deposit fund. The fund helps individuals and families overcome financial barriers to securing stable housing by assisting with rental security deposits.
Schweinfurth Art Center | Schweinfurth Memorial Art Center received $7,500 for the expansion of scholarship opportunities for children and adults.
Seward House Museum received $9,269 to purchase audio equipment for museum accessibility.
Sleep in Heavenly Peace received $4,054 to construct and deliver beds to children in Auburn.
Syracuse Rescue Mission Alliance received $8,400 for a summer youth recreation program that provides local educational outings, seasonal events, and enriching activities that encourage connection, recreation and positive youth development.
Syracuse Shakespeare in the Park received $1,000 for a future performance of "The Taming of the Shrew" at the Seward House.
Westminster Presbyterian Church received $1,500 for the installation of a hearing assistance system.
* * *
The Cayuga Community Fund, created in 2008, is a geographically-specific fund created to serve as a source of permanent charitable dollars available to nonprofits serving residents of Cayuga County. Grants are awarded from the endowment fund annually to aid vital programs in education, health, social services, the arts, civic and environmental concerns, as well as the preservation of historic resources in Cayuga County. The Cayuga Community Fund has granted more than $775,000 to nonprofit groups since 2010. To learn more about the Cayuga Community Fund, including how to make a contribution, visit cnycf.org/cayuga. The Cayuga Community Fund is an affiliate fund of the Central New York Community Foundation, cnycf.org.
* * *
About the Central New York Community Foundation
The Central New York Community Foundation is a public charity that turns community dollars into community change. Established in 1927, it receives contributions from donors, manages them to grow over time and then distributes funding to address the region's greatest needs. The foundation has invested more than $350 million in community projects that benefit Central New York. It also serves as a civic leader, convener and sponsor of strategic initiatives that foster a thriving and equitable region and address the most critical issues of our time.
* * *
Original text here: https://cnycf.org/cayuga-community-fund-distributes-more-than-165000-in-grants/