Public Policy & NGOs
Here's a look at documents from public policy and non-governmental organizations
Featured Stories
Maryland Bar Cites Technicality in Declining to Investigate FCC Chair Brendan Carr: Watchdog Responds
WASHINGTON, Jan. 10 -- Campaign for Accountability issued the following news release on Jan. 9, 2026:
* * *
Maryland Bar Cites Technicality in Declining to Investigate FCC Chair Brendan Carr: Watchdog Responds
Yesterday, in response to a complaint Campaign for Accountability (CfA) filed on September 23, 2025, requesting an investigation into FCC Chairman Brendan Carr's overt, politically motivated threats to broadcasters, the Maryland Bar issued a letter saying it was declining to investigate and closing the file.
The Bar's response did not address the substance of Mr. Carr's conduct, but instead
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Jan. 10 -- Campaign for Accountability issued the following news release on Jan. 9, 2026:
* * *
Maryland Bar Cites Technicality in Declining to Investigate FCC Chair Brendan Carr: Watchdog Responds
Yesterday, in response to a complaint Campaign for Accountability (CfA) filed on September 23, 2025, requesting an investigation into FCC Chairman Brendan Carr's overt, politically motivated threats to broadcasters, the Maryland Bar issued a letter saying it was declining to investigate and closing the file.
The Bar's response did not address the substance of Mr. Carr's conduct, but insteadcited a rule providing that Maryland Bar Counsel "may decline a complaint [...] derived from published news reports or third party sources where the complainant appears to have no personal knowledge of the information being submitted" (emphasis added). CfA's complaint was based largely on Mr. Carr's statements in a podcast and his posts on X.
CfA Executive Director Michelle Kuppersmith issued the following statement in response to the Bar's rationale:
"The Maryland Bar Rules do not limit bar complaints only to those personally impacted by a lawyer's misconduct. Although Maryland rules provide that Bar counsel 'may' dismiss a complaint that draws on public accounts - leaving it fully within counsel's discretion to investigate allegations of violations - the Bar chose not to. Clearly, the Bar was looking for an excuse to duck its responsibility to hold Carr accountable for potential misconduct."
* * *
Campaign for Accountability is a nonpartisan, nonprofit watchdog organization that uses research, litigation, and aggressive communications to expose misconduct and malfeasance in public life and hold those who act at the expense of the public good accountable for their actions.
* * *
Original text here: https://campaignforaccountability.org/maryland-bar-declines-investigation-of-fcc-chair-brendan-carr/
[Category: Political]
FFRF Action Fund: Indiana Gov. Gets 'Theocrat' Slam for Suing to Put Ten Commandments at State Capitol
MADISON, Wisconsin, Jan. 10 -- FFRF Action Fund, an organization that says it develops and advocates for legislation, regulations and government programs to preserve the constitutional principle of separation between state and church, posted the following news on Jan. 9, 2026:
* * *
Indiana gov. gets 'theocrat' slam for suing to put Ten Commandments at state Capitol
The FFRF Action Fund's opening "Theocrat of the Week" for 2026 is Indiana Gov. Mike Braun for recently filing a federal lawsuit to reinstall a Ten Commandments monument on the Indiana Statehouse lawn.
Braun, alongside Indiana
... Show Full Article
MADISON, Wisconsin, Jan. 10 -- FFRF Action Fund, an organization that says it develops and advocates for legislation, regulations and government programs to preserve the constitutional principle of separation between state and church, posted the following news on Jan. 9, 2026:
* * *
Indiana gov. gets 'theocrat' slam for suing to put Ten Commandments at state Capitol
The FFRF Action Fund's opening "Theocrat of the Week" for 2026 is Indiana Gov. Mike Braun for recently filing a federal lawsuit to reinstall a Ten Commandments monument on the Indiana Statehouse lawn.
Braun, alongside IndianaAttorney General Todd Rokita, ushered in the new year by asking a judge to vacate a longstanding ruling that bans a Ten Commandments monument from being placed on state Capitol grounds. After a Ten Commandments monument was vandalized outside the Statehouse in 1991, a replacement monument was constructed in 2000, dedicated to the Ten Commandments and, to a lesser extent, the Bill of Rights and the Preamble to the 1851 Indiana Constitution.
