Featured Stories
Texas Public Policy Foundation Supports the Preserving Our Constitution Act of 2026
AUSTIN, Texas, July 1 -- The Texas Public Policy Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
Texas Public Policy Foundation Supports the Preserving Our Constitution Act of 2026
*
AUSTIN, Texas -The Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF) today announced its support for the Preserving Our Constitution Act of 2026, introduced by Rep. Keith Self (TX-3) in the 119th Congress. The legislation prohibits federal courts and adjudicative bodies from recognizing or enforcing any foreign law, religious code, or custom that conflicts with the Constitution of the United States.
"The Constitution
... Show Full Article
AUSTIN, Texas, July 1 -- The Texas Public Policy Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
Texas Public Policy Foundation Supports the Preserving Our Constitution Act of 2026
*
AUSTIN, Texas -The Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF) today announced its support for the Preserving Our Constitution Act of 2026, introduced by Rep. Keith Self (TX-3) in the 119th Congress. The legislation prohibits federal courts and adjudicative bodies from recognizing or enforcing any foreign law, religious code, or custom that conflicts with the Constitution of the United States.
"The Constitutionis not one legal system among many. It is the supreme law of the land, and every person in this country deserves its equal protection. This legislation makes that principle enforceable, and TPPF is proud to support it," said Greg Sindelar, CEO of the Texas Public Policy Foundation.
The bill ensures that all Americans regardless of origin or faith are governed by the same constitutional standard of justice. TPPF believes this is the foundation of successful assimilation, national unity, and the preservation of the individual liberties that have made America a beacon of freedom for the world.
"This legislation reaffirms a simple but essential principle: in the United States, the Constitution is supreme. No foreign law, no religious code, no custom, and no external authority can supersede the rights, protections, and obligations established under our Constitution," said TPPF Campaign Director Selene Rodriguez.
***
Original text here: https://www.texaspolicy.com/press/texas-public-policy-foundation-supports-the-preserving-our-constitution-act-of-2026
TPPF: USMCA Pause Is a Chance to Demand Security Concessions from Mexico
AUSTIN, Texas, July 1 -- The Texas Public Policy Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
TPPF: USMCA Pause Is a Chance to Demand Security Concessions from Mexico
*
The Texas Public Policy Foundation commended the Trump administration's decision not to renew the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) in its current form and urged the administration to use this pause to strengthen American leverage and advance U.S. national security interests.
For too long, the USMCA has been treated as though trade exists separately from the broader U.S.-Mexico relationship. Economic integration
... Show Full Article
AUSTIN, Texas, July 1 -- The Texas Public Policy Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
TPPF: USMCA Pause Is a Chance to Demand Security Concessions from Mexico
*
The Texas Public Policy Foundation commended the Trump administration's decision not to renew the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) in its current form and urged the administration to use this pause to strengthen American leverage and advance U.S. national security interests.
For too long, the USMCA has been treated as though trade exists separately from the broader U.S.-Mexico relationship. Economic integrationand national security are inseparable. The United States has long provided Mexico with extraordinary access to the world's largest consumer market while bearing the consequences of persistent transnational security threats that directly impact American communities. An annual review process would provide an opportunity to ensure that America's economic relationships are evaluated alongside the security realities that affect both nations.
"For years, we have argued that trade policy and security policy cannot operate in separate lanes," said Joshua Trevino, Chief Transformation Officer at the Texas Public Policy Foundation. "Access to the American economy is a privilege. That privilege should be conditioned on measurable progress in confronting foreign terrorist networks and other transnational security threats that undermine both our nations. An annual review process would provide an opportunity to evaluate whether that progress is being made. By pausing renewal, the administration has bought itself real leverage -and it's time to use it."
The Foundation has consistently advocated that future trade relations with Mexico should be linked to measurable security performance. Continued access to the American market should depend upon demonstrated cooperation in dismantling cartel networks, reducing illicit trafficking, restoring the rule of law, and protecting both American and Mexican citizens.
Mexico's economy remains heavily dependent on trade with the United States, while remittances sent from the United States constitute another major source of economic support. At the same time, years of insecurity, weak governance, and economic mismanagement have constrained Mexico's long-term growth. These realities provide the United States with substantial leverage that should be used strategically to advance mutual security interests rather than treated as an unconditional benefit.
