Cornell Study Examines Judicial 'Rule Breaking'
January 20, 2017
January 20, 2017
ITHACA, N.Y., Jan. 20 -- Cornell University's School of Hotel Administration issued the following news release:
Courts across the United States are in a potentially awkward position when they are presented with employers' summary judgment motions relating to sexual harassment. As explained in a new Cornell report, judges often have to choose between following legal precedent or breaking the rule established by the Supreme Court. As explained in the report, "When Rules Are Mad . . .
Courts across the United States are in a potentially awkward position when they are presented with employers' summary judgment motions relating to sexual harassment. As explained in a new Cornell report, judges often have to choose between following legal precedent or breaking the rule established by the Supreme Court. As explained in the report, "When Rules Are Mad . . .