The Indiana Civil Liberties Union (currently known as the ACLU of Indiana) successfully filed a lawsuit to prevent the monument from being placed on the lawn. Now that federal courts lean conservative, Braun and other Christian nationalists are reigniting efforts to reinstall the religious monument on state grounds.
"This monument reflects foundational texts that have shaped our nation's laws, liberties, and civic life for generations," Braun stated in a press release. "Given the clear shift in constitutional law and the long history of similar displays across the country, we ask the court to lift this outdated injunction. Restoring this historical monument is about honoring our heritage and who we are as Hoosiers."
Rokita boasted that the Ten Commandment monument belongs on state grounds because it serves "as a reminder of core principles that have guided our nation." (By such ignorant and divisive statements, the governor and attorney general are callously disenfranchising the 34 percent of Hoosiers who are not Christian, including the almost a third who are atheists, agnostics or have no religious affiliation.)
Although the Supreme Court no longer applies the Lemon test that its decision in the Indiana Ten Commandments case was predicated on, federal and state governments still cannot favor one religion over another, or religion over nonreligion. Judges across the country have repeatedly blocked impositions of the Ten Commandments.
Braun and Rokita's effort to install a religious monument at the Indiana Statehouse are an egregious attempt to merge church and state. It is shameful that the governor is violating his oath of office to uphold the secular Constitution, including the First Amendment's language barring government establishment of religion.
* * *
FFRF Action Fund is a 501(c)(4) organization that develops and advocates for legislation, regulations and government programs to preserve the constitutional principle of separation between state and church. It also advocates for the rights and views of nonbelievers, endorses candidates for political office, and publicizes the views of elected officials concerning religious liberty issues.
* * *
Original text here: https://ffrfaction.org/indiana-gov-gets-theocrat-slam-for-suing-to-put-ten-commandments-at-state-capitol/
[Category: Sociological]
FFRF Action Fund: 'Secularist' Rep. Cohen Defends Civil Rights Group Against 'Anti-Christian' Slander
MADISON, Wisconsin, Jan. 10 -- FFRF Action Fund, an organization that says it develops and advocates for legislation, regulations and government programs to preserve the constitutional principle of separation between state and church, posted the following news:
* * *
'Secularist' Rep. Cohen defends civil rights group against 'anti-Christian' slander
The FFRF Action Fund honors as its first "Secularist of the Week" of the new year a member of Congress for his defense of the Southern Poverty Law Center against anti-Christian accusations.
In December, the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution
... Show Full Article
MADISON, Wisconsin, Jan. 10 -- FFRF Action Fund, an organization that says it develops and advocates for legislation, regulations and government programs to preserve the constitutional principle of separation between state and church, posted the following news:
* * *
'Secularist' Rep. Cohen defends civil rights group against 'anti-Christian' slander
The FFRF Action Fund honors as its first "Secularist of the Week" of the new year a member of Congress for his defense of the Southern Poverty Law Center against anti-Christian accusations.
In December, the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitutionand Limited Government hosted a stacked hearing titled "Partisan and Profitable: The SPLC's Influence on Federal Civil Rights Policy" during which prominent figures from the religious right "sought to characterize the longtime civil rights organization" as "anti-Christian." The subcommittee's Republican majority examined the Southern Poverty Law Center's supposed "coordinated efforts with the Biden-Harris administration to target Christian and conservative Americans and deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech and free association."
Among the witnesses against the center were Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, and Tyler O'Neil, senior editor at The Daily Signal, a conservative multimedia news organization. Amanda Tyler, a prominent state-church champion and executive director of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty, was a friendly witness.
U.S. Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., strongly questioned the accusations that the center is working to "silence" Christians because of their religious beliefs. "It upsets me greatly when any group is anti-Jewish, anti-Catholic, anti-Muslim, anti-Christian," Cohen said, while posing a question to Tyler: "Does the Southern Poverty Law Center have any Church of God and Christ folks that maybe support them, and Southern Baptist folk, and Methodists, etc., etc.?"