"This is a moment of real strategic clarity from the administration," said Greg Sindelar, Chief Executive Officer of the Texas Public Policy Foundation. "President Trump understands that America's economic strength is also a source of strategic leverage. We commend the administration for holding this agreement open, and we are urging them to use the time between now and a final deal to secure meaningful action against cartel violence and other shared security threats benefits both countries, but most importantly protects the American people."
The Texas Public Policy Foundation applauds the administration's foresight in recognizing that economic policy and national security are inseparable. The United States should continue to ensure that access to the American market is earned through genuine partnership, accountability, and measurable security outcomes-not assumed as a permanent entitlement.
***
Original text here: https://www.texaspolicy.com/press/tppf-usmca-pause-is-a-chance-to-demand-security-concessions-from-mexico
Statement From Dr. Rajiv J. Shah, President of The Rockefeller Foundation, on New Public Opinion Research on Foreign Aid Programs
NEW YORK, July 1 -- The Rockefeller Foundation posted the following statement by President Rajiv J. Shah on the public opinion research on foreign aid programs:
* * *
Statement From Dr. Rajiv J. Shah, President of The Rockefeller Foundation, on New Public Opinion Research on Foreign Aid Programs
As the United States approaches its 250th anniversary, new polling shows that the American people want an active, engaged relationship with the world. They recognize that helping vulnerable people and building a safer, healthier, and more prosperous world is an investment in America's own security and
... Show Full Article
NEW YORK, July 1 -- The Rockefeller Foundation posted the following statement by President Rajiv J. Shah on the public opinion research on foreign aid programs:
* * *
Statement From Dr. Rajiv J. Shah, President of The Rockefeller Foundation, on New Public Opinion Research on Foreign Aid Programs
As the United States approaches its 250th anniversary, new polling shows that the American people want an active, engaged relationship with the world. They recognize that helping vulnerable people and building a safer, healthier, and more prosperous world is an investment in America's own security andprosperity.
At a moment when many U.S. and world leaders are pulling back from global engagement, a report published today by Echelon Insights, supported by The Rockefeller Foundation, finds that Americans across political parties back efforts that prevent disease outbreaks, feed hungry children, reduce suffering, and create opportunity. The polling shows that 72% of Americans believe foreign aid keeps the U.S. safer from threats. Support is even stronger for specific types of aid: preventing disease outbreaks (90%), humanitarian and disaster relief (90%) and global health (84%).
As an example, after receiving information about the current Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo respondents overwhelmingly (3 in 4) supported restoring U.S. foreign aid funding to fight the disease. When presented with a real-world example of a fast-moving threat that can easily cross borders and where U.S. foreign aid can save lives, most Americans want their government to help.
The findings also point to a path forward. Americans support foreign aid when they understand its purpose, its cost, and its impact. They overwhelmingly favor strengthening and modernizing effective programs rather than eliminating them, and they want resources focused where they can save the most lives and deliver the greatest results.
Americans' support for foreign aid and global engagement remains strong. The opportunity before us is to answer that call by building a more modern model of development -- one that is country-led, results-driven, and capable of meeting today's challenges through innovation, partnership, and impact. In the 21st century, foreign aid should deliver better outcomes for vulnerable communities while continuing to advance America's long-term interests.
Americans are ready to help build what comes next. Their leaders should listen.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/statement-from-dr-rajiv-j-shah-president-of-the-rockefeller-foundation-public-opinion-research-foreign-aid-programs/
Latino Equity Fund at the Boston Foundation Launches Mass. United for Venezuela Fund
BOSTON, Massachusetts, July 1 -- The Boston Foundation issued the following news release on June 30, 2026:
* * *
Latino Equity Fund at the Boston Foundation launches Mass. United for Venezuela Fund
New effort will support relief and recovery efforts following devastating earthquakes
-
The Latino Equity Fund at the Boston Foundation, the first Latino-focused fund in Massachusetts, today announced that it is coordinating a statewide effort to support organizations that are working to help thousands of people in Venezuela in the aftermath of the earthquakes that devastated the country last week.
More
... Show Full Article
BOSTON, Massachusetts, July 1 -- The Boston Foundation issued the following news release on June 30, 2026:
* * *
Latino Equity Fund at the Boston Foundation launches Mass. United for Venezuela Fund
New effort will support relief and recovery efforts following devastating earthquakes
-
The Latino Equity Fund at the Boston Foundation, the first Latino-focused fund in Massachusetts, today announced that it is coordinating a statewide effort to support organizations that are working to help thousands of people in Venezuela in the aftermath of the earthquakes that devastated the country last week.
Morethan 1,700 people died and thousands more people have been displaced by earthquake damage in northern Venezuela after two magnitude 7 quakes struck within 39 seconds of each other last week. The quakes are estimated to have caused as much as $6.7 billion in damage.
The new fund, Massachusetts United for Venezuela, will have a similar structure to efforts to support Puerto Rico after the devastation of Hurricane Maria in 2017. Initial funds are being raised to support immediate relief efforts on the ground in Venezuela, with a longer-term focus on supporting organizations that can help rebuild and support the affected region in the months and years ahead.
The fund is launching with an initial commitment of $100,000 from Boston Foundation and Latino Equity Fund donors. The Fund is also developing a curated giving guide to connect donors to trusted organizations on the ground in Venezuela. In partnership with Venezuelan community leaders, local organizations, and Venezuelan-owned small businesses, this effort will ensure resources are directed where they are needed most and guided by the people closest to the crisis.
"The immediate need in communities across Venezuela cannot be overstated, and the devastation to homes, buildings and infrastructure across a wide swath of Venezuela will take months to years to rebuild." said Javier Juarez, Executive Director of the Latino Equity Fund. "Just as we were able to do after Maria, the Latino Equity Fund is uniquely positioned to mobilize philanthropy for Latino communities during moments that matter most. We hope that with our partnerships across philanthropy, business, government, and the Venezuelan community, we can coordinate a response that no single organization could accomplish alone."
Initial community partners in the Fund include the Venezuelan Association of Massachusetts, Casa VZL New England, small business partners Carolicious, Peka Restaurant, Viva Mi Arepa, Don Tequeno y Dona Arepa (Dorchester & Jamaica Plain), and several individuals, including artist Franklin Marval, who designed the effort's logo.
To learn more about the Fund and to make a donation, visit TBF.org/Venezuela. The fund is currently accepting donations by check, credit card and through donor advised funds at the Boston Foundation and other fund providers.
More than 25,000 Venezuelans live in New England, with an estimated 12,000 living in Massachusetts, primarily in Greater Boston, Framingham, Chelsea, Everett, Lynn and Revere.
The Venezuelan population has been one of the fastest-growing Latino communities in New England over the past five years, driven largely by humanitarian migration.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.tbf.org/news-and-insights/press-releases/2026/june/mass-united-for-venezuela-launch
Foundation for Economic Education Posts Commentary: Hidden Impact of Government Delays
DETROIT, Michigan, July 1 -- The Foundation for Economic Education posted the following commentary by Washington-based economist Daniel J. Mitchell:
* * *
The Hidden Impact of Government Delays
We don't see how much it costs us.
-
Recently, members of the Trump administration found themselves in a tug of war between two groups of people who have opposing views about how or whether the federal government should regulate artificial intelligence.
Critics say that moving too fast on AI could create risks. Others say that America can't compete against China under a tight regulatory regime. We
... Show Full Article
DETROIT, Michigan, July 1 -- The Foundation for Economic Education posted the following commentary by Washington-based economist Daniel J. Mitchell:
* * *
The Hidden Impact of Government Delays
We don't see how much it costs us.
-
Recently, members of the Trump administration found themselves in a tug of war between two groups of people who have opposing views about how or whether the federal government should regulate artificial intelligence.
Critics say that moving too fast on AI could create risks. Others say that America can't compete against China under a tight regulatory regime. Weare, after all, competing in one of the most important technological races of the 21st century.
But the fundamental question is much bigger than AI. Whether it is regulatory debates centered around tech, housing, energy, or healthcare, American policymakers should start each policy debate by asking themselves one important question: How much progress must we sacrifice for the sake of caution?
For decades, DC politicians and bureaucrats devoted enormous attention to the supposed dangers of approving a new technology, project, or product too quickly. Far less attention gets paid to the consequences of government delays.