Tyler responded, "What I hear you saying is that there's a difference between being against a religion and calling out ideologies, or hate speech in this case, which is, I think ... the issue here that we're discussing."
Cohen continued this line of questioning: "Is the Southern Poverty Law Center against Christian nationalism?" Tyler explained that the center has identified white Christian nationalism as "an ideology to watch." Cohen asked Tyler to define white Christian nationalism, and after describing it as a "political ideology that seeks to merge American and Christian identities into one" while also providing "cover for white supremacy," she set the record straight that "to be against Christian nationalism is not to be anti-Christian."
Moving on to other witnesses, Cohen questioned O'Neil: "Is there anything you can help me with ... your statement that the Southern Poverty Law Center is anti-Christian? How is the Southern Poverty Law Center anti-Christian?"
O'Neil cited the center's designation of the Ruth Institute as an anti-LGBTQ-plus hate group. The institute is a Louisiana-based Catholic organization that works to halt the so-called "sexual revolution," a term coined by the religious right to often describe the hard-fought rights of the LGBTQ-plus community in the United States. O'Neil argued that given the center's designation of the Ruth Institute as a hate group, the center was indicating "that just believing what 1 billion Catholics ostensibly say they believe justifies you being on the hate map. ... If there is anything more anti-Christian than that, I'm not sure what it is."
O'Neil later claimed that the Southern Poverty Law Center had "suggested that the entire Catholic Church should be on the hate map." Cohen responded that "it's wrong" to insinuate that, by placing the Ruth Institute on a hate map, the center had also placed the entire Catholic Church there. "I don't think Pope Leo would be put [in] that group," Cohen argued. Cohen also pointed out that many Christian ministers and churches support the Southern Poverty Law Center.
The FFRF Action Fund warmly thanks Cohen, a Congressional Freethought Caucus member, for his stalwart defense of the Southern Poverty Law Center against "anti-Christian" accusations. When the Trump administration and its legislative allies imply an "anti-Christian bias," members of Congress who point out the holes in these arguments become essential to safeguarding our secular democracy.
* * *
FFRF Action Fund is a 501(c)(4) organization that develops and advocates for legislation, regulations and government programs to preserve the constitutional principle of separation between state and church. It also advocates for the rights and views of nonbelievers, endorses candidates for political office, and publicizes the views of elected officials concerning religious liberty issues.
* * *
Original text here: https://ffrfaction.org/secularist-rep-cohen-defends-civil-rights-group-against-anti-christian-slander/
[Category: Sociological]
Domino's Rebrand Earns Pause in PETA's 'Vegan Cheese, Please!' Campaign
NORFOLK, Virginia, Jan. 10 -- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals issued the following news release:
* * *
Domino's Rebrand Earns Pause in PETA's 'Vegan Cheese, Please!' Campaign
Ann Arbor, Mich. - As Domino's moves into the new year after introducing its first brand refresh in over a decade--a move aimed at modernizing its image--PETA is pressing pause on its "Vegan Cheese, Please!" (https://www.peta.org/news/dominos-pizza-vegan-cheese-campaign/) campaign to give the company time to further modernize by addressing the demand for dairy-free cheese to be added to its U.S. menu. PETA delivered
... Show Full Article
NORFOLK, Virginia, Jan. 10 -- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals issued the following news release:
* * *
Domino's Rebrand Earns Pause in PETA's 'Vegan Cheese, Please!' Campaign
Ann Arbor, Mich. - As Domino's moves into the new year after introducing its first brand refresh in over a decade--a move aimed at modernizing its image--PETA is pressing pause on its "Vegan Cheese, Please!" (https://www.peta.org/news/dominos-pizza-vegan-cheese-campaign/) campaign to give the company time to further modernize by addressing the demand for dairy-free cheese to be added to its U.S. menu. PETA deliveredthe good news to Domino's CEO earlier today with a letter announcing the campaign hiatus, along with a giant custom-made pizza box packed with 45,000 signatures from would-be customers clamoring for the menu upgrade.