Flawed as its economic thinking sometimes is, the Trump administration still deserves credit for challenging a regulatory culture that often treats delay as cost-free.
Medical innovation, where the administration is routinely trying to cut down on FDA approval times, provides perhaps the clearest example.
In late May, the Committee to Unleash Prosperity Senior Research Fellow and former Trump White House Council of Economic Advisers Acting Chair Tomas Philipson published a study that addressed this very topic.
The study said that speeding up FDA development and approval timelines for drugs, biologics, and medical devices by one to six years could generate up to $61 trillion in combined value to consumers and producers. Patients would receive help faster, and it would encourage more research and investment.
What about housing?
Too many Americans say that they can't afford to have a home. Polls consistently show that they want the government to enact policies that increase the number of available homes.
Yet local, state, and federal regulations add years to development timelines and inflate construction costs. What's left is a shortage of houses. Families must pay higher prices to try to buy or even rent.
The Trump administration pushed to streamline permitting and environmental reviews. Critics then cried foul about insufficient oversight. But every year that a housing project spends trapped in regulatory limbo is another year that families pay higher rents, higher home prices, and have fewer housing options.
Energy projects have challenges of their own. AI, advanced manufacturing, and population growth are continually increasing energy demands. And yet, critical infrastructure projects spend years undergoing regulatory reviews before construction even begins.
Delayed projects mean delayed supply--and delayed supply often means higher costs.
As expected, Trump's efforts to speed up approvals for pipelines, transmission lines, power plants, and other types of energy infrastructure created fierce opposition. Critics claim environmental risks. Supporters, however, see a permitting system that can delay vital projects for 4.5 years on average for major energy infrastructure and 6.5 years or more for transmission lines. This, while Americans pay higher utility bills and businesses struggle just to have reliable power.
The debate over deregulation is frequently portrayed as a choice between caution and recklessness. In reality, the choice is more complicated. Moving too quickly creates court costs. But moving too slowly creates costs as well.
Trump's efforts to streamline approvals and reduce bureaucratic obstacles will no doubt go on to attract criticism, with perhaps some of that criticism warranted. But before Americans dismiss these reforms outright, they should ask and answer one simple question.
What is the cost of doing nothing?
Increasingly, the answer appears to be one the country can no longer afford.
* * *
Daniel J. Mitchell is a Washington-based economist who specializes in fiscal policy, particularly tax reform, international tax competition, and the economic burden of government spending. He also serves on the editorial board of the Cayman Financial Review.
* * *
Original text here: https://fee.org/articles/the-hidden-impact-of-government-delays/
FFRF: White House Report Twists Religious Liberty Into Christian Privilege
MADISON, Wisconsin, July 1 (TNSrep) -- The Freedom From Religion Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
FFRF: New White House report twists religious liberty into Christian privilege
The Freedom From Religion Foundation is condemning the Trump administration's newly released Religious Liberty Commission report (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/president-trumps-religious-liberty-commission-delivers-historic-report-draft) as a roadmap for dismantling the constitutional separation between church and state and replacing it with government favoritism toward Christianity.
Rather than protecting
... Show Full Article
MADISON, Wisconsin, July 1 (TNSrep) -- The Freedom From Religion Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
FFRF: New White House report twists religious liberty into Christian privilege
The Freedom From Religion Foundation is condemning the Trump administration's newly released Religious Liberty Commission report (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/president-trumps-religious-liberty-commission-delivers-historic-report-draft) as a roadmap for dismantling the constitutional separation between church and state and replacing it with government favoritism toward Christianity.
Rather than protectingreligious liberty for all Americans, the commission's 224-page report repeatedly attacks the Establishment Clause, dismisses decades of settled constitutional law and recommends policies that would entangle government with religion on an unprecedented scale.
"This report has almost nothing to do with protecting religious liberty," says FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor. "It is a political manifesto that attempts to redefine religious freedom as a special privilege for conservative Christianity."
The commission was established by President Trump in May 2025 and chaired by Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick. During its hearings, commissioners repeatedly attacked state-church separation and promoted Christian nationalist arguments. The final report simply codifies those views into official recommendations for the federal government.