In the past few months, PETA has teamed up with celebrities--including rock 'n' roll legend Joan Jett and Emmy-award-winning food author, Tabitha Brown--to call out the company through letters, social media videos, and sky-high billboards in front of Domino's headquarters and storefronts nationwide. PETA supporters have also dressed as unicorns and passed out thousands of slices of "magical" vegan pizza slices to Domino's customers across the country.
"The new year is the ripe time for a newly refreshed Domino's to deliver on the demand for vegan cheese," says PETA President Tracy Reiman. "A new jingle is nice, but those who won't or don't eat dairy for health, humane, or environmental reasons hope 2026 is the year Domino's resolves to put vegan on the pie!"
In the dairy industry, cows are repeatedly forcibly impregnated, and their calves are taken away from them within a day of birth so that the milk meant to nourish them can be stolen and sold to humans. Once their bodies wear out from repeated pregnancies, they're sent to slaughter. Dairy production fuels deforestation, water waste, and greenhouse gas emissions, and humans who drink dairy increase their chances of developing heart disease, diabetes, cancer, and other ailments.
Domino's already offers vegan cheese in Switzerland, Australia, Spain, Germany, and the UK, but has yet to recognize the 30 million Americans who are lactose intolerant. Competitors--including &Pizza, Blaze Pizza, Brixx Pizza, Buddy's Pizza, Mellow Mushroom, Papa Murphy's, Pieology, PizzaRev, UNO, zpizza, and more--already offer vegan cheese in the U.S.
PETA--whose motto reads, in part, that "animals are not ours to abuse in any way"--points out that Every Animal Is Someone and offers free Empathy Kits for people who need a lesson in kindness. For more information, please visit PETA.org or follow PETA on X, Facebook, or Instagram.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.peta.org/media/news-releases/dominos-rebrand-earns-pause-in-petas-vegan-cheese-please-campaign/
[Category: Animals]
Clean Air Task Force: Withdrawal From UNFCCC and IPCC Sidelines U.S. From Key Global Decision-making
BOSTON, Massachusetts, Jan. 10 -- Clean Air Task Force, an organization that says it works to safeguard against the impacts of climate change by catalyzing the development and deployment of low-carbon energy and other climate-protecting technologies, issued the following news:
* * *
Withdrawal from UNFCCC and IPCC sidelines U.S. from key global decision-making
WASHINGTON - The Trump administration announced the United States will withdraw from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), cutting the U.S. off from
... Show Full Article
BOSTON, Massachusetts, Jan. 10 -- Clean Air Task Force, an organization that says it works to safeguard against the impacts of climate change by catalyzing the development and deployment of low-carbon energy and other climate-protecting technologies, issued the following news:
* * *
Withdrawal from UNFCCC and IPCC sidelines U.S. from key global decision-making
WASHINGTON - The Trump administration announced the United States will withdraw from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), cutting the U.S. off fromthe world's central forums for climate diplomacy, scientific assessment, and international energy cooperation.
"By walking away from the UNFCCC and the IPCC, the Trump administration is sidelining the United States from global decision-making fora that shape energy markets, industries, and security outcomes," said David Yellen, Director for Climate Policy Innovation at Clean Air Task Force. "This decision will not stop global climate diplomacy or clean energy investment--but it will weaken U.S. credibility, limit the contribution of U.S. expertise, and hand over influence to competitors at a moment when trillions of dollars in energy and infrastructure investments are at stake."
Yellen Continued:
"Withdrawal from the IPCC removes U.S. scientists from the world's most authoritative assessments of climate risks and technology pathways, undermining the scientific credibility that has long underpinned U.S. climate diplomacy. And its withdrawal does not change the reality and science of climate change. As the United States steps back, other countries, including China, are positioned to consolidate influence over clean energy supply chains, financing, and standards-setting. Ceding leadership in these arenas does not put America first - it makes the U.S. a rule-taker rather than a rule-maker in the fastest growing sectors of the global economy."
CATF has a longstanding presence at COP, advancing a comprehensive climate agenda that accelerates innovation across the full suite of clean energy solutions, aligns climate action with economic growth and competitiveness, mobilizes rapid action to cut methane pollution, and strengthens global cooperation through regionally tailored pathways. As U.S. federal leadership retreats, CATF will remain fully engaged in multilateral forums and deepen collaboration with governments determined to keep climate progress moving forward.