Among its most troubling recommendations, the commission urges the Department of Justice to reject the longstanding understanding of the Establishment Clause, Congress to repeal the Johnson Amendment, the creation of "religious liberty" hotlines and a Religious Liberty Task Force, judicial appointments aligned with the commission's ideological vision, and restored military benefits to individuals who refused COVID-19 vaccines on asserted religious grounds.
The report repeatedly claims that the constitutional principle of church-state separation is a "myth" and argues that religious liberty should instead function as a "bridge" between church and state.
"That is exactly backward," says FFRF Co-President Dan Barker. "The Establishment Clause exists precisely because the government must remain neutral on matters of religion. Religious liberty flourishes when the government neither favors nor disfavors religion."
The commission's central premise rests on a false dichotomy. Although the phrase "separation of church and state" does not appear verbatim in the Constitution, it has long been understood as shorthand for the First Amendment's prohibitions on establishing religion and interfering with its free exercise.
The report also presents a profoundly distorted account of religious liberty in America.
Although it claims to defend "all Americans," the report overwhelmingly centers alleged grievances involving conservative Christians while paying scant attention to the religious discrimination routinely experienced by atheists, Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, Native American practitioners, Sikhs, minority Christian denominations and the religiously unaffiliated. Even its discussion of antisemitism is framed almost entirely through the commission's preferred political lens while ignoring the broader reality that religious freedom belongs equally to every American.
"The commission defines religious liberty almost exclusively as the right of conservative Christians to receive exemptions from laws they dislike," says Gaylor. "True religious liberty means the government cannot pick winners and losers among religions or between religion and nonreligion."
The report repeatedly portrays routine constitutional limits on government religious endorsement as examples of anti-religious hostility. It criticizes restrictions on religious displays in public schools, calls for expanded government support for religious education through school choice programs, urges greater government accommodation of religious expression by public employees and proposes new federal mechanisms to encourage complaints whenever individuals believe their religious expression has been limited.
Many of these recommendations would invite constitutional violations rather than prevent them.
Public school students unquestionably possess the right to pray voluntarily, discuss religion with classmates and express their personal beliefs. The Constitution prohibits government officials from using public schools to promote or endorse religion. Teachers, principals and other government employees have constitutional obligations that differ from those of private citizens because they wield the authority of the state.
Likewise, churches and religious organizations already enjoy broad constitutional protections under the Free Exercise Clause, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and decades of Supreme Court precedent. The commission offers virtually no evidence that these existing protections are inadequate. Instead, it seeks to transform religious liberty from a shield protecting conscience into a sword allowing religious entities to receive preferential treatment.
One of the report's most dangerous recommendations is the repeal of the Johnson Amendment. Eliminating that safeguard would effectively convert tax-exempt churches into taxpayer-subsidized political-action committees, allowing houses of worship to endorse candidates while continuing to receive the substantial benefits of tax-exempt status.
The report also urges presidents to nominate judges who share the commission's preferred constitutional approach rather than emphasizing judicial impartiality.
Equally revealing is what the report omits.
The commission expresses virtually no concern about increasing efforts to impose religion in public schools, to display the Ten Commandments in government buildings, to inject prayer into official government functions or to use public funds to advance religious education. Nor does it meaningfully address discrimination against the growing number of religiously unaffiliated Americans, who now comprise nearly one-third of the U.S. population.
"The commission starts from the assumption that Christianity deserves a privileged place in public life," Gaylor says. "That is not religious liberty. It is government favoritism."
The First Amendment guarantees every American the right to practice any religion, or none at all, without government interference or favoritism. That constitutional promise has made the United States one of the world's most religiously diverse nations.
FFRF is encouraging Americans who value genuine religious freedom to submit comments opposing the commission's recommendations before the public comment period closes.
The commission has opened its draft report for public comment through Monday, July 12, 2026. Comments may be submitted by email to RLC@usdoj.gov using the subject line:
PUBLIC COMMENT - [TOPIC OR CHAPTER NUMBER] - [NAME]
The Department of Justice notes that all comments are public records. Commenters should avoid including personally identifiable information, such as home addresses, in their submissions.
"This report does not speak for the millions of Americans who understand that religious liberty depends on government neutrality," says Barker. "We urge everyone who values the First Amendment to make their voices heard before this report is finalized."
* * *
The Freedom From Religion Foundation is a U.S.-based nonprofit dedicated to defending the constitutional principle of separation between state and church and educating the public on matters relating to nontheism. With about 41,000 members, FFRF is the largest association of freethinkers (atheists, agnostics and humanists) in North America. For more information, visit ffrf.org.
* * *
Original text here: https://ffrf.org/news/releases/ffrf-new-white-house-report-twists-religious-liberty-into-christian-privilege/
[Category: Religion]
FFRF Condemns Trump's "Godless" Rhetoric Targeting Millions of Patriotic Americans
MADISON, Wisconsin, July 1 -- The Freedom From Religion Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
FFRF condemns Trump's "godless" rhetoric targeting millions of patriotic Americans
The Freedom From Religion Foundation is condemning President Trump's inflammatory remarks at the Faith & Freedom Coalition's annual Road to Majority Conference, where he smeared political opponents as "godless communists," falsely cast Christianity as the foundation of American identity and warned supporters that Democrats "will close your churches."
"The president of the United States has no business telling
... Show Full Article
MADISON, Wisconsin, July 1 -- The Freedom From Religion Foundation issued the following news release:
* * *
FFRF condemns Trump's "godless" rhetoric targeting millions of patriotic Americans
The Freedom From Religion Foundation is condemning President Trump's inflammatory remarks at the Faith & Freedom Coalition's annual Road to Majority Conference, where he smeared political opponents as "godless communists," falsely cast Christianity as the foundation of American identity and warned supporters that Democrats "will close your churches."
"The president of the United States has no business tellingAmericans that patriotism depends on belief in God, much less demonizing millions of nonreligious citizens as threats to the country," says FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor.
Speaking to religious-right activists in Washington, D.C., Trump repeatedly portrayed Christianity as the defining force behind the United States. "Our founders invoked the Creator four times in the Declaration of Independence. Four times. I wasn't mentioned once, I'm very upset," he joked before asserting that "faith built this country into the most exceptional nation in the history of the world." He also claimed that "Americans have always deeply believed in the promise of Christ's words in the Gospel of Matthew. With God, all things are possible." Trump went on to declare that America has "always" been and "always will" be "one nation under God," while touting his administration's White House Faith Office, Religious Liberty Commission and Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias.
"The United States was not founded as a Christian nation," Gaylor explains. "The Declaration of Independence reflects the deistic beliefs of its principal author, Thomas Jefferson, but it is the Constitution, our governing document, that establishes our system of government. It is intentionally secular, contains no reference to Christianity and explicitly bars religious tests for public office. America's strength comes from protecting every citizen's freedom of conscience, not elevating one religion above all others."
Most disturbingly, Trump described his political opponents as "hardcore godless communists," called them the "most serious threat" to the country since its founding and warned that they "want to end religion." This rhetoric is reckless, divisive and deeply hostile to the constitutional promise that Americans are equal citizens regardless of religious belief or disbelief.
FFRF notes that atheists, agnostics, humanists and other nonreligious Americans serve in the military, teach in public schools, hold public office, pay taxes, raise families and contribute to their communities. They are not enemies of the nation. They are part of its fabric.
Trump's attempt to merge Christianity with national identity also rewrites American history. The United States was founded on a secular Constitution that contains no references to God, Jesus or Christianity. Its genius lies in preventing the government from taking sides in religious matters, ensuring that religion remains voluntary rather than state-sponsored.
The danger is not a secular government. The danger is a president using government power to privilege one religious viewpoint, vilify dissenters and turn religious identity into a partisan weapon.
FFRF urges Americans to reject this dangerous rhetoric and recommit to the constitutional principle of separation between state and church. No president or religious faction owns the United States. It belongs equally to all of us.
* * *
The Freedom From Religion Foundation is a U.S.-based nonprofit dedicated to defending the constitutional principle of separation between state and church and educating the public on matters relating to nontheism. With about 41,000 members, FFRF is the largest association of freethinkers (atheists, agnostics and humanists) in North America. For more information, visit ffrf.org.
* * *
Original text here: https://ffrf.org/news/releases/ffrf-condemns-trumps-godless-rhetoric-targeting-millions-of-patriotic-americans/
[Category: Religion]