* * *
About Clean Air Task Force
Clean Air Task Force (CATF) is a global nonprofit organization working to safeguard against the worst impacts of climate change by catalyzing the rapid development and deployment of low-carbon energy and other climate-protecting technologies. With more than 25 years of internationally recognized expertise on climate policy and a fierce commitment to exploring all potential solutions, CATF is a pragmatic, non-ideological advocacy group with the bold ideas needed to address climate change. CATF has offices in Boston, Washington D.C., and Brussels, with staff working virtually around the world. Visit catf.us and follow @cleanaircatf.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.catf.us/2026/01/withdrawal-unfccc-ipcc-sidelines-us-key-global-decision-making/
[Category: Environment]
Chairmen Jim Jordan and Scott Fitzgerald Champion Sensible Antitrust Standard at "Full Stream Ahead" Hearing
WASHINGTON, Jan. 10 -- Americans for Tax Reform posted the following commentary on Jan. 9, 2026:
* * *
Chairmen Jim Jordan and Scott Fitzgerald champion sensible antitrust standard at "Full Stream Ahead" hearing
By James Erwin
On Wednesday, the House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Antitrust held a hearing on potential consolidation of the video streaming market. Republican committee members, particularly committee leadership, advocated for sensible antitrust enforcement by championing the consumer harm standard that has served us well for decades.
Warner Bros.-Discovery, the media conglomerate
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Jan. 10 -- Americans for Tax Reform posted the following commentary on Jan. 9, 2026:
* * *
Chairmen Jim Jordan and Scott Fitzgerald champion sensible antitrust standard at "Full Stream Ahead" hearing
By James Erwin
On Wednesday, the House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Antitrust held a hearing on potential consolidation of the video streaming market. Republican committee members, particularly committee leadership, advocated for sensible antitrust enforcement by championing the consumer harm standard that has served us well for decades.
Warner Bros.-Discovery, the media conglomeratethat has been through a number of mergers in recent years, has accepted an $83 billion bid by Netflix to acquire most of its assets. The board rejected a competing bid from Paramount Skydance, but the latter company could try again if the Netflix deal falls through. Before either deal becomes official, the Federal Trade Commission and/or Department of Justice could intervene to try and stop the merger.
Democrats are already objecting, absurdly arguing that the streaming service market would not have enough competitors if two of them merged. It is difficult to think of a market as oversaturated as streaming services - Netflix pioneered the business model that every major media company has sought to emulate, and it remains the only consistently profitable of the platforms.
Meanwhile, consumers complain that there are too many streaming services and hit shows are not accessible. This market is rife for consolidation, which began with Disney's acquisition of Hulu several years ago. Consumers would be helped, not harmed by a merger that reduces the number of subscriptions one must pay for to find one's favorite shows.
That said, focusing on streaming marketshare is misleading in the first place since Netflix is not a peer studio to Warner Bros. Netflix may out-compete HBO Max in subscriptions, but that is just one piece of Warner Bros.-Discovery's media empire. It is Netflix's entire business.
Netflix does not have the intellectual property catalogue going back to the 1930s, the studio infrastructure, or the cable assets of a legacy studio like Warner Bros. They do not even have an iconic corporate mascot like Bugs Bunny. Netflix is a disruptor that harnessed new technology to make the market more competitive, and is now moving to join the big leagues by acquiring one of the legacy players. This is how competition is supposed to work.
This view was championed by subcommittee Chairman Scott Fitzgerald (R-Wis.) and Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) of the full committee. It was also echoed by witness Jessica Melugin of the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
"Antitrust cannot serve two masters," she told Chairman Jordan in response to his question about what happens when government enforcers depart from the consumer harm standard. If the government doesn't focus on consumer interests, it will fall to some other pecuniary interest.
That companies often have to seek permission from the government to merge is an albatross around the net of economic dynamism and a conduit for abuse and corruption. Democrats are objecting to a potential Paramount acquisition (even though Warner's board has already rejected it) because they do not like the politics of owner David Ellison.
Subcommittee Ranking Member Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) said as much during his opening statement. Making frequent reference to Bari Weiss, the new editor-in-chief of CBS News who was chosen by Ellison to help correct for some of the left-wing bias at the network, Nadler alleged that the Trump administration was installing "minders" in "pravda-like" fashion in newsrooms.
Putting aside that Weiss is a well-known moderate hired to reverse declining trust in media, Nadler is the one who wants to weaponize antitrust for political purposes. He is preemptively drawing a line in the sand on a potential Paramount purchase because he doesn't like how CBS News is covering politics.
How about instead of politicians using the power of the state to decide who gets to own their favorite news channel that gives them favorable coverage, we let the shareholders decide?
Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) made a forceful opening statement about the FCC weaponizing mergers to achieve outcomes the Trump administration prefers.
Americans for Tax Reform agrees with Raskin's sentiment: neither the executive nor the legislative branch should veto deals between private actors for political purposes, especially when the market is so competitive.
The bottom line with this merger is that the shareholders should be allowed to sell to whomever they want, and politics - whether it's the DOJ pushing for a certain editorial line or Congressional Democrats trying to punish David Ellison - should stay out.
As the subcommittee chairman Rep. Fitzgerald said in his closing statement, "We should let people decide what's best for them."
* * *
Original text here: https://atr.org/chairmen-jim-jordan-and-scott-fitzgerald-champion-sensible-antitrust-standard-at-full-stream-ahead-hearing/
[Category: Political]
Americans United for Separation of Church & State Urges Federal Appeals Court to Protect Religious Freedom, LGBTQ+ Workers
WASHINGTON, Jan. 10 -- Americans United for Separation of Church and State issued the following news on Jan. 9, 2026:
* * *
AU urges federal appeals court to protect religious freedom, LGBTQ+ workers
Americans United for Separation of Church and State, joined by nine other religious and civil rights organizations, today urged the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to affirm that religious freedom does not give employers a blanket license to discriminate against their workers. In an amicus brief filed in the lawsuit Doe v. Catholic Relief Services, AU and allies explained that the First Amendment
... Show Full Article
WASHINGTON, Jan. 10 -- Americans United for Separation of Church and State issued the following news on Jan. 9, 2026:
* * *
AU urges federal appeals court to protect religious freedom, LGBTQ+ workers
Americans United for Separation of Church and State, joined by nine other religious and civil rights organizations, today urged the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to affirm that religious freedom does not give employers a blanket license to discriminate against their workers. In an amicus brief filed in the lawsuit Doe v. Catholic Relief Services, AU and allies explained that the First Amendmentdoesn't exempt religious employers from non-discrimination laws and doesn't allow Catholic Relief Services to discriminate against an LGBTQ+ worker by compensating him less than other employees.
Religious freedom is not a license to discriminate or harm LGBTQ+ workers
"Religious freedom is not a license to discriminate or harm LGBTQ+ workers," said Rachel Laser, president and CEO of Americans United. "Employers don't have a right based on their religious beliefs to dock the compensation of an employee who happens to be LGBTQ+ -- that's not how religious freedom works.
"Religious extremists continue their crusade of urging courts to grant them immunity from civil rights and anti-discrimination laws," Laser added. "The lower court's decision in this case is consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court, which has said religious freedom 'does not mean that religious institutions enjoy a general immunity from secular laws.' We urge the court to protect religious freedom for all and reject the employer's demand for a religious exemption from Maryland's non-discrimination laws."
Religious & civil rights groups join AU in brief to court
Organizations joining AU on the brief include the American Civil Liberties Union; Bend the Arc: A Jewish Partnership for Justice; Central Atlantic Conference United Church of Christ; DignityUSA; Global Justice Institute, Metropolitan Community Churches; Hindu American Foundation; Methodist Federation for Social Action; Sadhana: Coalition for Progressive Hindus; and Society for Humanistic Judaism.
The brief was authored for AU by Litigation Counsel Jenny Samuels and Associate Vice President and Associate Legal Director Alex J. Luchenitser.
* * *
Americans United is a religious freedom advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, AU educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.au.org/the-latest/press/lgbtq-worker-catholic-relief-services/
[Category: Political]
